Connect with us

E-Business

Bring Your Own Device, Don’t Forget Security

Published

on

Scott Totzke
Kindly share this post

Mobile devices have become so seamlessly integrated in our lives that we don’t think twice about completing any kind of transaction across our phones or tablets – making a purchase, depositing money into the bank or checking email for work.

These devices have become our personal assistants in both our work and personal lives, which is why more businesses are embracing bring-your-own-device (BYOD) environments.

According to Forrester, Inc., in 2016, 350 million employees will use smartphones and 200 million will bring their own devices to the workplace.

However, the increase in BYOD represents one of the greatest challenges and opportunities facing organizations and governments today.

Employees benefit from staying connected to work email and data when they are away from the office.

Advertisement

But, to accommodate access from personal mobile devices, many IT departments have relaxed their standards and security to find cost-effective ways to connect disparate devices through a firewall.

In a global survey of executives, 49 percent stated the complexity of securing multiple data sources is a top challenge, while 48 percent reported they lacked knowledge of mobile-access security. In mobile computing, security is most effective when it’s baked in from the ground up, not layered on or strung together.

A patchwork of third-party security products is not adequate in a multi-platform environment, because it leaves the user susceptible to security breaches and interrupts the overall user experience.

The lowered level of security can also become a concern for both the enterprise as IT managers will reduce the level of management capabilities, and the end user as core functionality such as Web browsing and access to app stores is disabled.

In this case, the CIO is forced to marginalize the investment in mobility, making it just about email and calendar updates – missing an opportunity to really transform the business. 

Advertisement

Getting this balance between user experience and security right is the most important success factor for the CIO in today’s BYOD world.

For optimal security, organizations should seek out solutions that are capable of meeting corporate network requirements while concurrently providing three layers of security at the device, server and network level.

 With the right mobile container solution, organizations don’t have to compromise their security requirements to allow employees to carry the devices they choose. But the challenge becomes preventing the secure mobile computing environment from encroaching on the user experience.

The key point of embracing BYOD is offering employees technology that makes them more efficient as they transition from work to personal tasks.

To achieve this, their smartphone or tablet needs to provide the same capabilities as they have on a desktop: attaching emails, browsing the Web, toggling between work/personal environments, using applications, accessing Documents to Go, and much more.

Advertisement

These capabilities help organizations of any size and from any vertical arm their employees with secure devices that meet the demands of their job while keeping total cost of ownership down.

Another important fact to remember about BYOD security solutions is how the market has demonstrated the superiority of management systems and infrastructure that support multiple devices running varied operating systems.

In an environment where mobile technology innovation moves so quickly, organizations need to think about security solutions that provide the flexibility to adopt future technological advances.

For employees, the ultimate value in BYOD is the ability to have both work and personal functionality on a single device that is capable of keeping their data separate and secure. With the right BYOD solution, organizations will be able to strike the right balance between security, user experience and total cost of ownership.

Scott Totzke is responsible for maintaining, consistently, high standard for the security of BlackBerry products and services and helping to shape BlackBerry’s regulatory compliance, lawful access and privacy strategies on global scale.
His organization includes enterprise product management and strategy, security product life cycle management, operations and government sales. He founded and directs the BlackBerry Security teams that have made the transparency of its security solutions BlackBerry’s single biggest differentiator in enterprise and consumer markets. BlackBerry solutions continue to lead the mobile industry in certifications and security approvals, meeting the strict requirements of government and other security conscious organizations.

Advertisement

 

 

Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

E-Business

Kaspersky Uncovers Cyber Threats Defining the First Half of 2026 in Nigeria, Others

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Kaspersky’s Global Research & Analysis Team (GReAT) reveals key cyber threat trends for the first half of 2026 at the recent Cyber Security Weekend for the Middle East, Turkiye and Africa region (META).

As the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, cyberthreats are becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated. The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), coupled with ongoing geopolitical and economic instability, is contributing to the rise of cybercrime and the growing complexity of cyberattacks.

According to Kaspersky’s telemetry, online threats exploiting vulnerabilities in websites, emails and web services continued to affect millions of users across the META region during the first half of 2026.

Specifically, Kaspersky detection systems stopped 1,6M attacks from various online resources in Nigeria. Turkiye recorded the highest percentage of users affected by web-based threats at 22.8%, followed by Kenya (21.2%), Qatar (19.3%), Nigeria (18.4%) and South Africa (17.2%). In contrast, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Pakistan registered the lowest share of users targeted by web-borne attacks in the region.

AI is transforming attacker operations

Advertisement

Kaspersky experts report that threat actors are increasingly integrating AI into different stages of their operations. Large language models are already being used to generate phishing emails, malicious code and supporting operational content.

AI is also beginning to play a larger role in malware development. Modern language models are capable of generating substantial portions of malicious software, from initial code scaffolding to functional modules.

Researchers have already observed AI-assisted malware development in campaigns linked to the FunkSec group, which deployed Rust-based malware capable of data theft, encryption and process manipulation. Similarly, during the RevengeHotels campaign in 2025, threat actors used large language models to generate portions of the infector and downloader code.

“We expect AI to remain one of the key factors shaping the threat landscape in 2026, as we already see how it is reshaping attacker workflows and accelerating their operations,” said Sergey Lozhkin, Head of Global Research and Analysis Team in APAC and META regions at Kaspersky. “By lowering the time and cost required to develop and adapt malicious tools, AI allows threat actors to iterate faster and scale their efforts. Defenders should be prepared for quicker shifts in tactics.”

Emerging trends shaping the cyber threat landscape

Advertisement

In addition to the growing use of AI by cybercriminals, Kaspersky experts identified several trends that organisations should monitor closely:

  • AI-driven malware evolution: generative models can rewrite malware in different languages or architectures, making malicious code harder to detect, and faster to deploy at scale.
  • Cloud-based data exfiltration: attackers increasingly route stolen data through legitimate cloud and file-sharing services to blend in with normal traffic.
  • Ransomware targeting operations: some groups disrupt production and business processes, not just encrypt data, to increase pressure for payment.
  • AI agents as persistence mechanisms: some AI agent solutions are granted broad or even full system access. If compromised, attackers could modify the system prompt or the agent’s configuration, for example, causing it to download a payload on every startup.
  • Malicious AI skills become a new attack vector: as AI agents gain broader access to enterprise systems, attackers start to exploit compromised skills to manipulate agent behaviour, steal sensitive data, execute unauthorised actions, and establish persistent access. This creates a new layer of risk where trusted AI tools can be turned into powerful mechanisms for cyberattacks.

As cyberthreats continue to evolve alongside emerging technologies, Kaspersky recommends that organisations strengthen their cybersecurity posture through continuous vulnerability management, timely patching, employee awareness training, threat intelligence, and advanced security solutions like Kaspersky Next, capable of detecting sophisticated and AI-assisted attacks.

 

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Kaspersky Uncovers New Mirage Kitten Malware Used in Cyber-espionage Campaign Across Africa, Others

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Kaspersky Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT) has discovered a previously undocumented malware set used by Mirage Kitten APT. The findings were revealed at its annual Kaspersky Cyber Security Weekend for the Middle East, Turkiye and Africa (META).

The malicious tools were used in a targeted campaign aimed at maintaining long-term access to victim networks and stealing sensitive data.

The company’s researchers have identified victims of this campaign across the Middle East and Africa, including organisations in Egypt, small and medium-sized businesses and government entities in Jordan and Tanzania, aviation organisations in Pakistan, telecommunications companies in Ethiopia and financial-sector entities in Burkina Faso.

The toolset consists of three custom programs. At its core is NightLedger, a newly discovered Windows backdoor attributed to the group based on code and behavioural similarities to its previously known malware, which gives the attackers remote control over infected machines: they can run commands, explore and transfer files and capture screenshots.

It is complemented by two covert tunneling tools, ArcBridge and BridgeHead, which effectively turn a compromised computer into a relay node: the attackers run their tools on their own servers, while all the resulting traffic is quietly funneled through the victim’s machine, as if it originated from inside the victim’s network.

Advertisement

This lets them slip past network defences and preserve long-term access without drawing attention. The first of these tools was identified in April 2026 in activity targeting victims in the Middle East.

While the initial access vector remains unclear in most cases, Kaspersky GReAT researchers observed BridgeHead being deployed during post-compromise activity in victim environments in Egypt and at an aerospace and aviation organisation in Pakistan. In those cases, the intrusion activity followed targeted spear-phishing attempts consistent with the group’s known methods.

The lures were highly tailored including recruitment-themed messages impersonating trusted brands and hiring platforms, as well as fake videoconferencing pages that redirected victims to malicious archive files hosted on third-party file-sharing services.

“Based on our latest findings, we conclude that Mirage Kitten continues to evolve its malware arsenal in support of targeted cyber-espionage operations across the Middle East and Africa.

“Another notable aspect of the campaign is the group’s continued reliance on tunneling utilities as part of its operational toolkit: in practice this enables attackers to bypass network controls, maintain covert access to compromised environments and significantly complicate detection efforts.

Advertisement

“Given the persistence and sophistication of these techniques, organisations and defenders should incorporate these findings into their threat assessments and strengthen their detection and response capabilities accordingly,” says Omar Amin, senior security researcher at Kaspersky GReAT.

 

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

NDPC Directs DCPMIs to Register with Agency or Face Legal Consequences

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) has directed all Data Controllers and Data Processors of Major Importance (DCPMIs), yet to register with the commission to do so immediately.

NDPC Directs DCPMIs to Register with Agency or Face Legal Consequences

This followed a Federal High Court judgment affirming NDPC statutory powers to designate and register such entities.

DCPMIs are entities operating in Nigeria that handle sensitive personal data or large volumes of information, requiring mandatory registration with the NDPC under the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA).

In a statement issued on Tuesday by Babatunde Bamigboye, head of Legal, Enforcement and Regulations at the NDPC,  described the judgment as a major milestone for data accountability and regulatory oversight in Nigeria.

The commission said the ruling arose from a suit filed by Emmanuel Harunna against the NDPC in Emmanuel Harunna v. NDPC (FHC/L/CS/1116/2024), in which the applicant sought a declaration that Point of Sale agents were not Data Controllers or Processors of Major Importance under the Nigeria Data Protection Act and requested a perpetual injunction restraining the commission from registering them.

Advertisement

According to the statement, Justice F.N. Ogazi examined the commission’s Guidance Notice on Registration alongside Sections 5(d), 6(c), 44, 45 and 65 of the Nigeria Data Protection Act before concluding that the commission acted within its statutory powers in designating entities under the Major Data Processing – Ordinary High Level category as Data Controllers and Processors of Major Importance.

Quoting the judgment, the statement read, “The Nigeria Data Protection Act was enacted to promote accountability, transparency and responsible data governance. Registration enables the Respondent to identify entities engaged in significant data processing activities, monitor compliance.”

It added that the court held that, “Far from undermining the constitutional right to privacy, the registration framework is one of the statutory mechanisms designed to safeguard that very right by subjecting data controllers and data processors to effective regulatory oversight.”

The statement further quoted the court as saying, “Looking at the recitals of the Guidance Notice, there is every indication that the Guidance Notice is also aimed at protecting the privacy and security of data subjects, thus bringing the registration requirement of the Guidance Notice within the protective shield of Section 45 of the 1999 Constitution.”

According to the commission, the court also held that, “Remarkably, Section 63 of the Data Protection Act provides that the provisions of the Act shall prevail over any other law inconsistent with its provisions on matters relating to the processing of personal data.”

Advertisement

Reacting to the judgment, the commission described the decision as a significant boost to Nigeria’s data protection regime.

“The Commission appreciates the ground-breaking efforts of the court towards the advancement of the jurisprudence relating to data accountability in Nigeria, as eloquently demonstrated in this case,” the statement read.

Following the ruling, Vincent Olatunji, national commissioner and chief executive officer, had directed every Data Controller and Processor of Major Importance that had yet to comply with the registration requirement to register without delay.

The commission warned that entities failing to comply with the registration requirement could face legal consequences.

“Failure to register creates serious legal liabilities under the law, while compliance with registration requirements builds public trust and safeguards the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects in Nigeria,” the statement added.

Advertisement

 

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending