E-Financial
Bank Insiders Help Fraudsters Steal Billions

Despite multiple security checks in banks, incidents of fraud are on the increase, prompting the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to raise alarm, blaming it on insiders.
A report by Weekly Trust takes a look at the disturbing trend.
According to Weekly Trust, since e-banking commenced some years ago, banking operations and services to customers have been made easier.
But despite the smoothness and comfort on offer, there are also setbacks and risks the banks and customers face from time to time. Investigations indicate a rise in fraudsters cashing in on modern technology to fleece unsuspecting depositors.
Weekly Trust spoke to a banker in one of the leading commercial banks in Nigeria, who craved anonymity, and he confirmed the rise of insider collaborators in fraud. He noted that the network of criminals is so strong that it is extremely difficult to pin down the culprits.
The source said the most elementary aspect of the fraud is wilful neglect of checking and confirmation of personal data and addresses of fresh bank customers who want to open new accounts.
“There is a policy called “Know Your Customer” (KYC). It is expected that any person who comes to open a new bank account is only granted that opportunity upon confirmation by his account officer the accuracy of the information he has rendered in his personal data form, especially his office and residential address. But in most cases, customers who are fraudsters who come to open accounts and have connivers within, give fake information,” he said.
“Without necessary confirmation, the conniver goes ahead to open such accounts, which are used in defrauding people. In effect, when fraud happens, the suspects cannot be located with the addresses in personal data forms. He stands a better chance of evading prosecution at this point,” the source added.
Another source disclosed that would-be fraudsters who have insiders approach the bank with account numbers and other details of persons they know are flush with cash.
“They come and pretend that they have forgotten the signature they signed for the account in question. They request that the manifest be opened for them to see their signature and remember. Once the insider opens the manifest, the fraudster could also request to snap the signature with his phone, under the pretext that he doesn’t want to forget it again. These are questionable demands, but the insider grants it because they are in collaboration. Of course, we know there are expert forgers,” he explained.
In another case, a man who operated an account with a commercial bank (name withheld) with a heavy base in the North had N2.1 million withdrawn from his account by fraudsters.
The man, who pleaded anonymity, said he had N3.2 million in his account and went to withdraw N200,000.
He had not withdrawn cash for a while, noting that the transaction was done. But since his GSM number which receives SMS alerts was inoperative, he requested for written balance, only to discover that N2.1 million had been withdrawn.
“I raised alarm and upon investigation by the management of the bank, it was discovered that someone forged my bank documents, impersonated me with an identity card and also cloned my GSM line. The money was transferred into an account in Abuja, but I couldn’t get the alert. The bank later discovered I never made the transfer or withdrawals and refunded my money, but it suspended the cashier who authorized the payment,” the victim said.
Weekly Trust gathered that fraud within the banking sector manifests at different levels and it is systemic in nature.
A source said bank staff would not ordinarily open doors for a thief to come in and steal money from the vault.
He said what obtains is that corrupt bank staff carefully arrange for a lapse to occur, so they can explore that window.
Also, a recently retired senior manager with one of the old generation banks who prefers to be identified simply as Mustapha said experience tells him it is almost impossible to hit any bank without internal assistance.
“One of the common examples of fraud amongst the top officers of banks is in approving fraudulent loans for their proxies. They register companies in the name of their friends or families, put documents together and approve huge sums to these companies which largely exist only on paper.”
Then they go ahead to approve all manner of concessions and waivers, practically giving themselves these monies, robbing the bank of legitimate income. Billions of naira get stolen this way, accumulatively.
Investigation also revealed that even where these companies truly exist with verifiable business on ground, they cannot access bank loans on record time without reaching a compromise with the bank officials on what percentage they will get as kick-backs.
“In doing so, even where there are danger signals to warrant reconsideration, they will be overlooked and approval will be given,” another source added.
A chartered accountant and auditor, Mr. Sunday Enenche said a good number of the high-profile fraud cases are executed by top management staff of banks, with bank management using their branches to warehouse large sums for politicians and other highly placed individuals in the society.
According to him, these monies are not captured in the books of the banks because they could raise suspicion by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), saying it denies the bank of income.
“With the cooperation and understanding of the bank management, they move these sums around from time to time to avoid Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) unscheduled inspection. You will rarely see the real owners of these monies in the banking hall, as they have their agents who are well-known by the banks and can access these monies at any time of the day,” he added.
Worried by the increasing cases of fraud, the CBN on January 19 through a circular issued a directive urging banks to take steps to curb the trend.
The directive, signed by Mr. Dipo Fatokun, Director, Banking and Payment System Department, also stated that the abuses center on identity theft and abuse of authorization.
The apex bank therefore announced measures to check such and gave a December 31, 2015 time limit for compliance by all banks or a N50,000 fine daily after the expiration of the deadline.
Experts argue that what you get with the lower ranks of bank officials is not frequent and they also come in various forms because the opening is not always there.
They insist that in some cases, double deductions occur on same amount on an account where the customer has made same type of deductions, by not crediting the customer’s account with deposits, yet issuing a teller to the customer.
They could also connive with robbers to hit the banks premises or bullion vans if they notice that guards are loose on certain days or times. There are also cases of signature forgery and altered cheques.
But Mustapha cautioned that whereas banks keep updating their fraud counter-mechanisms, a lot more depend on the integrity and prudence of the staff to succeed.
The banks may need to also reconsider the current practice of contract workers who handle transactions far above their pay grades.
“You cannot employ a graduate, place him on contract and pay him less than 50 percent of what a similar graduate in the same system earns, who is not on contract. Temptation will be there.”
E-Financial
CBN Introduces Stricter BVN Rules to Curb Fraudulent Transactions

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has introduced stricter rules guiding the use and management of the Bank Verification Number (BVN) as part of efforts to reduce fraudulent transactions within the financial system.The revised framework, which takes effect from May 1, includes tighter controls on BVN enrolment, data access and customer information updates.

The apex bank said the measures are aimed at strengthening identity management, improving fraud monitoring and safeguarding the integrity of banking transactions.
Under the new guidelines, BVN enrolment is now restricted to individuals aged 18 and above, while customers will only be allowed to change the phone number linked to their BVN once.
The restriction is designed to curb identity manipulation often exploited by fraudsters through repeated updates of personal information.
The CBN also directed financial institutions to maintain a temporary watchlist for BVNs linked to suspicious transactions.
Affected BVNs may be flagged for up to 24 hours, during which customers are expected to verify or clarify flagged transactions before further action is taken.
In addition, access to BVN data has been tightened, with the apex bank retaining exclusive control over the database while granting access only to licensed financial institutions under defined conditions.
The move, according to the CBN, is expected to enhance data security and support a more resilient financial system as BVN enrolment continues to grow.
E-Financial
Binance is Missing from Ghana’s Crypto Sandbox

Ghana’s Securities and Exchange Commission has given the nod to 11 crypto trading platforms to participate in its new regulatory sandbox programme, its first major step in support of crypto after passing a law to provide the local market with regulatory clarity in December.

The big news however is that Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume is nowhere on the list, raising questions about the crypto exchange’s future in one of West Africa’s fastest-growing digital asset markets.
Newsghana reported that industry analysts covering the sandbox launch specifically flagged Binance as a notable absent player, alongside Yellow Card, whose mobile payment product Yellow Pay had previously been warned against by the Bank of Ghana (BoG) for operating without authorisation. Neither company has publicly explained its absence from the cohort.
For Binance, the omission carries particular weight. The exchange has cultivated a visible presence in Ghana for several years, including direct engagement with regulators, public financial literacy campaigns, and the presence of senior representatives in Accra.
Despite that groundwork, it did not secure a place in the inaugural sandbox when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published its list of approved Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) on March 10, 2026.
Analysts have pointed to Binance’s ongoing legal battle in neighbouring Nigeria as a factor likely complicating its regulatory position across the region.
And the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) is pursuing Binance for an $81.5 billion claim covering alleged economic losses and unpaid taxes, arguing the exchange has a significant economic presence that makes it liable for corporate income tax for 2022 and 2023, along with a 10 percent annual penalty on outstanding amounts.
The stakes of remaining outside Ghana’s regulatory framework are rising fast.
The BoG made clear on March 5, 2026, that all VASPs operating within Ghana’s jurisdiction including those serving Ghanaian residents through digital platforms with no physical office in the country must register with the Bank.
Firms that do not comply face sanctions and potential disqualification from future licensing.
Ghana’s digital asset market has grown rapidly, recording over $10 billion in cryptocurrency transactions by November 2025, up from roughly $6 billion the year before, making it one of West Africa’s most active markets.
With over three million users estimated to be active in the ecosystem, the country represents a market Binance cannot easily afford to be shut out of through regulatory non-compliance.
The eleven sandbox participants will effectively serve as the reference models for what a compliant licensed VASP looks like under Ghana’s framework.
Those that perform well within the first six months may transition to full licensing early, while those that fall short risk being shut out of the regulated market once the sandbox period concludes.
Binance did not respond to a request for comment before publication. The SEC Ghana and BoG have not publicly commented on why specific companies were excluded from the first sandbox cohort.
E-Financial
World Bank Debars 3 PwC Subsidiaries for 21 Months over Alleged Project Fraud

World Bank Group has debarred three African subsidiaries of global advisory firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), for 21 months after being allegedly found guilty of manipulating procurement processes for a major cross-border electricity project.

In a statement, the Washington-based multilateral lender said PricewaterhouseCoopers Associates Africa Ltd, based in Mauritius, along with its Kenyan and Rwandan affiliates, engaged in “collusive and fraudulent practices” linked to the Eastern Electricity Highway Project, a flagship initiative to transmit hydropower from Ethiopia to Kenya.
The decision sidelines PwC from lucrative World Bank-funded projects on the continent, dealing a blow to one of the region’s most influential audit and advisory firms.
This development could reshape competition for high-value consulting work across emerging markets, potentially disrupting startups and tech firms reliant on World Bank funding, as scrutiny over governance and compliance tightens.
The World Bank, through its private sector arm, International Finance Corporation (IFC), offers grants and low-interest loans to startups across emerging markets.
Earlier this week, the IFC committed $20 million to invest in high-growth startups in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa.
“The debarment makes PwC Associates, PwC Kenya, PwC Rwanda, and any affiliates they control ineligible to participate in Bank Group-financed projects and operations,” the World Bank said.
“It is part of a settlement agreement under which the three companies admit culpability for sanctionable practices.”
The determination was based on the company’s conduct between 2019 and the award of contracts for consultancy services and asset valuation work for the Ethiopian state power utilities.
According to the World Bank statement, the firm obtained confidential procurement documents to improperly influence the award of a contract for the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards at the Ethiopian Electric Power Corporation.
They also attempted to steer a separate contract for a fixed asset inventory and revaluation for the power utility towards PwC Associates.
During the bidding and execution of that contract, the bank found that the company misrepresented the availability and qualifications of key experts and failed to disclose the full list of subconsultants involved.
According to the World Bank, the debarment is shorter than would otherwise apply because PwC admitted misconduct.
The advisory firm also agreed to a series of remedial measures, including internal investigations, disciplinary action against responsible staff, terminating relationships with all subconsultants involved, and additional staff training.
E-Financial1 day agoKuda MFB Increases Kuda for Her Business Grants to ₦10 Million
General News2 days agoBanks, Offices to Close for Thursday and Friday for Eid-el-Fitr
News2 days agoKaspersky Discovers Infostealers Mimicking Claude Code, OpenClaw and Other AI Developer Tools
Telecom2 days agoNigeria, Ghana Trigger Stunning 45 Percent Surge in MTN Dividends
E-Financial2 days agoSEC Shuts Over 400 Fraudulent Investment Schemes, Arrests Operators
Telecom2 days agoATCIS Urges FG to Ensure Safety of Consumers Data
News2 days agoBreaking…….Nigerian Firms Pledge Millions, Create UK Jobs
General News2 days agoNigComSat-1R, Nigeria’s Only Satellite to Expire this Year













