Connect with us

News

Help! Some CDMA on Life Support, Others Dead

Published

on

CDMAs are dying as a result of poor corporate governance
Kindly share this post

Corporate mismanagement rather than market forces is responsible for the epilepsy which has reduced most code division multiple access (CDMA) operators in Nigeria to fringe players, Nigeria CommunicationsWeek can now reveal.
Apart from Starcomms Plc and Multilinks-Telkom, CDMA operators are now hanging on hair breath no thanks to years of successive mismanagement of the companies.
The same fraudulent and self-serving practices of some members of board and management and the overbearing influence of chairmen or MD/CEOs of CDMAs, especially in family-controlled businesses led to the collapse of the banking industry sometime ago.
Experts also point at non-compliance with laid down internal controls and operation procedures, biased recruitment exercises and general lack luster management practices as some of the reasons why the companies have failed to click. 
Elsewhere, local financiers repulsed by the companies’ stinking financial records have also turned their backs preferring to fund global system for mobile communications (GSM) operators with proven corporate practice.
Further investigations revealed that some CDMA operators had over the years regularly and consciously ignored sustained and systematic red flags as their promoters and managers diverted funds meant for expansion into frivolous projects like manufacturing, oil and gas, elections and so on.
Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that most of the companies are now either on life support, or already dead and decomposing.
Nigeria Communications Commission (NCC) had earlier in the year admitted that a number of telcos have actually begun to show disturbing signs of distress.
NCC agreed that it is as a result of issues revolving around poor corporate governance, wrong business decisions, and the management style employed by these telcos in the economic crisis.
The poor state of affairs with the CDMA operators has also to do with growing subscribers’ preference for GSM services and poor network coverage.
The inability of unified license holders to roll out services due to the scarcity of fund has not helped matters.
Already, some CDMA companies are reportedly axing large chunks of their workforce to underpin their hemorrhaging finances.
But it is only a temporary palliative because faced with challenges of replacing their obsolete infrastructure the long term survival of the companies are doubtful.
Adewale Jones, renown telecom lawyer , said that private ownership of CDMA companies and the multiplication of sites and infrastructure hastened their demise.
According to him, the companies are not dying because of the nature of the business they are doing but as a result of a combination of poor corporate governance and paucity of funds for expansion.
“You can see that Starcomms and Multi-links –Telkom are doing well because they understand the import integrity.  Both companies are run as a business but the same cannot be said of other operators” Jones added.
Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that unless the NCC comes up with tighter supervision of the management of the companies, the consequences of systemic failure in the industry will be far reaching.
Though the usually vocal stakeholders in the industry were taciturn when contacted at the weekend, they however agreed that there is need for the apex regulator to articulate a code of corporate governance, for which compliance must be mandatory.
It will be recalled that the similar effort worked in the banking sector after the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in 2006 entrenched transparency and adequate disclosure of information.
CBN had then asserted that  “these are key attributes of good corporate governance which the merged banks must cultivate with new zeal in order to provide stakeholders with the necessary information to judge whether their interests are being taken care of. Currently there are many deficiencies in the information disclosed, particularly in the area of risk management strategies, risk concentration, performance measures etc”
It is in recognition of this that the Central Bank of Nigeria has handed down stiff sanctions to any chief executive officer who makes false rendition to the bank.

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

 

Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

News

Xora Finance, Fintech Firm Refuses to Hire Nigerians over Alleged Dishonesty

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Xora Finance has announced it will no longer consider job applicants from Nigeria.

 

Xora Finance is a digital bank founded by Joren Lundgren, in February 2026 and allows users to deposit and earn interest on their XRP cryptocurrency.

Lundgren, founder, in an announcement on X (formerly Twitter), cited an ongoing pattern of misconduct, such as dishonesty and theft, from previous Nigerian hires as the reason for the decision.

This sudden blanket ban came just days after the company’s official career page was aggressively recruiting remote workers for marketing and content roles.

Advertisement

The announcement generated heavy backlash online, with many people upset that a blanket rule punishes honest job seekers.

 

 

 

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

How Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Some lawyers have said that victims of Ponzi schemes have legal remedies, although recovering lost funds and prosecuting perpetrators remain major challenges.

How Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers

A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new participants rather than from actual profits.

Operators lure victims by promising high returns with little to no risk.

The scheme inevitably collapses when the flow of new investors slows down.

Some lawyers who spoke to News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) separate interviews with on Sunday, said that victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money.

Advertisement

Mr Chibuikem Opara, a lawyer at Justification Chambers, Ikeja,said many Nigerians continued to fall victim to Ponzi schemes in spite of repeated warnings.

Opara said it was wrong to attribute participation in Ponzi schemes to a lack of investment opportunities, noting that promoters often exploit investors’ greed through promises of unrealistic returns.

“What you cannot take away is the fact that many Nigerians have fallen and continue to fall victim to these schemes every time,” he said.

According to him, victims may individually or collectively institute civil actions against the beneficiary company for breach of contract or refund arising from failure of consideration.

Opara said victims could also unite to seek an order from the Federal High Court to wind up the beneficiary company.

Advertisement

He, however, noted that such efforts might yield little benefit if perpetrators had already siphoned the funds and left behind an empty shell.

The lawyer said available remedies largely depended on the actions of relevant authorities, adding that recipient accounts could be frozen to facilitate fund recovery and support winding-up proceedings.

Opara said regulators and law enforcement agencies often became aware of Ponzi schemes only after substantial losses had occurred.

According to him, victims frequently failed to report suspicious schemes early enough to enable timely intervention.

He added that funds are sometimes moved outside the country before authorities become aware of the fraud.

Advertisement

Opara also cited inadequate information and the deceptive nature of the schemes as major obstacles to investigation and prosecution.

“Most times, everything about the schemes is made to appear elusive, just like the profits promised to victims,” he said.

Also speaking, Mr Vincent Aminu of A.F. Aminu and Co. advised that victims of investment scams should report such cases to appropriate law enforcement agencies on time.

Aminu said victims could petition the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) or file reports with the police.

He said that after investigation, prosecutors could bring charges against suspects under relevant fraud-related laws, including provisions of the Criminal Code and the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act.

Advertisement

Beyond criminal prosecution, Aminu said .victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money

According to him, such actions may be based on breach of contract, unjust enrichment, or fraudulent misrepresentation, depending on the circumstances.

He added that victims could petition the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which could investigate illegal operators, shut down unauthorised platforms, and freeze assets.

He identified the anonymity of online fraudsters as one of the biggest challenges confronting investigators.

According to him, many operators concealed their identities through fake digital profiles and technologies that made tracking them difficult.

Advertisement

Aminu also noted that victims who delayed taking legal action risked losing opportunities for redress.

He added that prolonged court proceedings often delayed justice for victims.

“Many fraud-related cases take years before the court reaches a verdict, thereby delaying justice for victims,” he said.

Also, Mr Chris Ayiyi of Ayiyi Chambers, Apapa, described Ponzi schemes as a gamble that benefited early participants at the expense of later investors.

Ayiyi said some early entrants received returns on their investments, thereby encouraging others to join the schemes.

Advertisement

He said the schemes eventually collapsed, leaving late investors to bear the losses

The lawyer called for a complete ban on Ponzi schemes or sustained public enlightenment campaigns against them.

He urged the National Assembly to enact laws that would strengthen regulation and provide greater protection for investors.

According to him, stronger legal safeguards are necessary in a country operating a capital-based economy.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

PalmPay Nigeria Appoints Samuel Oluyemi as Chief Operating Officer

Published

on

Kindly share this post

PalmPay Group (“PalmPay”), a multinational fintech company providing digital financial services across high-growth emerging markets, is pleased to appoint Samuel Oluyemi as Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of its Nigeria practice, effective immediately.

The appointment comes at a pivotal moment for PalmPay as it looks to reach more underserved communities and continuously strengthen the reliability and security of its services. It also comes as Nigeria’s broader financial services sector continues to modernize, bring millions more Nigerians into the formal financial system, and strengthen the cybersecurity and fraud-prevention standards that underpin public confidence in digital payments.

As COO of PalmPay Nigeria, Mr. Oluyemi will oversee PalmPay’s Nigerian operations — where the company provides a full suite of digital financial services to individuals and businesses — and communicate with regulators to ensure the company’s growth happens harmoniously with the country’s financial, digital, and social inclusion goals.

Mr. Oluyemi brings more than two decades of experience at the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (“NIBSS”). During his tenure as the Business Development Lead, he championed the development of key national payment services — including the Digital Validation of Nigerian International Passport (e-Passport Validation), Electronic Dividend Mandate Management System (“e-DMMS”), and the Electronic Pensions Contribution Collection System (“EPCCOS”) — and played a pivotal role in introducing and driving early adoption of NIBSS Instant Payment (“NIP”), Nigeria’s first online, real-time, inter-bank transfer system in 2011 and its subsequent extension to the Other Financial Institutions (“OFI”) segment of the Nigeria Payments System.

He holds an MSc in Monetary Economics from the University of Ibadan with extensive local and international professional training.

Advertisement

“Samuel joins PalmPay at an important stage in our journey to strengthen the foundations that will support our long-term goal of driving financial inclusion,” said Chika Nwosu, Managing Director of PalmPay Nigeria. “His extensive experience makes him well positioned to help us scale sustainably while maintaining the operational discipline, governance and customer-first culture that define PalmPay.”

“PalmPay has established itself as one of the most impactful fintech companies in emerging markets by making financial services more accessible and affordable for millions of people,” said Mr. Oluyemi.

“I am excited to join the company and look forward to working alongside an exceptional team to strengthen operational excellence and support PalmPay’s vision of building a leading digital financial services platform. Together, we will continue delivering secure, reliable, and customer-focused financial solutions while contributing to the continued evolution of Nigeria’s digital financial ecosystem.”

As Nigeria’s digital financial services sector continues to mature, this appointment reflects a broader commitment guiding PalmPay across all markets it serves: building financial services that are secure, reliable, and effective enough to earn a permanent place in people’s everyday lives.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending