Broadcasting
Nigeria PR Industry Witnessed 20% Drop in Profitability- According to Report
The Nigerian PR Industry has been suffering from a slow decline in profitability, as competing practices continue to encroach on the public relations space.
This and other revealing data are contained in the third edition of Nigeria PR Report, issued today in Lagos, Nigeria’s commercial capital, and the city with the most concentration of PR consultancies in the country.
Published by BHM Research and Intelligence, the 2018 Nigeria PR Report, records a 20% drop in respondents’ assessment of profitability in PR and a 33% increase in the number of respondents who think profitability is dwindling, reaffirming the fact that PR is mostly the first casualty when companies initiate a cost-cutting exercise.
Dwindled PR spend caused by the 2016/17 economic recession in the country manifested in the profitability of PR businesses.
‘The state of affairs has been driven largely by currency volatility, macro-economic shocks and policy issues with big spenders like MTN and Etisalat (now 9Mobile) in the Telecom sector, the Unilevers and the P&G’s in the FMCG sector crawling back with consequent squeeze on the local PR industry”, says Bolaji Okusaga, one of the key respondents whose think piece is also featured in the report.
The report, which gathers and analyses data on trends, perceptions, challenges and prospects within the industry, is a joint product of the BHM Research team and Brentt Consulting, one of Nigeria’s most respected market research companies.
Since its inaugural publication in 2016, PR industry stakeholders – practitioners, clients, investors, regulators, media and students – have come to look forward to the annual release of the report due to the useful insights that the report offers.
As in previous editions, the 2018 Nigeria PR Report looks at current trends, backed up by both quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Also, this year’s report is a product of online surveys, focus group discussions and individual interviews covering key stakeholder groups like agency CEOs, PR consultants, media practitioners and clients being served by PR experts.
The facts are presented in a reader-friendly format, employing infographics in data presentation for better understanding.
Over 400 practitioners were surveyed, over a period of 4 months. At least 25 professionals participated in focus group discussions.
Expert opinion articles were collected from Nigeria, South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and the US.
The 2018 edition is divided into seven sections covering various areas of interest – Research Findings,, Perspectives on Improving Nigeria’s PR Industry, Ethics and Professionalism in PR in Nigeria, Regulatory Bodies of Nigeria PR industry, Measurement in Public Relations, Perspectives from the Global PR Industry and a directory of Public Relations Agencies in Nigeria.
The first section of the report, Research Findings, is further divided into two parts of industry overview and state of Nigeria’s PR industry.
This section is a hugely quantitative presentation of industry facts and figures. It highlights a trend that more agencies in the country are recording some increase in their annual revenue.
The data shows that only 14% of agencies were billing below N5 million annually in 2017, compared to the 33% recorded in 2015.
The report noticed a 166% rise in the number of agencies who recorded annual revenues of N6 – N10 million between the 2015 and 2017 data.
There was also a 58% increase in the number of agencies who earned N150m and above, when comparing the 2015 and 2017 figures.
However, the report shows there were drops in the numbers of agencies whose annual revenue bands were N11m – N20m (9%), N21m – N50m (16%) and N100m – N150m (42%) between the years 2015 and 2017.
Overall, the report indicates that mid-sized agencies (billing-wise) did not have it as rosy as their micro- and mega counterparts.
It also highlights the fact that alcoholic beverages, with approximately 200% increase over its standing in 2016, upstaged the banking/finance, which dropped by 11 percent, telecoms (with a 38% drop) and manufacturing (even with a 15% increase) in the sectors serviced in 2017.
Over 80% of respondents checked digital/social media marketing as the most sought after/offered service in the Nigeria PR industry.
The reason may not be unconnected with the ease of measuring digital media results. Calculating reach, impressions and engagement on social media and online platforms is easy and the numbers are considered more accurate than those of traditional media.
“Digital and social media channels provide the platform for engagement and advocacy amongst a youthful, tech-fuelled population and with that comes the reputational challenges of a society that now has the power to communicate in real-time with its global ‘neighbours’.
“Now, more than ever before, PR professionals are under pressure to be more thoughtful, more creative and focused on delivering value for their clients.
“What makes a PR person different from the regular ‘tweet’ is their ability to bring to bear the traditional principles of PR in a technologically sophisticated communications terrain,” specialist in Strategic PR, Media and Reputation Management, Moliehi Molekoa, reiterates in the report’s foreword.
On PR Spend, the report indicates that most micro-, mini and mid-sized companies avoided PR agencies in 2017, leaving the space for mostly the large companies.
The data shows that companies whose PR Spend were in the bands of N0 – N5m, N6m – N10m, in 2015 did not engage PR agencies for the year 2017.
Those companies whose bands are N11m – N20m and N51m -N100m recorded a 25% increase in the PR Spend in 2017.
The disposition of communication managers in corporate organisations towards PR is the reason PR is the most hit of all companies’ supplies items in times of cost rationalisation.
This disposition even manifests more in these managers’ perception of the PR landscape as highlighted in the report.
There is almost a general consensus that the landscape is declining, with the group of respondents who are of the view that the landscape is improving dropping by 26%; those who said it is deteriorating increasing by 33%, while those who said it remains the same had also increased by 10%.
According to 70% of respondents, the skills required for success in PR are business, content and storytelling while 62% are of the opinion that creative thinking is important and 55% propose that media relations is equally important.
The report offers perspectives on improving the Nigeria’s PR industry, authored by some of the industry’s bests.
Bolaji Okusaga, a PR and communications strategist in his paper titled, Precise Projections On The Nigerian PR Industry In 2018, highlighted the performance of PR in 2017 and posited that “2018 promises to be brighter and better, given the obvious recovery of the economy and a projected increase in government and political spending being a year before the general elections.”
Nkiru Olumide-Ojo, an integrated marketing communications professional, in her article, PR: What Clients Want, highlighted some of the attributes that clients expect from their agencies.
These attributes include increased stakeholders reach, creativity and innovativeness, pedigree and good track record, professionalism, clear understanding of clients’ business, quick turnaround time, among others.
In her words, “there’s a lot that goes into being a successful PR consultancy or consultant.
“And while everyone takes a unique path, there’s one prerequisite that stands in the way of becoming successful: You have to possess a weighty understanding of who you are and what you bring to the table.
“In order to help others, you need to be acutely aware of your strengths, weaknesses, past experiences, and future aspirations and limitations.”
Ikem Okuhu, an editor of a brand publication reviewed the relationship between the PR agencies and their media partners.
In his article, Media and PR: Reviewing the relationship between two sides of same coin, Okuhu called on PR practitioners and the media men to dialogue and renegotiate how news stories should be treated, as most of the items PR practitioners pass off as earned media should actually be paid media.
Femi Falodun, a Marketing and Digital Communications Consultant, in his article, How ‘Influencers’ Are Killing Agencies and Why Clients Enable Them, advises brand managers, who run to social media influencers instead of PR agencies to promote their brands, to ensure that these influencers “really deliver value in terms of sales growth, marketing ROI, consumer behavioural change, brand recall and TOMA — the real outcomes that matter, and not just vanity metrics of Likes and Impressions.”
In his treatise, Moruff Adenekan, Marketing Communications and Reputation Management professional, also focuses on influencer marketing, expressing regret that some clients are beclouded by the sheer number of social media following of paid influencers, instead of first ascertaining whether these followers actually believe in them.
Although the report is billed to focus on Nigeria’s PR industry, there is the conscious fact that our local PR industry is not an island on its own but is also a part of the global PR industry.
This prompted the dedication of a section of the report to important perspectives on the global PR industry, which offers insightful articles by renowned practitioners on the trends of PR on the world stage.
Like the previous editions, the Nigeria PR Report 2018 is truly a collector’s item for all PR stakeholders, both in Nigeria and outside our shores.
It fills in for the omission of our local landscape in the Global PR Report, whose major focus is the top 250 agencies around the world, which unfortunately no agency in Nigeria currently belongs.
It is very informative, thrilling and presented with the reader in mind.
Gugu Gumede and S’Dumo Mtshali, the power couple in Netflix’s telenovela, The Polygamist, will be guest on this week’s edition of African Voices, which is sponsored by Globacom on Cable News Network (CNN).
The 22-episode sitcom focuses on the misadventures of an adulterous spouse who unknowingly entangles his family in the difficulties of polygamy.
The film depicts a series of intrigues, betrayals, and other events that shattered the harmony of a once-perfect marriage.
The fictional couple in Johannesburg are interviewed by the programme’s anchor, Larry Madowo, for a 30-minute show in which they discuss their personal experiences and the difficulties they have in the film industry, such as coping with popularity and typecasting and advocating for more actor protections.
Gumede, a 34-year-old South African who attended the American Academy of Dramatic Arts in Los Angeles to study acting, portrayed Joyce Gomora in the telenovela.
In addition to her part in The Polygamist, Gumede has portrayed Mamlambo, a prophetess on “Uzalo”, the most watched television program in South Africa, and Mandisa in “Generations”, one of the country’s most popular series.
Mtshali, a 43-year-old South African actor who portrayed Jonasi Gomora, gained notoriety in 2010 after competing in and winning the SABC1 reality program, “Class Act”. In the same year, he landed his first major part in the drama series “Intersexions” on SABC1.
Among other films, he has starred in “Inside Story” (2011), “Avenged” (2013), “iNumber Number: Jozi Gold” (2023), “Back of the Moon”, and “The Four of Us” (2025).
This special double-cast episode will feature on DSTV channel 401 on Saturday at 8a.m. It will be repeated same day at 11a.m., Sunday at 3.30a.m.,6p.m., Monday at 3a.m. and 5.45p.m. as well as on Tuesday,5.45p.m.
The repeats continue next week Saturday at 7.30a.m., 11a.m.;Sunday 3.30a.m., 6p.m.,and on Monday at 3a.m.
By Blaise Udunze
From a general observation, comparisons are powerful political tools. They simplify complex realities, inspire supporters and shape public perception. Another side of this is that they can also become misleading when symbolism replaces substance.
The latter appears to be the objective behind two recent interventions in defense of his excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Respectfully, it was observed that veteran journalist Martin Oloja likened Tinubu’s political journey to that of football icon Lionel Messi. He portrayed him as a resilient strategist whose patience and tactical brilliance eventually produced victory. As this now appears to be a trend, Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma further elevated the narrative, comparing Tinubu to Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew. He didn’t stop at that; rather further argued that today’s painful reforms would eventually transform Nigeria just as Lee transformed Singapore. They are compelling analogies.
Unfortunately, it was observed that both began to unravel once governance, not politics, was used as the standard of measurement.
It is a known fact to the world that Lionel Messi is celebrated not because he endured criticism or finally lifted the World Cup after years of disappointment. He is celebrated because his greatness is measurable. His goals are counted. His assists are recorded. His trophies are displayed and not just that, his records speak louder than the opinions of his admirers, which may have taken a different turn now after the outcome of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
The same is also true of Lee Kuan Yew. History has shown that he is not revered because he introduced difficult reforms or enjoyed the support of loyal political allies. Governor Hope should be reminded that Lee is remembered because he fundamentally transformed Singapore. Amongst his achievements were transforming a poor trading port into one of the world’s richest, cleanest, safest and most efficiently governed nations.
Lee’s records speak for him because under his leadership, Singapore built world-class infrastructure, an incorruptible public service, globally competitive education, affordable housing, investor confidence and one of the highest standards of living anywhere in the world.
Neither Messi nor Lee Kuan Yew became legends through carefully crafted narratives. Yes, they became legends because the evidence became impossible to dispute. That is precisely where comparisons with President Tinubu become difficult.
It is an error to assume that winning elections is the same as winning governance and at the same time, political brilliance may secure power, but only effective leadership secures history’s approval.
For millions of Nigerians, governance is not measured by campaign strategy or political resilience. It is measured by the realities they confront every morning.
Can they afford food? Can they pay transport fares? Can they pay rent with the current landlords’ economy? Can they keep their businesses open? Can they sleep or travel freely without fear of kidnapping? Can they find jobs after graduation? Can they access reliable electricity and healthcare? These are the scoreboards by which governments are judged.
Supporters of the Tinubu administration frequently point to encouraging macroeconomic indicators. Foreign reserves have improved. Government revenues have risen. States now receive significantly larger allocations through the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC). Well, these ‘achievements’ will be reviewed soon through the lens of news narratives. International financial institutions have welcomed several policy reforms. The removal of fuel subsidy and exchange-rate liberalisation are presented as courageous decisions that previous administrations avoided.
These developments deserve acknowledgement. Yet macroeconomic improvements are not the same as improvements in citizens’ welfare.
In reality, an economy cannot be declared successful merely because government revenues have increased while household purchasing power continues to deteriorate, as this would be a complete aberration.
Again, it is considered an anomaly that Nigeria reports stronger fiscal numbers, but millions of families continue to struggle with soaring food prices, rising transport costs, expensive housing, high electricity tariffs and shrinking disposable incomes.
Statistics may comfort policymakers. They rarely comfort hungry citizens. Messi never celebrated possession statistics after losing a match; rather, he cried and cried over losing the opportunity of winning the trophy at the concluded 2026 FIFA World Cup. To him, results mattered.
The reality is that governments should be judged by the same principle. This is open to dispute, but of a truth, Governor Uzodimma’s comparison to Lee Kuan Yew deserves even closer scrutiny because it raises an important question, though it may appear hard to answer.
If Tinubu is Nigeria’s Lee Kuan Yew, where is Nigeria’s Singapore? What exactly made Lee Kuan Yew exceptional? Was it simply his willingness to implement painful reforms? Certainly not.
Many leaders across the developing world have introduced painful reforms. Very few transformed their countries.
One thing stands out here: Lee’s legacy rests on outcomes, not intentions. Judging from all indications, it is obvious that his reforms dramatically reduced corruption, attracted investment, strengthened institutions, expanded industrialisation, improved education, guaranteed affordable public housing and steadily raised incomes across generations. Unlike Nigeria’s ongoing experience, Singapore’s rise was not a promise repeatedly postponed to the future. Citizens experienced tangible improvements in their daily lives. That is why history celebrates Lee Kuan Yew. Nigeria’s present reality tells a different story.
It is glaring and ironic that despite improved fiscal revenues, many Nigerians continue to grapple with rising inflation, worsening poverty, declining purchasing power, youth unemployment, struggling businesses and persistent insecurity. If they must know, these are not merely economic statistics; they are the lived realities by which citizens judge any government.
The Lee Kuan Yew comparison also overlooks perhaps the most important ingredient behind Singapore’s success, which is primarily the institutions.
It is obvious and practically doubtful if Governor Uzodinma’s kind of Singapore is the same as the one on which its transformation was built upon an efficient bureaucracy, disciplined public institutions, predictable regulation, meritocracy, uncompromising anti-corruption enforcement and consistent long-term planning as championed by Lee Kuan Yew. An honest question here is, can the same be said of Nigeria today?
The truth is not far-fetched; Nigeria is nothing close to it because the realities and lived experiences of Nigerians are that the country continues to grapple with weak institutions, policy inconsistency, bureaucratic inefficiency, corruption concerns and widespread insecurity.
His impeccable achievements are built on the institutions; hence, without institutional transformation, every effort to invoke Lee Kuan Yew risks confusing aspiration with achievement.
One common trend witnessed lately is that the supporters of the administration often argue that Nigerians must be patient because meaningful reforms require time. That argument deserves consideration.
Let it also be made known that patience should never become an endless substitute for accountability. Citizens are also entitled to ask whether the sacrifices demanded today are producing measurable improvements tomorrow.
History remembers leaders not because they prescribed hardship, but because that hardship ultimately produced prosperity for those alive and not for the dead.
Another weakness in both comparisons is the tendency to confuse political mastery with administrative excellence. These are totally two different things, because when it comes to winning elections, it requires coalition building, negotiation and political calculation. Whilst, running a nation demands competent institutions, sound economic management, transparency, public trust and measurable improvements in living standards.
Again, the two are not the same, and for this reason, many exceptional politicians have governed poorly. Many successful administrators never became political giants. Democracy ultimately rewards governance, not political mythology.
This is not to suggest that President Tinubu’s administration has achieved nothing. Tax reforms, infrastructure investments, fiscal restructuring and efforts to stabilise public finances represent important policy initiatives whose long-term impact remains to be seen. Well, acknowledging those initiatives is consistent with honest public discourse.
Equally important, however, is recognising that millions of Nigerians continue to judge the administration through the realities and their lived experiences rather than the promises they hear.
Football supporters judged Lionel Messi by the trophies in the cabinet. In like manner, history judges Lee Kuan Yew by the Singapore he built. The same measure should be applied in this nation, as Nigerians will judge President Tinubu by the Nigeria he leaves behind.
The key metric here is that if inflation falls sustainably, poverty declines significantly, insecurity is substantially reduced, electricity becomes more reliable, industries expand, jobs multiply and citizens regain confidence in the future, history will acknowledge those achievements without requiring comparisons to Messi or Lee Kuan Yew.
Neither Messi nor Lee Kuan Yew needed political allies to persuade the world of their greatness and that distinguishes both as the greatest of all time (GOAT).
Their records spoke for themselves. Political endorsements may dominate today’s headlines. History, however, listens only to evidence. Even Messi needed trophies. Lee Kuan Yew needed results. Nigerian leaders should be judged by no lesser standard.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) are set to introduce a joint broadcast monitoring framework ahead of the 2027 general elections as part of efforts to curb unethical broadcasting and promote responsible election coverage.
Charles Ebuebu, director-general, NBC, who disclosed the plan recently, said the collaboration would strengthen election monitoring through the deployment of advanced technology and closer coordination between regulatory agencies.
According to him, the increasing influence of digital and online platforms has made it imperative for regulators to work together rather than operate independently.
“We have written to INEC, and we are going to have a joint monitoring outlook over the elections. Gone are the days when agencies work in silos. When we coordinate, we’re able to monitor more effectively,” Ebuebu said.
He explained that the partnership would enable both agencies to jointly identify and address violations of broadcasting regulations during the election period instead of handling such issues separately.
Beyond INEC, Ebuebu said the NBC is also partnering with other key regulators to strengthen oversight of election-related content across digital platforms.
According to him, the commission is finalising agreements with the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) and the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) ahead of the polls to reinforce its monitoring capabilities.
“We are calling in other stakeholders to reinforce the election monitoring. We are signing agreements with the Nigerian Communications Commission and the National Information Technology Development Agency before the elections,” he said.
Ebuebu also revealed that the NBC is upgrading its monitoring infrastructure with artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools to keep pace with the rapidly expanding media landscape.
He noted that the proliferation of online platforms has made traditional monitoring methods inadequate.
“With online platforms, there are thousands of them. You need more than staff; you need AI monitoring facilities,” he said.
The NBC chief added that the commission has significantly improved its monitoring capacity and can currently track nearly 50 broadcast channels from its monitoring centre in Abuja.
He said additional monitoring facilities would be established across the country in line with evolving broadcasting technologies.As part of preparations for the 2027 elections, Ebuebu announced plans for a sensitisation workshop in Ibadan that will bring together broadcasters, INEC officials, security agencies and other stakeholders.
He said the engagement had become necessary as political discussions surrounding elections continue to grow more heated, including on television, stressing the need for broadcasters to adhere to professional standards.
Ebuebu noted that the commission has had to issue several warnings to broadcast stations for violating the broadcasting code during election periods.
“We have had to write several of them because they simply forget what the code says,” he said
HURIWA, CLO Protests Bill Asking Social Media Firms’ to Open Shops Nigeria
Anambra Govt Bans Graduation Ceremonies in Anambra Schools
Airtel Secures Another 10-year Spectrum Renewal in Nigeria
Moniepoint as a Key Driver in Expanding Financial Access for Businesses in Nigeria
Nigeria, Israel Strengthen Research, Technology Collaboration
NRC, Ponzi Scheme Collapses Resulting Loss of Billions of Naira
NASENI Moves to Digitize CCB’s 5m Assets Declaration and Operations
Tokenization, Blockchain Technology will Transform Financial Institutions – IMF
EFCC Busts NIS Visa Overstay Racket, Uncovers N700m in an Account
From Scarcity to Scale: What Africa Can Learn from India’s Agricultural Transformation
Telecom2 days agoCourt Dismisses Pan African Towers’ Bid to Halt Ex-CEO’s Suit, Awards ₦500,000 Costs
E-Financial2 days agoFG Says Rumours, Fear, Can Crash Banks
E-Business2 days agoKaspersky Warns of a Phishing Campaign Abusing Microsoft Authentication Mechanism
Telecom2 days agoTelcos Seek Clear Regulatory Framework on Airtime Credit Services
Telecom2 days agoMTN Nigeria Announces 2026 mPulse Spelling Bee, Opens Entries for Students Nationwide
Telecom2 days agoMTN Warns Customers against Fake Promo
News2 days agoIMF Sees 4% AI Growth Boost for Africa
E-Financial2 days agoEU Debunks Fake Compensation Scheme Targeting West African Bank Customers