Connect with us

General News

You Can Minimize not Eradicate Illegal Courier Operators – Chikezie

Published

on

GALAXY S 4 Product Image (6).jpg
Kindly share this post

Charles Chikezie is the chief executive officer (CEO) of Parcel Force Nig Ltd. He has been a player in the courier industry since 1987 and has worked with notable courier companies including IAS/TNT. He has also worked with RedStar Express as assistant manager, data processing before joining Royal Mail as data processing manager. In 1997 Chikezie founded Parcel Force to give buyers of the Express business a reasonable option. He spoke to emeka okafor on industry wide issues.

How Courier Companies Can Scale the Recession
In the first place, I think the global economic crisis is a two-way facet issue because it gives the opportunities for people who know their onions in whatever sector of the industry they are playing to stand on their feet and forge ahead.
 It is also a time for consumers to know who is who in the industry. It is a challenging period even for the expert; you will discover that the carpet has been pulled from under your feet because nobody expected the recession.
There are several steps a professional courier service operator would take to weather the storm. You must make sure that you watch your operational cost, it is very important. There are some expenses that are frivolities; you must try as much as possible to cut some expenses you can do without.
Another issue is that you must be innovative and dynamic. Are there some products you feel that can sell in this situation, even if it means cutting the prices of the products for consumers to find them attractive and affordable? This is another opportunity to stay afloat pending when things start looking up.
Another area is on employment, you have to make sure you employ, when it is absolutely necessary. You don’t just employ for fun. You only employ when you know the employee is going to add value to the business. In this kind of situation, you must make sure you have a very good relationship with your existing clients. A bird in hand is worth millions in the bush so you make sure you have a cordial relationship with existing clients, parley them from time to time, give them excellent service delivery and make them feel good. If there is any other way you can add to their business, go ahead and do it at no extra cost, then you will stay afloat.
You also make sure you have a good banking relationship with your bank because at the end of the day, you find out that most customers you run to at times are no longer coming up with payment for services rendered  because their receivables will definitely drop  this time around and this will affect their expenses. Even if the money will get to you, it might be after sometime, so you need your banker to bridge the gap to make your operations seamless for your customers not to understand that you are going through financial challenges. In as much as they know it is a global problem, sometimes they will refuse to understand, so make sure you maintain a good relationship with your banker.
Also if you have your way spend some money on advertisement and make sure you reach the target market not just advertising for the fun of it. The advert is also not for show offs, you are advertising for a particular purpose and that is to position yourself in the market to establish your brand.
Competition in the Industry
Competition is always healthy for every economy except you are operating a communist state or a socialist state but in a capitalist state, competition is the best. This brings about excellence in service delivery because there is competition. We have to welcome as many courier companies as are interested in joining us in this industry but one thing is that they must conform to the policies and ethics that guide the industry.

Regulating Activities of Illegal Courier Operators
In every industry we have bad eggs or illegal operators. Go to the telecom industry or the oil and gas, even banking industry. You can only minimize their actions, you cannot eradicate them completely. These are somehow functions of the economy because the economy is not balanced, so many people are not favored, and they are not cared for. If the economy was balanced and everybody was comfortable, nobody would operate an illegal business. Some of the reasons for smuggling is when the country is not producing a product and when it is eventually produced in the country, it is at a higher price. The reason for some of these acts is because people’s pockets are empty so they look for the smartest means to get what they want. One of the ways to curtail such activities is by looking at the cost of registration. When the cost of registration is too high and you want to regulate the industry, you get many of them fake because the industry is for middle men. This industry for now is occupied by middle class. Forget about the giants because most of them are multinationals. The middle men are graduates and they are intelligent, they know what to do to add to what they have and are ready to fight with the last drop of their blood to make sure they get to the next level which is a high class level. People will give them jobs because they attract sympathy and they begin to establish so they will survive.
Another aspect is the area of proper monitoring. Our CRD is trying, they are doing well but Nigeria is a very large country. That is where ICT comes in but because of the epileptic power supply, it is difficult for them to do most of the things they can do online. There is some extent to which constant power supply and ICT could help the CRD to minimize the activities of illegal operators.
One more thing is the sincerity of the citizenry. In some situations we accommodate fraud to the extent we do not report such until it becomes a way of life. If the society could come out to identify the lapses in the system and there is protection for those who report such activities, the better our economy will become. Going by the power given to the CRD by the constitution of the parliament, I think they are trying because they can only work as human beings.
 Effect of the Bank Shakeup on Courier
It is better we sanitize the system now than when the whole thing is allowed to crumble and Nigeria would look like Argentina. Like a child’s play, Argentina had a serious problem and the economy crumbled in a day, there was no bank, there was no money. The wicked ones in this country out of selfishness would want us to get to that point before we start doing something about it. They forget that you might have the money in your house and the whole thing collapses and becomes a paper. Just like the Zimbabwean dollar used for wall carpet, and it is no longer a legal tender.
The shake up is really affecting the courier companies because an average courier company’s customers – basically 70 or 80 percent of them pay after 60 days or 90 days after completion of job… How do you now bridge the gap? You need a facility from the bank. Based on your turn over the bank can give you the facility but now you need a collateral. Enlarging your fleet, expanding your logistics and others also become a problem. In all you find out that is going to be a problem for an average courier service company to function very well because you need a little bit of overdraft or facility to run your operations pending when your customer will pay. We want the government to come up with something that can give the whole thing a human face because players in the industry are middle people who do not have people to render financial assistance to them. When you do a blanket wipe out and they are affected at the end of the day, we go back to square one and what we have built over the years starts dying, so who are we building for? Talking of microfinance banks, they are for middle and small scale enterprises, the government should make sure there are policies to accommodate them while purging the big ones.
Company Registrars Owing Courier Companies
 Company registrars are our customers. I said earlier that 70 percent of customers pay after 60 days or after 90 days as the case may be. I think it is not a registrar issue because registrars too have their customers and some of those customers do not pay until after 24 months or six months as the case may be and at the end of the day it is a multiplier effect or a ripple effect. When you go there to make a request about your money you will be told the money has not been released to pay you so it is an entire economic problem. As the government is doing this, they should look into the credit system and overhaul it. At the end of the day it might not be registrars’ problem so to speak, it is a problem emanating from the system. Registrars are customers of courier companies, so they owe, other customers owe and their customers in return owe them. What we are saying is that quoted companies customers’ should please pay them on time so they can also pay their service providers. These are the end people just like saying the end product because they are the result of everything you have been doing. If the end product is not there then production is not complete until it gets to the final consumer. If you are organizing an AGM, there is no AGM so to say until that annual report gets to the shareholder.
Economic Crisis and Volume of Business
 Yes. There are  so many factors that hold to that. One is that if Company AYZ produces something and we used to have 90 percent demand for that product but because of the effect on the purchasing power of the consumers, it now drops to 50. If you are using a courier company to deliver those goods, automatically the quantity it will handle is affected. Two is that the effect cut across all sectors of the economy so what you do is to cut costs. The company analyses the situation and weighs the option and does most of their delivery jobs in-house to save cost. Most of the companies instead of outsourcing, they do most of their operations in-house to have absolute control over what they are doing.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions give a better branding position and outlook on the local and international scenes. I expect the regulatory department to begin to put together mergers and acquisitions policies because people can wake up one morning and say let us go to CRD we want to merge and you tell them goodbye go and implement it we have heard you.  We have to implement a code of conduct because when problem arises out of that marriage definitely as a regulatory department, they will have to come in. Another issue is that the regulatory department also, should begin to encourage people and organizations because the type of institution they monitor determines their capabilities. If we have one or two local operators merging, I think it will be a good one. 

Improving Skills in the Industry
Before now and even up till now, the regulatory department is doing that. Training is very important to every industry. CRD has been putting together trainings from time to time for courier operators but they can do better. For they  to do that , they should find a way of collaborating with professional training organizations and human capacity building institutes who know what is obtainable in the industry to form part of the faculty members. There should be a department where it is their job to brainstorm and come up with topics that would turn the industry around. There is no problem at all if mergers and acquisitions come through the courier and logistics industry. This would help chief executives who do not understand what it means. Before the consolidation in the banking sector, most people did not understand the meaning of merger. It was after that that many people in the banking industry started going abroad for training on mergers and acquisitions. Nothing stops courier regulatory  department from collaborating with either foreign or local companies who understand what mergers and acquisitions is and narrow it down to courier and logistics industry and begin to train people from there and  the desire would come naturally.  

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

Firm Launches AI-powered Platform to Simplify New Tax Laws

Published

on

Kindly share this post

As Nigeria enters a new phase of tax administration, a locally developed technology platform, Kaanta AI, has been launched to help Nigerians have a better understanding of their tax obligations.

Kaanta AI is a WhatsApp-based, AI-powered tax assistant designed to provide simplified tax guidance to traders, small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, and individuals.

The platform arrives at a time when tax reforms and compliance requirements are becoming more prominent in public discourse.

Rather than relying on complex online portals or technical language, Founder and Chief Technology Officer, Oluwaferanmi Oladepo, at the launch of the innovation, explained that Kaanta AI operates entirely on WhatsApp, allowing users to ask tax-related questions, receive explanations, calculate taxes, and understand available reliefs using text, voice, or handwritten notes.

The service also supports local languages, including Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa, and Pidgin, expanding access beyond English-speaking users.

With the new tax law taking effect on January 1, 2026, analysts expect increased public confusion and misinformation. However, Oladepo assured Nigerians that Kaanta AI positions itself as a verification and guidance tool, offering instant responses to tax-related questions and concerns.

He described the platform as a response to a long-standing gap in tax education, sayin,: “Tax should not feel scary or confusing. Kaanta AI is built to help Nigerians understand what applies to them and make informed decisions, using clear and accessible language.”

According to the tech guru, in addition to basic explanations, the platform provides tax calculations and insights on tax reliefs, noting that the company also plans to introduce professional tax services, including filing support for small businesses and larger organisations. Kaanta AI operates a freemium model, with basic guidance available at no cost and advanced services offered through paid plans.

According to Tobiloba Olanipekun, Product and Growth Lead, the platform was designed around how Nigerians already communicate.

Olanipekun said: “WhatsApp is where people naturally ask questions and seek help. We wanted Kaanta AI to feel like a conversation, not a lecture. Anyone from a market trader to a young professional can ask questions freely and get clear answers.”

He added that the long-term goal is to improve tax education and compliance culture across the country, adding that: “With tax becoming part of everyday conversation in Nigeria, we aim to guide people with clarity rather than confusion.”

Kaanta AI is now available to users nationwide. As tax reforms take centre stage in 2026, the platform is expected to play a role in helping Nigerians navigate the changing tax landscape.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Why Nigeria’s New Tax Regime Will Fail Without Public Trust

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By Blaise Udunze

Millions of Nigerian citizens are watching with cautious anticipation as the federal government begins implementing its far-reaching 2026 tax reforms. This is to say that the official assurances that the new tax regime will be fairer, simpler, and more humane, as relished by the proponents of the reforms, are being listened to by both low-income workers, small business owners, professionals, and informal sector participants.

Why Nigeria's New Tax Regime Will Fail Without Public Trust

Tax

Still, behind the optimism is a familiar worry shaped by past experience that reminds us that taxation without accountability undermines both governance credibility and the legitimacy of the tax system, thereby making it hard to believe in.

For many Nigerians, the question is not whether taxes should be paid, but whether the state has earned the moral authority to demand them, judging by the lack of accountability over the years.

The Nigerian Tax Act and the Nigerian Tax Administration Act, two of the four pillars of the 2026 reforms, came into force on January 1, reshaping how individuals and businesses are taxed. According to proponents of the reforms, particularly the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Dr. Taiwo Oyedele, the changes are deliberately pro-poor and pro-growth. Workers earning below N800,000 annually are exempted from personal income tax. Basic food items, healthcare, education, and public transportation have been removed from the VAT net. Small companies with turnovers of N100 million or less are exempt from corporate income tax, capital gains tax, and the new development levy. Multiple tax laws have been consolidated into a unified code to reduce duplication, confusion, and harassment.

On paper, these reforms acknowledge Nigeria’s economic distress and signal a genuine attempt to lighten the burden on the majority of citizens. However, Nigeria’s tax crisis has never been about tax rates alone.

Nigerians have lived through decades of taxation that did not translate into visible development, social welfare, or improved quality of life, as this has succinctly shown that it is fundamentally about trust. No matter how progressive, for this singular reason, Nigerians see the announcement of the reforms via a long memory of disappointment and failure, while Nigerians have increasingly become vocal in demanding accountability from government at all levels, and social media has played a powerful role in amplifying public scrutiny in recent years.

Images and videos of the alleged lavish lifestyles of public office holders and their families are alarming and circulate widely, reinforcing the perception that public funds are misused or siphoned for private gain. While not all such claims are verified, the damage lies in the perception itself since governance credibility suffers when citizens believe that those entrusted with public resources live far above the realities of the people they govern.

The Nigerian Constitution, while not explicitly mandating accountability in narrow terms, establishes in Section 14 that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government. The state is expected to manage the economy in a manner that ensures maximum welfare, freedom, and happiness of citizens on the basis of social justice and equality. The provisions made in Section 22 further empower the media and arm it to the teeth to hold the government accountable to the people and beyond constitutional provisions, Nigeria voluntarily signed up to global transparency initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, domesticated through the NEITI Act of 2007. Over the period, NEITI has helped improve disclosure in the extractive sector, as its mandate does not extend to tracking how revenues are spent, leaving a critical accountability gap.

This gap is most evident in the lived experience of Nigerian taxpayers. Intrinsically, the average Nigerian does not experience taxation as a collective investment in shared prosperity. Instead, taxation feels like an added burden layered on top of already crushing personal responsibilities. Nigerians generate their own electricity through generators, source water privately, pay for security, indirectly fund road maintenance through vehicle repairs, and bear healthcare and education costs out of pocket. When citizens pay taxes and still bear the full cost of survival, taxation begins to resemble organized extraction rather than civic contribution.

For instance, the stories of Mr. George and Mr. Kunle reflect this reality. Mr. George, is an earned salary worker who has personal income tax deducted monthly through PAYE. Meanwhile, George also pays for electricity, security, water, road repairs, and private schooling. What about Mr. Kunle, who is a small business owner and chooses not to pay taxes voluntarily with the belief that the government has failed to meet its obligations and other rights? Their frustration is widely shared. According to the IMF, only about 10 million Nigerians out of a labour force of 77 million are registered taxpayers. This low compliance is not a product of ignorance alone, but of a deeply broken social contract.

Over the years, successive governments have attempted to address low compliance through amnesty schemes such as the Voluntary Asset and Income Declaration Scheme. Though these initiatives temporarily expanded the tax base, their long-term impact remains questionable because compliance driven by fear of penalties or temporary incentives does not endure where trust is absent. In Nigeria, tax compliance is often compelled rather than voluntary, just as we are about to experience in this new regime, enforcement tends to replace persuasion. This approach may generate short-term revenue, but it weakens legitimacy and fuels resistance.

Academic studies on taxation and accountability in Nigeria reinforce this conclusion. While global literature suggests a strong relationship between government accountability and voluntary tax compliance, Nigeria’s experience has been distorted by weak institutions and limited political legitimacy. This should be noted by the policymakers that where citizens perceive government as unaccountable, coercion increases, collection costs rise, and evasion becomes normalized. Hence while, the result is a vicious cycle in which low trust breeds low compliance, prompting harsher enforcement that further erodes trust.

Other jurisdictions offer valuable lessons. For instance, today, a country like Sweden has one of the highest tax-to-GDP ratios in the world with remarkably high compliance rates, and this has been the norm despite imposing steep personal income taxes. The reason is simple, in the sense that transparency and visible benefits are not far-fetched. Citizens know how their taxes are spent and experience the returns through quality education, healthcare, social security, and public services. Taxation is viewed not as punishment but as a shared investment. In China, targeted tax deductions for healthcare and education similarly align taxation with social needs, reinforcing compliance through perceived fairness.

Nigeria’s challenge is not to replicate these systems mechanically, but to internalize their core principle that enables the people to comply willingly when they believe the system works and that everyone is treated fairly.

This principle is being tested anew by the recent controversy surrounding the Federal Inland Revenue Service’s (now branded as Nigeria Revenue Service) appointment of Xpress Payments Solutions Limited as a Treasury Single Account collecting agent. Though framed as a technical step toward modernizing digital tax infrastructure, the quiet nature of the appointment, coupled with limited public disclosure, has reignited fears of revenue capture and cartelization. Critics have drawn parallels with past private-sector dominance over state revenue systems, warning against concentrating sensitive national revenue functions in private hands without clear safeguards.

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s reaction captured the broader public unease. He raised an alarm while warning against what he described as the nationalization of a revenue collection model that had previously raised serious transparency concerns and the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) has insisted that Xpress Payments is merely an additional option and not an exclusive gatekeeper, the controversy highlights a deeper issue, which authenticates the fact that in a climate of low trust, silence, and lack of clarity, suspicion. Even well-intentioned reforms can falter if citizens feel excluded from the process.

With broader concerns about governance, accountability, and democratic integrity in society, this moment coincides with it. Even the recent calls by leaders such as Rotimi Amaechi and civil society organizations like ActionAid Nigeria underscore the growing demand for responsible, transparent and people-oriented leadership as being raised from different quarters. Governance indices consistently rank Nigeria poorly on accountability, while poverty, unemployment and insecurity remain widespread. That is what, in such a context, asking citizens to trust the tax system without first restoring confidence in governance is unrealistic and unattainable.

At the core of the debate lies a fundamental moral question: when does a government have the right to tax its citizens? Taxation is not charity and it is not magic. It is a contract. Citizens surrender a portion of their income so the state can provide security, infrastructure, justice, and essential services that individuals cannot efficiently provide on their own. When this exchange functions, taxation feels legitimate. When it fails, taxation feels coercive.

No doubt, legally, the Nigerian state retains the power to tax, but morally, legitimacy depends on performance. Security is foundational. Infrastructure enables productivity. The government must understand that healthcare and education protect human capital, while transparency ensures fairness. And, when these pillars are weak, taxation loses its ethical grounding. All that Nigerians demand is not perfection; they demand evidence that their sacrifices matter.

As the implementation of the new tax reforms takes root, Nigeria stands at a defining moment. The reforms offer an opportunity to reset the social contract around taxation, broaden the tax base, and reduce dependence on dwindling oil revenues. But the point being flagged is that reform without accountability will only reproduce old failures in new forms. To buttress this further, taxation without accountability, as being practiced in the past, will invariably undermine governance credibility and erode the legitimacy of the tax system.

And, as the scripture says, you cannot put “old wine in a new wineskin.” Failure to adhere to this instruction will lead to combustion. Yesterday’s methods or mindsets on taxation will rupture new strategies, which cannot thrive or survive because of a lack of accountability.

If the government is serious about improving voluntary compliance, it must go beyond policy announcements. Hence, must demonstrate transparent use of tax revenues, strengthen oversight institutions, limit monopolistic control over revenue collection, and communicate clearly and consistently with citizens. Most importantly, it must deliver tangible improvements in the daily lives of all Nigerians.

When citizens see roads fixed, hospitals working, schools improving, and security strengthened, compliance will follow. Voluntary tax compliance is not an act of generosity; it is a rational response to trust. Fix the system, restore confidence, and Nigerians will pay, not because they are forced, but because the contract finally makes sense.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Ministry of Finance Leads FG-Backed Deal to Deliver Quality Homes and Boost Agriculture in Niger State

Published

on

Doris Uzoka-Anite, Minister of State for Finance with Mohamed Umar Bago, Governor, Niger State during the signing of M.O.U for the Construction of Mass Housing Estate and Agricultural Settlements in Niger State between the Federal Government and Niger State, on Friday, in Abuja.
Kindly share this post

The Federal Ministry of Finance has anchored the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Niger State Government and the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) for the implementation of a Mass Housing and Agricultural Settlement Project in Niger State.

Speaking at the MoU signing ceremony, Dr. Doris Nkiruka Uzoka-Anite, the Honourable Minister of State for Finance, described the agreement as a landmark initiative that underscores the Federal Government’s commitment to cooperative federalism, inclusive economic growth, and strategic alignment in line with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda.

With the Federal Ministry of Finance serving as the anchor institution, the project benefits from strong policy coordination, financial credibility, and institutional oversight. The initiative is designed to integrate housing delivery with agricultural productivity, rural stability, and economic empowerment.

“Housing is a fundamental pillar of development. In Niger State, housing also intersects directly with agriculture, food security, and rural livelihoods. This project is therefore structured not merely as a housing intervention, but as a settlement framework for farmers aimed at strengthening agricultural value chains,” the Minister stated.

Niger State, one of Nigeria’s most agriculturally endowed states, continues to face challenges, including insecure settlements, rural-urban migration, and limited rural infrastructure. The project seeks to address these constraints by providing secure, well-planned housing settlements for farmers, strategically located to support agricultural production, storage, processing, and access to markets.

The Honourable Minister emphasized that anchoring farmers in stable communities with access to basic infrastructure will improve productivity, reduce post-harvest losses, enhance security, and encourage youth participation in agriculture, making farming more efficient, attractive, and profitable.

Sustainability and affordability are core pillars of the initiative, with integrated renewable energy solutions—including solar-powered homes and community facilities, designed to ensure reliable power, reduce energy costs, and support agro-processing and storage activities. The project also prioritises efficient land use, access roads, water infrastructure, and environmentally responsible building practices.

Reacting to the sustainability focus of the project, the Governor of Niger State, His Excellency Mohammed Umaru Bago, expressed strong optimism about its transformative impact on the state.

“When you say sustainability, affordability is very important. When I heard that a mini-grid has been deployed in Jos, it’s because it’s affordable. Diesel is not sustainable because it’s not affordable. For considering the factor of affordability in this project, we’re grateful,” the Governor said.

He further announced the state’s commitment to the project, adding, “So, Honourable Minister, Niger State is bringing forward 100,000 hectares of land for this project. I want to assure you that with this initiative, you have solved 80 percent of our problems.”

Drawing a direct link to the Federal Government’s development agenda, Governor Bago noted, “We’ve gone across the world and seen how people transit from poverty to prosperity. And I think the goal of the President, my father, is for us to transition our people out of poverty in the next four years, by the grace of God.”

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI), Dr. Armstrong Ume Takang (Ph.D.), who attended the ceremony alongside other critical stakeholders, including the building contractor, reaffirmed MOFI’s commitment to quality delivery and agricultural productivity.

Dr. Takang assured the Niger State Government of the contractor’s proven competence and credibility in delivering mass housing projects, stressing that affordability would not come at the expense of quality.

“We want affordable and decent houses. The fact that they are located in rural communities does not mean the quality should be compromised,” he said.

Beyond housing, Dr. Takang highlighted MOFI’s broader role in strengthening the agricultural component of the settlements through strategic partnerships.

“We have partners who will supply affordable fertilisers imported in large quantities. We will also work with other partners to ensure access to key agricultural inputs, not only fertilisers, but also pesticides, high-quality seeds, and elements of mechanisation,” he added.

The project adopts an innovative financing model that blends public assets with private investment, ensuring sustainability, transparency, and shared risk. Through this approach, the government focuses on policy direction and oversight while leveraging private sector efficiency and capital.

Beyond improving food security, the Mass Housing and Agricultural Settlement Project will stimulate broad-based economic activity and generate employment across construction, agriculture, Agro-processing, renewable energy, logistics, and community services. The initiative will support local industries such as cement, steel, transportation, and agro-allied enterprises, while strengthening rural economies and increasing Niger State’s internally generated revenue.

Affordability and inclusiveness remain central to the project’s design. The settlements are tailored to the income realities of farmers and low- to middle-income earners, supported by transparent allocation mechanisms and strong governance structures to ensure benefits reach the intended beneficiaries.

The MoU sends a clear signal to the investment community that Niger State, working in alignment with the Federal Ministry of Finance and MOFI, is open to credible, well-structured, and impact-driven investment. Developers, financial institutions, pension funds, real estate investors, and agribusiness operators are invited to view the project as a scalable and replicable model.

Reaffirming the Federal Ministry of Finance’s commitment, the Honourable Minister assured stakeholders of continued coordination, fiscal discipline, and policy support to ensure the project moves swiftly from signing to execution and delivery.

Commending the leadership of MOFI and the Executive Governor of Niger State, the Minister concluded that the initiative reflects a shared vision for integrated development.

“Through this partnership, we are not just building houses; we are creating stable farming communities, strengthening food security, and laying the foundation for sustained prosperity in Niger State,” she said.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending