E-Business
Delegate Responsibility not Accountability- Keele
Allen Keele is a certified fraud examiner, information security manager, information systems auditor and information systems security professional, among 20 other professional and technical accreditations. He shares over 17 years of experience in information security and risk management, including nine years of conducting professional advanced business lectures and seminars across the globe. Keele spoke to hilary okeke on a range of issues.
Training on Fraud Detection and Management
In information security, one of the most important things we have is not always having information security itself but having the internal control to be sure that we have information security. I wrote the text that most people use to prepare for Certified Information Systems Auditors (CISA) exams around the world. In that context, a lot of the controls that the internal auditors monitor have to do with controlling internal breaches and abuse. So, it would make logical sense to extend my auditors knowledge and expertise and interest into internal fraud detection and management. I was shocked to find in my younger days that 90 percent of frauds can be detected through the books. So many organizations tell you that they have no fraud problem but when you take a careful look, you find that there actually is a problem. People device all kinds of means to get money out their organizations without doing anything on the book. That was very concerning to me as an auditor. Fraud in itself is a disaster for an organization. It could lead to loss of market share if made public. Organizations need to be prepared for that kind of disaster just the same way they prepare for fire. So that is why we extended our training to business continuity, disaster recovery, as well as a new perspective on fraud. There are lots of folks out there who offer training on business continuity and disaster recovery, but what we are doing that is unique in the market is that we are not trying to project our best practices; we are teaching according to the new British standard – BS 25999. It is a new international standard designed to keep your business going during the most challenging and unexpected circumstances. It provides a basis for understanding, developing, implementing and managing business continuity within your organization and gives you confidence when dealing with stakeholders both within and outside your organization. BS 25999 has been developed by a group of experts representing a cross-section of industry sectors and governmental organizations which is reflected in its applicability. The standard is suitable for any organization, large or small, from any sector. It is particularly relevant for those that operate in a high risk environment such as the finance, telecommunications, transport, utilities and public sectors, where there is need for continuity. I have had a lot of organizations tell me they went for training a couple of years ago – the British standard may have existed a couple of years ago for training, but it just got ratified recently. There was no standard prior to BS 25999. So, this is a whole new world in terms of getting the certification to prove that your organization has the ability to manage fraud and disaster. Often times, organizations do things because regulators make them. Now more than ever, you have financial regulators requiring you to prove that you have strong control against fraud but you do not even have a fraud policy.
Best Security Strategy for an Organization
The best security strategy is first, to have one. Whether it is fraud, business continuity or information security; organizations have this odd tendency to casually appoint people within the organization to handle those areas. They point to the IT or compliance person – somebody who does not understand that area, and that person has to go and figure out what controls to put in place to get things working. So the problem is that currently, there is no strategy. Nobody has stopped to think “we need to be at 95 percent for fraud capacity at all times, no matter what.” They leave it up to the discretion of people who are not actually accountable for the business. That is wrong! Maybe you have an inexpensive web server that manages your brand new e-commerce that supports 90 percent of your business but because it was not expensive, your IT manager complains that it goes down all the time and that he is going to have it replaced in two weeks. Two weeks for e-commerce? That is why we said that the most important strategy is to have one. It is not just my idea, it is ISO 27001 standard for information security, which instructs that you get a strategy in place. I have always recommended that organizations should first have the right people that are actually accountable for that decision and have them make the decisions for a change. You can delegate responsibility but you cannot delegate accountability.
Networking and Telecommunication in Auditing, Internal Control
ICT has a very important role to play in internal control because auditors control access to information which IT does too. Auditors also control how information is used and how transactions are processed. Over the years, automated control organizes business functions and that has reduced loss of money. So, IT is able to put controls in place but then again, depending on how well it is managed, there might also be some vulnerability. In detecting and managing fraud, you need asset combination. I have often asked people in my classes if their organizations are committed to preventing, detecting and minimizing fraud. And they say yes, absolutely! I ask them to show me a policy that says: “Our organization does not want fraud, and this is what we are going to do to stop it.” They have no fraud policy! Shockingly, a policy is nothing more than a statement of management that states the way things are done within an organization. If you say that controlling fraud is a good objective, where is the policy that not only says it is wrong but also says here is who should be looking for it; here is who should be investigating it and here is what we do if we find it. A fraud policy is where senior managers say “not only am I going to accept responsibility, but I will accept accountability for something going wrong.”
Legal and Ethical Issues Facing IT Auditors
The legal and ethical issues are similar for IT auditors as they are for financial auditors. As an IT auditor, it is possible that you would be dealing with irregular or illegal acts. Towards that end, you have to be careful whom you release information to – there is always tendency for you to be exposed to sensitive information about an organization that you have to protect. As you are investigating issues, you have to be sure that you do not breach privacy laws. For instance, there are laws now that protect account information for people who have bank accounts. Imagine if during the course of an IT audit, the auditor compromised your account, and your account number and access code was made public. That auditor could be in for a lot of legal hassle.
E-Business
Kaspersky Identifies Ongoing Supply Chain Attack on Official Daemon Tools Website Distributing Backdoor Malware

Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT) discovered an active supply chain attack targeting the official website of Daemon Tools, a widely used virtual drive emulation software.
![]()
The compromised installer delivers malicious software alongside the legitimate application, granting threat actors the ability to execute arbitrary commands and remotely control infected devices.
During a recent telemetry study, researchers identified that threat actors have actively distributed the modified software directly through the vendor’s primary domain since April 8, 2026, successfully concealing the malware with a valid developer digital certificate.
The malicious injection affects Daemon Tools version 12.5.0.2421 up through the current release. Kaspersky has notified AVB Disc Soft, the developer of Daemon Tools, so that remediation actions can be taken.
Because disk emulation software requires low-level system access to function properly, users routinely grant the application elevated administrative privileges during installation. This mechanism allows the embedded malware to secure a deep foothold within the host operating system, severely compromising device integrity.
Specifically, attackers tampered with legitimate application binaries to execute malicious code at process startup and leveraged a legitimate Windows service to maintain persistence on the host.
Kaspersky telemetry indicates a widespread, global distribution of the compromised updates across more than 100 countries and territories. The majority of victims are located in Russia, Brazil, Türkiye, Spain, Germany, France, Italy, and China.
The analysis shows that 10% of the affected systems belong to businesses and organisations. While Daemon Tools is heavily adopted by consumers, its presence in corporate environments exposes enterprise networks to severe downstream risks.
On a small subset of just over ten machines — belonging to organisations in the retail, scientific, government, and manufacturing sectors — Kaspersky GReAT observed attackers manually deploying additional payloads, including a shellcode injector and previously unknown Remote Access Trojans (RATs).
The narrow industry profile of these victims, combined with typos and inconsistencies in the executed commands, indicates that the follow-on activity is conducted hands-on against specifically chosen targets.
While researchers identified Chinese-language artifacts within the malicious implants, the campaign is not currently attributed to any known threat actor.
“A compromise of this nature bypasses traditional perimeter defences because users implicitly trust digitally signed software downloaded directly from an official vendor,” said Georgy Kucherin, senior security researcher at Kaspersky GReAT. “Because of that, the Daemon Tools attack has gone unnoticed for about a month.
This period of time, in turn, indicates that the threat actor behind this attack is sophisticated and has advanced offensive capabilities. Given the high complexity of the compromise, it is thus of paramount importance for organisations to isolate machines having Daemon Tools software installed, as well as to conduct security sweeps to prevent further spreading of malicious activities inside corporate networks.”
Kaspersky actively detects and blocks the execution of the compromised installers. Researchers advise organisations to audit their networks for the presence of Daemon Tools Lite, isolate affected endpoints, and monitor for unauthorised command execution or lateral movement. Individual users should promptly uninstall the compromised application and run a thorough system scan to clear any persistent threats.
In March 2026, a Kaspersky study found supply chain attacks were the most common cyberthreat businesses faced over the prior 12 months, yet only 9% of organisations ranked them as a top concern.
E-Business
Kled AI, US Data Firm Blocks Nigeria over High ‘Fraudulent Activity’

Kled AI, US-based developer, has announced the removal of its application from the Nigerian app store, alongside an IP restriction affecting the region, citing what it described as an “unmanageable level of fraudulent activity” on the platform.

Kled is a data marketplace that rewards users for uploading photos, videos, and other multimodal content.
Avi Patel, 22-year-old founder, in his X handle, said the decision followed months of internal review, during which the startup found that a large share of uploads from Nigeria, including images, documents, and videos meant for AI training, were fake, duplicated, or generated by artificial intelligence.
Kled operates what it describes as an opt-in data marketplace, where users voluntarily upload personal content in exchange for payment, with the material later sold to AI labs for training models.
The startup said it has paid hundreds of thousands of users globally and processed over one billion data assets within four months of launch.
However, Patel said Nigeria stood out negatively.
According to him, the company reviewed a sample of 10 million uploads from the country and found that only a small fraction met quality standards required for AI training.
He added that the problem escalated when the platform was flooded with manipulated identity documents, including fake passports, during its verification process.
“As a startup, we cannot absorb the cost of filtering that level of bad data,” Patel said, noting that the company has now removed the app from Nigeria’s Apple App Store and imposed an IP ban on the region while it strengthens its fraud detection systems.
“On top of all of this, every time we make a post there is someone asking us to bring the region back within seconds. We hear you, but it’s gotten out of hand,” he added.
Despite the suspension, the company maintained that the move is temporary and not permanent.
“We’ve made this decision with great care. We love everyone who has genuinely supported Kled from Nigeria, and we hope to return when the time is right,” the statement concluded.
The decision has triggered backlash among Nigerian users, many of whom accuse the company of stereotyping and unfairly targeting the country.
Patel, however, insists the move is purely business-driven and not linked to race or nationality, stressing that Kled remains available in other African markets.
.
E-Business
Trusted Relationship and Exploits in Public-facing Applications Strengthen Position as the Main Attack Vectors

Although the main initial vectors in 2025 remain similar to 2024, their combined share has grown to over 80%. Public-facing applications account for 43.7%, while trusted relationships have increased from 12.7% to 15.5%.

Valid accounts make up 25.4%. These insights are from the recent Global Report by Kaspersky Security Services.
The ‘Anatomy of a Cyber World’ is an in-depth global report based on incident data gathered in 2025 from Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response, Kaspersky Incident Response, Kaspersky Compromise Assessment and Kaspersky SOC Consulting.
It highlights the most common attacker tactics, techniques and tools, as well as the peculiarities of detected incidents and their distribution across regions and industries.
According to data derived from Kaspersky Incident Response, the top three initial attack vectors have remained relatively stable over the past seven years and have not changed significantly. Valid accounts and exploits in public-facing applications consistently represent the most common entry points.
The third position has periodically shifted: malicious emails, once a common initial vector, were replaced by trusted relationships, which first appeared in 2021 and entered the TOP-3 in 2023. By 2025, the distribution of main vectors looked as follows:

These attack vectors are often interconnected within the same chain, for example, organisations compromised through trusted relationships are frequently first breached via exploits in public-facing applications. Recent cases reveal attackers targeting service providers or IT integrators to then access their clients.
This problem is compounded by many small service providers lacking dedicated cybersecurity expertise and resources. As they manage accounting software or websites, breaches in these companies can lead to the compromise of their clients’ systems through exploited remote access.
When examining the investigated attacks in terms of duration and impact, the data shows that the majority (50.9%) of them were rapid in nature, typically lasting less than a day and most often resulting in file encryption.
A significant portion (33%) were long-lasting, with an average duration of 108 hours, during which attackers not only encrypted files but also installed persistence mechanisms, compromised Active Directory and caused data leakage.
The remaining 16.1% exhibited a hybrid pattern: they initially appeared as rapid attacks but involved a considerable delay between the initial breach and subsequent malicious activities, extending their overall duration to nearly 19 days.
“Given that attackers are increasingly orchestrating coordinated, multi-stage attacks, organisations cannot afford to rely on a reactive, “firefighting” approach. To counter this, a proactive security posture is essential, one that embeds real-time threat monitoring and continuous detection into everyday operations.
This enables defenders to respond swiftly to adversary activity before it escalates. Key measures for protecting digital assets against both rapid intrusions and long-term compromises include: timely patching, enforcement of multi-factor authentication and strict control of third-party access,” comments Konstantin Sapronov, Head of Global Emergency Response Team at Kaspersky.
General News3 days agoWhy 9 African Countries Are Looking to Nigeria for Data Protection Lessons
E-Business3 days agoFirm Spots Rising Scam Activity Around the 2026 World Cup, from Bogus Tickets to $500,000 “grant” Emails
E-Financial3 days agoCBN to Raise N700Bn in First Treasury Bills Auction this May
Telecom3 days agoTelcos Recover N2 Trillion following Crackdown on Indebted Subscribers
Telecom3 days agoOrganized Criminals Plunder Telecom Infrastructure across Nigeria, Cause Service Disruptions
Telecom3 days agoMTN Nigeria Remits N878.7Bn Taxes, Levies in 2025
E-Financial3 days agoWhy African Crypto Brands must Communicate like Banks, Not Startups
E-Business2 days agoTrusted Relationship and Exploits in Public-facing Applications Strengthen Position as the Main Attack Vectors













