News
Cybersecurity And Risk Mitigation

By Austin Okere
“Twitter hack: 130 accounts targeted in attack” was the screaming headline on the BBC’s website on July 17, 2020.
Two days earlier, the social media site had admitted a major cyber-attack of celebrity accounts. The security breach saw accounts including those of Barack Obama, Elon Musk, Kanye West and Bill Gates tweet a Bitcoin scam to millions of followers.

Several Bitcoin-related accounts began tweeting what appeared to be a simple Bitcoin scam, promising to “give back” to the community by doubling any Bitcoin sent to their address. Then, the apparent scam spread to mainstream celebrity accounts such as Kim Kardashian West and former vice-president Joe Biden, and those of corporations Apple and Uber.
Twitter is not the only high-profile company that has been hit. Just about every other company you can think about has suffered similar fate. The roll call of victims includes Rupert Murdock’s News Corp, Sony PlayStation Network, Government of turkey, Britain’s Serious Organized Crime Agency, and the CIA amongst others.
The story of hacking will not be complete without Anonymous; a sophisticated group of politically motivated hackers who have emerged since 2011. Anonymous are demonstrating how vulnerable companies that are charged with protecting our data are.
Anonymous hacked 485 Chinese government websites, some more than once, to protest the treatment of their citizens. Among their major successful hacks are Visa, MasterCard, Amazon, PayPal, PostFinance, Bank of America, and Sony Computer Entertainment. We are at the beginning of the mighty struggle for the internet with the aged old dilemma that pits the demands of security with the desires for freedom.
Cybercrime has now become so prevalent globally that there is hardly any organization that is yet to be hacked, and Nigeria is no exception. In fact, it is said that there two types of organizations, those that know they have been hacked and those that don’t. If in doubt, ask your customers, and they will have a bucketful of useful feedback for you.
The increasing trends in cyber security breaches are due to the following factors; the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) – with over 25b devices forecasted to be connected by 2025, globalisation of cybercrime, the cybersecurity skills gap that continues to grow, Increased skill levels of attackers, increased use of the Public Cloud, increasing reliance on technology and digitisation – (now fuelled by the pandemic and working from home) and attackers risk/reward imbalance amongst others.
Polls at a recent cybersecurity webinar that I facilitated was very revealing:
- 54% of respondents said they had been hacked
- 31% said their company had been hacked
- 67% considered PEOPLE the weakest link in cybersecurity – way over Process, and Technology.
And yet we spend significantly more money on products and technology, with little emphasis on mass education.
Hiring the most accomplished CISA, however, will not do very much good if there is not a deliberate policy of self-awareness of all staff, especially during this period where there is an explosion in people working from home and connecting to enterprise servers through personal systems that could more easily be compromised.
Neither is buying the most expensive antivirus the magic wand. It is like having the best pizza toppings without the base bread. Or like having the best machine leaning algorithm without the Big Data that the system will use for pattern detections.
Cyber-attacks can have significant business impact including; loss of funds, theft of intellectual property, serious disruption to business, damage to reputation, loss of customer trust, huge regulatory fines, litigation costs and possible bankruptcy.
Risk mitigation against cybersecurity is most effective in its Dynamic Collaborative Form. Dynamic because it requires a shared Body of Knowledge that is consistently updated and available to all parties. Risk mitigation cannot be a competitive strategy for any organization; this notion could be quite illusory because the nature of cybercrime can be likened to an elephant. People at the side may think it is a wall, people at the trunk may think it is a snake. People at the tail may think in it is a monkey, and people at the leg may think it is a tree trunk.
As in the case of the elephant, it is only when you have curated the complete and accurate picture through which the breach can manifest that you can effectively deal with it or contain it.
This is why there is a need for constant collaboration and open and transparent reporting, similar to the way that the COVID Pandemic is being collectively monitored and reported globally. This is what helped to curb the chain email fraud also known as “419” and many malicious computer viruses unleashed to take over users’ systems.
Governments and private establishments can improve protection of critical infrastructure from cyber-attacks by following the following basis principles:
- First rule is not to assume anything is secure.
- Second is not to assume you will not be targeted.
- Third is to realize that modern systems have so many moving parts that you can’t really use a strategy of owning all of it, partnerships are essential.
- Nations have to build extreme levels of expertise across a wide threat surface. It’s no use protecting the databases while the CCTVs in the President’s office and residence have been compromised.
- Nations have to build cyber armies and cyber police to tackle external aggression, protect national assets and protect her citizens.
The most dangerous intruders are not the ones with guns but the ones with laptops. The terrorist killing people with bullets is “small fish” compared to the one that can make planes fall from sky or trains crash, or provoke a riot or influence an election without leaving any trace.
Cyber-attack is the new normal. Organizations and Technology Providers can mitigate these attacks by Perpetual state of vigilance. Every internet connected or smart device is a potential back door. From the internet connected TV to your webcam or printer. Even if nothing is stolen from you, your resources can be hijacked to attack others. Don’t assume you have enough expertise to be in constant state of vigilance all by yourself. Cyber products and cyber companies are also at risk.
If you are a transaction-oriented company then you have to be using Artificial Intelligence to watch out for fraudulent transactions. If you are a data company then you need to think of encrypting data at rest and in transit. Two factor authentications are a must for all sensitive access. Walling off all critical systems from the net as a last means of firewall is simply not a practical solution.
Are organizations and private establishments in Nigeria doing enough to collaborate on threats? I believe that we could do more.
There should be a national Security Operations Center (SOC) and threat Database where all incidents are reported. This center should also disseminate threats and analyze incidents to help others prevent similar infiltrations.
Many firms, especially banks, think it will impact their brand if they disclose vulnerabilities and attacks. The under reporting or cover up of breaches portends a vicious cycle of repeated unanticipated hacks, because you are inadvertently empowering the hackers to cause more damage to you by not reporting and exposing them and their future hacking plans.
Working in silos is not an option, because even when you believe you have secured your fortress; how do you guard against third parties connecting to your system through Application Programing Interfaces (APIs)? Take for instance the case of the N11b breach involving a major Nigerian Bank and a Fintech company, E-Transact.
According to a report by TechNext.com, this came to light following a petition that the company developed a solution which helped Smart micro Systems to defraud the bank. Have we thoroughly investigated and comprehensively documented the nature of the beach and the vulnerabilities exploited?
The demography and architype of the perpetrators? Any possible internal collaboration or any systems bugs? Answers to these question to the right quarters is invaluable in foiling future attacks. While this may not be the only major successful breach, the system is so opaque that you will struggle to find a database of cases to learn from and anticipate future attacks.
The major reasons why organizations generally do not report breaches are fear of litigation or regulatory action and loss of reputation. In tackling cybercrime, we all have to be on the same team!
According to iafrican.com, Nigeria is set to establish a Cyber Security Research Centre (CSRC) to combat cybercrime. This is in a bid to build capacity and co-ordinate incident management and contribute to knowledge generation in cyber security. According to reports, Nigeria is already working with Cyber Security Malaysia and the Canadian Cyber Incident Response Centre (CCIRC) on establishing the CSRC.
While these are useful initiatives, there is a need for organizations to come together to collaborate on researching past breaches and documenting them and comprehensively reporting current breaches to learn from them in order to prevent future attacks.
Private organizations such as the Risk Management Association of Nigeria (RIMAN) and the Bank Directors Association of Nigeria (BDAN) could be hardened and work closely with Government Agencies such as the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) on existing and new initiatives towards combating Cybercrime.
Cybercrime and cybersecurity are real, but they are not rocket science and they are certainly no scarier than COVOD or EBOLA. If we could contain Ebola, Aids and 419 through collaboration, then surely, we can also contain cybercrime through Collaboration too; but we must be willing to take the painful steps that are necessary to safeguard ourselves and our organizations. Only then can we build the requisite trust in the system to continue to enjoy the fruits of digital transformation.
Austin Okere is the Founder of CWG Plc, the largest ICT Company on the Nigerian Stock Exchange & Entrepreneur in Residence at CBS, New York. Austin also serves on the Advisory Board of the Global Business School Network, and on the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Innovation and Intrapreneurship. Austin now runs the Ausso Leadership Academy focused on Business and Entrepreneurial Mentorship.
News
More than 50 Percent of Leaked Passwords End with a Number – Research Reveals

To mark the occasion of World Password Day, Kaspersky experts analysed 231 million unique passwords in major password leaks from 2023 to 2026, and uncovered several key patterns.

First, 68% of modern passwords can be cracked within a day. Second, it turned out that the vast majority of compromised passwords either begin or end with a digit – a common pattern that makes them potentially vulnerable to brute force attacks.
And third, users also favour positive and trending words; for example, over the past couple of years, use of the word “Skibidi” in analysed passwords surged 36 times, mirroring the rise of that Internet trend.
In recent years, secure passwords’ rules have become a widely discussed topic. More and more services now demand passwords that are at least 10 characters long, include an uppercase letter, and contain a number or a symbol.
Yet a comparative analysis of leaked passwords from the past few years shows that even following some of those rules does not guarantee resistance to brute‑force or AI‑driven attacks.
Kaspersky experts share practical advice on how to make passwords more complex and secure, and how not to repeat common mistakes.
Be creative with using symbols and numbers
Among the leaked passwords that contain just one symbol, the “@” sign tops the list, appearing in 10% of cases. The next most common symbol is a dot (.), found in 3% of passwords. Among all analysed passwords “@” takes second place in terms of prevalence, and in third place is “!”.
Numbers also follow similarly predictable patterns:
53% of examined passwords end with digits;
17% begin with digits;
Nearly 12% include a numeric sequence that resembles a date (from 1950 to 2030);
3% of leaked passwords include keyboard sequencies like “qwerty” or “ytrewq”, but most of them are digital sequencies like “1234”.
Alexey Antonov, Data Science Team Lead at Kaspersky, notes that commonly used symbols, numbers, or dates – especially when placed in obvious positions (such as at the beginning or end of a password) – significantly simplify brute force attacks for cybercriminals. That’s why it’s highly recommended to give preference to less popular characters, and avoid numeric or keyboard sequences.
“Bruteforce works by systematically trying every possible character combination until the correct password is found. When attackers already know which characters users tend to favour, the time required to crack a password drops dramatically. To avoid the temptation of choosing predictable symbols, entrust password creation to dedicated generators that produce random letters, numbers, and symbols with equal probability”, says Alexey Antonov.
Between… Eden and hell: Try to avoid using words in a password
The research shows that emotional and trending words frequently become the basis for a password. For example, from 2023 to 2026 the use of the word “Skibidi” in passwords increased 36 times – mirroring the rapid rise of that Internet trend.
Kaspersky experts have also conducted analysis of the occurrence of positive and negative words in passwords, and it turned out that there are more positive ones. Among those regularly appearing are positive words like “love”, “magic”, “friend”, “team”, “angel” and “star”, “eden”. Interestingly, positive words are much more common than negative ones. However, words like “hell”, “devil”, “nightmare” and “scar” also occur.
“Using a single‑word password, even with a trailing number or a special character, is a weak choice. The pattern is too predictable, making it easy for attackers to guess. Instead, craft a passphrase that strings together several unrelated words, each supplemented with internal numbers and symbols, and sprinkle in a few intentional misspellings.
The longer and more random and unpredictable the password is, the harder it is to crack. As an additional way to protect yourself, enable two-factor authentication (2FA) wherever possible,” recommends Alexey Antonov.
Is password length important?
It’s well known that longer passwords are harder to crack, and the analysis of leaked passwords confirms this principle. However, with the rise of AI driven tools, length alone no longer guarantees security: even lengthy passwords can be compromised if they follow predictable patterns.
The research shows that short passwords of up to eight characters that appeared in the leak are typically cracked by brute force attacks in under a day. However, thanks to AI-powered smart algorithms, more than 20% of 15-character passwords can be broken in less than a minute.
What’s more 60.2% of all analysed passwords – regardless of length – can be cracked in about an hour; 68.2% – in a day.
In the examples provided, the calculations assume a single RTX 5090 GPU and the MD5 algorithm. In real‑world scenarios, attackers can rent multiple GPUs – ten, a hundred, or even more. Under such conditions, the cracking rate would increase potentially by several orders of magnitude.
In modern terms, truly secure passwords not only meet the gold standard of 16+ characters, but also consist of random, non-repeating letters, numbers, and symbols, and are unique for each account. To help users create such passwords, Kaspersky has added a password generation feature to the Kaspersky Password Generator website. Now users can not only check their passwords for leaks, but also generate secure passwords for free.
For easy and secure password management, auto-fill, and cross-device synchronisation consider using a password manager in which all credentials are stored in a secure vault and protected by a single master password. This eliminates the need to remember hundreds of passwords while keeping them safe from breaches.
What’s more, not only passwords, but also passkeys can be created and stored directly in Kaspersky Password Manager, which allows not only to sign in to supported services with a single tap, but also to access passkeys on all devices owing to secure synchronisation.
News
Cybervergent Expands to Three New Markets

Cybervergent has launched version 3.0 of its artificial intelligence (AI)-native posture management platform and expanded operations into Kenya, Ghana, and SA.

The move, according to the company, introduces automated risk verification for enterprises and aims to position Africa as a force in digital governance technology.
It goes on to say the latest platform upgrade introduces continuous posture management, replacing traditional point-in-time governance, risk, and compliance reporting with real-time verification systems.
An AI engine independently verifies 99.9% of audit and monitoring findings before they appear on enterprise dashboards, according to Cybervergent.
It says risk management, compliance, audit, and data security operations are integrated into a unified system built for cloud and on-premise environments.
According to Cybervergent, the platform maps more than 4 500 controls across frameworks, including the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA), International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 27001, and System and Organisation Controls (SOC) 2.
Cybervergent says the rollout of its first South African customer validates the platform’s readiness for highly regulated enterprise markets and strengthens its expansion strategy across Africa’s leading technology and financial hubs.
The company is also adopting a channel-first deployment model, working with local partners and system integrators in Lagos, Accra and Johannesburg to scale verified security infrastructure for enterprises navigating increasingly complex regulatory demands.
“We built verification into the architecture,” said Ayomide Daniels, co-founder and chief scientist at Cybervergent. “If a finding is not traceable back to source documentation, it does not reach the dashboard.”
Cybervergent rebranded from Infoprivacy in late 2023 to reflect its shift towards AI-automated cybersecurity.
The start-up previously focused on data privacy compliance in the West African market before pivoting to its current integrated posture management model.
News
FG Bans Honorary Degree Holders from Using ‘Dr’ Title, Warns of Academic Fraud

Federal Government has directed recipients of honorary doctorate degrees to stop using the title “Dr.” before their names, as part of efforts to protect the integrity of academic qualifications and curb the misuse of honorary awards.

Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa
Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, announced the directive after the approval of the new policy by the Federal Executive Council (FEC).
Alausa said the measure was necessary to address the growing abuse, commercialisation and politicisation of honorary degrees in some tertiary institutions across the country.
He explained that honorary doctorates are symbolic recognitions of outstanding contributions to society and do not equate to earned academic qualifications obtained through rigorous study, research and examination.
“Recipients of honorary doctorate degrees are not entitled to use the title ‘Dr.’ as a prefix to their names in official, professional or academic engagements,” he said.
According to the minister, awardees may instead indicate the honorary distinction after their names using formats such as D.Litt (Honoris Causa), LL.D (Honoris Causa) or other approved honorary designations.
Under the revised policy, only universities with active doctoral programmes will be permitted to confer honorary doctorate awards.
The government also restricted recognised honorary awards to four categories: Doctor of Laws (LL.D), Doctor of Letters (D.Litt), Doctor of Science (D.Sc), and Doctor of Humanities (D.Arts).
In addition, all honorary degree certificates must clearly carry inscriptions such as “Honorary” or “Honoris Causa” to distinguish them from earned academic degrees.
The minister warned universities against indiscriminate conferment of honorary degrees, noting that institutions found violating the directive would face sanctions from the National Universities Commission and the Federal Ministry of Education.
He said the policy was part of broader reforms aimed at restoring credibility to Nigeria’s higher education system and ensuring academic titles are not misrepresented for personal, political or financial gains.
Observers say the development could reshape the long-standing culture where public office holders, business executives and celebrities often adopt the “Dr.” title after receiving honorary awards.
E-Financial2 days agoFCMB Opens Applications for Zero-Interest Loans of Up to ₦10m for Women Entrepreneurs
E-Business3 days agoTrusted Relationship and Exploits in Public-facing Applications Strengthen Position as the Main Attack Vectors
E-Business2 days agoKaspersky Identifies Ongoing Supply Chain Attack on Official Daemon Tools Website Distributing Backdoor Malware
E-Business3 days agoKled AI, US Data Firm Blocks Nigeria over High ‘Fraudulent Activity’
Telecom2 days agoReps Claim NCC’s Weak Regulatory Oversight Responsible for Poor Telecom Services
Telecom2 days agoVitel Wireless Partners Fintechs to Expand Access to Services
Telecom2 days agoGSMA Africa Policy Group Chair Calls for Urgent Tax Reforms to Accelerate Digital Inclusion
E-Financial3 days agoUBA, Redtech, MoMo PSB Expand Merchant Payment Access Across Nigeria


















