News
Nigeria’s AGF Demands Share of Abacha’s $550m Loot- Lawyer

Godson Nnaka, the United States-based attorney involved in the controversy over the repatriation of $550 million Abacha loot, has absolved himself of responsibility in the delay of the funds being returned to Nigeria.
Mr. Nnaka was recruited in 2004 by the Nigerian government to recover funds stolen by late dictator Sani Abacha.
He had instituted a case in a U.S. district court seeking 40 per cent of the recovered loot. He also asked to be made the funds’ exclusive attorney.
He was kicked out of the fund recovery case after he had spent money and time to find and recover the funds.
He also alleged that Nigeria’s Attorney General, Abubakar Malami, jilted him after he turned down his demand to part with a kickback of as much as 70 per cent of his fee in order to access documentations needed for him to act on behalf of the country.
He also threatened to sue the minister for defamation if he did not desist from making false claims about him. He had given Mr Malami 48 hours to publish an apology in PREMIUM TIMES and or be prepared to be slammed with a defamation charge.
However, a statement by Mr. Malami on Monday explained that according to the U.S. law, when stolen funds are discovered, the U.S. Department of Justice would first approach a court for the forfeiture of the funds to the U.S. government.
If the court ruled in favour of the DOJ, the U.S. government, at the end of the process, would repatriate the money to the country from which the funds were stolen.
The AGF then claimed that Mr Nnaka’s suit demanding to be paid for representing Nigeria was the only thing standing in the way of the recovered loot being repatriated to the country.
Mr. Nnaka, in a statement released by his lawyer, Bennett Amadi, on Wednesday, replied that it was Mr Malami’s “corruption” and “greed” which was preventing the repatriation of the funds. He said all he was asking was to be paid for the services he rendered to Nigeria.
“Let it be noted that Nnaka is neither delaying the return of the Abacha loot to Nigeria nor attempting to extort anything from Nigeria. Rather, it is “corruption” and the selfishness and greed of Abubakar Malami that is centrally delaying the quick and safe return of the funds to Nigeria and to Nigerians. As it is commonsensical that every labourer is entitled to his wages, Nnaka is only asking to be paid for his services that he responsibly rendered and benefitted Nigeria with, and the cost and expenses incurred over several years pursuant to his agreement with the Federal Republic of Nigeria regarding the aforesaid loots.”
The statement claimed that since 2013, Mr. Nnaka had reached out to the Nigeria government on several occasions to ensure the funds are speedily returned to the country but he has repeatedly confronted a stonewall.
“However, it is the selfish, rapacity, bad faith, corruption and arrogance of the Nigerian Government officials, Abubakar Malami inclusive, that has forced Nnaka to recently approach the court in the United States to obtain justice. To be precise, when in April 2014, Nnaka and his team filed for the intervention and claim on behalf of Nigeria seeking for the prompt and safe repatriation of the loots to Nigeria to brief the then Attorney-general, Mr Adoke, and other government officials.
But for their deliberate inaction and corruption, the issue would have since been resolved. Following the election of President Muhammadu Buhari in May of 2015, Nnaka, in August of 2015 wrote to President Buhari seeking his intervention to ensure the prompt resolution of this matter. Nnaka also sought the assistance of well-placed Nigerians and even Senators to ensure the return of these Abacha loots back to Nigeria. All his efforts met brick-walls.”
The statement added that Mr. Nnaka’s representatives wrote to Mr. Malami on two occasions – November 17, 2015 and in February 2016 – asking him for an amicable settlement to his claim. He said Mr. Malami fixed a meeting with his representatives in Washington DC in April 2016, but when it became obvious that he was not going to dance to the AGF’s alleged demand for kickback, Mr. Malami cancelled the meeting and appointed a new lawyer for the case.
“Mr. Malami handed over the matter to a new lawyer who knew nothing about the case, for obvious selfish reasons. Faced with such arrogance, greed and selfishness, Nnaka perfected his appeal and petitioned the court for justice. So where in the world is Nnaka responsible for the delay in the return of the loots? Why can’t Nigerians be told the truth? What exactly does Mr Abubakar Malami intend to achieve in his present name-calling and image laundering antics? Does it bother him at all that Nigerian are wiser and more intelligent than he believes or thinks that they are?,” he asked.
“If Mr. Malami is sincere about the immediate and safe return of the present loots to Nigeria and to Nigerians, he knows exactly what to do instead of jumping from one newspaper house to another, Attorney General Malami and/or his attorneys for Nigeria are welcome to contact this office so that we may reasonably exchange ideas for the quick and immediate resolution of the issue in this matter and for quick return of these funds to Nigeria and Nigerians.
Mr. Malami and his lawyers know the telephone numbers and emails of this office. As always, our office is open to Mr. Malami and his lawyers for the sincere discussion and resolution of this matter. The present situation in Nigeria earnestly affirms that this matter should be sensibly looked into and resolved now so that these looted funds should go back to Nigeria without any further delay, and Nigeria can expand efforts to recover additional ones estimated at $20 billion in the next eighteen months.
“If the government of Nigeria fails to take advantage of this window, then Mr. Abubakar Malami should stop deceiving Nigerians with self-serving propaganda and tired image laundering antics, shut up and allow the United States Court to speak on this matter and render justice as it deems fit and proper. The matter is currently in court. Attorney General Malami should understand that civil litigation is not conducted on the pages of newspapers,” he added.
News
ValueJet Expands Fleet with Boeing Aircraft, Targets Wider African Network

ValueJet is set to expand its fleet with the introduction of Boeing aircraft. The airline in a statement said that the introduction of Boeing aircraft was part of its effort at increasing capacity, strengthen its regional operations and position the airline for wider connectivity across Africa.

The acquisition of Boeing aircraft is coming after its successful operations with the Bombardier CRJ aircraft, which have supported its domestic and regional expansion since it commenced commercial operations.
Omololu Majekodunmi, Managing Director of ValueJet, said the move would enable it to accommodate more passengers and cargo, operate longer routes and respond to the growing demand for air travel within Nigeria and across the African continent.
Majekodunmi, also said that the fleet expansion was a defining moment in the company’s journey, noting that the introduction of the Boeing aircraft would open a new chapter for the carrier.
According to him, ValueJet has remained focused on building a safe, reliable and customer-oriented airline since its entry into the market, adding that the transition to Boeing aircraft was being supported by investments in manpower development and technical capacity.
He said: “The arrival of Boeing aircraft into our fleet represents an exciting new chapter for ValueJet. Since commencing operations with our CRJ aircraft, we have remained focused on building a safe, reliable, and customer-centric airline.
“As we prepare to induct the Boeing aircraft, we are also investing in our people by ensuring our engineers receive world-class training that will enable us to maintain the highest standards of safety, reliability, and operational excellence. This investment positions us for the next phase of our growth and reinforces our commitment to delivering an exceptional travel experience.”
According to Majekodunmi, as part of preparations for the fleet upgrade, ValueJet’s aircraft maintenance engineers are already undergoing intensive technical training on Boeing aircraft in Lagos.
The training, delivered by Boeing through its partnership with Nigeria’s Federal Ministry of Aviation and Aerospace Development, focuses on the Boeing 737 Next Generation (737NG), covering aircraft systems, maintenance procedures, safety standards and operational best practices.
The airline said the training would equip its engineers with the required expertise to maintain the new aircraft type in line with global aviation standards, including European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) requirements.
Also speaking, Adekunle Soname, Chairman of ValueJet, said the introduction of Boeing aircraft was not just a fleet expansion programme, but a strategic investment aimed at supporting the airline’s long-term growth ambitions.
With the planned arrival of the Boeing aircraft, ValueJet is targeting expansion into more African destinations, including Abidjan in Côte d’Ivoire, Libreville in Gabon, Douala in Cameroon, as well as cities in Kenya and South Africa.
The airline said the new routes would form part of its strategy to strengthen intra-African connectivity and provide passengers with more travel options.
News
Court Orders Final Forfeiture of 48 Properties Linked to Former AGF Abubakar Malami

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, July 15, ordered the final forfeiture of 48 properties linked to the immediate past Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, who is facing money laundering charges.

Abubakar Malami
The court, in a judgment delivered by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, held that the properties, allegedly acquired with proceeds of crime, should be permanently seized by the federal government.
It held that Malami, who served as Justice Minister from November 11, 2015, to May 29, 2023, under former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, failed to rebut the reasonable suspicion that the properties were acquired through unlawful activities. The court dismissed contentions that some of the affected properties belonged to the larger Malami family in Kebbi State. According to the court, the legal issue was not “who owns the property, but how legitimate were the funds used to acquire them”.
Justice Abdulmalik held that Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act empowered the court to order the final forfeiture of illicitly acquired assets to the government. The judgment followed an application filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Although the anti-graft agency sought the forfeiture of 57 choice properties it said were traced to the former minister, the court held that there was credible evidence establishing the genuine ownership of nine of the listed properties. The EFCC and Malami had adopted their final written addresses in the matter on May 26.
It will be recalled that the anti-graft agency had earlier secured an interim forfeiture order for the assets, valued at over N212 billion. According to the anti-graft agency, the properties, spread across three states (Kebbi, Kano, and Kaduna) as well as the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja—were believed to have been acquired with proceeds of crime. In an ex parte motion brought before the court, the agency said the interim order was needed as a precursor to the final forfeiture of the properties to the federal government.
Malami is currently facing a 16-count money laundering charge. He was arraigned before the court alongside his son, Abdulaziz, and one of his wives, Hajia Bashir Asabe. The defendants were alleged to have laundered public funds totalling about N9 billion.
According to the EFCC, the former Justice Minister, in a bid to hide his proceeds of crime, resorted to acquiring choice properties in various cities and states. Having granted the interim forfeiture order, the court directed the agency to publish, within 14 days, a notice inviting anyone with an interest in any of the properties to appear before it and show cause why they should not be forfeited to the government.
Dissatisfied with the EFCC’s application, Malami’s legal team approached the court to have it set aside, insisting the properties were legitimately acquired. He told the court that the properties were appropriately listed in various asset declaration forms he filed with the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), insisting the EFCC had failed to adduce any prima facie evidence that they were acquired through proceeds of crime.
Accusing the EFCC of suppressing material facts, Malami maintained that the agency moved against him over properties that “were lawfully acquired post-appointment of the respondent/applicant and declared with the Code of Conduct Bureau as legitimate assets of the respondent/applicant, in compliance with the 5th Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, in 2019 and 2023”.
He argued that the interim forfeiture order was obtained through “manifest exaggeration, malicious inflation of the value of the assets, and unreasonable and incompetent valuation deliberately manipulated to mislead the court, negatively affecting its discretion in granting an order based on manipulated facts and conclusions deliberately cooked up by the applicant/respondent (EFCC)”.
While adopting his final brief of argument, counsel to the EFCC prayed the court to grant the final forfeiture order, relying on a 47-paragraph affidavit and 46 exhibits filed in support of the motion. The EFCC counsel argued that Malami had failed to satisfactorily explain the legitimate sources of the assets and urged the court to order their permanent forfeiture.
In response, the counsel representing the former AGF urged the court to dismiss the application and set aside the interim forfeiture order earlier granted. The defense counsel relied on a counter-affidavit deposed to by Malami to argue that the EFCC’s case was founded on suspicion rather than credible evidence.
The court-ordered list of confiscated properties includes:
A luxury duplex at Amazon Street within Cadastral Zone A06, Maitama, purchased in December 2022 at N500,000,000.00 (value after enhancement, N5,950,000,000).
A two-wing, large storey building situated at No. 3, Onitsha Crescent, Area 11, Garki, Cadastral Zone A03, Abuja (formerly Harmonia Hotels Limited), FCT, purchased in December 2018 at N7,000,000,000.00.
Plot 683, Jabi District, Cadastral Zone B04, comprising a five-storey building (now Luxurious Meethaq Hotels Ltd, Jabi, with 53 rooms/suites), purchased in September 2020 at carcass level at N850,000,000.00, with an additional N300,000,000 to take possession (value after completion, N8,400,000,000).
Property No. 3130, within Cadastral Zone A04, Asokoro District, FCT, Abuja, comprising terraces, purchased in January 2021 at N360,000,000.00.
Property No. 3, Rhine Street, Maitama, Abuja (Meethaq Hotels Ltd, Maitama, with 15 rooms), purchased in February 2018 at N430,000,000.00 (current value after rehabilitation, N12,950,000,000).
Plot No. 1241B, Asokoro District Zone (No. 11A Yakubu Gowon Crescent), Asokoro District, purchased in July 2021 at N325,000,000.00.
Shop No. C82, Citiscape — Shariff Plaza, Plot 739, Cadastral Zone A07, Aminu Kano Crescent, Wuse II, FCT, Abuja, purchased in March 2024 at N120,000,000.00.
No. 4, Ahmadu Bello Way, Nasarawa GRA, Kano, purchased in December 2022 at N300,000,000.00.
Plot 157, Lamido Crescent, Nasarawa GRA, Kano, purchased in July 2019.
A plaza, commercial toilets, laundry facility, and warehouse tanks adjacent to Birnin Kebbi Market, purchased in 2021 at N100,000,000.00.
100 hectares of land along Birnin Kebbi–Jega Road, purchased in 2020 at N100,000,000.00.
A four-bedroom bungalow, Gesse Phase, Birnin Kebbi, purchased in 2023 at N101,000,000.00.
Shops Nos. A36 and B3, Vegas Mall, Wuse 2, Abuja, purchased in July 2023 at N158,000,000.00.
No. 26, Babbi Drive, BUA Estate, Abuja, purchased in 2022 at N136,000,000.00.
No. 27, Efab Estates Avenue, 59th Crescent, Gwarimpa, Abuja, purchased in January 2016 at N120,000,000.00.
A four-bedroom house with two-room boys’ quarters at No. 10B, Doka Crescent, Abakpa GRA, Kaduna, purchased in January 2018 at N40,000,000.00.
Plot No. 13, Ipent 7 Estate, Karsana District, Abuja, purchased in June 2018 at N85,000,000.00.
A four-bedroom duplex with boys’ quarters at No. 12, Yalinga Street, off Adetokunbo Ademola Crescent, Wuse II, Abuja, purchased in October 2018 at N150,000,000.00.
Two warehouse shops, B40 and B46, Wuse Market, Abuja, purchased in July 2020 at N50,000,000.00.
Twin houses at Zone E, Apo Legislative Quarters, Cadastral Zone B01, Plot 14014, Gudu District, Abuja, purchased between February and May 2017 at N250,000,000.00.
Properties acquired by the Khadimiyya for Justice & Development Initiative at Academic Garden City, Birnin Kebbi, sold by the Federal Housing Authority Mortgage.
Nine units of three-bedroom bungalows, three units of two-bedroom bungalows, and 5.4 hectares of land, purchased between February and September 2023 at N187 million.
News
Court Grants Former CCT Chairman Danladi Umar N100m Bail Over EFCC Charges

A Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court sitting in Maitama has granted bail to former Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), Mr Danladi Umar, in the sum of N100 million with one surety in like sum.

Danladi Umar
Justice Peter Kekemeke granted the bail on Wednesday following Umar’s arraignment by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on a four-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office and conferring undue advantage on himself while serving as Chairman of the CCT and Chairman of the CCT Tender Board.
Umar was arraigned by the EFCC on July 9.
During Wednesday’s proceedings, counsel to the defendant, Mr Sunday Edward, urged the court to admit his client to bail pending the determination of the case, citing relevant provisions of the 1999 Constitution and the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).
Edward argued that the defendant was entitled to bail as guaranteed under the law.
However, EFCC counsel, Mr Christopher Mshelia, opposed the bail application, urging the court to deny bail and order an accelerated hearing of the matter.
In his ruling, Justice Kekemeke held that bail could not be denied based on mere suspicion that an accused person might commit another offence if released.
The judge said bail could only be refused on established grounds, including the likelihood of the defendant evading trial or interfering with witnesses.
Justice Kekemeke noted that Umar was no longer in a position to intimidate witnesses, adding that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence showing that he would abscond or interfere with the trial process.
He held that it would be wrong for the court to deny bail based on an unsubstantiated belief.
Consequently, the judge admitted Umar to bail in the sum of N100 million with one surety in like sum.
The court directed that the surety must own a property within the jurisdiction of the court.
The matter was adjourned until Oct. 29 for trial.
Umar served as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal from 2011 until 2024, when he was removed from office by President Bola Tinubu following recommendations by the National Judicial Council.
Telecom3 days agoMTN Nigeria Slashes Cost of Broadband Internet Router, Unwraps New Data Bundles for Low-Budget Users
E-Financial3 days agoNigerians Accumulate $59Bn in Cryptocurrency Assets —FDC
E-Financial3 days agoFlutterwave Partners Xoom on Transfers into Nigeria
General News3 days agoNearpays, Nigerian Fintech Becomes First African Startup to Win UN’s AI for Good Innovation Factory
News3 days agoDataPro Upgrades Dangote Cement’s Credit Rating to AA+
Telecom3 days agoNokia’s 14 Years of Mobile-Phone Supremacy Ended in an Afternoon
E-Business3 days agoTinubu Orders NIMC to Enrol Every Nigerian by End of this Year – DG
General News3 days agoFintech Brands Should Communicate Right in a VUCA Economy













