News
Group Calls for Robust Legal Frameworks to Uphold Human Rights Online
As countries worldwide commemorate International Human Rights Day, Paradigm Initiative (PIN) is calling for the enactment of robust legal frameworks that uphold human rights online.
The organisation underscores the importance of respecting rights and supporting the development and enforcement of laws in a human-rights-respecting manner in the Global South. These include strong data protection laws that safeguard the right to privacy and legislation governing automated decision-making systems to mitigate potential biases. This, PIN adds, would ensure human rights are realised as the future remains secure.
“Governments should address systemic issues that hinder the enjoyment of human rights and take the necessary steps to support an independent judiciary to ensure the impartial administration of justice and upholding the rule of law,” said Bridgette Ndlovu, the organisation’s Partnerships and Engagements Officer.
This year, International Human Rights Day is commemorated under the theme “Our rights, our future, right now.” The theme focuses on how human rights are a pathway to solutions, playing a critical role as a preventative, protective and transformative force for good. Paradigm Initiative (PIN) also highlighted the crucial role of digital rights in safeguarding human dignity and promoting social justice.
In securing a rights-respecting digital future, the organisation applauded the positive developments throughout 2024 and supported efforts to safeguard human rights online. Countries in the Global South, such as Malawi, Ethiopia, and Syria, made notable strides in advancing digital rights by enacting data protection legislation establishing guidelines for processing, storing, and sharing personal data. Botswana repealed its archaic data protection law and adopted a new Data Protection Act.
Equally, enforcement of data protection legislation gained momentum as countries such as Tanzania, in the case of Safari Automotive Limited vs. Godwin Danda, awarded compensation to the data subject after the automobile company published a video clip of the data subject on social media without consent.
In Kenya, taxi hailers Bolt Operations OU and Bolt Support Kenya were fined for failing to properly handle an incident and escalate it according to established protocols. The incident happened when unauthorised parties accessed a data subject’s Bolt driver account, performed fraudulent trips and altered the data subject’s account details, violating the data subject’s right to access personal data and correct false or misleading data.
In Kenya, data subjects were awarded compensation after offenders were found liable for commercial use of data subjects’ personal data without consent. Angola fined offenders who failed to protect data subjects’ personal data from cyber-attacks. Benin published decisions and resolutions that specify the certification of DPOs, and Brazil published two resolutions that define the activities of DPOs and regulate international data transfers.
In Nigeria, in the case of Folashade Moleshin vs United Bank of Africa, a Paradigm Initiative-supported case, the judiciary handed a judgement in favour of the complainant after a data breach reported on PIN’s Ripoti platform, promoting privacy.
PIN acknowledged the judiciary’s role in adjudicating cases brought before the courts and parliamentary oversight in innovations within the justice system, in particular, in Zimbabwe, where parliament produced an adverse report on the Integrated Electronic Case Management system, citing negative consequences for public participation due to limited access to the internet.
The organisation asserted that human rights online are crucial and legislation should be people-centred and provide robust safeguards for personal data, including measures to prevent unauthorised access and surveillance. Countries such as South Africa, Mauritania, Nigeria, and Zambia published National AI Strategies to safeguard human rights from risks that may arise from automated decision-making.
The African Union Executive Council endorsed the Continental AI Strategy and African Digital Compact at the regional level to set the pace and provide a framework for harmonising laws. At the international level, nations adopted the United Nations Global Digital Compact and countries such as Cote d’Ivoire acceded to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. Kenya is also planning to accede to the Convention.
Despite the outlined positive developments, significant challenges remain in the Global South with PIN condemning the actions of countries such as Mozambique, Mauritius, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Comoros, and Kenya, which shut down the internet this year.
These negative actions undermined human rights, suppressed dissent and had a chilling effect on freedom of expression. Going forward, governments ought to halt the practice of internet shutdowns and uphold the right to free expression so that individuals can freely impart information and engage in political discourse in line with the ideals set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948.
Viva Atlantic Limited and Technology House Limited, two Nigerian-based companies, have received a 30-month debarment from the World Bank Group due to fraudulent, collusive, and corrupt practices connected to the National Social Safety Nets Project in Nigeria (NSSNP).
According to a statement by the Washington-based bank, the debarment was issued alongside that of Norman Bwuruk Didam, the companies’ managing director and chief executive officer.
The NSSNP was established to enhance Nigeria’s social safety net systems by providing targeted financial transfers to poor and vulnerable households.
However, investigations revealed breaches of the World Bank’s Anticorruption Framework in the 2018 procurement and subsequent contract processes involving Viva Atlantic Limited, Technology House Limited, and Didam.
“According to the facts of the case and the general principles of the World Bank’s Anticorruption Framework, in connection with a 2018 procurement and subsequent contract, Viva Atlantic Limited, Technology House Limited, and Didam misrepresented a conflict of interest in the companies’ Letter of Bids and received confidential tender information from public officials, which constituted fraudulent and collusive practices, respectively,” the statement said.
A debarment renders firms or individuals ineligible to participate in projects and operations financed by institutions of the World Bank Group.
The debarments of Didam, Viva Atlantic Limited, and Technology House Limited qualify for cross-debarment by other multilateral development banks under the Agreement for Mutual Enforcement of Debarment Decisions signed on April 9, 2010.
According to the World Bank, Viva Atlantic Limited and Didam misrepresented a conflict of interest in their authorization letter of bids and gained improper access to confidential information from public officials, resulting in fraudulent and corrupt practices.
As part of their settlement agreements, the companies and Didam have acknowledged culpability and agreed to meet specified integrity compliance conditions as a requirement for release from debarment.
The settlement agreements feature reduced debarment periods due to the companies’ and Didam’s cooperation with the Bank Group’s investigation, voluntary corrective actions, voluntary restraint from participating in Bank Group tenders, and the passage of time.
“The companies commit to continue to fully cooperate with the Bank Group Integrity Vice Presidency. Among other things, Didam must complete individual corporate ethics training, and the two companies must enhance their internal integrity compliance policies and implement corporate ethics training programs, all of which must reflect the relevant principles set out in the Bank Group Integrity Compliance Guidelines,” the statement said.
News
Nigeria’s Electricity Exports Hit $112m amid Persistent Power Outage
Recent data from the International Trade Centre (ITC) has revealed that Nigeria’s electricity exports have reached a value of $112m.
According to the ITC’s website, Nigeria is currently exporting electricity to two neighbouring African nations: the Republic of Benin and Niger.
As of January 18, 2025, Nigeria’s electricity exports to Benin amounted to $66m, with a potential export value of $82m. However, there remains an unrealised export potential of $16m, according to the Punch.
Similarly, electricity exports to Niger were valued at $46m, with the potential for $51m in exports, leaving an unrealised potential of $4.1m.
“The products with greatest export potential from Nigeria to Benin are electrical energy, Urea, and Bars & rods of iron/steel,” the ITC noted.
It also highlighted that the largest absolute difference between potential and actual exports was in electrical energy, with an additional $4.1m in exports still unrealised.
The ITC further indicated that Nigeria’s exports to Niger include electrical energy, Portland cement, and soups, broths and preparations.
While the export data paints a picture of growth in the sector, concerns remain about the state of electricity supply in Nigeria.
According to the Punch, Chief Princewill Okorie, executive director, Electricity Consumer Protection Advocacy Centre, questioned the country’s priorities.
He said, “Are the electricity companies in those countries they export electricity to serve the consumers the way they serve Nigerian consumers? We cannot be celebrating electricity export when at home in Nigeria we are experiencing blackout and extortion in violation of our consumer protection laws. A good parent first takes care of his home before caring for outsiders.”
He further criticised the export of electricity, questioning whether the money generated was benefiting the Nigerian power sector.
“Is it the wellbeing of Nigerians that is more important or the money generated from export of electricity? If such money is generated, why not inject it into electricity when they are telling us they lack liquidity? What sense does it make for our local industries and economy to be dying because of electricity while export is building other countries’ economies?” Okorie asked.
He added that Nigeria’s economic struggles, including the exodus of professionals and youths, were exacerbated by power shortages, questioning the rationale behind celebrating electricity exports under these conditions.
“It is a shame. Charity begins at home. Let them also explain what the money has been used for when we keep borrowing from the World Bank,” he added.
News
SERAP Petitions Trump, Urges Recovery of Stolen Nigerian Assets, Barring Corrupt Officials from US
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on US President-elect Donald Trump to identify and recover stolen Nigerian assets hidden in the United States.
In a statement released on Sunday via X, SERAP urged Trump’s administration to ensure the return of these assets to the Nigerian people.
“We’ve urged US President-elect Trump and his incoming administration to identify US-based stolen assets traced to Nigerian public officials and to ensure the return of any such assets to the Nigerian people,” SERAP stated.
The organization also demanded that Nigerian public officials implicated in the theft of these assets be banned from entering the US.
Meanwhile in the letter, Trump was urged to “attach and release to Nigeria some $500 million worth of US-based proceeds of corruption traced to former Nigerian dictator General Sani Abacha.”
SERAP’s request “aligns with the UN Convention Against Corruption, which both the US and Nigeria have ratified.”
The organization emphasized that the US Department of Justice should initiate civil asset forfeiture proceedings to fulfill the US commitment to assisting Nigeria in recovering looted assets.
In the letter, SERAP explained that “these proceeds are separate from the $480 million of Abacha-origin funds that have been forfeited to the US under an August 2014 US federal district court order.”
SERAP urged Trump’s administration to initiate discussions with the Nigerian government to fulfill the objective of returning the stolen assets within an agreed framework and timeline.
The organization also stressed the importance of acknowledging the role of civil society in asset recovery matters.
SERAP noted that the UN Convention Against Corruption requires states to return “corrupt” assets to their countries of origin.
The organization noted it believes that Nigeria has met the requirements for the return of the $500 million in proceeds.
The letter was signed by Professor Alexander W. Sierck, US volunteer counsel, SERAP and Adetokunbo Mumuni, executive director and copied to Stuart Symington, US Ambassador to Nigeria.
- News2 days ago
SERAP Petitions Trump, Urges Recovery of Stolen Nigerian Assets, Barring Corrupt Officials from US
- News2 days ago
Nigeria’s Electricity Exports Hit $112m amid Persistent Power Outage
- Telecom2 days ago
Subscribers Reject Tariff Hike, Say FG Cannot Speak for Them
- E-Financial2 days ago
Over 562m People Own Cryptocurrency Globally
- Telecom2 days ago
MTNN Raises N42.20Bn through Commercial Paper
- General News2 days ago
NIS Announces Maintenance on Passport Portal
- General News2 days ago
NITDA, NFIU Collaborate on AML/CFT Data Management System Upgrade
- E-Financial2 days ago
SEC Sets January 31 Deadline for CMOs Registration Renewals