E-Financial
How and Why Contract Staff Aid Bank Fraud

There are indications that the growing tendency among banks to give sensitive positions to contract staff is heightening the risk of lenders being hit by fraudsters, according to New Telegraph.
The finding showed that despite repeated warnings by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), banks not only continue to hire contract staff, but have started assigning these employees to sensitive roles that were previously reserved for full time or permanent staff.
A well-placed source, which attributed the development to the need for banks to cut costs in the face of a tough economy and rising competition, blamed it for most of the fraud cases recently recorded in the industry.
Indeed, a “concerned” Head of Operations at a Lagos branch of one of the leading banks in the country, who asked not to be identified, revealed that contract staff were directly and indirectly involved in the two cases of fraud recorded at his branch in the past two months.
He said: “In the first incident, one of the contract staff at the branch was able to siphon about N40 million belonging to one of the big Pentecostal churches in the country, while in the second incident, another contract staff was suspected of providing information to fraudsters who succeeded in stealing N4 million from a customer’s account.”
According to the bank official, more contract workers, compared with their permanent staff counterparts, are perpetrating fraud because of their relative poor remuneration.
He argued that with more banks deploying contract staff to increasingly more sensitive positions in a bid to cut costs, the likelihood of these workers – given their meager salaries – succumbing to the temptation of getting involved in fraudulent acts also increases.
“Before now, contract staff were not assigned to Automated Teller Machine (ATM) watch duties. You will also hardly find them being told to perform customer service duties. But all that has changed. Furthermore, in the past, most banks usually set a maximum value of between N200,000 and N500,000 as the limit for risky transactions that a contract staff can undertake, but these days, this limit has been raised to N1 million.
“Yet these are people that are paid N60,000 compared with full time staff that earn between N120,000 and N200,000. Of course, it is not difficult to see why some of them (contract staff) will not be able to resist offers from fraudsters, especially in these hard times,” he stated.
This newspaper also gathered that following a significant increase in the number of fraud cases it was recording, a Tier 1 lender, a few months ago, disengaged many of its contract staff and hired fresh graduates.
It will be recalled that Mr. Dipo Fatokun, CBN Director, Banking and Payments System Department revealed last year that the apex bank had advised lenders to desist from giving sensitive banking roles to contract staff as they may not have a stake in the financial institution.
He said: “A temporary staff may not have a stake in the bank so to say. So, it is encouraged that if they have staff that are not permanent, they should not give them responsibilities or roles that will expose them to critical functions of a bank.
“If you are giving somebody an authority to approve transactions of high magnitude and he does not have a stake in your bank, then you are already exposing yourself. So, this been going on and I believe many banks understand the need to rely on their key staff for major duties. That is one of the reasons the fraud attempts have been rising, but the value lost declining.”
Similarly, in the past two years, the Managing Director and Chief Executive of the NDIC, Alhaji Umaru Ibrahim, had been repeatedly warning banks against the use of outsourced staff, pointing out that in 2015, over 75 per cent of fraud cases in the banking sector was traced to outsourced bank staff.
He revealed that bank examination reports indicated that the high incidence of fraud and forgeries in the banking system was linked to outsourced or contract staff.
The NDIC Chief Executive Officer also stated that in as much as regulators appreciated the necessity for banks to cut costs, it was incumbent on all stakeholders to fashion out capacity building and other strategies to motivate all employees to contribute positively rather than engaging in criminal acts that impact adversely on the entire banking system.
Interestingly, Ibrahim had told finance and business journalists in Ilorin in October 2015 that 64 per cent of fraudulent activities in the banking industry in 2014 were traced to temporary staff member of banks.
According to fraud statistics contained in the latest Nigerian Electronic Fraud Report, which was prepared by the Banking and Systems Payment Department of CBN, the banking industry recorded 31,736 fraud cases involving the sum of N16.5 billion between January 2014 and December 2016.
The study showed that the frauds were perpetrated through various payment channels such as Across the Counter, ATMs, cheques and electronic-commerce platforms. Others are Internet banking, mobile banking, Point-of-Sale and web transactions.
E-Financial
See Key Changes in BVN Rule from May 1 by CBN

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is implementing stricter Bank Verification Number (BVN) regulations, including limiting phone number changes to only once in a lifetime.

This will take effect from May 1.
Also, mobile apps will be restricted to one device, a 24-hour temporary watch-list for suspicious transactions will be enforced, and enrollment is restricted to individuals aged 18 and above.
Other key changes are:
One Device Policy: Mobile banking apps will be restricted to one device, with automatic logout when accessing another device.
Fraud Watchlist: BVNs linked to suspicious activity will be placed on a 24-hour, temporary, or permanent blacklist, temporarily freezing accounts.
Age Restriction: Enrollment for BVN is now restricted to individuals aged 18 and above.
Data Correction: Changes to BVN profile details (Name, DOB) are also heavily restricted, allowing only one-time corrections to data.
E-Financial
Paga Group Rejigs Leadership as Oviosu, Founder Becomes Group CEO

Paga Group has announced a major leadership restructuring, marking 17 years of operation and signalling a strategic shift toward deeper financial infrastructure development, emerging technologies, and expansion across Africa.

Tayo Oviosu, founder (front) and Ope Oyinloye, Group COO and CEO of Paga Nigeria
With the restructuring, Tayo Oviosu, founder, is now the Group CEO, while Ope Oyinloye has been appointed Group COO and CEO of Paga Nigeria, in an acting capacity, pending regulatory approval from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
Oviosu will also serve as executive chairman of the Group Board and non-executive chairman of Paga Nigeria.
He will be leading Paga Labs, driving geographic expansion, and overseeing fundraising efforts.
The fintech company said the changes represent a transition from its foundational phase into a new growth chapter, known as ‘Act 2’, focused on connecting Africans to global financial systems, scaling innovation, and entering new markets.
To support this transition, the company announced key leadership changes. advertisement
Jay Alabraba, co-founder, has been appointed group director of Special Projects, where he will initially lead the company’s expansion into lending and support new market entry initiatives.
Speaking on the transition, Oviosu said the company’s mission remains unchanged but its approach continues to evolve.
“Act 1 proved that we could build a profitable, high-growth infrastructure business that the world’s leading companies trust. Act 2 is about taking that infrastructure to its full potential—connecting Africans to global financial rails, moving into new markets, and leading the next wave of financial technology,” he said.
Oyinloye added that his focus will be on sustaining operational excellence while scaling the company’s next phase of growth.
With the new structure in place, Paga is positioning itself to play a more significant role in shaping the future of financial services across Africa, particularly as digital payments, blockchain technologies, and AI-driven solutions gain traction across the continent.
Paga has since evolved into a full-stack financial services infrastructure provider. Its offerings now span enterprise solutions through Paga Engine, consumer services via the Paga app, and merchant tools under Doroki.
The company’s first phase delivered significant growth. Between 2021 and 2025, total transaction value processed increased 17-fold to $11 billion across 169 million transactions in 2025 alone, with more than $1.5 billion processed monthly.
Net revenues grew five times within the same period, underscoring the scalability of its model.
Paga also expanded its enterprise footprint, with over 265 clients which include global firms such as PayPal, Meta, Amazon, LemFi, Tencent, Pesa, and Verto building on its infrastructure.
The company was further recognised by the Financial Times and Statista as one of Africa’s fastest-growing companies for three consecutive years from 2023 to 2025.
As part of its new strategic direction, Paga outlined three priorities which are strengthening its financial infrastructure to connect local and global payment systems; advancing emerging technologies such as stablecoins, cryptocurrency, and artificial intelligence through its innovation arm, Paga Labs; and expanding into new African markets.
E-Financial
Reputation: The Real Currency Powering Fintechs

By John Kokome
In the fast-evolving fintech ecosystem, capital is no longer the only currency that determines success. Increasingly, reputation has emerged as a powerful, if intangible, asset that can accelerate growth, attract investment, and secure customer loyalty, or conversely, trigger rapid decline when mismanaged. In a sector built on trust, speed, and innovation, reputation is not just complementary to business performance; it is foundational.

Fintech, by its very nature, operates at the intersection of finance and technology, two industries where trust is paramount. Traditional financial institutions spent decades, even centuries, building credibility through regulatory compliance, customer relationships, and institutional stability. Fintech startups, however, often attempt to compress this trust-building process into a few years, sometimes even months. This compressed timeline makes reputation both more fragile and more critical.
At the core of fintech’s reputation economy is trust. Users are asked to hand over sensitive personal data, link bank accounts, and transact digitally, often without ever stepping into a physical office. In markets like Nigeria, where scepticism around digital financial services can still linger due to fraud and system inefficiencies, trust becomes even more valuable. A single breach, whether data-related, operational, or ethical, can erode years of goodwill in hours.
Yet, reputation in fintech extends beyond security. It encompasses reliability, transparency, customer experience, and regulatory alignment. Downtime during peak transaction periods, unclear fee structures, or delayed dispute resolution can quickly escalate into reputational crises. Social media has amplified this risk. A dissatisfied customer’s complaint can go viral within minutes, shaping public perception far more rapidly than traditional media ever could.
Conversely, a strong reputation can be a growth multiplier. Fintech companies that consistently deliver seamless user experiences and communicate transparently often benefit from organic word-of-mouth marketing. In a crowded market with low switching costs, users tend to gravitate toward platforms they perceive as dependable. Reputation, in this sense, becomes a competitive moat.
Investors, too, are increasingly factoring reputation into their decision-making. Beyond financial metrics, venture capitalists and institutional investors are scrutinising governance structures, compliance culture, and public perception. A fintech with strong fundamentals but a tainted reputation may struggle to raise capital, while one with a solid reputation can command premium valuations. In this way, reputation directly influences access to funding and long-term sustainability.
Regulators also play a significant role in shaping reputational outcomes. In many emerging markets, regulatory frameworks are still evolving to keep pace with fintech innovation. Companies that proactively engage regulators, adhere to guidelines, and demonstrate a commitment to consumer protection often earn a reputational advantage. On the other hand, those that attempt to bypass regulations or operate in grey areas risk not only sanctions but also public distrust.
Importantly, reputation is not built solely through marketing. While branding and communications are essential, they must be rooted in authentic operational excellence. There is a growing disconnect between perception and reality in some fintech narratives where aggressive marketing promises outpace actual service delivery. In the long run, this gap is unsustainable. Reputation must be earned through consistent performance, not manufactured through messaging.
For fintech companies, managing reputation requires a deliberate, strategic approach. This includes investing in robust cybersecurity infrastructure, maintaining transparent communication channels, prioritising customer support, and embedding compliance into the organisational culture. It also involves proactive crisis management, anticipating potential risks and preparing clear response frameworks before issues arise.
Leadership plays a crucial role in this equation. Founders and executives are often the public face of fintech brands, and their actions, statements, and values significantly influence perception. Ethical leadership, accountability, and responsiveness can strengthen trust, while opacity or defensiveness can quickly damage credibility.
Ultimately, in the fintech ecosystem, reputation functions much like currency; it can be accumulated, spent, and, if mishandled, depleted. Unlike financial capital, it is far more difficult to rebuild once lost. As competition intensifies and the industry matures, fintech companies must recognise that their most valuable asset may not be their technology or funding, but the trust they earn and sustain.
In a world where digital transactions are instantaneous and information travels even faster, reputation is not just a byproduct of success; it is a prerequisite.
John Kokome is the Corporate Communications Manager at FlashChange, a fintech platform redefining secure digital asset exchange. With experience across fintech, cryptocurrency, telecoms, and development communications in Africa. He currently leads strategic storytelling, reputation management, and stakeholder engagement initiatives at the company, focusing on building trust, transparency, and financial literacy in the digital assets space. John’s work sits at the intersection of policy, technology, and public perception, with a strong emphasis on Africa-first narratives and responsible innovation. He has contributed opinion pieces and thought leadership articles on governance, youth empowerment, branding, and Nigeria’s evolving digital economy.
E-Business2 days agoNigeria Cyberattacks: Stronger Collaboration as a Panacea
Telecom2 days agoAirtel Becomes World’s Second Largest Telco as Global Customer Base Surpasses 650 Million
General News2 days agoNIBSS Says 28 Percent of Nigerians have Registered for BVN
Telecom2 days agoFrom Import Dependency to Local Capacity: Nigeria’s Tech Manufacturing Journey
E-Business2 days agoCBN Slams Custodian Investment with N419m Fines over Rule Breaches
General News2 days agoNITDA DG Urges Stronger Collaboration to Drive Nigeria’s Digital Economy
General News2 days agoOgun Set for Direct London Flights as Gateway Airport Gains Momentum
News2 days agoLagos Govt Drags Top Firms to Court Over Billion-Naira Tax Debts














