General News
Nigeria – SA: Market Leaders as Foes
In 2005 while on my very first visit to South Africa, I noticed two South Africa nations. While the one is welcoming, friendly and easily shares views with distant visitors, the other is visibly agitated and antagonistic to visitors. For obvious reasons the Afrikaans are the least of the people you’d expect to welcome visitors to that enclave, especially when you’re a Nigerian considering the role we played in the anti-apartheid struggle; but here they are quite interested in discussing Nigeria. On the other hand, the large black populations of Zulu, Xhosa form a homophobic block most crudely against Nigerians. Nigerians are for unspecified reasons seen as threat in that nation. My friend Patrick Omorodion, was almost shot dead in 1997 while on official assignment as a sports reporter in that country. He was targeted for being a Nigerian. Back in 2005 my first shock was a black South African asking if we were from ‘Africa?’ Not known for being too cool to stupid comments I told the fella it was great to realize we were in Australia. He looked me straight in the eyes and moved on. But the messages have been shared albeit coded. The Nigeria – South Africa relations have ever remained in that fashion. The recent bilateral spat were inevitable only pending when the bubble will burst. The issues are fundamental and deep rooted. While one played the welcoming ‘big brother’ and accommodated all manner of visitors/investors from its newly freed brother, the other played the ‘benefactor’ brother considered his brother a kind of ‘pest’ to be avoided. South Africa’s political leaders have always reacted negatively to Nigeria and Nigerians. The new black political leadership of South Africa view Nigeria as the country capable of stopping it from the ambition of becoming a UN permanent member. At every given political for a, they do everything to counter a Nigeria move. Since the dethronement of apartheid, its leaders have never seen Nigeria as an ally. Whereas Nigerian political leaders have been naïve to believe they were friends. Recently, in the wake of the Ivorian political imbroglio, South Africa chose to be at parallel with Nigeria and ECOWAS just to prove the point of its continental political leadership. Ditto the recent election in the chair of the Africa Commission where President Jacob Zuma’s ex-wife remains in lock jam with the candidate of Gabon largely supported by the West and Central Africa block. No doubt South Africa remains the continent’s super power in commerce, technology and political leader board due to over 300 years of consistent political-economic engineering by the Dutch-Boer descendants, its new leaders must realize that what has made the new reality possible for them does not lie only the blood of their forebears, but it consumed the blood of other Africans who stood against injustice for them to be enthroned. The Nigerian economy was battered when late General Murtala Muhammed, chose to take Nigeria into the Frontline States. The nationalization of multinationals like Coca Cola, BP, Liver Brothers, Mobil and others was the beginning of Nigeria’s economic meltdown. While Nigeria remains open to South African investors, the same cannot be said of Nigerian investors gaining access in the former apartheid enclave. While working as a PR consultant with an agency in Lagos few years back, I ran a campaign for a Nigerian firm which bid to enter South Africa was blocked, whereas a South African company was allowed to land similar project in Nigeria. The business indiscretion of my then employer led to my unceremonious exit. Nigerians have always fought against the lopsidedness in the bilateral relationship between both nations. Unfortunately previous Nigerian rulers have deferred the issue, not minding even when Nigerians get killed for flimsy jealousy. Didn’t the killer of late South African reggae singer Lucky Dube, confessed in court he killed him in error believing the artiste was a Nigerian? President Goodluck Jonathan must take a look at the issues of both nations from a more introspective view point. Never should Nigeria play the under dog again. In my view, Nigeria should impress it on the South Africans that if they want to invest in Nigeria, then they should re-write their trade policy to accommodate Nigerian investors as well. At the moment, you can only invest in South Africa when you willingly write-off a minimum of 51% of your investment to some idle South Africans. That is unacceptable! There is nothing wrong if South Africans must be part of the investment – they must put down their own Rand to enjoy the dividends. On the lesser side of it, Nigerians (including officialdom) should realize that our ‘big man’ altitude does not work outside our shores. I paid about 50 Rand to get my inoculation at the point of entry in Johannesburg (because someone doing me good unpacked my yellow card at home without my knowledge). It is stated clearly in their rule books that if you do not have the correct yellow card, you’ll pay and get inoculated before entry or in the alternative, you’ll be deported immediately. Both nations cannot do without the other at the moment. South Africans should realize that Nigerians would always come into their country. Most international IT firms have South Africa as their Africa hub and for that Nigerians would always go there either as journalists, investors or just visitors. The evidence of Nigeria – South Africa relations is quite evident here with South Africa firms engaged in IT, telecom, engineering construction, diary farms, hospitality industry and retain market segment. It is in the same measure that Nigerians ask the South African government to open up its market to Nigerian investors to seek greater opportunities in international trade.
General News
Lagos Unveils Plan for 24-hour Electricity Supply in the State

Lagos State Government has unveiled an ambitious roadmap to end the “culture of blackouts” and establish a 24-hour electricity market driven by private sector investment, smart metering and independent power generation across the state.

Biodun Ogunleye, commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, middle at the press briefing
Biodun Ogunleye, commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, disclosed this during the 2026 Ministerial Press Briefing held in Alausa, Ikeja, on Monday, where he presented the achievements and strategic direction of the ministry under the Babajide Sanwo-Olu administration.
Ogunleye said the state had commenced aggressive reforms following the implementation of the Lagos State Electricity Law 2024, describing the initiative as a major step towards making Lagos the leading subnational electricity market in Africa.
According to him, the administration’s long-term objective is to deliver between 95 and 100 per cent grid availability, achieve full metering penetration and reduce energy losses to single digits by 2030.
“The administration’s plan for a farewell to the culture of blackouts rests on strong regulatory institutions, investor-friendly policies, independent power generation and full metering,” Ogunleye said.
He disclosed that the Lagos State Electricity Regulatory Commission (LASERC), had already begun licensing operators, enforcing regulatory standards and strengthening consumer protection mechanisms within the emerging electricity market.
Ogunleye revealed that 14 licences and permits had already been issued to compliant operators, while the state planned to commence a 100 per cent metering initiative from July 2026.
The commissioner said Lagos was also developing an Artificial Intelligence-powered monitoring system known as the “Electric Eye of Lagos” to provide real-time visibility across electricity trading and power delivery activities statewide.
According to him, the state was finalising market rules, grid interface guidelines and consumer supply codes to support a competitive and investor-friendly electricity ecosystem.
Ogunleye disclosed that Lagos currently has 12 Independent Power Producers under regulation, with seven already fully operational commercially.
He added that the state government was facilitating strategic energy infrastructure projects to improve reliability and industrial growth.
Among the major projects highlighted was the 37.7-kilometre Badagry electricity infrastructure corridor, which includes three high-voltage distribution towers crossing the Gbaji Lagoon and the rehabilitation of 33kV lines linking Gbaji, Seme, Owode and Apa.
The commissioner also announced plans for a major Lekki-Epe Integrated Energy Corridor featuring a 132kV bulk transmission line stretching from Ajah to Alaro City alongside a parallel gas pipeline network.
Ogunleye stated that the government had significantly expanded public lighting infrastructure through the deployment of 42,000 smart solar streetlights across major roads and highways in Lagos.
He said 22,000 conventional streetlights had already been replaced with solar-powered systems on corridors including Gbagada-Oshodi Expressway, Lekki-Epe Expressway, Lagos Island Expressway and Ikorodu Road.
The commissioner further disclosed that nearly 40,000 solar-powered streetlights were now operational across the state.
On power interventions in public institutions, Ogunleye said Gbagada General Hospital now enjoys between 21 and 22 hours of uninterrupted electricity daily following the installation of 2MVA and 1MVA transformers.
He added that renewable energy upgrades had also been completed in 52 secondary schools and 11 primary healthcare centres through lithium-ion battery replacement projects.
General News
Group Backs Constitutional Challenge against X Restriction in Tanzania

Paradigm Initiative (PIN) has thrown its support behind an ongoing constitutional case before the High Court of Tanzania challenging restrictions on access to X, formerly known as Twitter, in the East African country.

A determination on the matter is expected on May 22, 2026.
The case was filed in 2025 by Tanzanian lawyers, Tito Elia Magoti and Kumbusho Dawson Kagine, as a public interest constitutional challenge against the Minister for Communications and Information Technology, the Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority (TCRA), and the Attorney General.
The applicants are seeking judicial intervention on the constitutionality of actions restricting access to digital platforms under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania and the Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act.
The dispute stems from restrictions imposed on May 20, 2025, which have rendered X inaccessible to users in Tanzania except through the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).
The applicants argued that the restriction violates constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 18, 20 and 29, including freedom of expression, access to information and freedom of assembly.
They further contended that the measures were blanket in nature, disproportionate in impact and introduced without public consultation or clear legal justification.
According to court filings, the restriction has disrupted access to public health information, affected digital and media-related livelihoods, constrained journalistic activities and undermined civic participation.
The applicants also noted that forcing citizens to rely on VPNs imposes additional financial and potential legal burdens while fragmenting communication within the country.
Supporting the suit, PIN said restrictions of such nature undermine constitutional guarantees and risk establishing disproportionate state control over digital spaces.
Executive Director of PIN, Gbenga Sesan, said the case raises critical questions about the limits of state power in regulating digital platforms.
“Where restrictions are imposed, they must meet constitutional thresholds of legality, necessity and proportionality.
“Blanket disruptions of access to widely used platforms threaten not only freedom of expression but also the broader ecosystem of civic participation and access to information,” Sesan said.
In response, the respondents denied claims that the restriction on X in Tanzania constitutes a global concern.
They maintained that the action was lawful and necessary to ensure public safety, public health and public morals.
The respondents further argued that the owner of X had been given prior notice to comply with Tanzanian laws and procedures before the restriction was imposed.
They said access to the platform was restricted due to the owner’s alleged failure to comply with local regulatory requirements.
The case remains pending before the High Court of Tanzania, with observers saying its outcome could define constitutional boundaries for digital platform restrictions and shape digital rights jurisprudence across the region.
General News
Xenophobic Attacks: Anonymous Nigeria Threatens to Leak South African Stolen Data

Anonymous Nigeria, hacktivism, known for launching coordinated cyberattacks and protests in support of socio-political movements, has threatened to leak stolen South African government data unless its demands were met.

The group, called for the department to stop xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, or it will expose the data.
“They call themselves correctional services, but they can’t correct the citizens. What a shame,” the group said in its Telegram channel, MyBroadband reported.
“They killed a lot of Nigerians while the so-called correctional services watched and the ministry of justice.”
It is immediately know if Anonymous Nigeria is affiliated to Nullsec Nigeria.
But in a post on a hacker forum, Nullsec Nigeria included a link showcasing an example of data stolen from the department.
It included two bid invitation notices, bid results, a copy of the bids received, and a notice of a bid awarded in various formats.
“We’ll expose all your evil deeds for the world to see, unless this attack stops. But if not, we’ll leak everything they got,” Nullsec Nigeria said.
“Unless the government of South Africa ends these xenophobic attacks on Nigeria, we’ll expose everything about you, your evil deeds will be exposed, and the world shall know.”
MyBroadband asked the Department of Correctional Services about the claimed breach and Nullsec Nigeria’s demands, but it did not immediately respond to our questions.
Nullsec Nigeria also claimed responsibility for breaching several other entities in South Africa, while responding to an X post about its OpSouthAfrica campaign in its Telegram channel.
“I wanna express something here. I saw a report on the #OpSouthAfrica hack by Nullsec Nigeria, but it was stolen by another person,” it said. “Tag the real breachers next time.”
In a separate thread on the hacker forum, Nullsec Nigeria also claimed responsibility for breaching the Ephraim Mogale Local Municipality’s systems.
It claimed to have hacked the local government’s website and threatened to expose “everything you got for others to see how heartless you are. You killed mothers, brothers, students.”
Nullsec Nigeria said the breach and the threats were in response to the xenophobic attacks on and killing of Nigerians and the South African government’s supposed silence on the issue.
“These attacks are still going on in the dark, and we’ll expose them all. If the South African government doesn’t act first, the whole of South Africa will suffer,” it said.
“This is just a wave. These documents are about 11GB, but we decided to pull just this one.”
Its post included two images: one for a public hearing and another, a handwritten tender document for the appointment of an insurance service provider.
It also included a link to several other documents, including an old annual report, council resolutions, financial statements, and various other notices.
The Nigerian Government recently announced plans to bring citizens back to the country from South Africa after violent protests over foreign nationals in the country erupted earlier in May.
President Cyril Ramaphosa condemned the protests and criminal acts directed at foreign nationals in his From the Desk of The President weekly newsletter on 11 May 2026.
He emphasised the recent demonstrations and attacks did not represent the views of the South African people, nor the government’s policy.
“These are the acts of opportunists who are exploiting the legitimate grievances, particularly those of the poor, under the false guise of ‘community activism’,” The President said.
“Some of these people are assuming functions that only state officials are permitted to perform, including stopping people to check identification and conducting searches of private property.”
He added that such lawlessness would not be tolerated, regardless of who the perpetrators or victims were.
General News1 day agoXenophobic Attacks: Anonymous Nigeria Threatens to Leak South African Stolen Data
E-Financial1 day agoChapel Hill Denham Says Banks Lose N2.5 Trillion Annually to High CRR in New Report
E-Financial1 day agoLagos Sanctions 15 Money Lending Firms for Operational Violations
Telecom1 day agoGBB Says Cross-border Partnerships Key to Africa’s Digital Transformation
News1 day agoWHO Says Ebola Outbreak Worse than Reported
E-Financial1 day agoAfDB Approves $200m for BoI to Support MSMEs
Telecom1 day agoMTN Targets 8m Homes in Fibre Expansion Drive
News1 day agoDigital PayExpo 2026 to Convene Africa’s Most Influential Payments Leaders in Lagos













