Connect with us

General News

Twitter…the Assault on Free Speech!

Published

on

Ikpoki.jpg
Kindly share this post

“Business is ‘just business’: a scramble for profit,” wrote Richard Branson, the British international entrepreneur in his 2008 book, Business Stripped Bare (Virgin Books).

Although Branson talks about corporate social investment projects of his businesses in their operational environments, it is evident that even for him; ‘profit’ comes before social investments.

Whether it involves his Virgin Nigeria misadventure which left an acerbic taste in his mouth; his India foray and to the iconic ‘David vs. Goliath’ battle as he took on Coca Cola in their backyard with an audacious Virgin Cola launch.

It was all about ‘profit’…and if there was no profit in an environment, moves on elsewhere where the pasture is greener.

Like Branson’s Nigerian adventure, twitter last week left behind sour taste following its decision to suspend the twitter account of British journalist, Guy Adams for breaking its rules-of-engagements. Adams angered twitters’ business partners, the American TV network, NBC for divulging one of its executives’ email address in a tweet. The network filed a complaint with twitter leading to Adams suspension.

Advertisement

This incident has thrown up new challenges faced by journalists in their pursuit of news against the protection of commercial interest by entrepreneurs who provide the platforms for journalists to operate. This portents a new threat against the journalists right to freedom of information.

 It conjures commercial interest over the right to inform and be informed.

Fair enough, twitter has restored Adams account following the international outcry against its initial decision to protect a business-partner’s interest.

“Twitter has a business relationship with NBC. If Twitter acts in a way to favour that business relationship over the freedom of its platform for its users, then Twitter risks losing the trust of those users,” Bloomberg Businessweek.com quotes Jeff Jarvis, a professor at City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism as saying.

Adams, a Los Angeles based writer for the London Daily Independent newspaper, said he didn’t do anything wrong with his post in an interview before twitter restored his account. “I don’t think I have done anything wrong, and I don’t think any reasonable person would think I’ve done something wrong. I’m surprised because I always thought Twitter was a company dedicated to the flow of information.”

Advertisement

The BBC reports that NBC paid $1.18 billion for Olympics broadcast rights over the United States territory. It subsequently worked out delay broadcast schedule (due to time differentials) in some states – but apparently, didn’t explain this to the viewers. “As a result its broadcast of the opening ceremony was shown on the US’s east coast with a three-and-a-half hour delay, and with a gap of up to six-and-a-half hours on the west coast.”

Adams’ suspension drew several tweet criticisms.

“Twitter’s suspension of @guyadams jars with company’s claim to be the free speech wing of the free speech party,” wrote the Guardian’s special projects editor Paul Lewis.

“I wouldn’t have posted the email address. But Twitter’s removing his account was outrageous,” added Dan Gillmor, from the Arizona State University’s school of journalism.

In the wake Hilary Clinton, US Secretary of State’s African tour where she is pontificating on need for Africa’s maximum rulers to do more to encourage democracy, this latest stunt from twitter is bad copy for the West’s freedom of expression as democracy dividend.

Advertisement

Nigeria’s elite ruling class frets over activities of citizens on social media, and some have lately muted the idea of censoring platforms like twitter and facebook. Last January, the Nigerian government discovered its state broadcast media propaganda apparatus couldn’t match the power of the social media platforms as citizens seizing up on the Arab Spring revolutions across the Middle East and North Africa effectively galvanized mass protests against unannounced fuel subsidy removal by President Goodluck Jonathan.

The result was mass protests against the government in cities across the country. The government backed down and reverted on the fuel prize, although not to its original price. But Nigerians saw that as a window of opportunity to free speech and association. No government would take them for granted anymore!

The Chinese effectively censors these social media platforms and if African governments also think they could do same without repercussions, then the citizens would have lost their last platforms to express their discontent with nonperforming governments.

Dr. Emovon Biokolo, Dean of the School of Media and Communications, Pan Africa University, Lagos noted that the social media platform(s) is a new media that enable citizens to express their views unhindered. He stated that their usage could checkmate arbitrariness among the ruling class over those they lord over without regards. Previous (military) governments resort to closing down erring media to bring them in line.

But incidents like the Adams case would provide a fertile ground upon which dictators could sow a new doctrine of ‘state security’ over citizens’ rights to free speech.

Advertisement

I am afraid that in this youth age of near absolute abandonment of age-old societal norms and beliefs, any attempt to gag the media of self expression could lead to total anarchy, the type never before experienced!

 

Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

ITUC-Africa Faults FG’s Plans to Remove Electricity Subsidy

Published

on

Kindly share this post

International Trade Union Confederation, (ITUC-Africa), representing trade unions from countries in Africa, has called on Nigeria and other African governments to ensure that industrialisation translates into improved living standards for workers and ordinary citizens.

ITUC-Africa Faults FG’s Plans to Remove Electricity Subsidy

According to ITUC-Africa, economic growth must lift Nigerians and other Africans out of poverty rather than deepen inequality, frowning at Nigeria’s government plans to remove subsidy on electricity.

Delivering his opening remarks at the New Energy for Africa 11 Convening: African Workers’ Contributions to Energy Sovereignty, Green Industrialization, and a  Common African for COP31, Akhator Joel Odigie, general secretary of ITUC-Africa, said, industrialisation remains central to Nigeria and Africa’s liberation and development agenda but warned that it would be meaningless if it failed to improve the welfare of the continent’s people.

He faulted the plans by the Nigerian government to remove so-called subsidy on electricity in 2027, arguing that it is aimed at satisfying the Bretton Woods institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, IMF, and the World Bank.

According to him, such removal would worsen the poverty rate in Nigeria and regress any marginal progress towards industrialisation. Subsidy removal will make electricity inaccessible to workers and the majority of the citizens.

Advertisement

He said, “As we speak now, Nigeria is talking of subsidy removal on electricity. The plan is not to satisfy or help Nigerians, but IMF, World Bank and other donor countries. The talk that subsidy is bad economics is a lie. All developed economies depended on public sector-driven electricity and not private sector.

“For us as Africans, industrialisation is central to our liberation and development. It is part of our aspiration to define our own identity and achieve shared prosperity through an industrialised Africa. Unfortunately, that vision has yet to be realised.

“We have also come to understand that lamenting our circumstances is not enough. Identifying the barriers to Africa’s development or pointing fingers at those who may be responsible does not move us forward. The more important question is: What next? What solutions can we pursue together?

“It is from that perspective that we confront the reality that more than 600 million Africans still lack access to electricity, while privatisation continues to deny many people affordable access to energy. This compels us to ask: What can we do differently?”

According to him, organised labour believes industrialisation can be achieved without worsening the climate crisis if governments, workers and development partners commit to energy justice.

Advertisement

Odigie noted that “When we speak about sustainable industrialisation, we are asking how Africa can industrialise without increasing environmental degradation or worsening the climate challenges our people already experience every day.

“We know this is possible. But it will require negotiation, compromise and genuine partnerships. It demands serious discussions on technology transfer, skills development and financing.”

He stressed that developing technical skills and mobilising investment for energy infrastructure are essential if Africa is to industrialise sustainably, saying “These are not impossible skills to acquire. With the right investment and commitment, Africa can build them. Equally important is access to finance and the resources needed to develop the infrastructure that will support sustainable industrialisation.

“An industrialised Africa has little meaning if it does not improve the lives of our people. Our vision is an Africa where prosperity is shared.

“We must reverse the growing phenomenon of the working poor. We must end the situation where women, children and older persons bear the greatest burden whenever governments attempt to balance national budgets.

Advertisement

“What does prosperity mean if ordinary people cannot enjoy a decent quality of life? A worker who returns home after a long day’s work should be able to switch on a fan during hot weather, watch television, listen to the news and spend meaningful time with family because electricity is available, reliable and affordable.

“If our people cannot enjoy these basic necessities, then what kind of prosperity are we really talking about?

“Energy justice means energy that is accessible, affordable and capable of improving people’s lives.”

Odigie also renewed ITUC-Africa’s campaign for stronger public participation in Africa’s energy sector, citing Finland as an example of how governments can ensure affordable electricity while working with private investors.

“Recently, we visited Finland, where we observed a successful model that combines public and private participation, with strong public leadership. Energy there is affordable. In fact, electricity costs less in Finland than it does here in Nairobi.

Advertisement

“Our hosts explained that this is possible because the state retains an important role in the energy sector, including the ability to influence pricing to ensure affordability for everyone.”

Ahead of the COP31 climate negotiations, he called for closer collaboration between organised labour and the African Group of Negotiators (AGN), saying trade unions are partners in governance rather than adversaries.

“Trade unions are not antagonistic to governments, even though we are sometimes misunderstood.

“Our responsibility is to strengthen accountability and help governments perform better because, from time to time, leaders can become too comfortable.”

Using a metaphor that drew applause from participants, Odigie likened the role of trade unions to keeping leaders “close to the fire.”

Advertisement

“Our responsibility is to keep the feet of our leaders close to the fire so that their heads do not become too cold. We want them to continue thinking clearly, making sound decisions and remaining connected to the realities faced by ordinary people.

“That is why we are not in opposition. We are not enemies.”

He said organised labour’s partnership with the AGN is intended to ensure African governments enter international climate negotiations with the full backing of workers across the continent.

Speaking, Dr Nana Amoah, chair of the African Group of Negotiators, AGN, said Africa’s energy transition presents both an urgent challenge and a historic opportunity, lamenting that “More than 600 million Africans still lack access to electricity, even though our continent possesses exceptional solar, wind, hydro and geothermal resources. Yet Africa continues to receive only a very small share of global clean-energy investment.”

Represented by Dr George Manful, AGN Senior Advisor,  Amoah, said: “This imbalance must be corrected if the transition is to support Africa’s development rather than reproduce existing patterns of dependence, extraction and inequality.

Advertisement

“For the African Group of Negotiators, a just transition cannot be measured solely by installed megawatts, emissions reductions or new electricity connections. It must also be measured by the quality of jobs created, affordability of energy, protection of workers, participation of women and young people, development of local industries, and the capacity of African countries to retain value from their natural resources.

“Initiatives such as Mission 300 must therefore go beyond expanding access. They must strengthen public institutions, mobilise affordable and debt-sensitive finance, support local manufacturing and skills development, and guarantee that no worker, community or vulnerable group is left behind.

“Africa’s critical minerals must similarly become a foundation for green industrialisation—not another chapter of raw-material extraction. Our policies must promote local processing, technology transfer, decent work, environmental integrity and equitable participation in global value chains.”

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Many Nigerian Airlines May Collapse within 30 Days  – Onyema

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Allen Onyema, vice chairman, Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) and chairman, Air Peace, has warned that several domestic airlines could cease operations within the next 30 days unless the federal government urgently intervenes in the challenges confronting the aviation industry.

Many Nigerian Airlines May Collapse within 30 Days  – Onyema

Allen Onyema

Onyema, gave the warning on Wednesday at the launch of the book, Pathways, Pilgrimage & Destiny: The Biography of Alhaji Muneer Bankole, held in Lagos.

He described the aviation industry as capital-intensive but less rewarding, warning that airlines are facing serious threats to their survival.

“Going into aviation is not a piece of cake. It is an industry that is not very rewarding. It is capital-intensive, yet less rewarding. Today, we are facing a phase that has existential threats. Except something drastic is done very quickly within the next 30 days, a lot of airlines might go extinct,” Onyema said.

The Air Peace chairman also cautioned aviation unions against their planned picketing of airlines over the non-remittance of the five per cent Ticket Sales Charge.

He warned that if any airline is picketed, other domestic carriers would suspend operations in solidarity.

Advertisement

“If they picket any airline, others will go because there’s no need for that. There is nowhere in the world that government agencies use unions to talk about issues of debt,” he said.

Onyema lamented the harsh operating environment for Nigerian airlines, noting that more than 50 airlines have shut down over the years.

“Everybody pities Nigerian airlines, yet nobody wants to do anything about their situation. Over 50 airlines have come and gone. The owners of these airlines succeeded in other businesses, yet they failed in airline business,” he said.

He stressed that airlines were not opposed to helping the government generate revenue but called for a more sustainable approach.

“The airlines are not against helping government generate revenue. But no airline in the world is taxed directly for revenue. The airlines indirectly provide revenue for government,” Onyema added.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

QNET Denies Links to Ignite, Backs Nigeria Immigration Service Crackdown on Alleged Fraud Syndicate

Published

on

Kindly share this post

QNET has denied any association with Ignite following the arrest of 12 individuals by the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) over alleged fraudulent recruitment, irregular migration and other unlawful activities.

QNET Denies Links to Ignite, Backs Nigeria Immigration Service Crackdown on Alleged Fraud Syndicate

QNET

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the direct-selling company described reports referring to the suspects as belonging to a “QNET/IGNITE network” as inaccurate, stressing that Ignite is an entirely separate entity with no relationship to QNET.

The company stated that Ignite is neither part of QNET nor authorised to conduct any business or activities on its behalf.

QNET urged media organisations, commentators and members of the public to avoid linking the two organisations, warning that such reports could mislead the public and unfairly associate the company with alleged criminal activities beyond its control.

According to the company, it has fully cooperated with the Nigeria Immigration Service and will continue to provide any relevant information required as investigations progress.

It reaffirmed its commitment to supporting law enforcement agencies in identifying and prosecuting individuals who misuse the QNET name to facilitate fraudulent recruitment, human trafficking, irregular migration or other criminal acts.

Advertisement

The company also clarified the use of the term “Model Q,” explaining that law enforcement agencies increasingly use it to describe criminal schemes in which fraudsters exploit the names of legitimate direct-selling companies and established brands to lure victims with false promises of employment, overseas travel, migration opportunities or guaranteed income.

It stressed that “Model Q” does not refer to QNET’s legitimate business operations but rather to criminal activities carried out through the unauthorised use of recognised brand names.

QNET maintained that it does not offer employment opportunities, visas, overseas travel or guaranteed financial returns through its independent distributors.

It explained that its business model is based solely on the direct sale of wellness and lifestyle products.

The company warned that anyone soliciting money for jobs, migration, travel or guaranteed investment returns in QNET’s name is acting without its authorisation.

Advertisement

According to the statement, criminal groups have repeatedly impersonated the company’s brand to deceive unsuspecting members of the public.

QNET said it considers itself a victim of such brand impersonation and has been working with law enforcement agencies in Nigeria and other countries to share intelligence, support investigations and protect potential victims.

The company commended the Nigeria Immigration Service for what it described as an intelligence-led operation that resulted in the rescue of victims and efforts to dismantle transnational criminal networks.

It reaffirmed its readiness to continue collaborating with the Service and other relevant authorities to ensure that those exploiting its name for criminal purposes are brought to justice.

QNET also advised members of the public to verify any claims involving the company through its official communication channels and to report suspicious offers relating to employment, travel, migration or investment made in its name.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending