News
How Africa Can Prepare as Drones Enter Hands of Insurgents

By Karen Allen
Like in the Middle East, drones are a new threat posed by armed groups and violent extremists in Africa.

The proliferation of drone technology across Africa has significantly expanded humanitarian, development, business, and military operations. Drones, also known as unmanned aerial systems, have many positive uses. In the hands of non-state armed groups however, they pose a threat that governments must be prepared for.
The global commercial drone market is forecast to reach US$43 billion by 2024, with Rwanda, Ghana, South Africa and Kenya expected to be Africa’s biggest users.
Commentary typically focuses on military drones and implications for international humanitarian law, or the use of drones for business and humanitarian purposes.
The impact of other entities using drones – be they companies, hobbyists or insurgents – has attracted little attention.
In exploiting the benefits of transformative technology, African states should be aware of the potential risks and develop strategies to track and trace drone proliferation.
Armed groups either receiving supplies from proxies or using drones as weapons in Iraq and Syria, and more recently in Yemen and Libya, should alarm African governments.
The risk of drones becoming a new form of improvised explosive device as seen in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Ukraine was also recently highlighted by General Kenneth McKenzie of the United States Central Command.
Armed groups have recently used drones to locate targets in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Drones already form part of the military’s arsenal in many African countries and are deployed in peacekeeping missions.
Although the adaptation of commercial drones by insurgents into strike platforms in Africa is yet to happen, there’s evidence of their use by armed groups for surveillance and precision targeting.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, insurgents have recently used unmanned aerial systems to locate targets for attacks.
And in May, Mozambique’s Interior Minister Amade Miquidade told a press briefing that insurgents had deployed drones for precision targeting in Cabo Delgado province. This aligns with unverified reports by private security companies in the region that militants used small drones for surveillance.
Analyst Jasmine Opperman told ISS Today that, ‘If we look at the ease with which [insurgents] are getting weapons and mounting attacks on the military, I will never underplay the possibility that they are [using] more technologically advanced capabilities including drones.’
The fact that hobbyist drones are commercially accessible and becoming more affordable heightens the threat and presents a challenge to those seeking to restore peace.
The Middle East experience doesn’t mean drones will be used as weapons in the same way in Africa
Don Rassler of the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point has focused on the dynamics of drone acquisition in Iraq and Syria. He told Institute for Security Studies (ISS) researchers that it’s ‘only a matter of time before drones get deployed more actively across Africa.’ His studies show how extremists acquire shop-bought drones in large numbers, transport them to conflict zones and adapt the technology to transform the devices into weapons.
It’s unclear whether Africa-based insurgents would use organisational ties to acquire technological know-how from Islamic State networks. Preliminary research in the Sahel and East Africa suggests that direct links are hard to prove. While more empirical studies are needed, the availability of shop-bought drones across Africa suggests that indigenous innovation is more likely to be observed than direct technology transfer.
The Middle East experience doesn’t necessarily mean that drones may be used in the same way in Africa, says Matt Herbert from the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, who has focused on Libya and emerging technologies. ‘Their tactical utility may be limited as a weapon; however, strategically they could be of use for wider intelligence gathering, for collection of footage and propaganda materials and for precision targeting.’
That aligns with information from Somalia that al-Shabaab has deployed drones for surveillance and propaganda purposes. Retired Colonel David Peddle, a former military service member in South Africa and the United Kingdom, believes it’s only ‘a matter of time’ before we start seeing the deployment of ‘clusters’ or ‘swarms’ of drones in Africa, given their accessibility and relatively low cost.
Early warning systems could flag large consignments of drones delivered to areas of conflict
The psychological advantage of threatening to deploy such aerial assets could give insurgents an advantage over their adversaries and expand their spheres of control. This applies both on land and at sea, with eyewitness accounts from Mozambique of drones used offshore during the March Palma attack.
Even if drones are primarily used for surveillance now, they remain a powerful tool. ‘It doesn’t have to be a hijacking or an attack,’ argues ISS maritime Project Leader Timothy Walker, who is investigating the expansion of maritime policing operations in the region. ‘It just has to be an intrusion for it to have potency.’
Increasing drone use in Africa should give policymakers and the humanitarian sector pause for thought. The United Nations’ World Food Programme, for example, deploys drones for disaster response and mapping purposes across Mozambique.
As a first step, mapping the use of drones by violent non-state groups across Africa could help ensure that aid programmes and humanitarian corridors aren’t compromised. This would also enable private or private-public partnerships such as oil and gas refineries, ports and harbours, airports and military bases to develop countermeasures.
While African governments may struggle to control the proliferation of commercial drones, early warning systems could flag large consignments of drones procured and delivered to areas of conflict. A registration scheme similar to that used for cellphones could be considered for shop-bought drones that don’t need a licence.
Internationally, the Global Counterterrorism Forum has developed the Berlin Memorandum under its Initiative to Counter Unmanned Aerial System Threats. It urges states to observe numerous UN Security Council Resolutions that require ‘effective measures to establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons and their means of delivery.’ The means of delivery includes drones.
African policymakers should play an active role in shaping future drone policy beyond the technology’s use in assisting agricultural development. Even when used for surveillance rather than attack, drones can provide insurgents with a strategic and operational advantage that could threaten security forces’ ability to protect citizens and stabilise conflict zones.
Karen Allen, Senior Research Adviser, Emerging Threats in Africa, ISS Pretoria
News
ICPC Charges Ozekhome with Forgery, Corruption Over London Property

Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has filed a criminal charge against Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, alleging his involvement in a corruption scheme connected to a London property.

Chief Ozekhome
The ICPC filed a three-count charge before the Abuja High Court through its Head of High Profile Prosecution Department, Osuobeni Akponimisingha. The charge, marked FCT/HC/CR/010/26 and dated 16 January, names Ozekhome as the sole defendant in the case.
In the first count, the commission alleged that Ozekhome, aged 68 and residing at No. 53 Nile Street, Maitama, Abuja, received a property described as House 79, Randall Avenue, London NW2 7SX, around August 2021. The ICPC stated that the property was purportedly given to him by one Mr. Shani Tali and that the act amounted to a felony contrary to Section 13 and punishable under Section 24 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000.
In the second count, the senior lawyer was accused of making a false document with a Nigerian passport bearing the name “Mr. Shani Tali” around the same period. The commission alleged that the passport, marked A07535463, was intended to support a fraudulent claim of ownership of the London property. The alleged offence contravenes Section 363 and is punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code CAP 532 Laws of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, 2006.
The third count alleged that Ozekhome dishonestly used the same passport to support claims over the property despite allegedly knowing the document was false, an offence said to violate Section 366 and punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code.
Supporting documents attached to the charge include an extra-judicial statement allegedly made by the defendant on 12 January 2026, a judgment referenced as REF/2023/0155 dated 11 September 2025, interim forfeiture proceedings relating to the London house, a data page for “Shani Tali,” a letter dated 18 December 2025, and other expected materials.
The ICPC also listed several individuals expected to testify, including investigators Wakili Musa and Tosin Olayiwola, a representative of the Nigerian Immigration Service, and investigators Ebenezer Nduo and Blessing Monokpo, alongside any additional witnesses the commission may call. As of the time of reporting, the case had not yet been assigned to a judge.
The development follows an earlier investigation by the ICPC sparked by a petition from Olanrewaju Suraj, head of the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA), citing a judgment from a London property tribunal.
The tribunal’s ruling had linked Ozekhome and others to alleged forgery and fraudulent claims of ownership of the North London building. The petition accused several individuals of conspiring with corrupt Nigerian officials to procure forged identity documents for the purpose of “fraudulently claim[ing] ownership” of the property.
News
NGX Unveils Net-Zero Plan for Greener Capital Market

Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) has launched the NGX Net-Zero Programme to guide listed companies toward clear carbon reduction pathways and enhanced climate disclosures aligned with global investor standards.

NGX
The high-level launch engaged chief executives of quoted firms alongside development partners including German Investment Corporation KfW, DEG, and African Foresight Group (AFG), NGX’s implementation partner. Issuers and investors discussed financing decarbonisation, sustainability practices, and attracting climate-aligned capital.
NGX Group Chairman Dr Umaru Kwairanga described the initiative as concrete climate action, commending partners for two years of groundwork. “Today marks leadership and decisive action. Climate change has become a core business imperative, with capital markets mobilising capital and setting standards,” Kwairanga said.
He positioned NGX Net-Zero to support emissions measurement, disclosure, capacity building, and sustainable finance access, urging CEOs to embrace it strategically rather than as compliance. Kwairanga reaffirmed NGX’s goal to make Nigeria’s capital market Africa’s green finance hub.
Group CEO Temi Popoola called climate action a business imperative, noting sustainability-embedded firms attract capital, manage risks, and stay competitive. DEG Management Board Member Monika Beck highlighted partnerships scaling impactful, commercially viable climate solutions.
The event closed with a ceremonial gong marking the programme launch and send-off for outgoing DEG Regional Director Bernd Telemann.
News
Nigeria Off EU High-Risk Money Laundering List in Major Financial Win

Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) has hailed Nigeria’s removal from the European Union’s list of high-risk third countries for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) as a landmark achievement endorsing the nation’s reform efforts.

Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU)
NFIU CEO Hafsat Abubakar Bakari said the delisting, contained in European Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) C (2025) 8460 adopted December 4, 2025 and effective January 29, 2026, affirms sustained AML/CFT and Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) reforms.
The move follows Nigeria’s exit from the FATF Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring after addressing strategic deficiencies, alongside Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, South Africa and Tanzania.
Bakari noted the European Commission recognised Nigeria’s strengthened AML/CFT effectiveness, closed technical gaps, and fulfilled FATF Action Plan commitments leading to grey list removal in June and October 2025.
The delisting eliminates enhanced due diligence requirements for EU financial transactions, easing compliance, boosting cross-border flows, and enhancing Nigeria’s appeal for European trade, investment and partnerships.
The NFIU attributed success to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s political will and collaboration among National Assembly, law enforcement, regulators, judiciary, private sector and development partners.
The agency reaffirmed commitment to ongoing FATF, GIABA, EU engagement and domestic framework resilience to maintain international confidence in Nigeria’s financial system.
E-Financial2 days agoSEC Hikes Minimum Capital Requirements for Market Operators After a Decade
Telecom2 days agoStudy Shows Blocks in Telegram are Pushing the Underground Out
News2 days agoNigeria Off EU High-Risk Money Laundering List in Major Financial Win
News2 days agoNGX Unveils Net-Zero Plan for Greener Capital Market
Telecom2 days agoGalaxy Backbone Marks Two Decades of Powering Nigeria’s Digital Evolution
Telecom2 days agoVodacom Crowned Africa’s Top Employer 3rd Year Running on Innovation, Ethical AI
Telecom2 days agoGalaxy Backbone Marks 20 Years, Tops FG Website Scorecard
Telecom11 hours agoMTN CEO Toriola Hails Nigeria’s Telecom Transformation at MIPAD













