Connect with us

Broadcasting

Dayo Samuel: An African Product Leader, Driving AI and Embedded Finance

Published

on

Dayo Samuel
Kindly share this post

We had a chat with Dayo Samuel, a seasoned Senior Product Manager whose career reflects a rare blend of vision and execution. Known for approaching product challenges with both strategic insight and practical solutions, Dayo has helped teams not only build but also scale effectively in competitive markets. His strength lies in connecting ideas to real outcomes, making him a dependable leader in driving both growth and innovation.

Dayo Samuel

In this conversation, we’ll explore his journey, his approach to product leadership, and the lessons he’s learned along the way.

Dayo, Africa’s technology ecosystem is growing rapidly, but infrastructure challenges still exist. How do you approach building products that balance global best practices with the unique realities of African markets?

Dayo Samuel (DS): Yeah, so for me, it always starts with context. I’ve seen that when you just copy-paste global playbooks into African markets, it doesn’t always land because the realities on the ground are different. Things like payment infrastructure, internet reliability, and even how trust is built with users those are not the same as in Europe or the U.S.

So the way I approach it is to learn from global best practices things like user-centered design, iterative testing, strong product frameworks, research methodology but then adapt them with the realities here. For example, in embedded finance, you can’t assume every user has a credit card on file. You need to consider mobile money, offline access, or even social trust networks as part of the product design.

I prefer to run reasonably controlled, research-led experiments. What I mean by that is I spend time understanding the local constraints and user behaviors first through interviews, observation, or data and then I design quick pilots to test solutions against those insights. That way, the experiments are not just “try and see,” they’re actually grounded in the realities of the people we’re building for.

At the end of the day, I see my role as bridging both worlds: bringing in the structure and discipline of global product leadership, but staying close enough to the ground here in Africa to design for what’s real. That balance is what creates products that actually scale sustainably.

In markets where reliable data can be scarce or fragmented, how do you go about gathering and validating customer insights to guide your product decisions?

DS:  Yeah, that’s a really common challenge here. Sometimes the data just isn’t complete or reliable, so you can’t just rely on dashboards or reports like you would in other markets. For me, it’s about triangulating insights from multiple sources. I combine whatever quantitative data is available even if it’s fragmented with qualitative research: talking directly to users, observing behavior in context, and understanding their real pain points.

Advertisement

Many African startups struggle with scaling beyond their first wave of users. From your experience, what does achieving true product–market fit in Africa look like, and how can companies measure it effectively?

DS: Yeah, achieving a product–market fit here is a bit different from other markets. In Africa, it’s not just about hitting growth numbers or downloads, it’s about building something that actually works for the people you’re serving, given local realities. For me, true product–market fit happens when users not only adopt the product but rely on it, tell others about it, and engage with it consistently, even in environments where infrastructure or trust can be challenging.

From my experience, getting there starts with really understanding the user: running research-led experiments, observing behavior in context, testing assumptions, and iterating quickly. For example, in embedded finance, we had to validate whether people would trust a new payment flow or rely on it for recurring transactions and that meant combining qualitative insights with small pilots before scaling.

As for measuring it, I focus on a few key signals: retention over time, engagement metrics that show real usage, and how much users become advocates for the product. In Africa, sometimes the numbers alone don’t tell the story so combining quantitative metrics with qualitative feedback is what really shows whether you’ve found a product that fits the market.

Monetization is often tricky in Africa, where consumers are highly price-sensitive. How do you design business models that are both inclusive and sustainable in the long term?

DS: Yeah, monetization here definitely has its challenges. For me, it’s about designing business models that meet people where they are affordable, accessible, and relevant while still making the product sustainable. I combine user research with small experiments to test pricing, payment methods, and value perception. For example, with embedded finance, we explored mobile-money-first flows and tiered pricing, validating what people would actually pay for before scaling. It’s all about balancing inclusivity with long-term viability.

Advertisement

There’s a growing demand for skilled product managers across Africa, but the talent pipeline is still maturing. How have you built or mentored product teams to deliver global-standard products while staying rooted in local context?

DS: Yeah, building product teams here is definitely about balancing global standards with local realities. For me, it starts with hiring people who are curious and adaptable, not just technically strong, but willing to learn from the market and the users. Then, I mentor them through research-led, hands-on experiences: small experiments, pilots, and iterative testing that are rooted in local context.

I also emphasize frameworks and processes from global best practices things like structured roadmaps, clear metrics, and user-centered design but always adapt them to what actually works here. Over time, this approach helps teams deliver products that meet international quality, but are also deeply relevant and usable for African users.

With global tech giants entering African markets, how can local product managers differentiate their solutions and compete on both value and scale?

DS: Local product managers win by deeply understanding the market and designing for realities global players might overlook things like offline access, mobile money, and social trust. I focus on research-led experiments to test solutions quickly, combining local insights with global best practices. That’s how you deliver products that are both relevant and scalable.

Fintech, mobility, and e-commerce have all seen significant regulatory attention in Africa. How do you navigate shifting government policies while ensuring product innovation isn’t stifled?

DS: Regulation is definitely a big factor here, so I treat it as part of the product strategy, not a blocker. I stay close to policy updates, engage with stakeholders early, and design flexible solutions that can adapt as rules change. At the same time, I ensure experimentation culture to keep innovation moving, so we’re iterating and learning without risking compliance. It’s about being proactive, adaptable, and user-focused.

Advertisement

Partnerships with telcos, banks, and even governments often determine the success of African products. What’s your framework for evaluating and structuring partnerships that drive adoption?

DS: Partnerships start with alignment, understanding what the partner can bring and how it adds value to the user. I evaluate potential partners based on reach, trust, operational capability, and shared incentives. Structuring the partnership is about clear roles, measurable goals, and flexibility to iterate. I also run small pilots early to test assumptions before scaling, so the partnership drives real adoption, not just theoretical impact.

Africa is made up of 54 very different markets. What strategies have worked best for you when trying to scale a product across multiple countries on the continent?

DS: Scaling across Africa is all about balancing standardization with local adaptation. I start with a core product framework that works universally, but I don’t assume it fits every market out of the box. I spend time understanding local behaviors, regulations, and infrastructure, then run small, research-led pilots in each market to validate assumptions before full rollout.

I also focus on building modular solutions things like flexible payment flows or language support that can be adjusted per market without redesigning everything. And finally, I prioritize partnerships and local teams who understand the context; they’re key to scaling efficiently while keeping the product relevant and trusted.

Advertisement


Finally, looking ahead, with technologies like AI, blockchain, and digital identity gaining traction, what do you see as the biggest product opportunities in Africa over the next decade?
DS: Looking ahead, I see huge opportunities at the intersection of technology and local needs. AI can help personalize financial services, credit scoring, and even healthcare in ways that were impossible before. Blockchain opens doors for transparent transactions, secure identity, and cross-border payments. Digital identity, in particular, is foundational once people can prove who they are, a lot of services become accessible, from banking to government programs.

For me, the biggest product wins will be solutions that combine these technologies with a deep understanding of local context solving real problems for users while building trust and accessibility. Products that do that will scale fast and have lasting impact.

Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Broadcasting

From Scarcity to Scale: What Africa Can Learn from India’s Agricultural Transformation 

Published

on

Kindly share this post

By Alice Ruhweza and Dr Purvi Mehta
Food security is often framed as a question of production. Yet at its core, it is about something far more fundamental: how societies organise themselves to ensure that food remains reliably available, accessible, and affordable. In that sense, food is not only a commodity. It is a public good, central to economic stability, social cohesion, and national resilience. Food sector also continues to remain the largest employment generator across developing countries.
India’s transformation from a food deficit nation to one of the world’s largest agricultural producers is frequently linked to the Green Revolution. Focusing too narrowly on that moment misses the broader lesson, aligning policy, institutions, markets, and science around a clear national objective. That alignment moved India from vulnerability to resilience, and increasingly to economic strength.
For Africa, the question is not whether that journey can be replicated. It is what can be learned from how it was built, and how those lessons inform a different context.
A transformation shaped by leadership and systems
India’s agricultural progress reflects decades of political commitment, public investment, and institutional development.
Scientific advances mattered, but so did procurement systems, rural infrastructure, financing mechanisms, farmer participation and research networks. These elements worked together to stabilise food supply and support rural livelihoods. Agriculture was treated as a national priority linked to economic and political stability.
Governments invested in increasing production and ensuring food systems delivered broader outcomes, including stability, price predictability, and social protection. Public grain reserves, price support mechanisms, and distribution systems built food security and underpinned national resilience.
Shared foundations, different realities
Agriculture plays a central role in India’s economy supporting a large workforce and remains closely tied to food security and economic stability. Africa shares structural similarities – agriculture remains central to livelihoods and large rural populations depend on it for income and stability.
The differences are equally significant. Africa’s agricultural systems are diverse, spanning multiple agroecology and climate conditions. Climate exposure is acute, markets fragmented and the pace of population growth faster. The pressure to generate jobs and economic opportunity is immediate. This is not a case of one region following another along a fixed path. It is a different starting point with different pressures. Africa must design its own pathway rather than replicate a historical model.
What the transformation journey reveals
India’s experience offers a set of principles about how transformation happens. First, transformation is built over time, requires sustained political commitment and consistent investment. Progress is cumulative and depends on alignment across multiple parts of the system.
Second, institutions matter as much as innovation. Research systems, extension services, market structures, and financing mechanisms all ensure that productivity gains translate into stable outcomes for farmers.
Third, agriculture must be treated as an economic system. Producing more food is one part of the equation. Markets, value chains, storage, and price realization determine farmers’ benefit. Fourth, food systems require public purpose. Left entirely to market forces, they may not deliver stability, equity, or resilience. Public policy ensures food systems serve broader societal goals.
Fifth, technology development is important, but the impact comes from how well the technology is disseminated and adopted. Affordability and access to technology optimizes the potential of technology.
Finally, inclusion must be deliberate. Even successful transformations can produce uneven outcomes unless access to resources and opportunities is designed to reach smallholders, women, and young people.
From productivity to farmer prosperity
The important shift for Africa is to move beyond a narrow focus on productivity towards a clearer focus on farmer prosperity. Agriculture remains the primary source of livelihood for millions, yet many farmers operate below viable economic thresholds, with limited access to markets, finance, and value addition opportunities.
The next phase of transformation must focus on converting agricultural activity into stable and growing incomes. This requires systems that connect production to markets, strengthen participation in value chains, and support farming as a viable economic enterprise.
Farmer prosperity is not simply a social ambition. It is an economic imperative. When farmers generate reliable incomes, they invest more, produce efficiently and participate fully in markets, strengthening economies and long-term development.
An evolving approach across Africa
Institutions such as AGRA work with governments, research systems, and private actors to strengthen these foundations. The emphasis is on aligning evidence, markets, finance, and policy for agricultural systems to function coherently and deliver measurable outcomes, shifting away from isolated interventions to coordinated efforts that link productivity, market access, and income growth.
Africa’s opportunity is different
Africa enters this moment with advantages such as digital connectivity is expanding, regional markets are growing, national and regional institutions are strengthening. Access to knowledge and technology is greater than ever before.
These conditions create the possibility not only to accelerate progress, but to design it differently. Climate resilience, diversification, and market participation can be integrated from the outset to build inclusive, adaptive and more sustainable food systems.
A new phase of agricultural transformation
India’s journey demonstrates large scale agricultural transformation is possible. It shows how it is built through leadership, institutions, and long-term commitment. Africa’s path will not be identical, but the ambition is similar: to ensure agriculture functions not only as a source of food, but as a driver of economic growth and stability.
The question is no longer whether transformation can happen. It’s whether leadership, systems, and partnerships will align to make it happen at scale.
Ms Ruhweza is the current AGRA President and Dr Mehta is an international development expert and advisor

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

BON Establishes Six Ad Hoc Committees to Modernize Broadcasting

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Broadcasting Organization of Nigeria (BON) has established six committees to help strengthen and modernize the country’s broadcasting industry.

The committees will focus on content creation, skills development, digital transformation, sustainability, policy and commercial opportunities

The initiative aims to support industry growth and improve collaboration between broadcasters, regulators and media experts

The official launch recently, was led by Tony Akiotu, president, BON and attended by media professionals, program directors, former journalists and heads of specialized media organizations.

The event brought together several prominent figures in Nigeria’s media industry, including veteran broadcaster and trainer Bimbo Oloyede, Tony Uyah of M4S TV, Kingsley Uranta of Channels Television, Ismael Sani of Platinum TV and Ibrahim Shehu of Trust TV.

Advertisement

Together, they are expected to help drive innovation and support the growth of Nigeria’s broadcasting sector.

According to Akiotu, the committees are intended both to help shape industry policy and to provide a forum for dialogue between BON and broadcasting experts.

Akiotu said the ad hoc committees were intended to strengthen BON’s work and ensure that the umbrella body for Nigeria’s broadcasters played a more direct and meaningful role in developing the country’s broadcasting sector.

The six committees reflect the sector’s main priorities. The first focuses on collaboration and innovation to promote content creation.

The second is dedicated to training and talent development, while the third focuses on industry sustainability by improving the sector’s long-term financial viability.

Advertisement

A fourth committee will focus on digital transformation and work with the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) on regulatory issues.

The remaining two committees will oversee public policy advocacy and the development of sports and commercial rights to help broadcasters increase revenue and attract more investment. Together, the committees are expected to guide BON’s efforts to modernize and strengthen Nigeria’s broadcasting industry.

The committees, chaired by members of BON’s General Assembly and supported by the organization’s Secretariat, have an initial 12-month mandate that may be renewed if necessary.

They are required to submit a progress report within three months and implement approved recommendations within the following six months.

The arrangement is intended to ensure close oversight and the timely implementation of their work.

Advertisement

Akiotu also reminded committee members that Nigeria pioneered television broadcasting in Africa and urged them to carry out their work with greater effectiveness and efficiency.

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

NELFUND Investigates 34 Universities Over Students’ Missing Tuition Refunds

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) says it is investigating about 34 tertiary institutions over allegations that they failed to refund students whose tuition fees were paid twice under the Federal Government’s student loan scheme.

The Managing Director of NELFUND, Mr Akintunde Sawyerr, disclosed this during an interview on Arise Television.

Sawyerr said the agency had deployed a five-member investigative team, including operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and internal auditors, to examine the allegations.

According to him, the investigation was prompted by numerous complaints received from affected students.

“As of right now, there are 34 institutions that we are looking at closely with respect to this issue,” he said.

Advertisement

Sawyerr explained that the double payment issue arose because President Bola Tinubu directed that the student loan scheme commence in the middle of an academic session instead of at the beginning.

He said the decision compelled many students to pay their tuition fees to meet registration deadlines while awaiting approval of their loan applications.

“What happened is that a lot of schools got double payment; some from the students and some from us,” he said.

“The refund process is entirely out of our hands. It is the recipient of the double payments that is obliged to make refunds to the students.”

The NELFUND boss noted that many students had borrowed money from family members, friends and other sources to pay their tuition with the expectation of receiving refunds once the loans were disbursed.

Advertisement

He said while some institutions had promptly refunded affected students, others had failed to do so.

“Some have been very good at this. Others haven’t been so good at it,” Sawyerr said.

“I reserve judgement on the intentionality around it because, for some of them, they just didn’t have the process to make refunds.”

Sawyerr disclosed that NELFUND was exploring a tokenised payment system that would enable students to authorise tuition payments directly to their institutions, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplicate payments.

He said the agency deliberately chose not to disburse tuition loans directly to students to minimise the risk of fund diversion.

Advertisement

“Paying the funds to the students could really lead to the temptation for them to divert and do other things,” he said.

The managing director, however, acknowledged that NELFUND lacked the statutory powers to compel institutions to refund students or prosecute officials found culpable.

He added that many frustrated students had submitted complaints not only to NELFUND but also to anti-corruption agencies, including the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

Sawyerr also expressed concern over increases in tuition fees by some institutions following the introduction of the student loan scheme.

He said NELFUND had declined to pay institutions that increased their tuition fees beyond acceptable levels.

Advertisement

“Some schools, because they get paid easily, started to put up their fees. We refused, point blank, to pay institutions who had hiked their fees beyond a certain level,” he said.

He reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to investigating every reported irregularity and strengthening the implementation of the student loan programme through continuous monitoring and internal reviews.

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending