Connect with us

General News

Nigerian Banks and the Culture of Concealment: How Financial Results Are Being Cooked to Hide Losses

Published

on

Kindly share this post

In Nigeria’s banking industry, profit has become more a press release than a performance. Every results season, the same storyline plays out with record profits, rising assets, and promises of “strong fundamentals.” Yet, beneath the eye-catching headlines lies a quiet deception of a pattern of accounting charades aimed at repressing the true picture of reality and skyrocketing success.

An analysis of the 2025 half-year results from ten leading financial institutions like Zenith Bank, GTCO, UBA, First HoldCo, Access Holdings, Stanbic IBTC, Wema Bank, FCMB Group, Sterling HoldCo, and Jaiz Bank exposed a pervasive culture of concealment. What the market is celebrating as a season of extraordinary profitability is, in truth, a story of concealed losses, revalued deceptions, and selective disclosure.

Zenith Bank reported a pre-tax profit of N625.6 billion, yet its trading gains fell by N328 billion and credit impairments jumped 83 percent. GTCO, the self-proclaimed profit leader, showed N900.8 billion in pre-tax earnings, but once last year’s N523 billion one-off fair-value gain is removed, actual profit declined by 26 percent. UBA’s earnings were flattered by revaluations, while its interest expenses exploded from N328.9 billion to N560.6 billion. Its trading desk flipped from a N98 billion gain to a N10 billion loss, forcing a drastic cut in interim dividends.

First Bank HoldCo’s books told their own story that despite higher revenues, pre-tax profit fell due to a N486 billion collapse in trading income from a N432 billion gain in 2024 to a N53.7 billion loss in 2025. Impairments doubled to N185 billion as the bank exited CBN’s forbearance regime, revealing losses long deferred. Access Holdings reported N2.5 trillion in gross earnings, but its statement of comprehensive income disclosed a N62.4 billion loss to shareholders driven by N155.9 billion in forex translation losses and N74.4 billion in fair-value write-downs. Profit at the top, destruction of value at the bottom.

Stanbic IBTC’s growth was buoyed by asset sales, not sustainable income. Wema Bank’s celebrated 229 percent profit surge rested on a fragile base: interest expenses rose 34 percent, while impairment charges remained suspiciously light at just N532 million. FCMB Group’s digital-era optimism could not hide the 35 percent slump in non-interest income following the loss of revaluation gains, or the N36.2 billion impairment that followed once regulatory leniency expired. Sterling HoldCo trumpeted a 157 percent jump in profit, which looks less impressive when you realise it was achieved in the shadow of a N100 billion recapitalization. The group admits it still needs N53 billion more to meet regulatory capital. Meanwhile, its cost-to-income ratio remains a heavy 64.5 percent, and non-performing loans hover above the 5 percent prudential threshold.

Jaiz Bank, meanwhile, announced N14.45 billion in profit, but its total assets shrank by N100 billion, and its operational cash flow swung from a N428 billion inflow to a N119 billion outflow with profit on paper and erosion in practice.

Behind the curtain of impressive numbers, a silent manipulation is taking place. Creative accounting, selective disclosures, and reclassification tricks have become tools in the bankers’ art of survival.

Insiders in the banking sector admit, off the record, that “results management” has become a normalised practice. The strategy is simple as in where the true numbers would reveal losses or mounting risk, the presentation is massaged to reflect strength. Loss-making subsidiaries are quietly merged into group accounts where their poor performance is diluted. Bad loans are reclassified as “restructured assets” or shifted into special-purpose vehicles that sit conveniently off the parent bank’s main balance sheet.

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) bears part of the responsibility. In recent years, its supervision appears more reactive than proactive. While the apex bank routinely sanctions banks for minor customer-service infractions, it has been slow to demand full disclosure on FX exposures, hidden losses, or aggressive revaluations. Transparency is not a threat to stability; it is its foundation. A banking system that hides its weaknesses under glossy financial statements is like a house built on borrowed sand.

The real problem facing Nigerian banking today is not liquidity or profitability; it is credibility. When numbers are manipulated, when press releases are crafted to deceive, and when regulators turn a blind eye, the trust that underpins the entire financial system begins to erode. Depositors no longer believe in transparency. Investors no longer trust the data. Even genuine success stories are viewed with suspicion.

For too long, the industry has mistaken perception for progress. Banks inflate interest income in a high-rate environment, then bury the cost of risk in footnotes. They celebrate foreign-exchange gains in one year and quietly dismiss translation losses the next. They rely on regulatory forbearance to delay recognition of bad loans, then call the resulting impairments “non-recurring.”

Dividends are weaponised to signal confidence even when retained earnings are flat. Capital raises are packaged as expansion plays when, in reality, they are patchwork efforts to maintain solvency. And nowhere in these results, not even in the glossy CEO quotes, did we find a serious discussion of declining cash generation or sustainability of earnings once interest rates normalise. None of these manoeuvres strengthens the banking system; they only postpone accountability.

The way forward begins with truth. Banks must be compelled to present their financials in full, not selective highlights crafted for headlines. The CBN must demand clearer disclosures on FX positions, loan restructuring, and the sources of non-interest income, while requesting that banks disclose core operating profit separate from one-off gains and trading income; front-load cash-flow data; publish detailed impairment breakdowns that show exposures by sector and vintage; explain capital raises transparently; and align dividends with free cash flow, not cosmetic accounting profits.

Auditors must rediscover their professional conscience and not rubber-stamp whatever management wants. Journalists and analysts must drill into the notes of the accounts, asking why interest income is rising while impairment and non-performing loans are rising too. The health of the financial system depends not on who can publish the biggest profit figure, but on who can prove that the profit is real, repeatable, and resilient.

Until then, the public is advised to read every “record result” with skepticism. Because in Nigerian banking today, what the headlines celebrate, the balance sheets quietly contradict.

If the current trend continues, the supposed “profits” of today may soon be revealed as the losses of tomorrow.

A bank’s greatest asset is not capital; it is credibility. And once that is lost, no amount of cooked numbers can restore it.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional writes from Lagos, can be reached via: [email protected]


Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

Nestlé Commits to Boosting West Africa Solar Rollout Through Partnership

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Renewable energy firm Daystar Power Group has expanded its installed solar capacity across West Africa through a partnership with Nestlé, bringing total deployments to 6,884 kilowatt-peak (kWp), or nearly 7 megawatts (MW), in what the company describes as one of the largest commercial and industrial solar partnerships in the region.

Four manufacturing facilities across Nestlé sites in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Senegal are now operational, with installations located in Abidjan, Tema and Dakar.

Daystar Power has installed 3,447 kWp across two sites in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. In Ghana, a 2,547 kWp system powers Nestlé’s Tema factory, while in Senegal an 890 kWp installation operates at the Dakar facility.

The company said each system is designed to deliver measurable environmental impact, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved energy resilience.

The installations are tailored to local operational and grid conditions to ensure reliable renewable energy supply while supporting Nestlé’s net-zero ambitions and its commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

“Nearly 7MW across four Nestlé facilities is a number we are proud of, but what it represents matters more than the figure itself. It means that one of the world’s most demanding manufacturers has tested our model, trusted it, and come back. Our job now is to keep earning that across every market where industry needs energy it can count on,” said Yischai Beinisch, CEO of Daystar Power Group.

Samer Chedid, CEO of Nestlé Central and West Africa Region, said: “This investment reflects our commitment to building a business that not only grows but does so responsibly.

“By advancing solar energy projects in Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal, we are embedding sustainability into our growth, reinforcing our role as a force for good, creating long-term value for communities and ensuring that our footprint actively contributes to a cleaner, more resilient future.”


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

NCGC, SMEDAN Partner on MSME Financing Support

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The National Credit Guarantee Company Limited (NCGC) and the Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at supporting access to finance for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Nigeria.

The agreement was signed at the NCGC headquarters in Abuja and outlines areas of cooperation between the two agencies, including financial literacy programmes, credit guarantee support, capacity building, and other initiatives targeted at small businesses.

Speaking at the signing ceremony, NCGC Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Bonaventure Okhaimo, said the partnership is intended to provide a framework for expanding financing opportunities available to MSMEs.

According to him, small and medium-sized enterprises play a significant role in economic activity and employment generation across the country.

Okhaimo said NCGC has facilitated ₦32.78 billion in credit and provided over ₦13.09 billion in guarantees through its partnerships with financial institutions. He added that 1,478 businesses and entrepreneurs have benefited from the financing interventions, with 1,682 jobs reportedly created or sustained.

Also speaking, SMEDAN Director-General, Charles Odii, said the collaboration would enable the agency to connect more small businesses with available financing opportunities, particularly Nano and Micro enterprises that often face challenges accessing credit.

The two organisations said the partnership would also involve stakeholder engagement and awareness campaigns to provide information on financing options and the use of credit guarantees in lending arrangements.

The agreement forms part of ongoing efforts by both agencies to support enterprise development and improve access to financial services for small businesses across the country.

Observers say access to finance remains one of the major constraints facing Nigerian MSMEs, making collaborations between public institutions an important aspect of broader economic development initiatives.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Elon Musk Loses Trillionaire Status as $500Bn Vanishes in Days

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Elon Musk is no longer a trillionaire after a sharp global sell-off in technology stocks wiped an estimated $500bn (£379bn) from his personal fortune.

Elon Musk Loses Trillionaire Status as $500bn Vanishes in Days

Elon Musk

The billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk had recently become the first individual to reach the trillion-dollar milestone following a record-breaking listing surge for his rocket company SpaceX earlier this month.

However, shares in SpaceX have since fallen by around 30% from their peak, while Tesla was also caught in a broader technology market downturn on Tuesday, June 23.

His net worth now stands at $957.1bn, according to analysis by Bloomberg, while calculations by Forbes suggest his fortune previously peaked at $1.45tn last week.

The drop in Musk’s wealth over the past week exceeds the total fortune of Larry Page, whose estimated net worth stands at just under $297bn.

The decline comes amid two consecutive days of losses on Wall Street, with more than $89bn wiped from Tesla’s market value after its shares fell 5.8% on Tuesday. Chipmaker Nvidia also dropped 4.1% during the same session.

Traders have warned that further volatility may follow after memory-chip producer Micron Technology prepares to release its third-quarter results, amid concerns that artificial intelligence valuations may be overheating.

Investment bank Goldman Sachs cautioned that AI-linked stocks could be vulnerable if there are signs of slowing investment from major tech firms.

Ben McKeown, an investment manager at Dowgate Wealth, said Musk’s fortune remains highly exposed due to its concentration in two major holdings.

He said: “The old adage is, you concentrate to build wealth and diversify to keep it. Musk is the most extreme example of this.

Almost his entire net worth sits in Tesla and SpaceX, which have been extremely volatile, especially SpaceX as the shareholder base starts to be unlocked and becomes free to sell.”

Musk had briefly become the world’s first trillionaire on June 12 following the listing surge of SpaceX, which saw its shares jump as much as 67% in its first three days of trading after an IPO that valued the company at more than $1.8tn.

However, the stock later fell for three consecutive sessions, erasing around $928bn in market value from a peak of $2.9tn to just over $2tn, before a slight recovery.

The scale of his recent wealth decline is now considered the largest on record, surpassing his previous loss in 2022 when his fortune fell by an estimated $165bn amid a slump in Tesla shares.

Another billionaire affected by recent market turbulence is Larry Ellison, whose net worth peaked at around $400bn last September before falling to approximately $210bn following a major sell-off in Oracle shares.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending