E-Financial
Driving Nigeria’s Economy to G10 Status
Nigeria’s economy has all it takes to rank amongst the world’s top 10 economies. Driving the polity effectively towards that goal is the urgent task of the country’s present political and economic managers.
Nigeria’s 2015 general elections have been won and lost. The nationwide focus on politics for almost a year has however been detrimental to the economy and the financial markets.
Despite being poised for fast growth, Africa’s largest economy is currently crawling on all fours.
Key economic and financial indicators are down year-on-year and year-to-date. Ditto for corporate earnings.
The most significant being a 1.5% loss in GDP growth and speculative devaluation and volatility of the national currency, the Naira, which has lost at least 20% value against most benchmark currencies.
The year-end outlook is also not bright. Most investors and corporate players are coasting and seem to have accepted 2015 as a lost year from a productivity standpoint.
Politics in Nigeria as clearly proven by recent events is driven by political cum personal interests. This is always at variance with the national economic interests.
The cumulative cost of perceived political instability, record low crude oil prices, and dipping confidence in economic and financial markets is estimated to be anywhere between US$25-30bn. Who is counting?
Certainly not the political class. They have not come to terms with the fact that a new budget cycle has commenced, and it’s clear that the only tangible approach the new government can take, is to start the process of amending the existing budget and delivering a brand new 2016 budget that reflects contemporary economic realities.
After hinting that the Central Bank of Nigeria’s currency controls were making Nigeria’s bond market transactions too complex to meet its rules, JP Morgan, the United States-based lender, has now moved to expel Nigeria from its Emerging Market Bond Index (EMBI) by the end of September 2015, as a result of the illiquidity and lack of transparency in our foreign exchange market.
This exit will hurt Nigeria’s financial and economic ratings, putting the nation’s $31bn external reserves under threat of further massive sell-offs of Nigerian assets by foreign portfolio investors.
The cost of borrowing will increase; access to the international financial markets for both sovereign and corporates will also become limited. More importantly, this exit will stem the inflow of portfolio investments which peaked at US$20.5Billion in 2013, that otherwise could help stabilize the Naira and balance of payments.
JP Morgan’s EMBI with around $210bn in assets under management is the most widely used and comprehensive emerging market sovereign debt benchmark. Nigeria was added in the index in 2012 when liquidity was improving, making it the second African country after South Africa to be included.
To state the obvious, the lack of articulation on policy and economic direction by the new government is not helping matters and is unsettling the financial markets.
Time is money. And in the fast emerging global fiscal order, lost time and opportunities may never really be regained.
The next challenge the Nigerian government faces is the validation and structured financing plan for the current fiscal deficit, estimated at =N=6.5Trillion.
The government’s actions on the fuel subsidy could significantly increase this figure. With the restructuring and swap of state government commercial bank loans into Treasury Bonds, the new government has increased the domestic debt profile by =N=1Trillion overnight.
Unfortunately state governments have not been compelled to execute conditional covenants, such as adhering to the tenants of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, which stipulates provisions for fiscal discipline.
With a US$49bn domestic debt and US$10.8bn external debt overhang, Nigeria is now committing 23% of its fiscal revenues to servicing debt.
With the levels of projected fiscal deficit, we might exceed the revenue-to-debt service best practice benchmark of 25% by year end. The alignment of fiscal and monetary policy which the economy befitted from over the last five years, seems to have been lost over the last several months.
The apex financial institution and industry regulator, the CBN, seems to have lost its independence and the intellectual fecundity central banks are renowned for.
With an outflow of new policy pronouncements almost every week, the Bank has struggled to articulate a well thought out strategy for managing the Naira.
This misalignment of fiscal and monetary policy has started to impact the macroeconomic indicators as inflation creeps up into double digits. Unemployment also stands at a high 35%.
The effects of quantitative easing are manifesting on the Naira exchange rates as interest rates remain artificially high at 25%. This, despite the excess supply of the currency in circulation with M2 at =N=19Trillion, 25% or =N=4.75Trillion denominated in US dollars deposit.
Our commercial banks have also exacerbated the situation: about 50% of their loan books are denominated in US dollars.
These artificially high rates, and the distortion it causes are not sustainable in the long run. Western nations over the last eight years have maintained rates at below 1% clearly aimed to spur economic recovery.
Nigeria’s financial intermediation rates at 25% cannot support productive investment and development; it will also stunt economic growth. Major reforms are therefore required in the banking system to support single digit rates.
Banks also have to better deploy technology to reduce and manage costs. Their productivity and efficiency levels will consequently improve leading to a more competitive financial services sector
.
Beyond the macro economy, we need to do a critical reappraisal of our trade and investment policies, we need to ensure they are properly integrated into the global value added system.
The domestic gains and success we have had in the cement sector with import substitution and backward integration has primarily been driven by an individual and unfortunately not yet replicated nor institutionalized in other critical sectors such as agriculture, another potential engine room of Africa’s political economy considering its huge social development and value chain effect.
Drastic attention also needs to be paid to Customs and Excise reform and management to ensure proper implementation of Trade Policy, Industrial Development and Investment. The corruption menace of duty waivers, duty evasion, smuggling and weak import documentation also continues to affect the Naira, clearly disrupting and discouraging industrial development, investment and expansion.
Nigeria has been defined as a corrupt country with weak institutions, poor governance, and a compromised judiciary with consistently low scores in the ease of doing business and competitiveness rankings. Despite or in spite of all these quirks, the Nigerian economy with a GDP of US$535Billion is the largest in Africa with a global G20 ranking.
Until recent times, the Nigerian economy sustained a 7% annual growth rate, ranking it amongst the top three fastest growing economies globally.
Our substandard physical and social infrastructure needs to be upgraded; we need to make Power, Healthcare and Education sectors key focus priorities. Addressing the infrastructure deficit, corruption, good governance and the rule of law will no doubt propel Nigeria to realize its potential and capacity as a G10 economy.
Indeed, despite the absence of a cabinet, the euphoria the new government has generated, including its ongoing efforts to clean up the Augean stable is highly commendable. Restoring sanity into the polity was never going to be an easy undertaking. President Buhari’s recent working visit to Washington DC, USA left a good a good impression in the minds of our international business and diplomatic allies. They remain convinced that the president is on the altruistic path.
His top level meetings, appearances and the opinion pieces in the critical and pro-Western US media were obviously left a good impression. This was an African leader who seemed genuinely sincere, and genuinely concerned about Nigeria’s place in the global economy.
Going forward, the President and his ministerial team (even before he finally unveils them) must constantly balance the dual priorities of institutionalizing probity and economic management. Curbing high level graft must be accorded equal weighting as curbing hyper-inflation.
The Nigerian environment despite all its shortcomings and shenanigans is clearly a potential G10 economy. A recent Economist article highlights the “opportunity that knocks” with the new government in place, having endorsed President Buhari before the election. A 2013 article in the same publication cautions that Nigeria, “Africa’s giant is waking up but still looks unsteady on its feet like a heavy weight boxer who has gone too many rounds.”
The same publication has in the past enquired if “anyone has seen a giant” and warns further that the awaking giant eventually might fall flat on its face.
The Nigerian economy is a purposeful and powerful contraption akin to a Formula One racing machine. Unfortunately, the economy has in the past, been driven by a leadership and a political elite class behaving very much like a “Danfo Driver” in the driving seats of a Formula One racing machine.
In the final analysis, the Nigerian President needs to demonstrate policy leadership and must not be shy on the issues of the economy. To achieve G10 targets, we need the right drivers with strong leadership thinking and backing.
The President invariably has been elected on a change platform. However, events in the legislative arm of governance give serious cause for concern. There are critical laws that need to be unbundled and a lot more bills that needs passage to move our economy forward. A pandemic scenario where division, derision and political acrimony continuously stem passage of critical bills is detrimental to economic progress.
It is fitting, at a time like this, for one to seek counsel from the indefatigable Machiavelli whose reflections on the subject of change, captured in his classic tome, “The Prince” speak to the Nigerian situation:
“And let it be noted that there is no more delicate matter to take in hand, nor more dangerous to conduct, nor more doubtful in its success, than to set up as a leader in the introduction of changes. For he who innovates will have for his enemies all those who are well off under the existing order of things, and only the lukewarm supporters in those who might be better off under the new. This lukewarm temper arises partly from the fear of adversaries who have the laws on their side and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who will never admit the merit of anything new, until they have seen it proved by the event”.
#
Adebajo, an investment banker & economist is the CEO of The CFG Advisory.
E-Financial
CBN Introduces Stricter BVN Rules to Curb Fraudulent Transactions

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has introduced stricter rules guiding the use and management of the Bank Verification Number (BVN) as part of efforts to reduce fraudulent transactions within the financial system.The revised framework, which takes effect from May 1, includes tighter controls on BVN enrolment, data access and customer information updates.

The apex bank said the measures are aimed at strengthening identity management, improving fraud monitoring and safeguarding the integrity of banking transactions.
Under the new guidelines, BVN enrolment is now restricted to individuals aged 18 and above, while customers will only be allowed to change the phone number linked to their BVN once.
The restriction is designed to curb identity manipulation often exploited by fraudsters through repeated updates of personal information.
The CBN also directed financial institutions to maintain a temporary watchlist for BVNs linked to suspicious transactions.
Affected BVNs may be flagged for up to 24 hours, during which customers are expected to verify or clarify flagged transactions before further action is taken.
In addition, access to BVN data has been tightened, with the apex bank retaining exclusive control over the database while granting access only to licensed financial institutions under defined conditions.
The move, according to the CBN, is expected to enhance data security and support a more resilient financial system as BVN enrolment continues to grow.
E-Financial
Binance is Missing from Ghana’s Crypto Sandbox

Ghana’s Securities and Exchange Commission has given the nod to 11 crypto trading platforms to participate in its new regulatory sandbox programme, its first major step in support of crypto after passing a law to provide the local market with regulatory clarity in December.

The big news however is that Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume is nowhere on the list, raising questions about the crypto exchange’s future in one of West Africa’s fastest-growing digital asset markets.
Newsghana reported that industry analysts covering the sandbox launch specifically flagged Binance as a notable absent player, alongside Yellow Card, whose mobile payment product Yellow Pay had previously been warned against by the Bank of Ghana (BoG) for operating without authorisation. Neither company has publicly explained its absence from the cohort.
For Binance, the omission carries particular weight. The exchange has cultivated a visible presence in Ghana for several years, including direct engagement with regulators, public financial literacy campaigns, and the presence of senior representatives in Accra.
Despite that groundwork, it did not secure a place in the inaugural sandbox when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published its list of approved Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) on March 10, 2026.
Analysts have pointed to Binance’s ongoing legal battle in neighbouring Nigeria as a factor likely complicating its regulatory position across the region.
And the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) is pursuing Binance for an $81.5 billion claim covering alleged economic losses and unpaid taxes, arguing the exchange has a significant economic presence that makes it liable for corporate income tax for 2022 and 2023, along with a 10 percent annual penalty on outstanding amounts.
The stakes of remaining outside Ghana’s regulatory framework are rising fast.
The BoG made clear on March 5, 2026, that all VASPs operating within Ghana’s jurisdiction including those serving Ghanaian residents through digital platforms with no physical office in the country must register with the Bank.
Firms that do not comply face sanctions and potential disqualification from future licensing.
Ghana’s digital asset market has grown rapidly, recording over $10 billion in cryptocurrency transactions by November 2025, up from roughly $6 billion the year before, making it one of West Africa’s most active markets.
With over three million users estimated to be active in the ecosystem, the country represents a market Binance cannot easily afford to be shut out of through regulatory non-compliance.
The eleven sandbox participants will effectively serve as the reference models for what a compliant licensed VASP looks like under Ghana’s framework.
Those that perform well within the first six months may transition to full licensing early, while those that fall short risk being shut out of the regulated market once the sandbox period concludes.
Binance did not respond to a request for comment before publication. The SEC Ghana and BoG have not publicly commented on why specific companies were excluded from the first sandbox cohort.
E-Financial
World Bank Debars 3 PwC Subsidiaries for 21 Months over Alleged Project Fraud

World Bank Group has debarred three African subsidiaries of global advisory firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), for 21 months after being allegedly found guilty of manipulating procurement processes for a major cross-border electricity project.

In a statement, the Washington-based multilateral lender said PricewaterhouseCoopers Associates Africa Ltd, based in Mauritius, along with its Kenyan and Rwandan affiliates, engaged in “collusive and fraudulent practices” linked to the Eastern Electricity Highway Project, a flagship initiative to transmit hydropower from Ethiopia to Kenya.
The decision sidelines PwC from lucrative World Bank-funded projects on the continent, dealing a blow to one of the region’s most influential audit and advisory firms.
This development could reshape competition for high-value consulting work across emerging markets, potentially disrupting startups and tech firms reliant on World Bank funding, as scrutiny over governance and compliance tightens.
The World Bank, through its private sector arm, International Finance Corporation (IFC), offers grants and low-interest loans to startups across emerging markets.
Earlier this week, the IFC committed $20 million to invest in high-growth startups in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa.
“The debarment makes PwC Associates, PwC Kenya, PwC Rwanda, and any affiliates they control ineligible to participate in Bank Group-financed projects and operations,” the World Bank said.
“It is part of a settlement agreement under which the three companies admit culpability for sanctionable practices.”
The determination was based on the company’s conduct between 2019 and the award of contracts for consultancy services and asset valuation work for the Ethiopian state power utilities.
According to the World Bank statement, the firm obtained confidential procurement documents to improperly influence the award of a contract for the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards at the Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation.
They also attempted to steer a separate contract for a fixed asset inventory and revaluation for the power utility towards PwC Associates.
During the bidding and execution of that contract, the bank found that the company misrepresented the availability and qualifications of key experts and failed to disclose the full list of subconsultants involved.
According to the World Bank, the debarment is shorter than would otherwise apply because PwC admitted misconduct.
The advisory firm also agreed to a series of remedial measures, including internal investigations, disciplinary action against responsible staff, terminating relationships with all subconsultants involved, and additional staff training.
E-Financial1 day agoKuda MFB Increases Kuda for Her Business Grants to ₦10 Million
News2 days agoKaspersky Discovers Infostealers Mimicking Claude Code, OpenClaw and Other AI Developer Tools
General News2 days agoBanks, Offices to Close for Thursday and Friday for Eid-el-Fitr
Telecom2 days agoNigeria, Ghana Trigger Stunning 45 Percent Surge in MTN Dividends
E-Financial2 days agoSEC Shuts Over 400 Fraudulent Investment Schemes, Arrests Operators
Telecom2 days agoATCIS Urges FG to Ensure Safety of Consumers Data
Telecom1 day agoVitel Wireless Lures Subscribers with “Data that Never Expires” Campaign
News1 day agoBoI, MTN Foundation Launch N1Bn Fund for Women Entrepreneurs













