Connect with us

E-Financial

AfDB Approves Policy for Victims of Bank-financed Operations

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Board of Directors of the African Development Bank Group has approved a new policy framework for the Independent Recourse Mechanism.

The IRM provides individuals or communities who are adversely affected by bank-financed operations with an independent mechanism through which they can raise their concerns.

They can also seek redress and hold the bank to account for ensuring it complies with its policies and procedures related to sustainability.

The new policy is aimed at strengthening accountability and providing more effective recourse to people affected by bank-financed operations.

According to a statement from the AfDB on Friday, the policy framework is the result of series of internal and public stakeholder consultations that began in December 2019.

This process was part of the third policy review of the bank’s Independent Review Mechanism.

It further marked the first time that the IRM had engaged in such a comprehensive public consultation process.

David Simpson, Director, Compliance Review and Mediation Unit, AfDB, said the new policy represented a significant step forward for the IRM.

“The new policy framework restructures the complaints’ mechanism, to make it more accessible, efficient and predictable.

“It also simplifies the complaint process for users of the Independent Recourse Mechanism,while enhancing its transparency, and providing clearer guidelines for case management.”

Stephanie Amoako, a Senior Policy Associate at Accountability Counsel, an international civil society organisation said: “The new accountability policy, if properly implemented, better serves the needs of communities across Africa.

” This is by removing barriers to access the IRM and creating a more equitable process for those using the mechanism.”

Accountability Counsel supports communities adversely impacted by internationally financed projects.

According to the statement, a new name accompanies the new policy as the Independent Review Mechanism will now be known as ” the Independent Recourse Mechanism.”

The new mechanism has been restructured, replacing the previous external experts panel model with a fully integrated unit that will now lead all problem-solving and compliance review functions.

The new policy strengthens accessibility for complainants by allowing complaints to be filed by a single person.

It enables the mechanism to advise communities on how to submit complaints if needed.

It adopts a zero-tolerance standard for retaliation against complainants and rejects any form of threats.

It also rejects intimidation, harassment, violence, or discrimination towards those that raise concerns through the Independent Recourse Mechanism.

The mechanism also requires AfDB management to make the IRM better known among affected communities by disclosing information about the mechanism at a project level.

Furthermore, the new operational rules and procedures approved by AfDB’s board also provides the IRM with some advantages.

For istance, it has the ability to initiate compliance review processes in certain circumstances without a formal complaint from affected communities.

It also increases complainants’ participation in the complaint-handling process by allowing them the opportunity to comment on draft compliance review reports before they go to the board.

The operational rules and procedures also commit the IRM to pursue a culturally appropriate and gender-sensitive complaint process.

It allows the IRM to consider a complaint’s eligibility even in the case of parallel judicial or non-judicial proceedings.

It further empowers the IRM to make recommendations to the bank on issues related to redress and remedy.

“That is when individuals and communities are adversely impacted as a result of bank-financed operations.

“As well as ensure that agreements reached by parties in problem-solving activities are aligned to international norms,” it added.

While the new policy enters into force with immediate effect and would apply to all new complaints, it is expected that the IRM would require a reasonable transition period to fully implement the new policy.

Where appropriate, ongoing complaints will be transitioned to the new policy over time.

The bank’s complaint mechanism became operational in 2006 and has received over 100 complaints submitted by civil society organisations and affected communities.

The mandate of the IRM covers both public and private sector operations of the bank group.


Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

E-Financial

CBN Proposes 30-Member Mediation Panel for Loan Disputes

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has released an exposure draft proposing the establishment of a 30-member Mediation and Dispute Resolution Panel (MDRP) aimed at strengthening consumer protection and boosting confidence in Nigeria’s financial system.

CBN Proposes 30-Member Mediation Panel for Loan Disputes

Pic credit….aequitasjuris.com

According to a circular signed by Paul Oluikpe, acting director of the Development Finance Advisory Department of the CBN, the establishment of the MDRP, is in furtherance of efforts to strengthen the financial ecosystem, ensure compliance with extant legislation, and enhance the efficiency of financial intermediation.

The draft guidelines and modalities for the operation of the MDRP are in line with the Secured Transactions in Movable Assets (STMA) Act, 2017, which established a MDRP as the first recourse for mediation and settlement over any civil dispute which may arise between the creditor and the grantor in the course of implementing the Act.

The act also mandates the Governor of the Bank to issue guidelines that will set out the modalities and regulate the Panel’s functioning, among others. The circular further noted that the “MDRP is intended to provide a specialised, cost-effective platform for resolving disputes arising from creation, perfection and enforcement of security interests in movable assets.

“The key objective of the MDRP guidelines is to establish a clear and standardised procedure for managing STMA-related disputes, while ensuring transparency, fairness and efficiency to bolster confidence in the secured transactions in movable assets system.”

According to the draft guideline, the CBN will “appoint 30 persons from whom panels shall be constituted, with each panel comprising 3 members.

The members shall serve on a rotational basis for an initial term of four years.

“Upon satisfactory performance, determined through an evaluation by the CBN, members may be reappointed for an additional term of four years. The tenure of members shall not exceed two terms of four years each, which need not be consecutive.

“Members shall be professionals with a minimum of 10 years of relevant experience in any of law, banking, finance, mediation, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, or financial regulation. Members shall be persons of proven integrity, professional competence and sound judgement.”


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

NDIC Seeks Court Nods to Liquidate 89 Failed Banks

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) said that it has commenced the process of liquidating 89 closed Microfinance Banks (MFBs) and Primary Mortgage Banks (PMBs).

NDIC Seeks Court Nods to Liquidate 89 Failed Banks

This followed their successful acquisition by new owners under the Purchase and Assumption (P&A) resolution model executed by the Corporation.

The corporation disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday, signed by Hawwau Gambo, head of Communication and Public Affairs.

It explained that the affected institutions were part of the 179 MFBs and four PMBs whose licences were revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), on May 22 and 23, 2023.

According to the corporation, under the P&A arrangement, 89 new eligible institutions were subsequently licensed by the CBN to assume the assets and liabilities of the defunct banks.

It noted that the new banks had since commenced operations under different names.

“To legally conclude the liquidation process, the NDIC, in its capacity as liquidator, will file applications at various divisions of the Federal High Court for orders of dissolution of the closed banks and its discharge as liquidator,” the statement said.

NDIC added that the move was in line with provisions of its enabling Act and other relevant laws guiding bank resolution in the country.

The corporation said the exercise would ensure proper closure of the defunct institutions while safeguarding financial system stability.

It reiterated its commitment to protecting depositors and sustaining public confidence in the banking sector.

The affected banks were located across several states, including Lagos, Anambra, Oyo, Kaduna, Kano and the Federal Capital Territory.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

IMF Downgrades Nigeria’s GDP Outlook, Warns of Rising Risks

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria’s economy is projected to grow at 4.1 per cent in 2026 and strengthen slightly to 4.3 per cent in 2027, even as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned that the ongoing Middle East conflict is clouding the global outlook.

The projections, contained in the IMF’s April 2026 World Economic Outlook released at the ongoing IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings in Washington DC, the United States, show a relatively stable trajectory for Nigeria despite rising external risks, particularly from energy market disruptions triggered by the war.

The IMF had earlier projected stronger growth of about 4.4 per cent in early January before the latest global shock, reflecting the impact of domestic reforms and improving macroeconomic conditions.

While Nigeria’s growth outlook remains steady, the IMF warned that countries like Nigeria face growing vulnerability from higher global energy prices, inflation pressures and tighter financial conditions.

The war, which has disrupted oil supply routes and pushed up fuel costs, is already feeding into domestic inflation and cost-of-living pressures.

Recent data show petrol and diesel prices have surged sharply since the conflict began, straining households and businesses.

Although higher crude prices may support government revenues, the broader macroeconomic impact remains mixed, with inflation and exchange rate pressures posing downside risks.

The IMF also cut global growth to 3.1 per cent in 2026, with only a modest recovery to 3.2 per cent in 2027 as the Middle East conflict disrupts trade and energy markets.

Emerging markets and developing economies, including Nigeria, are expected to grow at 3.9 per cent this year before recovering to 4.2 per cent in 2027, reflecting the uneven impact of the shock across regions.

Sub-Saharan Africa is projected to expand by 4.3 per cent in 2026 and 4.4 per cent in 2027, placing Nigeria slightly below the regional average but still among the stronger performers.

South Africa, the continent’s largest economy, continues to lag with growth forecast at one per cent in 2026, rising modestly to 1.3 per cent in 2027.

Among major economies, the U.S. is projected to grow by 2.3 per cent in 2026 before easing to 2.1 per cent in 2027, while China is projected to grow by 4.4 per cent and four per cent respectively.

India remains the fastest-growing major economy at 6.5 per cent through 2027, while the Euro Area continues to struggle with weak growth, particularly in Germany and France.

The IMF warned that many developing economies, particularly energy importers, remain vulnerable to rising costs and external shocks.

The IMF urged central banks to prioritise price stability, warning against easing policy prematurely in response to supply shocks. It stressed the need for clear communication and strong institutional independence.

On fiscal policy, the Fund cautioned against broad-based energy subsidies, describing them as costly and inefficient. It recommended a targeted and temporary support for vulnerable households, funded within existing budgets.

The IMF also warned against the use of trade restrictions to address external imbalances, noting that such measures tend to weaken output without resolving underlying issues. It called instead for coordinated global action to stabilise trade and restore energy supply chains.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending