Connect with us

E-Business

Key Considerations in Using a Web Application Firewall

Published

on

Anton Jacobsz, managing director at Networks Unlimited
Kindly share this post

Cyber security specialists are realising more and more the growing danger of application layer threats to a network.

While there is no denying the need to remain aware of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, application layer attacks are very difficult to detect and provide little or no advanced warning before attacking your applications.

This is according to Simon McCullough, major channel account manager at F5, the specialist in application delivery networking and technology for the delivery of web applications, as well as security and network and cloud resources.

McCullough said, “Administrators and security teams are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up-to-date with the latest attacks and protection measures. Applications are the gateway to data and data is what hackers are after. In an attack on applications, traditional network firewalls are not a defence. Here, you need a web application firewall (WAF).

“As we become increasingly aware of the dangers posed by application layer threats, it is useful to revisit the F5 White Paper, ‘Key Considerations in Choosing a Web Application Firewall’, which notes that a robust WAF is a requirement of network security. This has come about in a cyber landscape in which enterprises are extending their businesses by using more web-based and cloud-hosted applications, which in turn are inviting increasingly sophisticated attacks that threaten enterprise data.”

McCullough said the White Paper offers a number of useful considerations in choosing your WAF.

He noted that the first consideration is the choice of WAF deployment model, which includes: hardware WAF appliance to protect critical applications maintained in a traditional data centre; deploying a WAF as a software-based virtual edition (VE), which is a cost-effective option for small-to-medium-size businesses or those wanting to deploy protections closer to the app; and cloud-based WAF (WAF-as-a-Service) to intercept web traffic before it enters the network or reaches the server in the cloud.

He said, “The White Paper distinguishes between initial basic considerations when deploying a WAF, and further advanced considerations.”

Basic considerations when deploying a WAF

Network architecture and application infrastructure
Web application firewalls are designed to watch and respond to HTTP/S traffic. They are most often deployed as appliances in the line of traffic between the requester and the application server, inspecting requests and responses before forwarding them. Inline deployments tend to be most effective in actively blocking malicious traffic based on policies and rules that must be applied judiciously to avoid dropping legitimate traffic. A WAF can also be deployed “out of band”, which allows the WAF to observe traffic from a monitoring port. This non-intrusive “passive” deployment option is ideal for testing the WAF without impacting on traffic, yet still enabling the WAF to block malicious requests.

Security effectiveness and detection techniques
Today’s leading WAFs employ a combination of techniques to ensure accurate detection coverage that does not block legitimate traffic.

Traditionally, the most widely used WAF configuration has been a negative security model, which allows all transactions except those that contain a threat/ attack.

In recent years, positive security models have become popular. This approach blocks all traffic, allowing only those transactions that are known to be valid and safe. The positive approach is based on strict content validation and statistical analysis.

An integrated positive and negative approach can also be implemented.

Performance, high availability and reliability
WAF capabilities should include these features:

  •        Caching copies of regularly requested web content to reduce repeated requests to back-end servers.
  •        Automatic content compression to provide for more efficient network transport.
  •        Hardware-based SSL acceleration to speed SSL processing and reduce the burden on back-end web servers.
  •        Load balancing web requests across multiple back-end web servers to optimise performance.
  •        Connection pooling to reduce back-end server TCP overhead by allowing multiple requests to use the same back-end connection.

Virtual patching and scanner integration
Although developers apply best practices in secure coding, and perform adequate security testing of applications, all applications are prone to vulnerabilities. Additional tools are needed to detect, validate and patch software exposures until a new application code is made available.

Virtual patching requires no immediate changes to the software, and it allows organisations to secure applications immediately upon dynamic application testing. Virtual patches are a key component of a strong WAF, often requiring integration with a vulnerability scanner.

PCI DSS compliance
Malicious attacks designed to steal sensitive credit card information are increasing, with more and more security breaches and data thefts occurring daily. The PCI DSS requirements have been revised in an attempt to prevent these types of attacks and keep customer data secure.

Protection against application attacks
With the continued growth of multi-layered attacks, IT managers need a strong WAF solution. A good WAF ensures application security and availability by providing comprehensive geolocation attack protection from layer 7 DDoS, SQL injection, Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Top Ten application security risks, cross-site scripting, and zero-day web application attacks. It also can prevent execution of fraudulent transactions, stop in-browser session hijacking, and secure AJAX applications and JSON payloads.

When evaluating a WAF, make sure you understand the full scope of protections it offers to ensure that your business receives the best coverage.

Data classification of protected applications
More and more attackers are encrypting their attacks, therefore your WAF solution needs to be able to understand the application and the data that it is protecting. If that data is encrypted, your WAF must be able to decrypt the information and then classify the data within the apps in order to provide additional protection. A strong WAF can terminate SSL traffic, expose what is inside it, and make security decisions based on the encrypted data.

Visibility and reporting
Reports provide visibility into attack and traffic trends, long-term data aggregation for forensics, acceleration of incident response, and identification of unanticipated threats before exposure occurs. Many WAFs also integrate with database security products to give administrators a real-time view into the operation of their websites, and provide reports on web-based attempts to gain access to sensitive data, subvert the database, or execute denial of service (DoS) attacks against the database.

Advanced considerations when deploying a WAF
McCullough notes further advanced considerations when deploying a WAF, as set out by the F5 White Paper, as follows:

  •        Automatic attack detection to identify more evasive bot sequences that may escape traditional detection methods, and identify unauthorised, automated attacks upon the first attempt to access an application.
  •        Device ID and fingerprinting in order to identify a client.
  •        SSL offload to other network resources, allowing applications to dedicate important CPU resources to other processing tasks, which can improve performance.
  •        Behavioural analysis to understand volumetric traffic patterns and scan for anomalous behavior, as well as assess average server response time, transactions per second, and sessions that request too much traffic – to use as a baseline for determining whether an attack has commenced.
  •        Security operations centre: A responsive security team should include experts who analyse threats and malware, and who reverse engineer code to uncover how attacks work and how to mitigate them. The WAF vendor should work with you to mitigate threats as they arise, as well as enhance your organisation’s own security practices.
  •        Anti-fraud capabilities: More advanced WAF solutions integrate with web fraud detection services to simplify deployment, streamline reporting, and strengthen the overall application security posture by thwarting requests from validated fraudsters.
  •        Ease of management: You should be able to deploy your WAF with security policies that immediately address common attacks on web applications, including HTTP(S) attacks.
  •        Scalability and performance: Organisations need to ensure application availability, even when under attack.
  •        Vendor release cycle: With the threat landscape changing so quickly, vendors that offer more frequent release can help decrease your window of exposure and reduce the risk of your applications becoming compromised by a new or emerging threat.

Anton Jacobsz, managing director at Networks Unlimited, a value-added distributor of F5 in Africa, concludes, “Application attacks have definitely been increasing over the past few years, due to the increasing proliferation of useful web apps which, concomitantly, increase a network’s vulnerability. Web application firewalls detect and block malicious attacks woven into safe-looking website traffic that may have slipped through the traditional security solutions, by examining incoming HTTP requests before they even reach the server.”
 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

E-Business

Kaspersky Discovers Vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon Chips that can Lead to Data Loss & Device Compromise

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Kaspersky ICS CERT discovered a hardware-level vulnerability affecting Qualcomm chipsets that are widely used in a range of consumer and industrial devices, including smartphones and tablets, car components, IoT devices and more.

The vulnerability resides in the BootROM – firmware embedded at the hardware level. Attackers could potentially get access to any data stored on the device or device sensors like camera and microphone, implement complicated attack scenarios and in some circumstances get full control of the device. The results of the research were presented at Black Hat Asia 2026.

The vulnerability affects Qualcomm MDM9x07, MDM9x45, MDM9x65, MSM8909, MSM8916, MSM8952 and SDX50 series and was reported to Qualcomm in March 2025. Qualcomm formally acknowledged the vulnerability in April 2025. It has been assigned a CVE-2026-25262. Other Qualcomm-based chips may be affected as well.

Kaspersky researchers explored the Sahara protocol, a low-level communication system used when a Qualcomm chip enters Emergency Download Mode (EDL) – a special recovery mode designed for repairing or restoring smartphones or other devices. Sahara acts as the first step that allows a computer to connect to the device and load software before the operating system on the device starts.

Kaspersky demonstrated that a security flaw in this process could allow an attacker with physical access to the target device to bypass key security protections in the chip, compromise the secure boot chain and, in some cases, deploy malicious applications and backdoors to the chip’s Application Processor, thus fully compromising the entire device.

For example, in cases when the target device is a smartphone or a tablet, the attacker can potentially get access to entered user passwords, and subsequently this opens further access to multiple types of sensitive user data, such as files, contacts, location, access to the devices’ camera and microphone, etc.

A potential attacker only needs a few minutes of physical access to a device to compromise it. Therefore, if a smartphone has been sent for repair or left unattended for a short time, one can no longer be sure it is not infected. Researchers warn that the threat extends beyond end-user scenarios to include potential compromise during the supply chain phase.

“Vulnerabilities like this may allow attackers to deploy malware that is difficult to detect and remove. In practice, this could enable covert data collection or influence device behaviour over extended periods of time.

“While a reboot might seem like an effective way to remove such malware, it cannot always be relied upon: compromised systems may simulate a reboot without actually resetting. In such cases, only a complete loss of power – including battery depletion – guarantees a clean restart,” comments Sergey Anufrienko, security expert at Kaspersky ICS CERT.

Kaspersky advises organisations and individual users to exercise strict physical security control over devices including at the supply, maintenance and decommissioning phases. A reboot of the device by cutting off the power supply to the affected chip (if available) or full battery discharge may help to get rid of the malware if it was installed.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Survey Shows Gaps in Cybersecurity Policies and Employee Commitment Leave Organisations Vulnerable

Published

on

Kindly share this post

A recent Kaspersky survey entitled “Cybersecurity in the workplace: Employee knowledge and behaviour”, showed that 39% of professionals in the Middle East, Turkiye and Africa (META) region, consider cybersecurity rules in their company to be excessive or not fully appropriate.

While 7% noted that their organisations do not have cybersecurity rules or that they are not aware of them. These results show a disconnect between corporate cybersecurity policies and employee commitment to these rules, underscoring the risks associated with shadow IT and unmanaged device usage in the workplace.

Shadow IT is defined as the use of unauthorised software, devices, or services without IT oversight, and it has evolved into a critical business risk. While often driven by employee productivity needs, it creates blind spots for IT departments.

The rise of hybrid work environments, increased reliance on cloud-based tools and the spread of AI tools have accelerated this trend. Without robust cybersecurity management and oversight, organisations face heightened exposure to ransomware attacks, data leaks, and regulatory penalties.

19% of survey respondents in the META region said there are no policies regarding the use of non-corporate devices in their company. 35% of employees admitted that they can use their own devices to access business information, provided they have some type of cybersecurity protection, even consumer-grade software.

On the positive side, 21% said they can use their own device, but these must first pass more stringent corporate IT security checks; while 25% of respondents indicated that only devices provided by the IT function can be used for work purposes.

The situation is significantly better with permissions for employees to install software on corporate devices without IT department’s approval. 50% reported that only IT specialists in their company are allowed to install software, while in 31% of organisations only top management or designated users can do so. 11% of employees can install software that is approved by the IT team. However, 8% of respondents said that all users can install any software they need without IT agreement in their organisation.

At the same time 21% of professionals surveyed acknowledged that within the past year they installed software on their work devices without IT supervision. That highlights a persistent shadow IT challenge that continues to expose organisations to security vulnerabilities, compliance risks, and data breaches.

“Shadow IT is now a mainstream operational risk. When one in five employees installs software without IT oversight, it signals a policy gap. Many organisations already have security policies in place, but employee perception must also be considered.

Organisations should move beyond restrictive controls and instead implement intelligent, user-centric cybersecurity strategies that combine strategies that integrate technology with employee awareness and responsible use,” said Toufic Derbass, Managing Director for the META region at Kaspersky.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Microsoft Faces £1.7Bn Cloud Lawsuit in UK over Alleged Market Abuse

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Microsoft is facing a £1.7 billion ($2.3 billion) class action lawsuit in the United Kingdom over allegations that it abused its dominant market position in cloud computing.

Microsoft Faces £1.7bn Cloud Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Market Abuse

Microsoft

The case, filed before the Competition Appeal Tribunal, was brought by Maria Luisa Stasi on behalf of about 59,000 British businesses and organisations. It alleges that Microsoft unfairly imposed higher costs on customers running its Windows Server software on rival cloud platforms.

Stasi said the company’s practices have had a significant financial impact on both public and private sector organisations over several years.

In allowing the case to proceed, the tribunal ruled that it has a “reasonable prospect of success.” The judges noted that Microsoft is alleged to have abused its dominance in the paid server operating system market to undermine competition in the cloud services space.

If the claim succeeds, compensation for affected organisations is estimated to range between £1.7 billion and £2.1 billion.

Microsoft has rejected the allegations and confirmed it will appeal the ruling. A company spokesperson said the decision does not represent a final judgment on the claims and that it disputes the substance of the case.

The lawsuit comes as regulators in the UK and the European Union intensify scrutiny of Microsoft’s cloud business practices. UK authorities are currently assessing whether the company should be designated as having “strategic market status,” a move that would subject it to stricter competition rules.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending