Connect with us

Telecom

Corporate Blackmail, My Story as a Case Study, by Leo Stan Ekeh, Chairman Zinox Group

Published

on

LEO STAN EKEH
Kindly share this post

At an end-of-year inspirational talk delivered on 14th December, 2024 to his select mentees of young entrepreneurs in Nigeria monitored in Lagos, Dr. Leo Stan Ekeh advised them not to lose hope in the Nigerian economy, as he projects that the country shall start returning to a comfortable zone from the 3rd quarter of 2025,  he also warned them to apply greater caution in transactions with persons and corporates of questionable character, stressing why due diligence and being local are both critical and an added advantage. Below are excerpts from the lecture.

The new fraud is corporate and Personal blackmail, which my companies and I have fallen victim to. I am sure you have read some in the newspapers where CEOs of responsible corporations in Nigeria are tagged fraudsters.

This is the work of blackmailers, and they partner with a few blogs, engage some innocent respected law firms for hyping and a few government officials to achieve their set objectives to destroy your corporate and personal reputations.

These negative online materials are then lifted by Google, Facebook, Instagram, and other social media platforms so that when people search your organisation or personal names, you are seen as a crook. This is with the intent to destroy your brand and affect your credit rating globally.

In some cases, they sue you in multiple courts in Nigeria for the noise and to have the content to continue to upload on various social media platforms. Having set this platform against you, your competitors would leverage them to blackmail you by paying them handsomely.

In some cases, they secure a Fiat from the office of the Attorney General of the Federation to give an impression that the Federal Government is suing you for fraud, which allegations they cannot prove in courts. This is to make more money from your competitors and extort you if you want such negative news taken down from social media pages.

I am a private person, but for the first time in the history of my entrepreneurship, I will tell you a bit about the Group I founded over 38 years ago. In Nigeria, humility is seen as stupidity. You are free to reconcile and appreciate the noise a certain Benjamin Joseph and Femi Falana chambers are making as an insult to themselves and the nation.

My integrated technology group is the largest on the continent, and we have the second-highest credit rating in the tech sector as far as I have been told in the whole of Africa. What this means is that if you award us a contract of over $5 billion, we don’t need to borrow to execute because we are trusted.

In 38 years of tech entrepreneurship, we have had a global turnover of over $23.7 billion, and we have not borrowed a kobo from any financial institution in the world, neither do we owe any. We have delivered the biggest tech projects across Africa and most of them you are aware of. I set out from day one as an orphan and an only child even though my parents were alive and I have five other siblings. So, I am my own adviser.

We built the Group as corporate collateral, we are trusted by all our over 35 global partners and most of them are listed in Fortune 100. We do our best to promote a trust economy.

A few weeks ago, I paid one of the leading multinationals over $31m for a debt one of the companies in the Group incurred due to Naira devaluation challenges, and this is one out of 31 multinationals. So, I am like someone on steroids 24 hours a day and manage to sleep 3 hours a day to maintain this global reputation.

Last week, I inspected our companies’ books, and the group exposure on credit extension to companies in Nigeria was over $89m. We have worked very hard to build knowledge, infrastructure, and spiritual capacities for our survival, and the Group is not focused on money but on our passion. Please research all these before our final meeting in the first quarter of 2025. I shall tell my full story one day.

Using what my companies TD Africa Distributions, Zinox Technologies, my colleagues in both companies, my wife, and I have suffered in the last 11 years in the hands of Benjamin Joseph of Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd, an Enugu indigene based in Ibadan, and an alleged serial blackmailer and fraudster as a case study, you shall appreciate it.

I have never met Benjamin Joseph in my life, and neither has he directly or indirectly enquired or transacted any business with Zinox Technologies Ltd in the history of our existence.

Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd was amongst 13 companies awarded HP PC contract by Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS) in 2012, with instruction from the FIRS that the laptops must be sourced genuinely from HP Authorized Distributor in Nigeria, and TD Africa is the biggest HP Partner in Nigeria.

This is because the FIRS wanted to guard against grey or fake products and the challenges of after-sales support. Citadel, through its authorised partner, Princess Kama (with a letter of Authority signed by Benjamin Joseph as the MD of Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd), approached TD Africa to supply Citadel the laptops on credit as the company did not have enough funds to pay TD Africa.

The agreed condition was that FIRS should pay into a Citadel Account, where two staff members of TD shall be signatories to protect our pre-agreed invoice value, plus an additional guarantee from a responsible Nigerian.

Citadel raised a Board resolution to include two TD staff, Chris Eze Ozims and Shade Oyebode, as the signatories in an account Citadel opened with Access Bank.  TD Africa then supplied the systems to FIRS with serial number of each system captured.

This was the same process for the other companies awarded similar contracts by the FIRS who didn’t have enough funds to pay for the laptops.  FIRS, as a responsible FGN agency, paid all on time, and other companies immediately remitted the pre-agreed amount from the dedicated account to TD Africa Account. But Benjamin Joseph, the CEO of Citadel, as I was told by his partner, Princess Kama, wanted to divert the fund and possibly pay us at his own time or never.

However, Princess Kama, because her Uncle Chief Igbokwe (a long-time partner of TD Africa) was an additional guarantor for the credit extended to Citadel, disagreed with the plans of Benjamin Joseph.

She approached TD Africa signatories/representatives to debit the dedicated bank account for the pre-agreed amount, as Benjamin Joseph insisted on diverting the funds. TD representatives actioned immediately. This is where the problem started.

One year after this transaction was closed and forgotten, we did not know both partners had been fighting over the profit-sharing ratio. Benjamin Joseph engaged Afe Babalola Chambers and claimed that his company was used to defraud FGN, that no laptops were supplied, and that he was not aware of both the contract and Citadel Account opened with Access Bank Plc.

According to Princess Kama, Chief Afe Babalola SAN, a distinguished lawyer of Afe Babalola Chambers, invited her to Ibadan and she obliged. When he raised the claims by Benjamin Joseph, she presented documentary evidence which was confirmed by FIRS management that Benjamin Joseph was aware of the contract, and indeed submitted a copy of his International Passport, a Letter of Acceptance of the FIRS Contract, and the appointment of Princess Kama as the duly authorised representative of Citadel on the FIRS contract.

In fact, her position was vindicated by the FIRS in a letter dated 11th February 2014 and signed by FIRS Head of Legal, Idrissa Kogo, addressed to the same Afe Babalola and Co. confirming that Mr. Benjamin Joseph was aware of the contract and even gave FIRS a letter dated 13th December, 2012 to deal with Princess Kama in relation to the contract.

In the same letter, FIRS confirmed that Citadel instructed them to pay the proceed of the laptop into the Citadel Account with Access Bank. These matters would later be corroborated in the Witness Statement on Oath by Benjamin Joseph in a civil case he filed at the Lagos State High Court, accepting he was aware of the contract and gave those documents to Princess Kama.  According to Princess Kama, Chief Afe Babalola advised her to increase Benjamin Joseph’s share by an additional N2m from the N10million she had initially offered. However, Mr. Joseph insisted on taking all the profit from the transaction, and she refused.

It was after one year that Benjamin Joseph started writing all sorts of petitions to different police stations and EFCC offices both in Lagos and Abuja and publishing interviews against me and Zinox with his hired media agents. I checked with Zinox and they never transacted any business with his company.

When my staff started receiving invitations from the Police and EFCC, I had to independently investigate the transaction, and it was in order. I had no idea who both Benjamin Joseph and his partner Princess Kama were, and because a lady was involved, I had to investigate both and, particularly Princess Kama to establish their partnership, in case she was a member of a fraud syndicate and their true relationship. I hired foreign-certified detectives who worked with local ones to establish their long-term relationships.

They once belonged in the same church, nearly got married, and were partners for years. They even had previous contract bids which Princess Kama did for Citadel Oracle Concept Ltd in many offices, including the Presidency. This cost me then $241,000. It was after I received a comprehensive report from the detectives that I asked my office to invite her to see me and she came and confirmed everything.

Mr. Joseph, who was properly investigated and documented, including his financial status, became more aggressive in publishing false claims and probably expected me to call him to negotiate as he was told I am a very rich man.

At one point, an AIG of Police invited us to meet in his office at SFU Milverton, Ikoyi, to find a solution because he was shocked that someone was writing a petition against my companies, my staff, and myself for less than N170m. But at the last minute, I apologised to the AIG that I would not attend as Mr. Benjamin Joseph, who came from Ibadan for the meeting, was already blackmailing me in blogs and newspapers. He could use that meeting to a negative advantage.

Sometime in November 2013, the law firm of Afe Babalola, acting for Mr. Benjamin Joseph and his company, Citadel, wrote the first petition to the Special Fraud Unit (SFU) of the Nigerian Police at Milverton Ikoyi, that his signature was forged on the Board resolution and other documents. The SFU investigated his petitions and wrote a report that his claim of the forged signature by his partner Princess Kama and his claim that no computers were supplied to FIRS were false. He, again, petitioned the DIG of Police, then Dr. Solomon Arase, who finally became Inspector General of Police. Dr. Arase, according to what I was told, sent his crack team to visit FIRS office and investigated other claims and found out that Mr. Benjamin Joseph lied absolutely.

Consequently, the IG of Police charged him to court in Charge No. CR/216/16 before Honourable Justice Peter Kekemeke of the FCT High Court, for false information. Even though the Prosecution proved and closed its case in 2018, Mr. Benjamin Joseph could not defend or substantiate his allegations after being required many times by the court to open his defence.

He would change lawyers and absent himself from court, giving medical reasons. Rather than opening his defence, Mr. Joseph was spending time in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation begging for the AGF to take over the case and discontinue the charges against him.

However, the then Attorney General, after reviewing the case file on each of those three occasions, wrote to the Police to continue with his prosecution to a logical conclusion. These directives were contained in three separate letters dated 10th February 2017, 7th May 2018, and 6th June 2022.

While the above case was on, Benjamin wrote the same lies to the then Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, claiming that his company was used to defraud the FGN. The VP rightly instructed the Chairman of EFCC to investigate and report back.

The EFCC, in their report, stated that the allegation was false and absolved TD and its staff of any wrongdoing because they are entitled to payment for the laptops they supplied on credit and did not forge any documents; in fact, they had no reasons to forge documents.

However, the EFCC charged Princess Kama and her uncle, Chief Igbokwe, to court before Honourable Justice Senchi of the FCT High Court on the instigation of Mr. Benjamin Joseph. But, again, Mr. Benjamin Joseph, was unable to prove his allegations against them, and in a judgment delivered in February 2021, Honourable Justice Danlami Senchi in Charge No. FCT/HC/CR/244/2018, discharged and acquitted both Princess Kama and Chief Igbokwe, and imposed a damage of N20 million against Mr. Benjamin Joseph for false petitioning and to serve as a deterrence against others who engage in false petitions that waste tax payers’ money.

More importantly, the judgment of Honourable Justice Senchi unequivocally stated that Technology Distributions and its staff were not liable for any fraud and that they were entitled to receive the proceeds of the laptops supplied on credit to Citadel Oracle Concept Limited, which were delivered to FIRS, and confirmed by them. This judgment is still subsisting and  Mr. Joseph has yet to pay the damage of N20 million imposed on him.

Before this point, Mr. Joseph and his media partners became desperate in blackmailing my wife, myself, and  Zinox Technologies in cheap blogs, as no responsible media ever published any of their press releases except Sahara Reporters, who were coopted and refused to hear our side of the story.

All these years, none of my staff, companies or myself was invited or included in all these court processes except the EFCC court case where TD was only invited as a witness because Citadel  transacted with them. But his media blackmail was on me and Zinox and he smartly avoided his partner Princess Kama.

What Benjamin Joseph and his syndicate set up is a platform to work with my competitors who are willing to sponsor them to diminish my reputation by escalating in the media same case he could not defend and begged that it should be withdrawn.

This is the cause of the Nigeria digital census project delay till date and equipment worth over N300b are wasting in warehouses because my competitors and their sponsors at the highest level used them and engaged Femi Falana SAN to secure a Fiat against my name, my wife, my companies to tag us as frauds. By their action, Zinox almost lost a digital census contract of over $250m of which it was the most qualified.  However, then Attorney General of Federation, Mr. Malami SAN, when he found out that he was deceived by Femi Falana (SAN) in granting the Fiat, wrote him a letter dated 28th October 2022, withdrawing the Fiat and discontinuing the case against me and my company which they had filed, unknown to us.

This is because Femi Falana SAN did not disclose fully to the Attorney General the fact that there is a subsisting judgment given by Honourable Justice Senchi that has dismissed all the allegations of Mr. Joseph and asked him to pay N20 million damages. He also did not disclose the fact that his client, Mr. Joseph, was still facing a criminal trial brought by the IG of Police against him.  So, a few days after, President Muhammadu Buhari, based on submissions at the Federal Executive Council meeting, approved that the contract be awarded to Zinox Technologies Ltd based on competence, capacity and experience. And it was awarded to Zinox Technologies after months of blackmail to eliminate us from the deal. We delivered the project on time per our terms of engagement, but it was too late for the previous administration to conduct the Digital Census. What it means is that these blackmailers with support of people like Femi Falana caused the lack of credible data to move the country forward as all the equipment procured for the census are lying waste in warehouses nationwide. That’s shameless Nigerians for you and they walk the street as free men till date.

The arrival of the new Attorney General, Lateef Fagbemi SAN, changed everything. As a lawyer who had worked with Afe Babalola chambers (former lawyers to Benjamin Joseph), one of his early actions in office was to discontinue the Police case (CR/216/16) against Benjamin Joseph following the petition lodged by the chambers of Afe Babalola SAN at the SFU, Milvertion Road, Ikoyi, Lagos, on behalf of Mr. Benjamin Jospeh, that was found to be false.  As a distinguished lawyer that I respect, I expected him to request for source documents of the cases including one already decided against Joseph by Honourable Justice Senchi of the FCT High Court that had already found Mr. Benjamin Joseph of lying in his petition with a damage of N20 million imposed on him.

As the number one judicial officer of the nation, even if he wanted to save Mr. Joseph from going to jail, I expected the Honourable Attorney General to act dispassionately in the light of a subsisting case/order directed against him to refrain from discontinuing the Police Charge pending the determination of that case, and also in the light of the valid and subsisting judgment of Honourable Justice Senchi.

Instead, he, against all the glaring SFU and EFFC reports and the decided case, withdrew the Police case against Mr. Joseph on reasons best known to him, thereby setting Mr. Joseph free, and he has been celebrating the withdrawal of a case he reported and could not prove/defend for years. To date, Benjamin Joseph acts as a blackmail platform for my competitors whenever we are competing on a bid, using nefarious publications in social media directed at me, my wife, and my company, Zinox.

Please, as stakeholders and future Nigerian trillionaires, learn from my experience. However, you must not dine with blackmailers, as technology will soon delete them from the tech ecosystem.

 


Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Telecom

NATCOMS, Subscribers Body to Sue NCC over Call, Data’s 50 Percent  Tariff Hike

Published

on

Kindly share this post

National Association of Telecommunications Subscribers (NATCOMS) has said it would file a lawsuit against the federal government’s decision to allow telecom operators to increase tariffs by 50 per cent.

NATCOMS, Subscribers Body to Sue NCC over Call, Data’s 50 Percent  Tariff Hike

Deolu Ogunbanjo, president, NATCOMS

Deolu Ogunbanjo, president, NATCOMS, in an interview in Lagos, said the Nigerian Communications Commission did not carry subscribers along.

Ogunbanjo said that NATCOMS understood the dilemma faced by the telecommunications industry and had suggested a five per cent to ten per cent marginal increase in tariff.

He said that the approval by the federal government for telecom operators to hike tariffs but capped at 50 per cent maximal increment was unacceptable.

According to Ogunbanjo, earlier, economic experts had x-rayed the telecoms sector and said that it was in intensive care, meaning that it needed to be attended to.

“The industry operators can opt for an initial public offer for Nigerians to buy shares in their companies as a way of raising funds. However, a situation where a whole 50 per cent is granted for a tariff hike is not cheap. It is a no from us subscribers.

“I mean, for what we are already going through, no for us, we will challenge this in court,’’ Ogunbanjo stated.

On Monday, the NCC, the industry’s regulatory body, released a statement saying it had acceded to the requests of operators to hike tariffs.

This was announced in a statement.

The NCC said it had approved the 50 per cent tariff adjustments in response to prevailing operational costs. It said this was less than the 100 per cent demanded by some telecom operators.

It said its decision was pursuant to its power under Section 108 of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003, to regulate and approve tariff rates and charges by telecommunications operators.

The NCC added that, while recognising the concerns of the public, the decision was made after extensive consultations with key stakeholders across the public and private sectors.

“The NCC has prioritised striking a balance between protecting telecoms consumers and ensuring the sustainability of the industry, including the thousands of indigenous vendors and suppliers who form a critical part of the telecommunications ecosystem.

“The NCC recognises the financial pressures faced by Nigerian households and businesses and remains deeply empathetic to the impact of tariff adjustments. To this end, the commission has mandated that operators implement these adjustments transparently and in a manner that is fair to consumers,” the NCC explained.

It added that these adjustments would support the ability of operators to continue investing in infrastructure and innovation, ultimately benefiting consumers through improved services and connectivity.

The NCC also mentioned that consumers would benefit from better network quality, enhanced customer service, and greater coverage within the country.

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

CBN, NCC Provide New Framework for Resolution of USSD Dispute between Banks and Telcos

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) have provided a new framework to resolve the protected Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) debt issue between Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) and Mobile Network Operators (MNOs).

CBN, NCC Provide New Framework for Resolution of USSD Dispute between Banks and Telcos

USSD, sometimes referred to as “quick codes” is provided by MNO and are used for banking services.

MNOs and banks have been at loggerheads over debts.

USSD debt issue emerged from allegations that some banks were deducting the USSD fees from customers but failing to remit the funds to telecom operators.

Instead, the banks reportedly used these funds to address other financial obligations.

Despite significant efforts, the dispute has remained unresolved.

In their second intervention, the CBN and NCC issued a joint circular signed by Oladimeji Yisa Taiwo, acting director, Payments System Management Department, and Chizua White, head of Legal & Regulatory Services of CBN and NCC respectively.

In the circular, the regulators mandated the banks to settle 85 percent of all outstanding invoices issued after the implementation of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) by December 31, 2024.

Furthermore, all future invoices must also be settled at 85 percent within one month of issuance.

Banks are required to pay 60 percent of invoices predating the API implementation as full and final settlement.

Payment plans, whether lump sum or installments, must be finalized between DMBs and MNOs by January 2, 2025.

Where installment payments are proposed, such plans must consist of equal monthly payments, with all payments completed by July 2, 2025.

Transition to End-User Billing (EUB)

Compliance with the aforementioned directives is a prerequisite for transitioning to an End-User Billing (EUB) system.

The NCC will activate the necessary regulatory processes to enable this transition and will provide public guidance on the matter.

 

 

Part of the guidance incudes the following.

To ensure fairness in billing, MNOs must adopt a rule that any USSD session lasting less than 10 seconds will not be billable.

Migration for prepaid billing DMBs

Banks currently operating under prepaid billing may transition to EUB after fulfilling all regulatory requirements.

Discontinuation of Litigation Both DMBs and MNOs have been instructed to discontinue any ongoing legal proceedings related to the USSD debt dispute,” it read in part.

The circular underscored that non-compliance with these directives would attract regulatory sanctions from both the CBN and NCC.

The USSD debt issue emerged from allegations that some banks were deducting the N6.98 USSD fees from customers but failing to remit the funds to telecom operators.

Instead, the banks reportedly used these funds to address other financial obligations.

As a result, telecom companies, under the directive of the NCC, threatened to disconnect nine banks from USSD services by January 27, 2025, if they failed to settle outstanding debts.

The affected banks include Fidelity Bank, First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Jaiz Bank, Polaris Bank, Sterling Bank, United Bank for Africa (UBA), Unity Bank, Wema Bank, and Zenith Bank. Collectively, their debts are estimated to exceed N160 billion.

 

The NCC issued a notice emphasising its commitment to consumer protection and warned customers of the potential loss of USSD services with these banks if the debts remain unpaid. “As part of its commitment to consumer protection, the Commission wants to inform consumers that they may lose access to the USSD services of the affected banks from January 27, 2025,” the NCC stated.

Previously, telecom operators threatened to suspend the USSD services of 18 banks due to unpaid bills totaling over N200 billion.

However, the recent directives signal a renewed effort to resolve the impasse and ensure that consumers continue to enjoy seamless USSD services.

 

The CBN and NCC aim to resolve the USSD debt issue through the outlined measures, ensuring a balance between the interests of telecom operators, banks, and consumers. A key element of this resolution is the shift to an End-User Billing system, which will streamline the payment process and minimize disputes.

In addition to the financial directives, the circular encouraged collaboration between banks and telecom operators to implement these measures effectively.

It also directed both parties to ensure prompt and transparent communication to avoid further misunderstandings.

For customers, the resolution of this issue is critical to maintaining uninterrupted access to USSD services, which are essential for mobile banking transactions.

The adoption of the “10-Second Rule” is expected to reduce disputes over unfair billing and enhance consumer trust.

As part of the regulatory process, the NCC and CBN will provide public guidance on the transition to the new billing system.

This step is expected to foster a smoother shift to End-User Billing while ensuring that consumers are adequately informed.

The ongoing efforts by the CBN and NCC to address the USSD debt dispute reflect a commitment to safeguarding consumer interests and maintaining stability in Nigeria’s financial and telecommunications sectors.

By enforcing these directives, the regulators aim to resolve the debt crisis, ensure fair practices, and support the continued growth of digital financial services in the country.

While challenges remain, the outlined resolutions provide a clear path forward, emphasising accountability, transparency, and collaboration among all stakeholders.

The next steps will determine the success of this initiative and its impact on the broader financial ecosystem.

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

Telecom Tariffs Set to Rise by 50 Percent as NCC Approves Adjustments

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has announced that it will approve tariff adjustment requests by network operators, in response to current market conditions.

The adjustments, capped at a maximum of 50% of current tariffs, are lower than the over 100% requested by some operators.

These changes will remain within the tariff bands stipulated in the 2013 NCC Cost Study and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, adhering to the NCC Guidance on Tariff Simplification, 2024.

The adjustments aim to address the gap between operational costs and current tariffs, ensuring service delivery is not compromised.

They will support operators in investing in infrastructure and innovation, benefiting consumers through improved services and connectivity.

The decision was made after extensive consultations with stakeholders, balancing consumer protection and industry sustainability.

The NCC has mandated transparent implementation and public education on the new rates, with a focus on measurable service improvements.

The NCC remains dedicated to fostering a resilient, innovative, and inclusive telecommunications sector, supporting indigenous vendors and suppliers, and promoting Nigeria’s digital economy.

The Commission will continue to engage with stakeholders to create a telecommunications environment that works for everyone.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending