Connect with us

Broadcasting

Capital Flight and the Politics of Betrayal: When Leaders Stop Believing in Their Own Economy

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By Blaise Udunze

Nigeria’s economy is bleeding, not from the absence of money, but from the silent, systemic outflow of capital that should be building industries, creating jobs, and stimulating innovation. Instead, wealth is fleeing into the vaults of local banks, offshore accounts, and speculative government instruments that promise easy returns but deliver little to the real economy.

This quiet drain known as capital flight has become one of Nigeria’s most understated yet devastating economic tragedies. It reflects not only a lack of investor confidence but also the failure of the banking and financial ecosystem to function as a true engine of growth. The role of banks in any healthy economy is to mobilize deposits, lend to productive sectors, and finance businesses that create value. Yet, in Nigeria, this cycle has broken down.

The country’s major banks, flush with liquidity, increasingly prefer to invest in risk-free government securities rather than lend to manufacturers, farmers, or entrepreneurs. The ease of earning double-digit interest from government bonds has turned banks into passive rent collectors rather than drivers of development. This behavior represents a form of internal capital flight with money technically within the system but practically locked away from the economy’s productive veins.

Beyond domestic hoarding, Nigeria faces a more pernicious form of external capital flight. Each year, billions of dollars exit the country through legal and illicit channels, draining investment, depleting foreign reserves, and eroding confidence in the nation’s economic future. Government and independent estimates suggest that Nigeria loses between $17 billion and $18 billion annually through illicit financial flows (IFFs), roughly 20 percent of the $88.6 billion that Africa collectively loses each year. That amount could have built schools, hospitals, and industries capable of employing millions.

The story of capital flight from Nigeria is not merely an economic tragedy; it is a moral one, the tale of a nation betrayed by its own custodians and courted by foreign accomplices who profit from its dysfunction.

Nigeria’s political elite have long mastered the art of wealth extraction. Through inflated contracts, misappropriated public funds, and dubious foreign investments, billions leave the country yearly. Yet, for many politicians, local investment is a risk they refuse to take. Their mansions rise in Dubai, London, and New York while their home constituencies languish in neglect. From shell companies in the British Virgin Islands to luxury real estate in the UAE, Nigerian politicians have woven a global web of concealed wealth shielded by secrecy jurisdictions and weak local enforcement. The irony is stark, as those who control Nigeria’s wealth have no faith in the economy they manage. Their lack of confidence in their own governance is perhaps the strongest indictment of their rule.

The aristocracy and business elite are not blameless. Nigeria’s high society, traditional rulers, business moguls, and political patrons have continued to move funds abroad under the guise of “diversification” or “investment security.” In reality, it is the same cycle of extraction and expatriation, where profits earned from domestic monopolies or state patronage are rarely reinvested at home. Instead, they are laundered into foreign banks, luxury assets, and offshore trusts. This unrestrained financial migration deprives the nation of growth capital and erodes public confidence, reinforcing a psychological colonization with the belief that nothing of value can thrive in Nigeria.

The problem, however, is not purely internal. Foreign corporations and their local collaborators play a significant role through aggressive tax avoidance and profit repatriation schemes. By exploiting loopholes in Nigeria’s weak fiscal systems, multinationals shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, a process known as transfer pricing, which is draining billions from the economy each year. To make matters worse, global consulting and legal firms help structure these outflows, acting as enablers of corruption while hiding behind the veil of legality.

Capital flight thrives where institutions are weak. Agencies such as the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) operate under immense political pressure. Investigations into politically exposed persons are often selective, and prosecutions drag endlessly. Meanwhile, banks (both local and foreign) play the silent role of facilitators, processing questionable transactions with minimal scrutiny. The result is a perfect ecosystem for looting by powerful politicians, complicit banks, pliant regulators, and eager foreign beneficiaries.

The effects are devastating. Capital flight undermines foreign exchange stability, weakens the naira, and starves industries of investment. When billions are left unchecked, the government resorts to borrowing, increasing national debt and mortgaging the country’s future. Nigeria’s public debt now stands at N149.39 trillion, with debt servicing consuming over 70 percent of government revenue. Inflation remains stubbornly high at 20.12 percent as of August 2025, while food inflation stands at 21.87 percent. Unemployment, officially at 5 percent, is far worse in reality, with underemployment and informal work masking widespread joblessness.

One overlooked driver of this crisis is Nigeria’s weak respect for property rights, which is the very foundation of investor confidence. In September 2025, the Lagos State government demolished over 19 buildings in the Trade Fair Complex, Ojo, citing permit violations. But beyond regulatory enforcement, the event exposed a deeper issue: inconsistent governance, opaque processes, and disregard for ownership that fuels distrust and drives capital offshore. When investors are uncertain that their assets are safe from arbitrary government action, they simply take their money elsewhere.

Multiple taxation, inconsistent policies, and weak monitoring of illicit flows further complicate the picture. Businesses face overlapping levies from different tiers of government, pushing many to conceal income or move operations abroad. Civil society estimates that over $18 billion is lost annually through illicit flows. This is a drain that robs Nigeria of the fiscal capacity to fund schools, hospitals, and roads.

Ultimately, the story of capital flight is one of moral and institutional decay. It reveals a political class that preaches patriotism while stashing wealth abroad, a banking system that serves itself rather than the economy, and a foreign financial order that profits from Nigeria’s dysfunction.

Reversing this pattern requires a national reorientation, one that goes beyond slogans to enforce accountability and rebuild trust. Nigeria must strengthen asset recovery frameworks, enforce beneficial ownership registries, and enhance cooperation with countries that host stolen wealth. Western nations, too, must shut down the safe havens that shelter looted funds; they cannot condemn corruption abroad while their financial systems profit from it.

More importantly, Nigeria’s leaders must recognize a simple truth that no nation develops by exporting its capital and importing its luxuries. Development is sustained by faith, the faith of a people who believe enough in their land to invest in it.

Capital flight is not merely an economic statistic; it is the reflection of a broken covenant between Nigeria and its leaders. The wealth that should build the nation has become the currency of betrayal. Until the ruling class and their foreign accomplices are held accountable, Nigeria will remain a country of immense potential shackled by the greed of its own custodians.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional writes from Lagos, can be reached via: [email protected]


Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Broadcasting

CBN’s $1 Trn Mirage: Why Nigeria’s Real Sector Holds the Missing Key

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By Blaise Udunze

When the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) recently declared that the country was on course to becoming a $1 trillion economy through ongoing banking reforms, the statement was met with cautious optimism. To many, it sounded like a long-awaited promise of prosperity as a declaration that Nigeria’s economic renewal is finally underway. But behind the projection lies a critical question, if banking reforms alone drive the kind of broad-based, sustainable growth required to make Nigeria a trillion-dollar economy?

The truth, according to several experts and economic data, is that banking reforms though necessary are insufficient. The structure of the Nigerian economy is still too fragile, the real sector too weak, and the policy framework too inconsistent to sustain such lofty growth. Without targeted reforms that strengthen production, industry, and exports, the trillion-dollar dream risks remaining what one economist aptly described as a “mirage.”

Tilewa Adebajo, Chief Executive Officer of CFG Advisory, did not mince words when he addressed the subject on ARISE NEWS earlier this year. “We said Nigeria already has the potential of a $1 trillion economy. But $1 trillion economy is a mirage. We shouldn’t go there again,” he said. “If you do not have your policies in place, you cannot reach that $1 trillion economy.”

Adebajo’s caution strikes at the heart of the matter, saying potential is not performance. Nigeria has abundant human and natural resources, but poor policy implementation, weak governance, and persistent inflation continue to choke productivity and investment.

According to Adebajo, reforms alone cannot drive growth. “Reforms on themselves cannot be the solution or answer to growing the economy,” he explained. For him, the CBN’s focus on financial sector restructuring must be complemented by microeconomic solutions such as job creation, poverty alleviation, and social intervention policies that ease the hardship of ordinary Nigerians.

“There has to now be a human face,” he emphasized. Economic transformation, he argues, must not only be about GDP numbers but about improving the quality of life for millions trapped in poverty.

While the CBN’s recapitalisation directive aims to strengthen the banking system and attract foreign capital, many industry players insist that banking strength is meaningless without productive outlets for credit. The Group Managing Director of UBA Plc, Oliver Alawuba, made this clear at the Annual Conference of the Finance Correspondents Association of Nigeria (FICAN).

He stated that achieving the $1 trillion economy target “requires not just incremental growth, but structural shifts in how we approach banking, financial innovation, and sectoral development.”

For Alawuba, the real sector in agriculture, manufacturing, and services must become the true engine of growth.

“A vibrant real sector will drive employment, foster innovation, and strengthen the overall economy by reducing dependency on the oil sector,” he said.

Recapitalization alone, he noted, “is not enough; it must be followed by focused lending to strategic areas that promise the highest economic returns.”

This sentiment reflects a broader consensus among economists that credit must flow to where value is created. Yet, Nigerian banks often prefer the comfort of investing in risk-free government securities over financing industrial or agricultural expansion. The result is a financial system that thrives on paper profits but contributes little to real economic output.

Indeed, Nigeria’s real sector has remained under pressure for years. Manufacturing’s share of GDP still hovers around 10 to 12 percent, hampered by erratic power supply, high logistics costs, and dependence on imported inputs. Agriculture, employing over one-third of the population, remains largely subsistence-based and technologically backward. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), which make up 90 percent of businesses and contribute 48 percent of GDP, continue to struggle with limited access to affordable, long-term credit.

Alawuba suggests that this is where the banking recapitalisation drive must meet fintech innovation. By creating products specifically tailored to SMEs such as flexible loan packages, digital lending tools, and market access platforms which banks can unlock exponential growth. He argues that the future of Nigeria’s economy depends on “the strategic alignment of policy, investment, technology, and, most importantly, our collective will to innovate and grow.”

However, achieving this alignment requires more than monetary engineering; it demands a complete rethink of fiscal and industrial policy. As Isa Omagu of the Bank of Industry (BoI) explained during the same forum, “The economy stands on both the monetary and fiscal sides; we need both sides to work together.” While the monetary side stabilizes prices, fiscal authorities must “come in on the issue of governance.” Nigeria’s biggest economic problem, he said, is simple: “We are not producing enough, and we cannot continue to consume imported goods and expect the economy to be robust.”

Omagu’s statement underscores the country’s most pressing contradiction as a consumption-driven economy that produces little of what it consumes. He called for deeper investment in agriculture, infrastructure, and services to minimize importation and reduce pressure on the foreign exchange market. “We cannot achieve a $1 trillion economy without focusing or boosting our production capacity,” he warned.

The Deputy Director of the Banking Examination Department at the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), Emeka Udechukwu, echoed a similar concern. He warned that “without a vibrant real sector, the economy might not grow fast enough to hit the $1 trillion target.” He argued that while the CBN’s loan-to-deposit ratio policy was designed to compel banks to lend more to the productive sector, “fundamental infrastructural deficits” and policy inconsistencies have undermined its impact. “If there is challenge in the real sector of any economy, that economy is already challenged,” he said. “We have to go back to the real sector and do what we are supposed to do.”

This diagnosis aligns with what many analysts have long argued that Nigeria’s economic problem is not lack of money but lack of production. Trillions of naira circulate within the financial system, yet they rarely translate into new factories, expanded farms, or exportable goods. A $1 trillion GDP projection, therefore, may reflect currency devaluation or statistical rebasing more than genuine productivity gains.

The country’s overreliance on oil further complicates the path to sustainable growth. Data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) shows that in the last quarter of 2023, crude oil accounted for over 81 percent of total exports, while non-oil exports amounted to just around N1 trillion. Even though non-oil exports grew by 38.5 percent in early 2024, their value remains meagre for an economy seeking diversification.

Nigeria’s non-oil export base including manufactured goods, agricultural products, and services remains underdeveloped. Experts argue that to escape this trap, Nigeria must learn from Asian success stories like Singapore and Vietnam, where industrialization, export-oriented manufacturing, and human capital investment transformed poor economies into global competitors.

Singapore, for instance, transitioned from high unemployment and poor infrastructure in the 1960s to one of the world’s richest nations through massive investment in education, manufacturing, and technology. Its top exports today include integrated circuits and machinery products that drive global industries. Similarly, Vietnam evolved from an agrarian, war-torn economy to a manufacturing hub exporting electronics, textiles, and footwear worth over $370 billion in 2022. Nigeria, by contrast, has watched its GDP fall from $400 billion in 2013 to around $250 billion by 2023.

Both countries demonstrate that industrialization, not financial speculation, drives long-term growth. As Uchenna Uzo, a marketing professor at Lagos Business School, put it, “Manufacturing and local production are the key things that can set Nigeria apart.” He added that Nigeria can also attract diaspora investment if it builds the right infrastructure and policy stability.

The lesson is clear; a trillion-dollar economy cannot be decreed from monetary policy statements or achieved through banking reforms alone. It must be earned through production, value addition, and innovation. Nigeria’s manufacturing base must expand, its agricultural productivity must rise, and its infrastructure such as power, transport, and logistics must be modernized.

Banking reforms should therefore serve as an enabler, not a substitute, for real sector development. The CBN’s recapitalization drive, while commendable, must be tied to sectoral targets. Banks that expand credit to manufacturing, agriculture, or export-oriented businesses should enjoy regulatory incentives, while speculative investments in non-productive assets should be discouraged.

Equally important is the need to tame inflation and stabilize the currency. As Adebajo noted, Nigeria can only sustain GDP growth of 8-10 percent if inflation is kept below 12 percent. Persistent inflation erodes purchasing power, deters investment, and undermines long-term planning. Without macroeconomic stability, even the best-intentioned reforms will falter.

Furthermore, there must be a coordinated industrial policy that aligns monetary, fiscal, and trade objectives. For instance, while the CBN seeks to strengthen the naira, the fiscal authorities must simultaneously support local manufacturers through tax incentives, infrastructure investment, and export facilitation. Import restrictions, when necessary, should be strategically designed to protect emerging industries without stifling competition.

Nigeria’s SME ecosystem also deserves targeted support. As the Bank of Industry’s Omagu and UBA’s Alawuba both emphasized, SMEs are the backbone of employment and innovation. Yet, they are often the most credit-starved. Government-backed credit guarantees, venture funds, and fintech-driven micro-lending could bridge this gap, helping small enterprises become the foundation of Nigeria’s industrial base.

Equally, agricultural transformation must move beyond subsistence farming to agro-industrialisation such as processing, packaging, and exporting value-added products rather than raw materials. This approach will not only increase farmers’ incomes but also create jobs and reduce pressure on foreign exchange demand. A focus on value chain development from farm to factory to market will ensure that the benefits of growth reach ordinary citizens.

At a time when 133 million Nigerians are multidimensionally poor, according to NBS data, the urgency for real sector reforms cannot be overstated. An economy that depends overwhelmingly on oil exports, consumes more than it produces, and imports most of its essential goods cannot claim to be on the path to a trillion dollars in any meaningful sense.

The government’s projection of achieving a $1 trillion economy by 2030 could still be attainable but only if the country embarks on deep structural reforms. These include ensuring reliable power supply, revamping transport infrastructure, tackling corruption that inflates project costs, and improving governance and policy consistency.

Nigeria must also invest aggressively in education and skills development, following the example of countries like Singapore, which turned human capital into its greatest economic asset. A young, skilled population can drive innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological adoption which is the real levers of modern economic power.

The road to a trillion-dollar economy will not be paved by balance sheets and banking reforms alone. It will be built by factories, farms, and entrepreneurs. It will depend on a nation’s ability to produce, innovate, and trade competitively. It will require a deliberate shift from policy announcements to policy execution, where government actions translate into measurable outcomes for citizens.

Nigeria’s trillion-dollar dream is achievable, but not on the current trajectory. Without revitalizing the real sector, ensuring macroeconomic stability, and investing in people and production, the CBN’s optimism risks sounding like rhetoric detached from reality. Banking reforms may stabilize the system, but only real sector reforms can sustain growth.

In the end, Nigeria’s economic destiny will not be determined in banking halls but in the fields, factories, and workshops where real value is created. The trillion-dollar economy will not come from financial statements, it will come from the sweat of productive Nigerians who, if properly empowered, can transform potential into prosperity.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional writes from Lagos, can be reached via: [email protected]


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

Oluwaseun Dania Unearths How AI will Shape Africa’s Creative-AI Future @ World Bank Forum

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Oluwaseun Dania, Technology entrepreneur, creative economy strategist, and Founder of Alpha-Geek Technologies, delivered a major intervention at the World Bank and Eden Venture Group’s Entertaining Change: Next-Generation Media Partnerships for Social Impact and Gender Equality event, introducing groundbreaking ideas shaping the future of African storytelling, AI governance, and digital policy.

Speaking during the knowledge-sharing session on AI for Entertainment Media Content: Advancing Impact and Research, Dania outlined how artificial intelligence can unlock unprecedented opportunities for creators, researchers, regulators, and development partners across the continent.

Key Messages Delivered at the Event

  1. 1. AI as a Multiplier for African Creativity

Dania emphasized that AI is not replacing creativity, it is amplifying it:

“Africa’s creative sector already shapes global culture. AI gives our stories reach, scale, and economic force.”

He showcased how AI supports script-writing, editing, VFX, audio enhancement, audience forecasting, and rights protection, enabling African creators to produce globally competitive content at significantly reduced cost.

  1. The Indie-Studio-in-a-Box: A Creative and Economic Breakthrough

Dania introduced the Indie-Studio-in-a-Box, a streamlined AI-powered production model that allows small teams (5–8 people) to execute an end-to-end studio pipeline from a single laptop.

The model includes:

  • AI-assisted script development
  • Virtual pre-visualization
  • Smart on-set production tools
  • Automated post-production (clean-up, VFX, edits)
  • Multi-language AI dubbing
  • AI-enabled IP protection
  • Rapid digital distribution

“A complete African studio can now live inside a laptop. That is a transformative shift for creators and the economy.”

  1. A.I.R.: A Modern Ethical Framework for Creative AI

To ensure AI adoption remains responsible and creator-centred, Dania unveiled the A.I.R. Framework, which sets out three core pillars:

A — Attribution:

Clear rights, consent and credit for creators, performers, and their likeness.

I — Integrity:

Mandatory provenance watermarking to maintain transparency around AI-generated or AI-assisted content.

R — Residuals:

Smart-contract systems that ensure fair, automated compensation whenever a creator’s work or likeness is reused.

  1. Collaboration with Academia to Tackle AI Bias & Update Creative Curricula

Dania strongly advocated for deep collaboration between the government, Big Tech Companies, the creative industry, and universities to ensure African voices and contexts shape the AI tools used in media.

He stressed the importance of:

  • Updating film, media, and computer science curricula to include AI literacy
  • Teaching future creators how to recognise, audit, and mitigate AI bias
  • Building African-language and culturally relevant datasets in partnership with universities
  • Establishing research labs that study representation, inclusivity, and algorithmic fairness
  • Creating pipelines between academia and the creative industry to ensure continuous innovation

“If we want AI systems that understand African faces, voices, stories, and social norms, we must build them ourselves, through research, curriculum reform, and proactive academic collaboration.”

  1. Call for a Creative AI Regulatory Sandbox

Dania called for a NITDA-led Creative AI Sandbox, involving NDPC, NFVCB, NBC, NCC, CBN, guilds, universities, and development partners.
This sandbox would trial emerging AI tools in real productions, ensuring safety, ethics, and scalability.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

MultiChoice Rings in the Festive Season with Big Decoder Discounts

Published

on

Kindly share this post

MultiChoice has announced a further reduction in the prices of its decoders, continuing its commitment to providing affordable access to premium entertainment for Nigerian households.

With the new adjustment, the DStv decoder now sells for ₦7,900, while a GOtv decoder sells for ₦6,500. The DStv dish is set to sell at ₦10,000, while the GOtenna will go for ₦3,500. The latest price slash follows an earlier reduction in June 2025, under the company’s “We’ve Got You” campaign, when the price of a DStv decoder was reduced by 50% from ₦20,000 to ₦10,000 and the GOtv decoder went from ₦18,600 to ₦9,900.

The company said the move reflects its determination to reward both new and loyal customers by making its offerings even more accessible. The new pricing takes effect from November 1, 2025, coinciding with the launch of the company’s Festive Campaign.

Speaking on the development, Tope Oshunkeye, Executive Head of Marketing at MultiChoice, said the initiative underscores the company’s mission to keep entertainment within reach for all Nigerians.

“As the festive season draws closer, family time and celebrations are a big part of our lives, and what better way to do this than to spend quality time with loved ones while enjoying premium entertainment. This price slash makes it possible for more families to enjoy quality local and international entertainment without putting too much pressure on their pockets. At MultiChoice, we remain committed to making world-class storytelling accessible to every home,” he said.

Over the festive season, MultiChoice, through its DStv and GOtv platforms, will be airing its rich slate of kids’ content, international blockbusters, and local originals such as The Low Priest, Mother of the Brides, and Etiti, among others. For football fans, the Premier League, Ligue 1, La Liga, Serie A, and AFCON will also be available on SuperSport channels.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending