News
Constructing a Network Access Policy
The best security tool you can have in any computer network is always a smart user. There are two kinds of users, the administrative users and the and the end users. You can purchase the best firewalls and the best antiviruses but with a careless user your security strategy will end up like a mice breakfast. Therefore organizations need a network access policy signed by all employees as regards to what they can do and cannot do on the network: so that the next time they break the policy regulations you will show the agreement you had together, and in that situation you will have to act fast even if some of your best friends in the organization have to work elsewhere. The user is the path of the least resistance and most hackers target them through social engineering. Often times when I go to my bank to withdraw cash I can count about ten things the bankers do that is inappropriate in a computer network which they don’t know.
A network access policy is a documented set of guidelines stipulating what should and shouldn’t be done in regarding computer usage in an organization. This compliance effort is to ensure security of resources in a network environment
Why do we need a network access policy? A well formulated and implemented network access policy reduces IT Risk complexities and IT risk complexities reduces an organization value. IT Risk is a potential damage to an organization’s value, often from inadequate management of IT processes and events as IT Risk is emerging as a significant component of total business risk. Below is an outline of a guideline towards the formulation of a complete security policy for an organization.
PHASE 1: RISK ANALYSIS.
Who makes the security policy?
An organization need to set up a joint committee of technical persons and decision makers usually call an organization’s Security Working Group(SWG) who is to perform a risk analysis regarding:
– what data to protect
– what to protect it form
– How to protect it.
– Determine the likely threats.
– How to protect the data in a cost effective way
– Review the protection process continuously because security planning is an ongoing process
But before determining the likely threats above, the SWG is supposed to outline the possible targets in the organization which includes:-
-Hardwares
-softwares
-users
-documentations
-supplies (ribbon, papers, damage media)
After outlining the target, the next step is to detail the kind of threat:-
(1) Unauthorized access
(2) Disclose of information
3) Denial of services(DOS)
Imagine a glimpse of banking proposal in the financial sector or a glimpse of sensitive vouchers in a ministry, or ebay going down for an hour. At the onset of any policy agreement, it should be stated that employees are responsible for their actions and that they are responsible for understanding and respecting the policy agreement.
WHAT A SECURITY POLICY SHOULD CONTAIN:
(1) Restrictions regarding resources consumptions: issues like the limits of the helpdesk staff and the system admin are set here.
(2) What might constitute an abuse should be clearly stated: Illegal installation of software, sharing of accounts, modification of file are all set in this category.
(3) Handling password and password formation rule: issues like how secure should you keep your password, how often should you change your password is set in the category.
(4) Backup policy: who create the backups, who password the backups, how irregular or regular should one backup his files.
CRATERIA FOR EVALUATING
-Has the policy been around in advance and agreed upon?
-Does the policy deals appropriately with difference form of communication?
– Is the policy workable?
-Does the policy unnecessary compromise the interest of the employee?
-Does the policy comply with law and third party disagreement?
PHASE 2: POLICY VIOLATION
Policies are highly likely to be violated due to:
(1) Negligent
(2) Mistake
(3) Improper understanding
(4) Accident
Also, in this phase, procedures should be stated on how to handle violating
Handling intrusions and incidents
There are two approaches to handling instructions
(1) Evaluating: how serious is the issue
(2) Notification: who to notify, normally the notification goes first to the point of contact (POC) who communicate to the second working group
(3) Response: what is the nature of response to be taken, it is going to be
(a) Protect & proceed. Or,
(b) Pursue and prosecute
(4) Legal implication.
(5) Documentation: during and after the incidents
To be Continued
News
US Okays $2.1Bn for Christian Healthcare in Nigeria

The United States has signed a five-year agreement with Nigeria to strengthen its health system, with a strong emphasis on promoting Christian faith-based health care providers.

The Department of State, in collaboration with Congress, will commit nearly $2.1 billion to expand essential preventative and curative services for HIV, TB, malaria, polio, and maternal and child health.
Under the bilateral agreement signed at the weekend, the Nigerian government will increase its domestic health expenditures by nearly $3 billion during the five-year term.
The Memorandum of Understanding is the largest co-investment any country has made to date under the America First Global Health Strategy, said Thomas Pigott, State Department spokesperson.
The MOU was negotiated within the context of Nigeria’s reforms to protect Christian populations from violence and includes significant dedicated funding to support Christian healthcare facilities.
The investments were approved to complement the efforts of Nigeria’s 900 faith-based clinics and hospitals, currently serving millions of people, and strengthen the country’s health infrastructure.
The U.S. government stressed that the President and Secretary of State retain the right to pause or terminate any programs which fails to align with the national interest.
“The Trump Administration expects Nigeria to continue to make progress ensuring that it combats extremist religious violence against vulnerable Christian populations,” Pigott added.
The MOU was signed despite the U.S. designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and its recent inclusion in the travel ban list, which President Donald Trump premised on terrorism and visa overstay rate.
The America First Global Health Strategy, released in September 2025, covers dozens of countries. It shifts the focus of U.S. health aid to self-reliance, data security, HIV, TB, malaria, and maternal and child health services.
News
SERAP Asks Tinubu to Release CTC of Tax Bill

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged President Bola Tinubu to “urgently direct Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to widely publish a certified true copy of the version of the tax bills received from the National Assembly and a certified true copy of the tax laws signed by you.”

SERAP
The documents requested by SERAP are the National Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, Nigeria Tax Administration Act; and Nigeria Tax Act.
SERAP urged Tinubu “to direct Mr Lateef Fagbemi to clarify whether the version of the tax bills received from the National Assembly are exactly the same contents as the bills that were signed into law by you and the version ultimately gazetted.”
The body made the demand of President Tinubu in a Freedom of Information request dated December 20, 2025.
It was signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare.
The organisation said in the FOI request: “The law-making processes including the passing of any bills and signing them into laws, as well as gazetting the laws must meet the requirements of the Nigerian Constitution, the rule of law and separation of powers.
“This means that any passed bills and signed laws must be accessible, authentic, intelligible, clear, legitimate, and predictable so that people can know and comply with them.
“Clarifying whether the version of the tax bills received from the National Assembly are exactly the same contents as the bills that were signed into laws by the President and tax laws ultimately gazetted would promote transparency and accountability, and help to address any threats to Nigerians’ human rights.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within 7 days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel your government and the Attorney General to comply with our request in the public interest.
“Widely publishing the certified true copies of the tax bills passed by the National Assembly and the tax laws signed by the President and the gazetted versions would also allow Nigerians to identify if the provisions of the laws are consistent with their human rights, and seek effective remedies to challenge any infractions of the rights.
“Your government has the obligations under the Nigerian Constitution and the human rights treaties to which the country is a state party to promptly, independently, impartially, transparently and effectively investigate the alleged unlawful allegations of the tax laws and to ensure full accountability in this case.
“Our requests are brought in the public interest, and in keeping with the requirements of the Nigerian Constitution, the Freedom of Information Act, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to Nigeria is a state party.
“According to our information, the National Assembly recently alleged that there are unlawful alterations and some material differences between the tax bills passed by the legislative body and the tax laws gazetted by the Federal Government.
“A Sokoto lawmaker, Abdussamad Dasuki, raised the issue under a matter of privilege, drawing the attention of the House to the alleged discrepancies between the harmonised versions of the tax bills passed by both chambers of the National Assembly and the copies gazetted by the Federal Government.
“The National Assembly said the alterations contained in the gazetted copies did not receive legislative approval. These alleged unlawful alterations raise questions over the legality and legitimacy of both the law-making processes and the versions of the tax laws currently being circulated by the Federal Ministry of Information.
“The National Assembly established that substantive provisions were inserted, deleted, or modified after passage by both chambers. Several oversight, accountability, and reporting mechanisms approved by parliament were reportedly removed in the final Acts. New coercive and fiscal powers (e.g., arrest powers, garnish without court order, compulsory USD computation, appeal security deposits) were also reportedly inserted in the final Acts without legislative approval.
“Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution, article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantee the right to seek, receive and impart information.
“The Nigerian Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights impose duties on your government to ensure transparency and accountability in lawmaking processes.
“By the combined reading of the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution, the Freedom of Information Act, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, there are transparency obligations imposed on your government to widely publish the certified true copies of the version of the tax bills received from the National Assembly and the tax laws signed by you.
“The Nigerian Constitution, Freedom of Information Act, and the human rights treaties rest on the principle that citizens should have access to information regarding their government’s activities.”
News
NITDA Partners OGP to Drive Presidential Digital Goals

The Director General of the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), Kashifu Inuwa, CCIE, has reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to open governance, transparency and inclusive digital development as the Open Government Partnership (OGP) team formally presented the award and certificate received at the OGP Global Summit Spain 2025 to the Agency’s leadership.

Nigeria emerged as the overall global winner in the Digital Governance category in recognition of the country’s excellence in deploying digital tools and policies to strengthen government transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. In addition, Nigeria received the Regional Award for advancing Open Digital Governance across Africa and the Middle East, reaffirming its leadership role in promoting open government principles and driving digital transformation across the region.
These recognitions were largely attributed to initiatives led by NITDA in collaboration with civil society partners, such as Dataphyte, which showcased innovative and inclusive approaches to digital governance at the summit.
The summit, which was organised in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, brought together more than 1,500 high-level representatives of governments, civil society leaders, and policymakers from around the world to exchange experiences, best practices, and progress on open government initiatives and implementation on key issues.
Receiving the OGP delegation at NITDA, Inuwa described the recognition as a national honour rather than an institutional one, stressing that the award reflects Nigeria’s collective efforts across government, civil society and the private sector in advancing open governance principles through the digital space.
According to him, such global recognition comes with heightened responsibility to deliver on commitments made under the OGP framework.
“This is not just about NITDA. It is a national recognition, and every recognition comes with responsibility,” the DG said.
“If we fail to execute the commitments we have made, it will not only affect our image locally but also at the international stage. This is also not something NITDA can do in isolation,” he added.
Inuwa linked the achievement directly to the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, noting that digital transformation, transparency, economic diversification, job creation and efficient public service delivery remain central presidential priority areas.
He emphasised that leveraging digital technologies to deepen openness and accountability aligns with national objectives of strengthening institutions, improving governance outcomes and building trust between government and citizens.
Highlighting the importance of collaboration, the NITDA boss underscored the role of the OGP platform as a catalyst for a strong multi-stakeholder approach in Nigeria’s digital ecosystem.
He called on civil society organisations, development partners, the private sector and other government institutions to provide technical expertise, guidance and sustained engagement to ensure effective implementation of agreed commitments.
“We need to leverage the OGP platform. We need your expertise, your guidance, your support and your commitment to hand-hold us in delivering on these commitments,” he said.
He further noted that “a multi-stakeholder approach in the digital space is critical to fostering a resilient ecosystem that delivers real value to citizens.”
Inuwa disclosed that NITDA has already begun internal reviews of its OGP commitments and has tasked its representatives, including Dr Rousseau, to work with colleagues to develop a clear execution strategy.
He proposed the creation of joint work streams with OGP stakeholders to support implementation, ensure accountability and keep all parties on track.
“We are humans. Oversight and collaboration help us stay focused. With commitment, nothing is impossible, and I believe these goals are achievable,” he added, assuring the delegation of NITDA’s readiness and political will to deliver on all agreed commitments.
Inuwa also welcomed the idea of engaging the political leadership of OGP, including the Honourable Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, with a view to briefing President Tinubu on the achievement. He noted that celebrating milestones is important, as it reinforces morale and demonstrates that Nigeria’s efforts in digital governance are gaining global recognition.
“It’s also good when there are wins, we should celebrate, because we too never knew that the little things we are doing are noticed not just within Nigeria, but globally, to the extent of earning us this award,” he asserted.
He concluded by expressing gratitude to the Nigerian National OGP Secretariat and the global OGP leadership, reaffirming NITDA’s commitment to strengthening collaboration and building a more productive working relationship that will translate open governance principles into measurable national impact.
Earlier in his remark, Mr Olusoji Apampa, who led the OGP deelegation, said the honours were earned through a strong partnership between government and civil society, with NITDA playing a critical role, particularly in commitments focused on improving digital governance in Nigeria.
Apampa expressed hope that the awards would serve as added momentum to deepen ongoing commitments under NITDA’s leadership and accelerate the practical implementation of reforms aimed at strengthening digital governance across the country.
General News3 days agoJumia Kicks Off December Holiday Sale, Bringing Festive Deals to Shoppers Nationwide
E-Financial3 days agoAccess Holdings Shareholders Approved to Raise N40bn Capital Through Private Placement
Broadcasting3 days agoNIMC rolls out Pre-Enrolment Portal for seamless NIN registration
General News3 days agoDangote, Monopoly Power, and Political Economy of Failure
General News3 days agoOAU, Baptist Day School Oluponna honour Akano with Distinguished Alumnus Awards
General News1 day agoThe Mood Market to Light Up Lagos with a Rooftop Gifting, Food & Lifestyle Fair this Christmas
News21 hours agoUS Okays $2.1Bn for Christian Healthcare in Nigeria
Broadcasting21 hours agoTim Akano Recounts 20-Year Growth, Media Support at NITRA End-of-Year Meet











