Connect with us

E-Financial

NGX Gives Securties Firm 10 Days to Resolve Theft, Forgery Allegations

Published

on

Kindly share this post

NGX Regulation Limited has given a 10 working-day ultimatum to Global Assets Management Limited, a securities company, to resolve the allegations of alleged forgery, theft, diversion of proceeds, and possibly money laundering leveled against it by Mr Kolawole Oladapo Adesina, a complainant.

Adesina had alleged that shares belonging to him and Emmanuel Olanipekun Adesina, his late father, from different companies were stolen and proceeds diverted to unknown persons.

In the same vein, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also launched investigations into the same complaints against the same securities company.

NGX Regulation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX group) committed to promoting just and equitable principles of trade and sound business practices in the Nigerian capital market by strictly enforcing clients’ listing and trading rules in accordance with global best practices.

Its activities seek to promote the integrity, transparency and efficiency of our market, ensuring that the standards set are effective in maintaining a fair and orderly market where investors are adequately protected.

In a letter with reference number NGXRECO/MRIVG/7160/1/26, signed by Chinedu Akamaka, Head, Market Regulation, the regulatory body acknowledged the petition of the complainant and stated that “In line with rule 5(4) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rules on Complaints Management Framework of the Nigerian Capital Market 2015, your firm is required to solve this complaint within ten(10) working days and forward a report on resolution or non resolution. Your report should reach NGX Regco not later than 30 January 2026”.

SEC, in its own letter dated January 7, 2026 and signed by Mr John Abel Briggs, the Head, Lagos Zonal Office stated that while acknowledging Adesina’s petition, it has commenced investigations into the matter.

“Please be informed that we have commenced investigations by seeking Global Assets Management Limited, CSCS, and NGX to investigate the allegations in line with the Complaint Management Framework of the Nigerian Capital Market (NCM).

The company in the eyes of the storm, Global Assets, has however denied any wrongdoing in its reply addressed to NGX Regulation and signed by Sir Babatunde Sobamowo, managing director,  saying the allegations were unfounded.

Adesina, still smarting from the shocking revelation that his father, Prince Emmanuel Olanipekun Adesina, a late Banker with the United Bank of Africa (UBA) who allegedly died intestate did not,  but has a will.

He’s currently battling to have the will read at the Probate Registry of the High Court of Lagos State, Ikeja Judicial Division.

In the many shocking revelations while going through his parents’ documents, he discovered many shares his father had bought for him since the time of his youth.

Most of these shares, and that of his father, has disappeared without a trace, only relying on the father’s documentation to trace them.

In a 15 paragraph affidavit he deposed to and filed at the registry of the Ikeja High Court, which formed his petition before SEC, the complainant narrated his ordeal this:

“I am the beneficial owner of securities and investments held with Global Asset Management Limited under account number 23278460(old account number A0457245) and Clearing House No C4928105AN. I have held the investments registered in my name since my childhood, acquired and maintained by my late father for my benefit.

My late father, whose particulars I can provide on request, purchased shareholdings  in my name up to and including the date of his death on February 21, 2006.

I did not authorize any sale of the Securities held in my account and have never knowingly sold any holdings in that account;

“On or about August 25,2022 when I attended the offices of Global Assets Management to effect a sale of certain securities to raise funds, I was provided with documentation and account records indicating that a substantial (and in some cases total) portion of my securities had already been sold and the sale proceeds diverted.

“No such sale had been authorized by me and no proceeds of such alleged sale were paid to me or credited to the account records held by Global Assets in my name;

“Upon inspection of the physical file and documents in my possession and in the custody of Global Assets Management, I discovered numerous stock transfers, notes on sale and other documents bearing my signature which I did not sign. I verily believe that the said signatures are forged”.

With this discovery, Adesina directed his lawyers, Pich Solicitors, to write a letter of demand to the company requesting production of all documents and materials relating to his account from February 21, 2006 till date. The company however failed to comply. He therefore urges SEC to compel the company to produce the documents and other materials requested. He fears if it’s not compelled, the company may alter, delete, or otherwise fail to preserve records relevant to the matters that are subject of his complaint.

Adesina exhibited over 10 documents to support his complaint which include copies of his account statements, copies of stock transfers bearing alleged forged signatures, CSCS certificate/ deposit forms relating to his holdings, sales contract notes and transaction confirmations, CSCS printout on stocks held in his name, dividend statements and dividend warrants in his name, copies of his share certificates in Berger Paints Nigeria Plc, Nigerian Bottling Company Plc, Grammac Industries Plc, and West African Portland Cement Plc. “I unequivocally and verily believe that the exhibits listed are materials relevant to the issues raised in this application and that they substantiate the allegations of unauthorized sales, forged signatures,and diversion of sales proceeds”, he averred.

Adesina’s petition was copied to the Chairman of Global Assets Management, Dr S.T.V Adegbite and all other directors of the company. It’s also copied to DG SEC, CEO, Nigerian Exchange Group, MD, Central Securities Clearing System Plc(CSCS), The Chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Director, Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit(NFIU), and Commissioner of Police, Force CID(Financial Crimes Unit).

In its response addressed to NGX Regulation, Global Assets Management Limited described all the allegations as unfounded. “In compliance with our regulatory obligations, we have carefully reviewed the allegations contained in the petition and hereby provide our response, addressing each issue raised by the petitioner sequentially and supported by relevant documentation”, the response stated.

The company explained that their real client was the petitioner’s mother, late Mrs Frances Omorolaun Adesina. “Our professional relationship with her spanned several years during which she conducted securities transactions through our firm until her demise. At no time prior to her death did the petitioner operate the relevant account independently or maintain a separate trading mandate with GAM”, it stated.

GAM maintained that its first formal interaction with the petitioner occured through his lawyer, Pich Solicitors, requesting information relating to the state of the petitioner’s father. Subsequently the petitioner personally visited and was availed with a CSCS statement relating to his account and a KYC update form which the petitioner never returned.

The company stated further: “According to records obtained directly from CSCS,  the only securities credited to the petitioner’s account were deposited on September 15, 2009, three years after the death of his father in 2006. We are unable, and not required to determine whether the shares were purchased by his late father or late mother. However the records show that no securities were deposited into the petitioner’s account in 2006 or earlier. Only three securities were deposited through GAM”.

The company also listed as exhibits documents which includes a duly executed sale order form dated April 4, 2014, Statement of account of the late mother, copy of cheque, letter of authority dated January 11, 2014 signed by the petitioner and his sister authorizing their late mother to transact on matters relating to their father’s estate, and GAM bank statement confirming payment of the proceeds to the named beneficiary.

However, there seems to be discrepancies in the signature tendered by both parties as they did not correspond. SEC will therefore determine which one is genuine and having regard to the power of a parent to trade on an adult child securities without proper consent.

 

Credit… The Nation

 


Kindly share this post

E-Financial

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of N81.1m Sterling Bank Fraud Funds

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has ordered the final forfeiture of N81,108,143.8 stolen from Sterling Bank Plc following a system glitch that befell the financial institution.

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of N81.1m Sterling Bank Fraud Funds

Justice Yelim Bogoro gave the order on Monday, March 9, 2026, directing that the funds be forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria in favour of the bank.

The ruling followed a motion filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) through Hannatu U. KofarNaisa, its counsel.

The court had earlier granted an interim forfeiture order on October 2, 2025 and directed that the order be published in a national newspaper for anyone with an interest in the funds to appear and show cause why the money should not be permanently forfeited.

Investigations revealed that the funds were part of more than N2.5 billion stolen by some customers of Sterling Bank following a system glitch that allowed unauthorised transfers.

The glitch reportedly enabled customers to exploit the PAYATTITUDE Global Ltd banking platform to move funds from their accounts even when they were not funded.

The anti-graft agency said it began investigating the case after receiving a petition from Sterling Bank on July 18, 2022.

According to Maina Gapani Gyal, EFCC investigator, more than N2.5 billion was fraudulently transferred and converted for personal use by several bank customers and third-party beneficiaries.

The investigation traced part of the stolen funds to accounts linked to Sulaiman Kehinde Ojora, identified as one of the major beneficiaries of the fraud.

Further findings showed that N43 million was concealed in the account of his friend, Taiwo Oluwaseyi Alawode, domiciled in Access Bank.

N122.2 million was hidden in the account of his wife, Aminat Olatanwa Ojora, domiciled in Sterling Bank.

The EFCC said the bank was unable to recover N295.9 million from the stolen funds because the money had already been withdrawn and converted by customers.

However, investigators were able to salvage N81.1 million, which became the subject of the forfeiture proceedings.

The bank also recovered N490.3 million from its internal ledger during the investigation.

The EFCC informed the court that the interim forfeiture order was published in The Punch on February 19, 2026, inviting any interested party to challenge the forfeiture.

After reviewing the motion and supporting documents, Justice Bogoro ruled that the application was valid.

“Having gone through the motion and attachments, I find the application meritorious and the same is accordingly granted,” the judge held.

The court subsequently ordered that the recovered N81,108,143.08 be finally forfeited to the Federal Government in favour of Sterling Bank.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

SEC Cautions Fintechs of Rising Risks as Digital Finance Expands

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Securities and Exchange Commission Nigeria (SEC) has cautioned fintech operators that while technology can expand access to investment opportunities, it also has the potential to magnify risks if not properly managed.

While speaking at the first biannual SEC Regulator–FinTech Clinic, Rabi Maidawa, fund authorisation officer at the commission, said technology-driven platforms do not eliminate risk in investment but can amplify it when systems are poorly designed.

“Technology does not eliminate risk in investment; it amplifies it. A single design flaw on a platform, such as a data integrity issue, can spread quickly across the investor ecosystem,” Maidawa said.

Regulators and industry stakeholders at the forum stressed the need for stronger compliance frameworks as digital finance continues to evolve across Nigeria’s financial ecosystem.

Muhammad Jiya, chief operating officer for emerging technologies and innovation at the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), noted that digital assets and technology-driven financial services are creating new channels for financial crime.

According to him, operators must ensure that compliance programmes are embedded within their platforms from the early stages of development.

“Digital assets and technology-driven financial services also present new actors for financial crime. As operators, compliance programmes should be embedded into your systems,” Jiya said.

Industry experts also advised fintech founders to engage regulators early when developing new products.

Nelson Ikeagu, a regulatory expert, said pre-launch engagement with regulators is essential for innovators whose products may not clearly fall within existing regulatory frameworks.

“Pre-launch dialogue is important for operators because it helps provide guidance on what regulators expect,” he said.

He added that startups developing innovative products that do not fit neatly into existing regulations, such as those overseen by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) should consider applying for regulatory sandbox programmes to obtain guidance while testing their solutions.

“Operators that adopt higher compliance standards are better positioned to navigate the regulatory environment,” Ikeagu noted.

Ismaila Muhammad, an IT professional who spoke at the event, also advised fintech founders to treat their platforms as regulated entities and ensure they do not become conduits for illicit financial activity.

“You are still an entity even if you are a tech company. Ensure that money launderers do not infiltrate your business. Proper registration with the SEC and adherence to regulatory requirements are essential,” he said.

While delivering remarks on the commission’s regulatory approach to fintech, Jameelah Sheriff-Ayedun said the SEC was among the first Nigerian regulators to formally institutionalise collaboration with fintech companies.

According to her, the commission introduced a regulatory incubation programme to provide innovation-friendly supervision while maintaining market integrity.

“The regulatory incubation programme provides innovation-friendly supervision. The SEC has also played an active leadership role in the regulators’ forum,” she said.

She noted that between 2020 and 2022, the commission moved early to support emerging fintech models, including crowdfunding, robo-advisory services, tokenisation, and digital assets.

However, Sheriff-Ayedun acknowledged that several structural challenges remain in Nigeria’s fintech regulatory environment. These include complex multi-regulator oversight, overlapping mandates among agencies, and prolonged licensing timelines.

She also pointed to operational clarity gaps in areas such as digital assets and decentralised finance (DeFi).

Beyond regulation, she said the industry still faces significant market and capacity gaps, including shortages of skilled talent in compliance, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence, as well as limited investor education and barriers to broader retail capital participation.

Other challenges include the limited depth of early-stage capital available to support fintech innovation in the country.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

First Asset Management Secures Ratings Upgrade

Published

on

Kindly share this post

First Asset Management investment management rating just got an upgrade to ‘AA’ from ‘AA-’ by DataPro and affirmation of A+(IM) by Agusto & Co. This reflects how we are continuously improving to serve our investors better. Our funds levelled up too as Agusto & Co upgraded our First Asset Money Market Fund rating to A+ (f) (up from Aa‑(f)).

What its means for customers

It means you are investing with a firm that is getting stronger, smarter, and more disciplined. Our upgraded rating recognizes our solid performance track record, the strength of our parent financial group, and the systems we have put in place to manage investments responsibly.

We have also improved our governance and decision-making structure, with experienced professionals leading well-defined investment and risk committees. Behind the scenes, our team of seasoned investment experts constantly monitor markets, manage risks, and position portfolios to navigate volatility and capture opportunities.

At the same time, we have strengthened our risk management and compliance framework to ensure that everything we do meets global best practices. In simple terms, it means your money is being managed with discipline, transparency, and strong oversight.

Independent rating agencies — Agusto & Co and DataPro Limited recognize these improvements. Their ratings highlight our commitment to responsible asset management, strong governance, and operational systems designed to support stable long-term performance.

But beyond the ratings, what really matters is helping you build wealth over time.

That is why we offer a range of investment plans designed for different goals — whether you are just starting your investment journey, looking to grow your portfolio, or aiming to build long-term financial security.

If you are part of the next generation of investors, this is your moment to start early and stay ahead. The earlier you begin investing, the more time your money has to grow.

Jump on the First Asset investment journey. Explore our investment plans and start building your future with a firm that is getting stronger.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending