Connect with us

News

MRA Inducts Federal Civil Service Commission into ‘FOI Hall of Shame’

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Media Rights Agenda (MRA) today inducted the Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC) into its “Freedom of Information (FOI) Hall of Shame”, accusing the Government’s oversight body for the civil service of an appalling record of non-compliance with the FOI Act.

 

In a statement in Lagos, Ms Morisola Alaba, MRA’s Legal Officer, catalogued a series of breaches of various provisions of the FOI Act by the Commission over the last six years that the Act has been in operation, and called on the Presidency to intervene in the matter as the Commission oversees the Government’s engine room and could hamper its ability to implement its programmes and activities or to deliver on its mandate, which include instituting transparency and accountability in government and eradicating corruption in Nigeria.

 

Established by Section 153(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) as a Federal Executive Body, the Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC) is empowered to appoint persons to offices in the Federal Civil Service and to dismiss or exercise disciplinary control over persons holding such offices.

 

Ms Alaba said: “It is difficult to see how the Federal Civil Service Commission can, with any sort of credibility, exercise disciplinary control over persons holding offices in the Federal Civil Service for instance, for contravening extant public service rules and regulations, while the Commission itself is in violation of an existing Law such as the Freedom of Information Act.”

 

According to Ms Alaba, “Going by the clear and persistent disregard of the FOI Act by the Commission since the Law came into force, one can say without fear of contradiction that the claim by the Commission that its vision is to build a corps of highly focused, disciplined, committed and patriotic Civil Service totally dedicated to supporting the Government in the development of a strong, united and virile Nigeria, is untrue.”

 

Justifying the Commission’s induction into FOI Hall of Shame, MRA noted that since the passage of the FOI Act in 2011, the FCSC has failed to submit a single annual report to the Attorney-General of Federation, as required by section 29 (1) of the FOI Act, which has also made it impossible to determine how responsive the Commission has been to requests for information from members of the public.

 

It also cited the failure of the Commission to publish on its website or any other public platform the title and address of the appropriate officer to whom applications for information under the FOI Act should be made, as required by Section 2(3) (f) of the Act.

 

MRA noted that despite the express provisions of the Law, over the last six years since the FOI Act has been in operation, there is no indication that the commission has organized any training for its staff or officials to sensitize them on the public’s right of access to information or records held by government or to equip the relevant personnel with the knowledge and skills to effectively implement the Act, as required by Section 13.

 

It observed that the Commission has proactively disclosed applicable regulations and guidelines as well as the functions of each division and department of the institution on its website as required under Section 2 of the Act.

 

However, MRA said the Commission has consistently failed to proactively disclose information relating to the receipt or expenditure of public or other funds of the institution, information containing applications for any contracts made by or between the institution and another public institution, as well as the names, salaries, title and dates of employment of all employees and officers of the institution; and other information which it is obliged to disclose in accordance with Section 2 of the Act.

 

Ms Alaba noted that “It is unfortunate that the agency which oversees what is practically the engine room of the Federal Government is widely perceived as a place where irregularities and lack of due process are rife, and indeed the graveyard of so many failed governments.”

 

According to her, “This appalling reputation of the Federal Civil Service Commission is not helped by the recent FOI Rankings of Public Institutions in Nigeria published by the Public and Private Development Centre which indicates that the Commission is among Nigeria’s top public institutions violating the provisions of the FOI Act.”

 

Ms Alaba said in the light of the terrible record of the Commission, it is necessary for the Presidency to intervene in the matter because as the supervisory body for the engine room of government, the Commission is essential to the government’s ability to implement its programmes and activities as well as delivering on its mandate, including ensuring transparency and accountability in government and eradicating corruption in Nigeria.

 

Launched on July 3, 2017, the FOI Hall of Shame shines the spotlight on public officials and institutions that are undermining the effectiveness of the FOI Act through their actions, inactions, utterances and decisions.

 

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

News

ICPC Charges Ozekhome with Forgery, Corruption Over London Property

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has filed a criminal charge against Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, alleging his involvement in a corruption scheme connected to a London property.

ICPC Charges Ozekhome with Forgery, Corruption Over London Property

Chief Ozekhome

The ICPC filed a three-count charge before the Abuja High Court through its Head of High Profile Prosecution Department, Osuobeni Akponimisingha. The charge, marked FCT/HC/CR/010/26 and dated 16 January, names Ozekhome as the sole defendant in the case.

In the first count, the commission alleged that Ozekhome, aged 68 and residing at No. 53 Nile Street, Maitama, Abuja, received a property described as House 79, Randall Avenue, London NW2 7SX, around August 2021. The ICPC stated that the property was purportedly given to him by one Mr. Shani Tali and that the act amounted to a felony contrary to Section 13 and punishable under Section 24 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000.

In the second count, the senior lawyer was accused of making a false document with a Nigerian passport bearing the name “Mr. Shani Tali” around the same period. The commission alleged that the passport, marked A07535463, was intended to support a fraudulent claim of ownership of the London property. The alleged offence contravenes Section 363 and is punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code CAP 532 Laws of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, 2006.

The third count alleged that Ozekhome dishonestly used the same passport to support claims over the property despite allegedly knowing the document was false, an offence said to violate Section 366 and punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code.

Supporting documents attached to the charge include an extra-judicial statement allegedly made by the defendant on 12 January 2026, a judgment referenced as REF/2023/0155 dated 11 September 2025, interim forfeiture proceedings relating to the London house, a data page for “Shani Tali,” a letter dated 18 December 2025, and other expected materials.

The ICPC also listed several individuals expected to testify, including investigators Wakili Musa and Tosin Olayiwola, a representative of the Nigerian Immigration Service, and investigators Ebenezer Nduo and Blessing Monokpo, alongside any additional witnesses the commission may call. As of the time of reporting, the case had not yet been assigned to a judge.

The development follows an earlier investigation by the ICPC sparked by a petition from Olanrewaju Suraj, head of the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA), citing a judgment from a London property tribunal.

The tribunal’s ruling had linked Ozekhome and others to alleged forgery and fraudulent claims of ownership of the North London building. The petition accused several individuals of conspiring with corrupt Nigerian officials to procure forged identity documents for the purpose of “fraudulently claim[ing] ownership” of the property.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

NGX Unveils Net-Zero Plan for Greener Capital Market

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) has launched the NGX Net-Zero Programme to guide listed companies toward clear carbon reduction pathways and enhanced climate disclosures aligned with global investor standards.

NGX Unveils Net-Zero Plan for Greener Capital Market

NGX

The high-level launch engaged chief executives of quoted firms alongside development partners including German Investment Corporation KfW, DEG, and African Foresight Group (AFG), NGX’s implementation partner. Issuers and investors discussed financing decarbonisation, sustainability practices, and attracting climate-aligned capital.

NGX Group Chairman Dr Umaru Kwairanga described the initiative as concrete climate action, commending partners for two years of groundwork. “Today marks leadership and decisive action. Climate change has become a core business imperative, with capital markets mobilising capital and setting standards,” Kwairanga said.

He positioned NGX Net-Zero to support emissions measurement, disclosure, capacity building, and sustainable finance access, urging CEOs to embrace it strategically rather than as compliance. Kwairanga reaffirmed NGX’s goal to make Nigeria’s capital market Africa’s green finance hub.

Group CEO Temi Popoola called climate action a business imperative, noting sustainability-embedded firms attract capital, manage risks, and stay competitive. DEG Management Board Member Monika Beck highlighted partnerships scaling impactful, commercially viable climate solutions.

The event closed with a ceremonial gong marking the programme launch and send-off for outgoing DEG Regional Director Bernd Telemann.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Nigeria Off EU High-Risk Money Laundering List in Major Financial Win

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) has hailed Nigeria’s removal from the European Union’s list of high-risk third countries for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) as a landmark achievement endorsing the nation’s reform efforts.

Nigeria Off EU High-Risk Money Laundering List in Major Financial Win

Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU)

NFIU CEO Hafsat Abubakar Bakari said the delisting, contained in European Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) C (2025) 8460 adopted December 4, 2025 and effective January 29, 2026, affirms sustained AML/CFT and Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) reforms.

The move follows Nigeria’s exit from the FATF Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring after addressing strategic deficiencies, alongside Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, South Africa and Tanzania.

Bakari noted the European Commission recognised Nigeria’s strengthened AML/CFT effectiveness, closed technical gaps, and fulfilled FATF Action Plan commitments leading to grey list removal in June and October 2025.

The delisting eliminates enhanced due diligence requirements for EU financial transactions, easing compliance, boosting cross-border flows, and enhancing Nigeria’s appeal for European trade, investment and partnerships.

The NFIU attributed success to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s political will and collaboration among National Assembly, law enforcement, regulators, judiciary, private sector and development partners.

The agency reaffirmed commitment to ongoing FATF, GIABA, EU engagement and domestic framework resilience to maintain international confidence in Nigeria’s financial system.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending