General News
EFCC, NSA, Others Fight over Abacha’s Loot

Confusion emerged at the weekend over how much had so far been recovered from the money looted from the nation’s treasury by former Head of State, the late Gen. Sani Abacha, its whereabouts or how the recovered funds were spent.
According to National Mirror, agencies of the Federal Government, who played one role or the other in the recovery and custody of the loot, are currently passing bucks over the loot.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), had claimed that the Offices of the Attorney- General of the Federation (AGF), and Minister of Justice and the National Security Adviser (NSA), know how much had been recovered and the money’s whereabouts.
According to National Mirror, EFCC disclosed this in an affidavit.
Strangely though, Offices of the AGF and NSA have disowned EFCC’s affidavit.
They told a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that they did not know how much of Abacha loot was recovered or had been spent. The EFCC itself had passed the buck when a non-governmental organisation, Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP), invoked provisions of the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act to demand information on how much had so far been recovered from the loot and its whereabouts.
The anti-graft agency said it had no such information and directed the organisation to the AGF and NSA.
The development made LEDAP to join both NSA and AGF to the suit.
LEDAP had in 2011 instituted the suit with EFCC as sole defendant after the commission refused its request for information.
But LEDAP decided to join AGF, who was then Mr. Mohammed Adoke, and the NSA, Col. Sambo Dansuki, after the EFCC in its counter-affidavit opposed the suit and directed LEDAP to seek the information from offices of the AGF and NSA.
A lawyer in the Legal and Prosecution Unit of EFCC, Mr. Austin Emmumejakpor, stated in the counter-affidavit dated March 5, 2012, “That I am informed that remittances relating to the estate of the late Gen. Abacha was coordinated by the offices of the National Security Adviser and the Attorney- General of the Federation and not the respondent (EFCC) as erroneously thought by the applicant.”
But both the offices of AGF and NSA through their lawyer, Godwin Onwusi, opposed the application seeking an order joining them as respondents in the suit.
They predicated their opposition to being joined to the suit on grounds that contrary to EFCC’s claim, they did not coordinate the recovery of the loot. A counter-affidavit dated January 28, 2015, and deposed to by a lawyer from Onwusi’s law firm, Austin Nwaroh, opposing LEDAP’s application for joining the new respondents, also denied any involvement of NSA in the remittances.
It reads: “That the 2nd party sought to be joined (NSA) did not coordinate the remittances relating to the estate of the late Gen. Sani Abacha.
“That the 2nd party sought to be joined is neither in custody nor in possession of information relating to the remittances referred to in paragraph 5 above.
“That the 2nd party sought to be joined is neither a necessary party nor an indispensable party in this suit.”
An earlier counter-affidavit deposed to by another lawyer from Onwusi’s law firm, Ifeanyi Umeji, on March 25, 2014, also denied custody of the requested information on behalf of the AGF and NSA, stating, “That the 1st and 2nd parties sought to be joined (AGF and NSA) did not coordinate remittances relating to the estate of the late Gen. Abacha.”
In a reply, plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Chino Obiagwu, insisted that the AGF and NSA were necessary parties, arguing that by virtue of the provisions of section 21 of the FoI Act, 2011, “the onus is on such body to prove the information is not within its control.”
The case comes up on October 8.
General News
CRMI Warns of Risks, Sees Gains in UAE Exit from OPEC

Chartered Risk Management Institute of Nigeria (CRMI) has highlighted potential benefits for Nigeria such as increased production flexibility, expanded market share, and improved revenue prospects following the United Arab Emirates’ decision to exit the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

However, the Institute cautioned that these opportunities come with significant risks, including exposure to price volatility, reduced protection from coordinated supply management, intensified competition, and mounting fiscal pressures.
In a statement signed by Victor Olannye, registrar/chief executive officer, described the development as a major shift in global oil governance, with far-reaching implications for market stability and international energy dynamics.
Olannye noted that the move could trigger increased oil price volatility, heightened geopolitical tensions, and disruptions across global energy supply chains.
He urged corporate organisations, public institutions, financial bodies, and risk professionals to reassess their risk frameworks and strengthen resilience in response to evolving global realities.
He identified key risks to include a potential weakening of OPEC cohesion, oil price instability, geopolitical uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, macroeconomic volatility, and the possibility of further exits by member states.
In line with its mandate to promote sound risk management and support national development, the Institute advised corporate organisations to implement robust risk management frameworks, adopt dynamic hedging strategies, and diversify their business portfolios.
Financial institutions and investors were also urged to reassess energy-related risks, strengthen portfolio diversification, and enhance risk disclosure practices.
CRMI further called on government and policymakers to reinforce fiscal buffers, accelerate economic diversification, and promote the transition to renewable energy.
Individual risk professionals were encouraged to upskill in geopolitical risk analysis and energy economics while developing expertise in scenario planning and predictive analytics.
The Institute emphasised the need for stakeholders to reposition proactively to navigate the evolving geo-economic landscape. It also projected possible scenarios, including fragmentation of global oil governance structures, increased reliance on market-driven pricing mechanisms, and an acceleration of global energy transition efforts.
General News
UK Cracks Down on Russia’s Exploitation of Vulnerable Migrants and Deadly Drone Capability

The UK has announced a raft of new sanctions to curb production of Russian drones and the nefarious networks that are exploiting vulnerable migrants from across the globe to support Russia’s illegal war in Ukraine. The latest action hits 35 individuals and entities, including those responsible for human trafficking networks, funnelling exploited migrants into Russia’s war machine.

Networks sanctioned by the UK have been deceptively recruiting foreign migrants in search of a better life and either sending them to the front line as cannon fodder or putting them to work in weapons factories. This includes through schemes like Russia’s Alabuga Start programme for drone production at a UK-sanctioned entity.
Russia continues to terrorise Ukraine by indiscriminately using drones, killing, and injuring innocent civilians and damaging critical infrastructure. Russia fired the equivalent of over 200 drones per day into Ukraine in March 2026, the highest ever monthly total. Russia is likely to exceed this grim record for a second consecutive month in April.
These attacks rely on domestic manufacturers and third country suppliers providing key components and technical support. This new action is designed to disrupt these supply chains and hold those responsible to account by targeting the businessmen and companies fuelling Russia’s drone manufacturing capabilities.
Sanctions Minister Stephen Doughty said: “The practice of exploiting vulnerable people to prop up Russia’s failing and illegal war in Ukraine is barbaric.
“These sanctions expose and disrupt the operations of those trafficking migrants as cannon fodder and feeding Putin’s drone factories with illicit components to target innocent civilians and vital infrastructure.
“The UK continues to lead international efforts to disrupt Russia’s war machine, ramping up pressure on its economy and confronting its hybrid threats. We stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine in defence of European security and our shared values.”
Sanctioned targets also include individuals and entities based in third countries, including Thailand and China, responsible for supplying drone components and other critical military goods to Russia.
Among those sanctioned is Pavel Nikitin, whose company develops Russia’s VT-40 drone – a cheap, mass-produced attack drone which has been used extensively by Russia in its attacks on Ukraine.
Also sanctioned are three individuals with links to the Russian state involved in recruiting individuals to travel to Ukraine to fight for Russia.
This includes Polina Alexandrovna Azarnykh, who, backed by the Russian state, has been facilitating the travel of individuals from countries including Egypt, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, Morocco, Syria and Yemen through Russia to Ukraine, where they are deployed with minimal training and under dire conditions to the frontline to sustain Russia’s illegal war of aggression.
The UK remains unwavering in its support for Ukraine and will continue to use the full force of its sanctions powers to disrupt Russia’s hybrid threats and squeeze the Kremlin’s war machine. These measures underline our determination to hold Russia and its enablers to account, defend European security and support Ukraine’s fight for freedom.
Charge d’Affaires and British Deputy High Commissioner in Abuja, Mrs. Gill Lever, said: “Today, the UK sanctioned Russian-linked networks and individuals involved in the deceptive recruitment of vulnerable Nigerian men and women, who were misled into joining Russia’s frontline in its war against Ukraine.
“These sanctions shine a light on those who seek to exploit vulnerable Nigerians to sustain Russia’s illegal war, including through schemes such as the Alabuga Start Programme.
“Such practices knowingly place innocent civilians in grave danger, showing a complete disregard for their safety and wellbeing. Tragically, some have already lost their lives as a result.
“In February, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs advised citizens to exercise caution and avoid these schemes. We intend that today’s sanctions will further reduce the risk of harm and help protect others from similar exploitation.”
General News
FirstCap Closes N4.46Bn LAPO MFB SPV Series 1 Bond, Deepens Access to Long Term Capital

FirstCap, an investment banking firm and subsidiary of FirstHoldCo Plc., has successfully closed the ₦4.46 billion Series 1 Bond Issuance by LAPO MFB SPV Plc, reinforcing its strong leadership in Nigeria’s debt capital markets and deepening access to long term funding for high impact sectors.

Acting as Lead Issuing House, FirstCap structured the fund raising on behalf of LAPO MFB SPV Plc (a company sponsored by LAPO Microfinance Bank Limited to mobilise institutional capital targeted at SME financing, renewable energy expansion, and digital financial services, three critical drivers of inclusive and sustainable economic growth in Nigeria.
The transaction is underpinned by a compelling impact thesis, with proceeds strategically deployed to support small businesses and clean energy initiatives. The microfinance sector continues to demonstrate resilience and strong fundamentals positioning the issuance at the intersection of growth, sustainability, and financial inclusion.
Commenting on the transaction, Ukandu E. Ukandu, Managing Director, FirstCap Limited, said: “This successful issuance underscores our strategic commitment to directing capital where it delivers measurable economic impact. At FirstCap, we partner with institutions that have the scale, discipline, and vision to transform markets, and LAPO exemplifies these qualities.
The ₦4.46 billion bond is positioned to be a catalyst for SME growth, expanded energy access, and broader financial inclusion. We remain committed to structuring transactions that are not only bankable, but impactful and aligned with Nigeria’s long term economic trajectory.”
FirstCap Limited remains committed to leading from the forefront of Nigeria’s capital markets, structuring transactions that are bankable, impactful, and investable, while supporting the future trajectory of Nigeria’s economic development.”
General News3 days agoWhy 9 African Countries Are Looking to Nigeria for Data Protection Lessons
E-Business3 days agoFirm Spots Rising Scam Activity Around the 2026 World Cup, from Bogus Tickets to $500,000 “grant” Emails
E-Financial3 days agoCBN to Raise N700Bn in First Treasury Bills Auction this May
Telecom3 days agoTelcos Recover N2 Trillion following Crackdown on Indebted Subscribers
Telecom3 days agoOrganized Criminals Plunder Telecom Infrastructure across Nigeria, Cause Service Disruptions
Telecom3 days agoMTN Nigeria Remits N878.7Bn Taxes, Levies in 2025
E-Financial3 days agoWhy African Crypto Brands must Communicate like Banks, Not Startups
E-Business2 days agoTrusted Relationship and Exploits in Public-facing Applications Strengthen Position as the Main Attack Vectors


















