Connect with us

Broadcasting

BBNaija: Twists, Evictions, Alliances, Strikes and More on Episode 8 of the Buzz

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Buzz kicked off with a wave of drama as host Toke Makinwa dissected the latest evictions with her guests, music producer Kay Solo and digital entrepreneur Adetutu Sanusi.

Toke was surprised that Onyeka’s fans didn’t rally for Chizoba. “I would have thought… they would be carrying themselves,” Toke remarked, with Sanusi speculating that something was off. Kay Solo suggested it was a strategic move, saying, “It’s hard when you have people meant to be a team.”

Strikes and Conspiracy: Biggie Cracks Down

The episode also highlighted strikes for Kassia, Shaun, Wanni, and Handi. Kay Solo thought the strikes came “late,” although he felt Shaun didn’t deserve one. Reflecting on her advice to Shaun, Toke said, “I think telling Shaun what I told him made him feel that he doesn’t have to do some extra work.” Kay Solo agreed, adding her words caused confusion among the housemates, but Toke stood by Shaun, saying, “He is bigger than all of them, I like him.”

Relationship Tensions: Nelly and Sooj’s Breakup

The breakup of Nelly and Sooj sparked discussion. Sanusi empathised with Nelly’s emotional struggles, saying, “It is understandable… I feel she has still not built trust for men.” Toke, on the other hand, suggested Nelly may have simply lost interest. Kay Solo found Nelly’s story moving, calling it a “major cracker.”

Kassia and KellyRae: A Strategic Duo?

Kassia’s gameplay has continued to raise eyebrows, and in this episode, her relationship with her husband KellyRae came under scrutiny. Toke asked if KellyRae’s laid-back approach was allowing Kassia to thrive or if he should take a more active stance. Kay Solo thought KellyRae was playing it smart, maintaining good relations with everyone. However, Toke didn’t agree with fan strategies that saved KellyRae over Kassia, saying, “She is the real entertainer.”

Sanusi was adamant that Kassia was the fire keeping the house alive. “She is playing the game, and she is very smart,” Sanusi said, with Kay Solo concurring that Kassia was the true mastermind behind many of the house’s key moves.

Onyeka and Victoria: The Feud Deepens

One of the most intense rivalries in the house between Onyeka and Victoria also took centre stage in The Buzz. The two housemates have been at odds since the start, with Toke asking if Onyeka believed Victoria was weak, leading her to target her. Kay Solo noted that “When women fight, it’s not about who has the facts but who has the sharpest mouth.”

The tension between Onyeka and Victoria wasn’t just about their personal issues. The duo was also vying for the attention of fellow housemate Ozee, which Toke described as a “case of may the best woman win.” Sanusi added that Ozee’s charm seemed to be dividing the women.

Predictions: Who Will Take the Crown?

As the episode wrapped up, Toke and her guests moved on to predictions for the top 3 housemates. Vox pop segments with fans indicated strong support for Wanni, KellyRae, and Victoria. However, Toke voiced her own opinion, favouring Wanni, Kassia, and Victoria. The debate ended on a note of agreement that Kassia’s fans needed to keep the momentum going if she was to make it to the final stretch.

Kay Solo and Sanusi also threw their weight behind Kassia as a real contender. “Kassia is the real game in the house,” Kay Solo said emphatically, while Sanusi echoed the sentiment, praising Kassia’s emotional intelligence and ability to manage the game smartly.

The countdown to the finale of BBNaija No Loose Guard season is on. Get up to date with all the gist with Toke and guests on BBNaija: The Buzz.. New episodes drop every Thursday on Showmax.


Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Broadcasting

NELFUND Investigates 34 Universities Over Students’ Missing Tuition Refunds

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) says it is investigating about 34 tertiary institutions over allegations that they failed to refund students whose tuition fees were paid twice under the Federal Government’s student loan scheme.

The Managing Director of NELFUND, Mr Akintunde Sawyerr, disclosed this during an interview on Arise Television.

Sawyerr said the agency had deployed a five-member investigative team, including operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and internal auditors, to examine the allegations.

According to him, the investigation was prompted by numerous complaints received from affected students.

“As of right now, there are 34 institutions that we are looking at closely with respect to this issue,” he said.

Sawyerr explained that the double payment issue arose because President Bola Tinubu directed that the student loan scheme commence in the middle of an academic session instead of at the beginning.

He said the decision compelled many students to pay their tuition fees to meet registration deadlines while awaiting approval of their loan applications.

“What happened is that a lot of schools got double payment; some from the students and some from us,” he said.

“The refund process is entirely out of our hands. It is the recipient of the double payments that is obliged to make refunds to the students.”

The NELFUND boss noted that many students had borrowed money from family members, friends and other sources to pay their tuition with the expectation of receiving refunds once the loans were disbursed.

He said while some institutions had promptly refunded affected students, others had failed to do so.

“Some have been very good at this. Others haven’t been so good at it,” Sawyerr said.

“I reserve judgement on the intentionality around it because, for some of them, they just didn’t have the process to make refunds.”

Sawyerr disclosed that NELFUND was exploring a tokenised payment system that would enable students to authorise tuition payments directly to their institutions, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplicate payments.

He said the agency deliberately chose not to disburse tuition loans directly to students to minimise the risk of fund diversion.

“Paying the funds to the students could really lead to the temptation for them to divert and do other things,” he said.

The managing director, however, acknowledged that NELFUND lacked the statutory powers to compel institutions to refund students or prosecute officials found culpable.

He added that many frustrated students had submitted complaints not only to NELFUND but also to anti-corruption agencies, including the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

Sawyerr also expressed concern over increases in tuition fees by some institutions following the introduction of the student loan scheme.

He said NELFUND had declined to pay institutions that increased their tuition fees beyond acceptable levels.

“Some schools, because they get paid easily, started to put up their fees. We refused, point blank, to pay institutions who had hiked their fees beyond a certain level,” he said.

He reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to investigating every reported irregularity and strengthening the implementation of the student loan programme through continuous monitoring and internal reviews.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

Obi, NDC Presidential Candidate Faces N50Bn Defamation Claim over Alleged Podcast Remark

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Abayomi Arabambi, national vice chairman (South-West) of the Labour Party, has demanded a public apology, a retraction, and N50 billion in damages from Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), over an alleged defamatory statement made during a podcast interview.

Obi, NDC Presidential Candidate Faces N50Bn Defamation Claim over Alleged Podcast Remark

The demand was contained in a letter issued by the law firm Neplus Ultra Attorneys and signed by Anderson U. Asemota, Peter O. Asimegbe, and Stanley C. Eziefulle on behalf of Arabambi.

According to the letter, the legal dispute arose from comments allegedly made by Obi during the interview, where he reportedly stated that Arabambi “does not have an address.”

Arabambi’s legal team described the statement as false, malicious, and defamatory, arguing that it portrayed their client as a faceless individual without legitimacy, credibility, or standing in public life.

The lawyers further claimed that the interview was widely circulated on television stations and digital platforms, exposing Arabambi to public ridicule and damaging his reputation.

“Our client has had a known residential and business address, maintains professional and political affiliations within Nigeria, and has never been a person whose whereabouts or identity were unknown,” the letter stated.

The legal team maintained that the alleged publication caused embarrassment and harmed Arabambi’s public image and political standing.

As part of their demands, the lawyers called for an unreserved public apology to be aired on national television, published on Obi’s verified social media platforms, and carried as full-page apologies in national newspapers.

They also demanded the payment of N50 billion as compensation for the alleged injury to Arabambi’s reputation, dignity, political standing, and public image.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

Why We’re Partnering With NIHOTOUR To Bring Nigerians In South Africa Home – Steve Babaeko

Published

on

Kindly share this post

When Nigerians began arriving back home on emergency flights following an ultimatum from anti-migrant groups in South Africa, Steve Babaeko, alongside The Nigerian Institute of Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR), saw an opportunity to step up for his fellow citizens.

Why We’re Partnering With NIHOTOUR To Bring Nigerians In South Africa Home - Steve Babaeko

Steve Babaeko

The CEO of X3M Ideas explains that he saw a deep obligation, one that had nothing to do with advertising and everything to do with hospitality. For Babaeko, it was a reminder that an agency owes a duty of care to the community it exists within.

That conviction shaped the creative agency’s partnership with the Nigerian Institute of Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR) for the newly launched ‘Welcome Home’ pilot programme at Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA) in Lagos. Rather than simply crafting a messaging campaign around the crisis, X3M Ideas helped design a tangible, physical system.

“This wasn’t built as a campaign about a crisis,” Babaeko said. “It was a hospitality agency deciding what it owes its own citizens the moment they land.”

For Babaeko, what X3M has built is infrastructure, something returnees can physically walk through, use, and benefit from the instant they clear the arrival gate.

With the MMIA pilot now officially running, NIHOTOUR directs returnees to immediate support services and issues them a Returnee Card. This card grants individuals a free first night at partner hotels, immediate transport assistance from the airport, and fast-tracked business registration support.

Furthermore, the initiative features a dedicated Restart Desk to assist returnee entrepreneurs and tradespeople with job placement referrals and business registration. This operates alongside a public Homecoming counter that tracks the cumulative number of returnees welcomed, businesses restarted, and jobs facilitated.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending