Connect with us

News

N1.17Bn Fine Tears Telecom Industry Apart

Published

on

(L-r): Segun Ashaye, director, Wale Thomas, managing director, Ms. Funmi Somade, general mamanger, Online and Tobi Asehinde, Web consultant, all of Revive Technologies Limited during the Company's online retail mart flag off on Monday
Kindly share this post

The recent N1.17 billion sledge hammer on the four major mobile operators in the country for allegedly failing in their key performance indicators has thrown up a varied assortment of issues ranging from the mundane to the call by hitherto unknown group for the probe of subsidy regime in the industry, Nigeria CommunicationsWeek can now report.

As the opinion on the fines swung left and right, the Nigeria Communications Commission (NCC), at the weekend descended harder on the operators with additional N2.5 million daily fines each on the telcos for their continued failure to pay up their earlier sanctions.

NCC said it was going ahead with the sanction and the additional daily fines for default on the operators after the telcos failed to put up convincing case for their inabilities to provide quality of service to Nigerians.

But in a twist, Telecommunications Customers Association (TeCA), a hitherto unheard of group, has called on the national assembly to probe subsidies in the telecom sector.

Elsewhere, the National Association of Telecommunications Subscribers of Nigeria (Natcomms), an organized consumer advocacy group, said that the fines should be paid to subscribers as they are the ones suffering from the poor quality of service.

In its reaction, Nigeria Internet Group (NIG) said the fine is a waste of time as the money imposed as sanctions could be realized by operators in a matter of minutes.

Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (Alton), the body responsible for all telecommunications companies and those providing subsidiary services to telecommunications service providers in Nigeria, said that the NCC’s sanction came as a surprise to it.

Alton, said that the regulator was yet to address various challenges militating against the progress of the sector.

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that the matter came to a head after the NCC fined the four mobile operators N1.17 billion for poor quality of service.

MTN Nigeria and Etisalat were fined N360 million each while Airtel Nigeria and Glo Mobile were asked to pay N270 million and N180 million respectively.

As the NCC stuck to their guns, the operators pleaded for understanding but after a meeting failed to find a way out between them, the apex regulatory body invoked additional N2.5 million daily fines for default on the telcos.

NCC also said that it may withhold regulatory services to the affected operators including issuance of new numbers or entertaining any requests from them.

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that the skirmish between the regulator and the operators is drawing commentaries from different quarters.

Kennet Obinwa and Rasheed Umar, president and secretary respectively of TeCA last week took paid advertorials in major newspapers titled: ‘Pay Customers, Not NCC’ petitioned the NCC to direct GSM companies to refund customers their money within the next five days at the end of which it will approach the courts for the enforcement of its rights.

The group asked “what has NCC lost that it should demand our money should be paid to it? Does NCC have a way of giving us the money or do they want to pay it into Nigeria’s coffers for politicians to steal? NCC is one of the richest government agencies in Nigeria. NCC collects annual operating levy from all telecommunications service providers and this runs into billions every year; what are they doing with it apart from paying themselves fat salaries and allowances?,”

Also, Bayo Banjo, president of Nigeria Internet Group (NIG) said the fine is a waste of time as the money imposed as sanctions could be realized by operators in a matter of minutes.

 “If NCC must impose fines, it must be vested with similar powers as the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to punish any erring operator. The NCC should allow the operators keep the money and invest it in stolen generators and other infrastructure to improve quality of service.”

Deolu Okubanjo, national president, National Association of Telecommunications Subscribers (Natcomms), told Nigeria CommunicationsWeek that the fines should be paid to subscribers as they are the ones suffering from the poor quality of service and sees no reason operators should pay the fines to NCC.

“We held a national meeting and concluded that subscribers should be compensated. Operators should compensate subscribers and not government as the NCC represents the government because we are being shortchanged,” said Okubanjo who is widely known in the telecom sector.

Okubanjo however called on mobile operators’ umbrella body, the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria to sort out the issues with NCC to avoid escalation.

But Alton said that the NCC’s sanction came as a surprise to it, stressing that the regulator was yet to address various challenges mitigating against the progress of the sector.

Gbenga Adebayo, chairman of the group, bemoaned the situation, adding that the basis for the fine did not reflect the problems the sector was facing. He stated that the commission acted against the fact.

The NCC had set up the following KPIs for the operators to meet, 98 per cent Call Setup Success Rate (CSSR), two per cent Call Drop Rate (CDR), 98 per cent HoSR, One per cent Standalone Dedicated Control Channel (SDCCH), 96 per cent Call Completion Rate (CCR) and two per cent Traffic Congestion ratings (TCH CoNG), but according to the regulator, none of the operators met its target within the period of March and April under review.

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that the affected operators, times without number, had identified poor infrastructure, poor power supply, vandalism and capacity crunch, among others, as being responsible for their poor service delivery in the country.

NCC on its part said these challenges are not new to the Commission adding the issue of Quality of Service (QoS) has been in discussion for six years until finally January this year the QoS guidelines were gazetted; and then there was need for the Commission to apply sanctions to the service providers that did not meet the key performance indicators.

The commission was invoking the provisions in the laws establishing it which requires operators to meet with the minimum standard of quality of service including the key performance indicators, (KPIs) set for them.

On the suggestions that the fines be paid to the subscribers, Tony Ojobo, public affairs director at NCC said that paying to the subscribers “are not only trite but will not serve as deterrent. Our rough calculations showed that sharing the N1.17 billion to 99 million active subscribers in the network, would amount to an average of no more than N10 per subscriber.”

He said that “this suggestion is tantamount to supporting the operators to continue to provide poor quality of service as it would be easier for operators to credit subscribers with this amount than pay penalties for poor services rendered.

Ojobo reasoned that acceding to the TeCA’s demands was capable of derailing the regulatory processes set in place by the commission to achieve acceptable quality of service in the networks within the foreseeable future.

The NCC spokesman said that that prior to the vexatious penalty, the telcos had promised improved services to customer by March 2012 but that did not materialize.

“There was a meeting between the service providers and the Commission where they had made commitments that by March this year we were going to see noticeable improvements in the Quality of service offered; but of course as at March we still didn’t see any noticeable improvement rather we observed very, very, very poor Quality of service on all the networks,” he stated.

 

Emeka Oparah, vice president, corporate communications at Airtel Nigeria had stated a forthnight ago in a facebook posting that the regulator ought to pay annual subvention to the telcos rather than fine them considering the hazards they undertake in providing service to Nigeria.

 

“I think its time the operators took off the gloves and engage both NCC and NASS (National Assembly – Nigerian parliament). Let’s talk about QoS. Has anybody asked what’s responsible for the poor QoS? Is it unwillingness by the operators, who actually stand to gain when the network is good? Or some people are shirking their responsibilities and only playing to the gallery? Let’s take Abuja for example: there (is) a law which prevents operators from building base stations in the FCT and so since 2005 operators haven’t gotten approval to build new sites. How can QoS be improved? And both NASS and NCC are based in Abuja!!! At NASS in Asokoro, (Abuja suburb) coverage is atrocious…has anybody asked why? Operators cannot install inbuilding solutions there for ‘security reasons.’ Operators pay NCC 2.5 per cent of their annual revenue as operationg levy fee…what has NCC done with the over $2 Billion it has collected in the past 11 years,” wrote Oparah.


Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

News

The Nigeria Prize for Science & Innovation Records New Height as 2026 Edition Attracts 237 Entries

Published

on

(2nd Left) GM, External Relations and Sustainable Development, NLNG, Sophia Horsfall, presenting entries for The Nigeria Prize for Science and Innovation to the Chairman of the Prize’s Advisory Board, Prof. Barth Nnaji, at a press conference held in Lagos on Thursday.
Kindly share this post

For the first time since it was established in 2004, the 2026 edition of The Nigeria Prize for Science and Innovation has recorded an historic milestone, attracting a record-breaking 237 entries.

The submissions were formally handed over to the Prize’s Advisory Board at a press conference in Lagos on Thursday, marking the start of the adjudication process.

The handover marks the beginning of the search for Nigeria’s most innovative scientific mind, under the theme “Innovations in ICT, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Digital Technologies for Development.” The theme was a deliberate retention from the 2025 edition, which concluded without a winner after no entry met the required standard for selection.

Speaking at the press conference, Sophia Horsfall, NLNG’s General Manager, External Relations and Sustainable Development, said the continued focus on digital technologies reflects both global trends and Nigeria’s development priorities. She noted that the Prize remains a platform for identifying solutions with real-world relevance.

“In this fourth revolution, digital infrastructure is as foundational to our survival as electricity or water. For Nigeria, our economic sustainability depends on our ability to move beyond promising research and into undeniable innovation that delivers,” she said.

She added that global recognition for Nigerian innovation must be earned through stringent standards. “We believe that if a Nigerian discovery is to command global respect, it must withstand the highest levels of scrutiny. It is this conviction that guided the difficult decision seven months ago”.

While acknowledging the level of interest the theme continues to attract, Horsfall maintained that expectations remain uncompromising, noting that only solutions demonstrating real impact and scalability will be considered. She added that the decision not to award a winner in 2025 reflects this commitment and sets the benchmark for the current adjudication process.

Receiving the entries, Chairman of the Advisory Board, Barth Nnaji, described the handover as a decisive stage in the Prize’s selection process, emphasising that its credibility is anchored on strict standards of excellence. He reaffirmed that the Prize remains focused on identifying innovations that translate scientific insight into tangible socio-economic outcomes.

“Our refusal to award the prize in 2025 was not a dismissal of the hard work of Nigerian innovators; rather, it reinforces that The Nigeria Prize for Science and Innovation holds a gold standard of excellence,” he stated.

He further clarified that the outcome of the 2025 edition, in which no winner was declared, should be viewed within the context of the Prize’s rigorous evaluation framework, which demands novelty, depth, relevance, and demonstrable impact. He emphasized that all entries will continue to be subjected to the same high level of intellectual and technical scrutiny.

Professor Nnaji added that the Prize seeks solutions that directly address Nigeria’s real-world challenges. “Our broader objective is to identify work that brings tangible impact to the challenges Nigeria faces, whether through digital health technologies that serve rural populations or the use of AI in preserving our cultural heritage and languages.”

Other members of the Board are Chief Dr. Nike Akande, a two-time former Minister of Industry, and Professor Baba Yusuf Abubakar, a professor of quantitative genetics and animal breeding.

The Nigeria Prize for Science and Innovation, now in its 22nd year, is valued at $100,000 and remains arguably Africa’s most prestigious science award. The winning entry for the 2026 edition will be unveiled at a world press conference scheduled for September.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

FG, World Bank Launch $65m SPESSE Funding for 24,000 Nigerians

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal government, in partnership with the World Bank, has launched a fresh $65 million funding phase of the Sustainable Procurement, Environmental and Social Standards Enhancement (SPESSE) project aimed at benefiting more than 24,000 Nigerians through professional training and institutional capacity development.

FG, World Bank Launch $65m SPESSE Funding for 24,000 Nigerians

The initiative, coordinated by the National Universities Commission (NUC), is designed to strengthen procurement systems, environmental management and social standards across public and private institutions, while promoting transparency, accountability and sustainable development practices nationwide.

Abdullahi Ribadu, executive secretary of the Commission, disclosed this in Abuja during the signing of performance contracts for the additional SPESSE financing. He explained that the intervention builds on the gains of the initial $80 million SPESSE project, which became effective in 2021.

According to Ribadu, the programme has significantly improved institutional frameworks and developed professional expertise in key governance sectors. He noted that the initiative was introduced to address the shortage of qualified professionals in procurement, environmental management and social standards within both public and private institutions.

He said: “With the support of the World Bank and under the coordination of the NUC, six centres of excellence were established across the six geopolitical zones to provide sustainable capacity building in these critical sectors”.

Ribadu stated that the participating universities were selected through a transparent and competitive process based on institutional readiness, quality assurance and sustainability.

He added that the institutions have continued to produce skilled manpower capable of advancing transparency, environmental responsibility and inclusive national development.

He described the contract signing ceremony as a renewed commitment to accountability, sustainability and institutional excellence, noting that the centres have recorded major achievements, including the introduction of specialised academic programmes ranging from short courses to undergraduate and postgraduate degrees.

The NUC boss further disclosed that three of the six centres have already commenced PhD programmes, while the remaining centres are expected to begin by July 2026.

He added that under the new funding phase, the Commission targets at least 60 PhD graduates, enrolment of 60 foreign students, staff internships and expanded student exchange programmes with international institutions.

Also speaking, Adebowale Adedokun, director-general, Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), said the project has so far trained more than 2,700 officers from both the public and private sectors to improve procurement competence nationwide.

He said the next phase would support the rollout of Nigeria’s electronic procurement system and expand online capacity-building programmes for policymakers and small and medium-scale enterprises involved in managing public funds.

On his part,  Ishtiak Siddique, World Bank Task Team Leader for SPESSE, revealed that more than 40,000 participants had benefited from training under the original project, with over 4,000 certified in procurement, environmental and social standards.

Siddique said the additional funding would focus on strengthening the capacity of federal, state and local government agencies to improve development outcomes and service delivery, stressing that sustainability remained central to ensuring continuity beyond donor support.

For her part, Prof. Folasade Ogunsola, Vice-Chancellor, University of Lagos,  reaffirmed the institution’s commitment to advancing professional capacity development under the SPESSE framework through postgraduate training, institutional ownership and international collaborations.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Kaspersky Challenges IT Leaders with Next-generation Cyber Protection Simulations

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Kaspersky has expanded its Kaspersky Interactive Protection Simulation (KIPS) with new advanced cyberattack scenarios tailored specifically for IT organisations.

The update introduces realistic simulations of deepfake-enabled fraud, supply chain compromise, trusted relationship attacks and destructive wiper malware, helping businesses test their preparedness against today’s complex threat landscape.

IT companies remain one of the most attractive targets for cybercriminals. As attackers increasingly combine social engineering, supply chain manipulation and ransomware tactics, organisations require hands-on, strategic training that reflects real-world attack dynamics.

Kaspersky Interactive Protection Simulation is designed to bridge the communication gap between CISOs, IT teams and top management. By immersing participants in realistic cyber crisis scenarios, KIPS demonstrates the operational and business impact of attacks in an accessible, engaging format.

Real-world attacks in a realistic simulation environment

The updated IT-focused scenario in KIPS exposes participants to modern attack techniques observed by Kaspersky experts in active malicious campaigns targeting the IT sector.

Participants may face:

Binary Backdoor in the Build – a supply chain attack that compromises software during signing, packaging or distribution stages. Once deployed, the tampered product enables data theft, persistent remote access and the compromise of trusted customers downstream.

DeepFake Boss – a social engineering campaign leveraging AI-generated video and voice impersonations of corporate executives to manipulate finance teams into initiating unauthorised payments.

Trusted Relationship Attack (VPN) – exploitation of third-party access and remote connectivity tools to infiltrate corporate environments through contractors or service providers.

Wiper Attack (Babuk) – a destructive malware scenario based on leaked Babuk ransomware code. This scenario tests resilience against irreversible data corruption combined with ransomware deployment. In the simulation, if players fail to contain the attack in time, data becomes encrypted, forcing a complete rebuild from scratch.

IT companies can now choose between two dedicated attack scenarios, testing coordination, crisis management and decision-making under pressure. KIPS is available in both live (up to 100 participants) and online (up to 1,000 trainees) formats and provides detailed analytics on participants’ decisions, team coordination and benchmarking against previous sessions.

“To stay secure, organisations need a layered defence strategy that combines technology, processes and people. But investing in tools alone is not enough. Cyber resilience depends on awareness, coordination and the ability to respond effectively under pressure,” comments Svetlana Kalashnikova, Security Awareness expert at Kaspersky.

“Kaspersky Interactive Protection Simulation, a part of a comprehensive Security Awareness offering, helps organisations experience real-world attack scenarios in a controlled environment, strengthening decision-making, cross-team collaboration and executive understanding of cybersecurity risks. By transforming complex threats into practical learning experiences, we empower companies to build stronger, more resilient security cultures.”


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending