Telecom
Is MTN Being Shaken Down By Buhari’s Government?

Nigeria’s costly claims against the South African company raise questions about investment security in Africa’s largest economy, according to Peter Fabricius, a consultant with Institute for Security Studies (ISS)
ISS partners to build knowledge and skills that secure Africa’s future.
Fabricius said that there’s something suspicious about the two large and unexpected charges Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari’s government has just imposed on the largest cellphone operator in the country, South Africa’s MTN.
“Last month the Nigerian central bank ordered MTN to return US$8.1 billion in dividends it allegedly illegally transferred out the country between 2007 and 2015. The bank also slapped US$16 million in fines on several foreign banks for facilitating these transfers.
Then the attorney-general’s office demanded US$2 billion in back taxes from MTN, which vowed it was innocent of all the charges and would vigorously oppose them. The double whammy helped knock MTN’s share price by about a third, boosting shareholders’ losses to well over R100 billion since the start of 2018.
Coming on top of the US$5 billion fine – later negotiated down to US$1.7 billion – that Nigeria hit MTN with two years ago for failing to disconnect unregistered subscribers, this has raised questions about the motives of Buhari’s government.
He faces a difficult re-election campaign in February. A major part of his mandate from his first election in 2014 was to combat corruption and enforce financial regulations. So is clamping down on MTN a genuine attempt to improve governance? Or is it more about fleecing an easy target – a rich foreign company – when low oil prices and mismanagement of the economy have slashed revenue and badly depleted foreign reserves?
There are good reasons to be sceptical about the hit on MTN. For one thing, as Dobek Pater, director of business development at Africa Analysis, told Biznews, how was it that the Central Bank of Nigeria and the tax authority failed to detect both the allegedly illegal transfer of dividends and the failure to pay tax for so many years?
He said this suggested either a failure by the Nigerian authorities to do their job of monitoring such large financial movements, or a deliberate laxness. If the latter, why did they suddenly decide to enforce the regulations now? It also seems improbable, merely on face value, that after being hit with that huge fine two years ago, MTN would have flouted the regulations again so soon.
Pater noted that other mobile phone operators in Nigeria had not come under the same scrutiny as MTN, which was an ‘easy target’ because it was profitable and because its operations were transparent, unlike some other mobile phone operators in the country. Also, no doubt, because it’s foreign.
Vestact CEO Paul Theron told Bloomberg that Nigeria’s move was ‘pathetic, nationalistic and immature’ and could ‘severely weaken Nigeria’s economy in the years to come’. MTN has been among the most committed foreign investors in recent decades, the money manager said.
Nigeria’s move has also cast doubt on MTN’s plans to list on the Nigerian stock exchange which it promised to do after the fiasco two years ago. Pater told Biznews he thought it unlikely that MTN would want to list in Nigeria under the cloud of alleged flouting of regulations and with its share price at home so far down.
Alastair Jones, an analyst at the London-based New Street Research, told South Africa’s Business Times that if MTN failed to avoid the huge claims, the listing might never occur, as this would raise questions about MTN Nigeria as a going concern.
Pater told Biznews that perhaps the Nigerian government was trying to get its house in order, adding that ‘from history, MTN does not have a squeaky clean reputation, and there have been some transgressions in the past’.
But if indeed the Nigerian authorities were merely shaking down MTN to replenish the country’s foreign exchange coffers and plug the holes in the budget, as some were alleging, this could harm the country’s investment prospects in the long term.
MTN would probably not decide to exit Nigeria this time, as the country remained a big earner for it. It provides the largest number of subscribers – about 27% of the total in the 23 countries where it operates across Africa and the Middle East. Nigeria also earns MTN some 25% of its total revenue, second only to its earnings in South Africa.

And Pater pointed out that while the South African market was mature, Nigeria’s was still growing. Even so, if the company continued to be hit by such large penalties, it might eventually reconsider the viability of its Nigerian investment, he said.
It was likely that another large operator would then move in to take MTN’s place. Pater suggested though that Nigeria would be lucky to find another mobile phone operator with the same commitment to the country as MTN. And potential new investors with no existing commitments to Nigeria would be discouraged.
Atiku Abubakar, a former vice president who is running against Buhari for the main opposition People’s Democratic Party next year, told Bloomberg the way the central bank had targeted MTN would only serve to discourage foreign investors.
‘Even in a worst-case scenario where there were breaches of financial laws and regulations, there are much better ways to deal with it than by the public exposure that MTN has been subjected to,’ Abubakar said. ‘It is bound to send the wrong signal to foreign investors.’
The saga is already affecting investment prospects, it seems. Alan Pullinger, CEO of FirstRand, which is managing the Nigerian listing for MTN, told Business Times that MTN’s experience had made his group more cautious about doing an acquisition in Nigeria.
For some analysts and investors, MTN’s high-profile experience has only served to advertise the hazards of investment in Africa and reinforce an opinion – some would say a prejudice – that Africa as a whole is not a safe destination for one’s money.
David Shapiro, deputy chairman of Sasfin Wealth, told Business Day that the news reinforced his ‘sceptical’ stance towards investments in Africa. Despite the continent’s potential, ‘you have governments, and I must include SA, that are largely unpredictable’.
For the short-term gain of re-election next year, it seems, Nigeria is risking ‘killing the geese that lay the golden eggs’, as Pater warned.”
Peter Fabricius, ISS Consultant
Telecom
FCCPC Denies Banning Airtime Borrowing, Blames Cartel for Misinformation

Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has dismissed widespread claims that it banned airtime borrowing and data advance services in Nigeria, describing the reports as false and driven by vested interests seeking to mislead the public.

In a statement issued on Friday, the commission said it neither cancelled nor prohibited such services, contrary to viral social media posts and some media reports suggesting otherwise.
The clarification follows a wave of public concern triggered by viral social media posts and some media reports suggesting that the Commission had shut down telecom-based credit services widely used by millions of Nigerians.
Recall that in separate notices, Airtel and MTN Nigeria announced the temporary suspension of their airtime and data credit services, which previously allowed eligible prepaid customers to borrow airtime or data and repay on their next recharge.
But FCCPC, said no such directive was issued, stressing that consumers remain free to access lawful telecom value-added services.
Ondaje Ijagwu, director of Corporate Affairs, FCCPC, said that “The attention of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has been drawn to a series of newspaper publications and a viral anonymous post on social media seeking to create the impression that the Commission cancelled, shut down, or banned airtime borrowing and data advance services in Nigeria. Those claims are incorrect.
“The Commission has not prohibited airtime borrowing or data advance services, and no directive was issued preventing consumers from accessing lawful telecom value-added services,” the statement partly read.
Rather than a regulatory ban, the FCCPC attributed recent disruptions in some of these services to the failure of certain operators to comply with its Consumer Lending Regulations introduced in July 2025.
According to the Commission, the regulations were developed following a surge in consumer complaints over exploitative practices in the digital lending and advance-services space.
“Following a deluge of consumer complaints bordering on opaque charges, unexplained deductions, aggressive recovery practices, poor disclosure standards, and inadequate accountability in segments of the digital lending and advance-services market, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission issued the DEON Consumer Lending Regulations in July 2025.
“The Regulations were introduced, among other reasons, to curb the excesses of abusive service providers whose practices had generated persistent consumer harm and undermined confidence in the market,” it stated.
The agency said the framework was designed to sanitise the market and protect consumers by enforcing transparency, accountability, and fair competition.
“The primary aim is to promote a fairer and more transparent system by mandating proper registration, responsible lending conduct, clear disclosure of fees and terms, accessible consumer complaint channels, data protection safeguards, stronger accountability for third-party partners, and effective regulatory oversight,” the FCCPC explained.
Providing a deeper insight into the telecom sector, the Commission revealed that some operators had been engaged in anti-competitive practices, including exclusionary arrangements with third-party service providers.
“In the telecom sector, our findings indicated that some operators engaged in exclusionary third-party technical arrangements in clear disobedience to the provisions of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018. The Regulations sought to unlock the market to allow local participants alongside foreign partners, in line with free market principles,” it said.
It added that the new regulations were also intended to open up the market to more participants, including local players, in line with free market principles.
Despite giving operators ample time to comply, the FCCPC said several companies failed to align with the new regulatory framework.
Related News
“These measures benefit Nigerians by reducing abusive practices, improving transparency, strengthening consumer choice, and encouraging responsible innovation by legitimate operators. At the commencement of the framework in July 2025, affected operators were granted an initial 90-day compliance period to regularise their products, structures, and operations. That opportunity was not utilised within the prescribed timeframe,” the statement noted.
The Commission said it extended the deadline to January 5, 2026, but compliance remained unsatisfactory.
“Despite that further extension, the necessary compliance steps were still not completed by the relevant operators,” it added.
The regulator stressed that any temporary suspension or restriction of services should be seen as a business decision by non-compliant operators rather than a government-imposed ban.
“Any temporary suspension, restriction, or operational change introduced by service providers should therefore be understood as a business or compliance decision by those operators, not a ban imposed by the FCCPC,” it said.
The Commission also accused certain interest groups of deliberately spreading false information to undermine reforms.
“We are aware that some vested interests and their foreign collaborators are opposed to the creation of safe markets and fair competition, therefore resorting to a campaign of disinformation,” it stated.
Describing such narratives as “mischievous,” the FCCPC urged Nigerians to disregard sensational claims and rely on verified information.
“It is inaccurate to attribute avoidable disruption to regulation where regulated entities had adequate notice and sufficient opportunity to comply. Nigerians deserve accurate information, not sensational claims.
“The FCCPC is fully committed to protecting consumers, promoting fair competition, encouraging responsible innovation, ensuring transparent digital financial practices, and working constructively with sector regulators and service providers in the public interest,” the statement added.
Airtime borrowing and data advance services have become critical tools for millions of telecom subscribers in Nigeria, allowing users to access credit for calls and internet services with repayment deducted upon recharge.
However, the segment has long been plagued by complaints over hidden charges, automatic deductions, unclear repayment terms, and aggressive recovery mechanisms.
The FCCPC’s intervention through the Consumer Lending Regulations marked one of the most significant attempts to regulate digital micro-lending and telecom-based credit services in the country.
The rules align with broader efforts by the Federal Government to strengthen consumer protection, enhance transparency in digital financial services, and curb exploitative practices in Nigeria’s rapidly expanding fintech and telecom ecosystem.
Friday’s clarification signals a push by the regulator to reclaim the narrative, reassure consumers, and shift responsibility to operators who have yet to fully comply with the law.
The Commission reaffirmed its commitment to protecting consumers while fostering innovation and fair competition in the sector, noting that regulatory compliance remains non-negotiable for all service providers operating in the Nigerian market.
Telecom
Airtel Nigeria Suspends Airtime and Data Credit Services

Airtel Nigeria has announced the temporary suspension of its airtime and data credit services. The affected services allowed eligible prepaid customers to borrow airtime or data and repay on their next recharge.

However, the company noted that customers will continue to enjoy uninterrupted access to airtime and data purchases through its existing channels.
Airtel Nigeria also indicated that the temporary suspension is not expected to have a material impact on its service standards across the country.
Commenting on the development, Airtel Nigeria Director of Marketing Ismail Adeshina, said:
“This is a necessary and responsible step as we align our operations with evolving requirements. Airtel Nigeria remains committed to the highest standards of compliance, transparency, and consumer protection, while continuing to innovate responsibly within Nigeria’s digital ecosystem.”
The company added that it will provide updates on the status of the service in due course.
Telecom
NITDA Urges Youths to Build Nigeria’s AI Future Now

National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) has urged young Nigerians to take the lead in developing home-grown artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to address the country’s socio-economic challenges.

The Director General of National Information Technology Development Agency, Kashifu Inuwa, represented by Mrs. Udoka Mannie of the Digital Literacy and Capacity Building Department, delivered the keynote address at the Artificial Intelligence Hackathon organised by the Agency in partnership with VibeCode Africa in Abuja.
Kashifu Inuwa, director-general of NITDA, made the call at an Artificial Intelligence Hackathon organised by the agency in partnership with VibeCode Africa in Abuja.
Inuwa, who was represented by the Acting Director of Digital Literacy and Capacity Building, Dr Ahmed Tambuwal, and delivered through Mrs Udoka Mannie, said Nigeria’s youthful population presents a significant opportunity for innovation and digital transformation.
He noted that with over 60 per cent of Nigerians under the age of 25, the country is well positioned to benefit from emerging technologies such as AI.
“As you can see, this room is filled with young people. This represents a powerful opportunity for innovation and digital skills development,” he said.
Inuwa stated that the hackathon provided a strategic platform for participants from diverse backgrounds to collaborate and develop practical AI-driven solutions tailored to Nigeria’s realities.
He observed that artificial intelligence is already transforming economies, governance systems and societies globally, stressing that Nigeria must decide whether to shape the technology for national development or remain a passive consumer.
According to him, NITDA’s mandate is to regulate and develop information technology in Nigeria while ensuring it serves as a driver of economic growth.
He explained that the agency’s Digital Literacy and Capacity Building Department is focused on building a digitally skilled population capable of competing in the global digital economy.
The Director-General highlighted the Digital Literacy for All initiative (DL4ALL) as a flagship programme aimed at equipping millions of Nigerians with essential digital skills, in line with the Federal Government’s target of achieving 95 per cent digital literacy by 2030.
“Beyond literacy, we are now moving into capability. It is one thing to use technology, but another thing entirely to build with it. Today, we are challenging you to build,” he said.
Inuwa urged participants to prioritise impact-driven innovation, identifying sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, education, financial inclusion, public service delivery and misinformation as areas where AI can drive meaningful change.
He also stressed the importance of ethics, inclusion and data protection in the development of AI solutions.
“As we explore AI, we must be mindful of ethics, data protection and inclusion. Building responsibly is just as important as building brilliantly,” he said.
Inuwa commended VibeCode Africa for partnering with NITDA, describing such collaborations as vital for scaling innovation across the country.
He encouraged participants to collaborate, experiment and innovate, adding that Nigeria’s AI future would be driven by local talent.
“The future of AI in Nigeria will not be imported. It will be built by people like you in rooms like this,” he said.
In her remarks, the founder of VibeCode Africa, Lola Adey, urged participants to harness AI to solve real-life challenges within their communities.
Adey said the hackathon was designed to move beyond theory by encouraging participants to identify problems they personally experience and develop practical solutions.
“We want you to dig deep into yourselves. What are the problems you are facing? What are the issues you notice when you walk around?” she said.
She cited challenges such as electricity shortages, insecurity and gaps in social services as areas where innovation could make a difference.
Adey added that the initiative aims to create opportunities for entrepreneurship, employment and global exposure for young Nigerians.
“With artificial intelligence, you now have something in your hand that you can use to actually solve problems. You don’t have to wait for anybody anymore,” she said.
She urged participants to remain focused, collaborative and open to learning, noting that the platform could connect them to future partners, investors and employers.
News2 days agoLagos Targets Vulnerable Residents in Expanded Social Register
E-Business2 days agoCAC Urges Users to Secure Accounts after Cyberattack Scare
E-Financial2 days agoIMF Downgrades Nigeria’s GDP Outlook, Warns of Rising Risks
E-Financial2 days agoCBN Proposes 30-Member Mediation Panel for Loan Disputes
E-Financial2 days agoNDIC Seeks Court Nods to Liquidate 89 Failed Banks
Telecom1 day agoMTN Suspends Data, Airtime Borrowing Service over New FCCPC Lending Rules
News2 days agoStudy Shows 38% of Northern Women Lack Access to Financial Services
E-Financial2 days agoSEC Sets N7.5Bn Capital Floor to Shield Investors in FTZE Public Offerings












