Connect with us

General News

Lack of Regulation Hobbling Courier Business-Uba

Published

on

Okey Uba is the managing director, Ebony Express
Kindly share this post

Okey Uba is the managing director, Ebony Express, a fast growing courier outfit in Nigeria and secretary general of the Association of Nigeria Courier Operators (ANCO).
Uba who holds Bachelor of Science in Political Science from the University of Nigeria Nsukka (UNN); possesses simple and gentle personality.
He has attended several courses in courier management and has worked at the Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST) from where he resigned to establish Ebony Express.
He spoke to peter ugwu highlighting factors that have inhibited the development of the sector in Nigeria and other sundry issues.     *

 
Courier Sector 2013

The whole events centered on how to make the industry grow. There are certain challenges we have in the industry, viz-a-viz the issue of regulation.

Courier is a very wide industry; unfortunately, it is yet to be fully harnessed in Nigeria. And like I would always say: you really need an enabling environment that will guarantee return on investment (ROI), proper operations and the likes, before you can tap into the industry.

The operators cannot make headway in an incoherent environment. For the indigenous (courier) companies, licencing and renewal fees pose very big challenge, because they are on the high side in comparism to other sectors.

Expectations from the Regulatory Bill

I think it boils down to the general view of the Government. It is not as if the operators do not crave for a Regulator or, as if the industry operates without a regulatory department (as in the CRD capacity), but the truth is that you cannot give someone some pieces of meat and deny him the teeth to chew them or the necessary “weapons” to fight the war against irregularities in the sector.

When you do that it appears like the person does not know what he is doing. Meanwhile, the officials at the Courier Regulatory Department (CRD) of NIPOST are worth their onus, but they lack the equipment to work, which starts with the provision of enabling laws.

As a matter of fact, it is portraying them as toothless bulldogs. It also affects courier operators, particularly the indigenous companies.

They are the most affected, because the international operators can source their inbounds from abroad, while the domestic operators are left with nothing.

Most times, when you want to play the game according to the rules, you are shortchanged. When you are in an environment where some operators do not give a damn over what the rules say, definitely, you will be shortchanged.

Having gone to school, garnered reputations and experience, there are some practices you wouldn’t ordinarily get involved in order to survive in a business. It makes the sincere ones to suffer unnecessarily.

However, whenever the Government is ready to legislate on this, they should not just start comparing the courier with the telecoms. In logistics or courier industry, the most important ingredients are integrity and honesty. Is not the matter of capital capacity; it plays a secondary role in that part. In logistics, you are carrying valuables on behalf of the customers or consignees from a place to the destination and that is on trust.

It behooves on the Regulatory body to determine who is or should be in this business; those who will not view it as a ground to engage in fraudulent activities.

To make the job easier for the Government, probably, when the Commission is finally established, they tend to turn it to a political piece-cake, the technocrats who would have been relegated to the background. Those currently at CRD should be made to manage the affairs of the Commission; with full regulatory backing. Then, they can bit and mediate between the operators and the Government. As it is now, there is a limit to which they can operate.

 
How to Reinvigorate the Bill

Actually, you cannot shave a man in his absence. Meanwhile, I haven’t joined the industry as a player when the Bill was articulated.

So, I wouldn’t know how far they have gone. But, there are indications that the contents are not bad.

However, there are things that must be put into consideration before the passage of the Bill. For instance, classification of courier companies in Nigeria. We do not expect all firms to posses the same operational strength.

Therefore, you cannot put a flat-rate licencing and renewal fees for them. Like I said earlier, integrity and truth are paramount in the industry, thus, capital base should not be the benchmark.

In fact, I do not see what is holding the Bill from its passage, if not that in Nigeria you must path-away with something before someone does the necessary thing; if it implies bringing it back for us to cross the T’s and dot the I’s, then let them revert it back; it wouldn’t take us time to do.

Nevertheless, there must be the willingness on the part of the Ministry to assist the industry.

Today, everybody is into logistics and courier. If you are moving along the road trucks are tumbled with the goods in them; nobody is talking about goods damage insurance, compensation for the consignees or the consignor; so, many people who are into this business do not even understand what Goods In Transit Courier (GIT) Insurance means.

Most of them do not understand what time frame means. To me, that is not right. Things have to be done right; if you are interested in courier business you have to abide by the principles.

ANCO’s Contribution in Tacking the Challenges

Yes, the Association of Nigeria Courier Operators (ANCO) has been trying on its part to champion the course for the development of the industry.

We have our monthly forum where we try to educate and inundate our members on new grounds in courier; we educate them on international partnership; how to employ genuine and sincere staff; on courier management in general.

But, no matter how you try, without government support you will not have so significant achievements.

For instance, when someone has done something wrong, he is caught and charged to court, and there is no enabling law to prosecute the culprit, all you have done is in vein. We have been trying so hard to build up and educate our members; that has led to increase in our membership over the years.

But we need an unbiased umpire to move the sector forward. This will enable the smaller companies to survive. If they reach out to us in ANCO, we are willing to add our inputs to the whole matters. In fact, courier and telecom are not supposed to be in the same Ministry. That is what we are advocating for; proper regulations.

Call for Mergers

First, we have heard comments like the internet revolution is a threat to the courier sector. But if you put that into perspectives, you will discover that these are mere sayings. Nigeria, for example became internet compliance just about a decade ago.

The developed world, Germany, UK, US and others have been internet compliant all along.

Till today logistics and courier are moving forward, gaining more grounds and recognitions in those countries.

So, it is a fallacy to say that internet will strangulate the courier sector. Our problem is the lack of regulation.

Secondly, when people are shouting for mergers and acquisitions, you don’t just talk about that.

The reasons are that you do not force people to merge. They do that when they perceive the benefits of the partnership and can work cordially.

There have been cases of friends coming together to set up a courier firm, but in a short while it led to several companies, because the motives are different

Banks are not like the courier. People are obliged to do businesses with the bank, but in courier, even companies now set up their in-house dispatch department.

When you put the laws in place, naturally, there will be mergers and acquisitions. Then, there will be an arbitrator to mediate on your matter when you are shortchanged.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

General News

Enterprise Development Fund Launched to Bridge Capital Access Gap

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Godman Akinlabi, Leadership coach has launched the Godman Akinlabi Enterprise Development Fund to bridge capital access gap for entrepreneurs.

This initiative followed a recent report by the International Trade Centre (ITC) that the vast majority of Nigerian SMEs remain underfunded, with only 15 percent able to access formal credit.

Akinlabi who unveiled the fund in commemoration of his 50th birthday celebration in Lagos, stated that the fund, initially endowed with N50 million would financially empower faith-based entrepreneurs, drive innovation, and champion sustainable business practices.

He disclosed further that the fund was a realisation of a long-held vision to raise leaders who will build profitable enterprises, transform industries, and inspire tangible change.

“I believe true leadership is not just about personal success but about creating platforms for others to thrive. This Fund is that platform: a vehicle to empower courageous, faith-driven entrepreneurs to break barriers, innovate boldly, and redefine the future of business,” he added.

The fund will offer seed capital ranging from N250,000 to N2,000,000 for small and early-stage businesses, as well as growth capital of up to N5,000,000 for enterprises with proven potential. Beneficiaries will also receive mentorship and strategic guidance to ensure they are well-equipped to navigate business growth.

“By equipping individuals with resources, mentorship, and opportunities, we are not only creating economic prosperity but also fostering a legacy of leadership and positive impact that will reverberate across generations,” he reckoned.

Also held on the sidelines of the launch of the fund was an exclusive leadership lecture featuring renowned thought leader, Leke Alder.

Akinlabi remarked that the lecture underscores the importance of visionary leadership, ethical governance, and strategic innovation in creating a sustainable and prosperous future.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

NGX weekly: Investors gain N1.137trn as Wema, FBN, Universal lead

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Exchange Ltd. (NGX) All-Share Index and Market Capitalisation appreciated by 1.80 per cent each, to close the week at 105,451.06 and N64.303 trillion respectively.

Theses are against 103,586.33 and 63.166 trillion posted last week.

Consequently, equity investors gained a total of N1.137 trillion for the week under review.

Similarly, all other indices finished higher with the exception of NGX Insurance, NGX AFR Bank Value, NGX AFR Div Yield, NGX MERI Value, NGX Consumer Goods, NGX Oil and Gas.

Also, NGX Industrial Goods which depreciated by 6.91, 0.08, 1.11, 0.17, 0.34, 0.34 and 0.26 per cent respectively, while the NGX ASeM closed flat.

Meanwhile, a total turnover of 4.698 billion shares worth N85.043 billion in 72,562 deals was traded this week by investors on the floor of the Exchange.

This was in contrast to a total of 2.618 billion shares valued at N69.742 billion that exchanged hands last week in 47,953 deals.

The Financial Services Industry measured by volume led the activity chart with 3.470 billion shares valued at N40.791 billion traded in 34,364 deals: thus contributing 73.86 and

47.97 per cent to the total equity turnover volume and value respectively.

The Services industry followed with 407.032 million shares worth N2.226 billion in 4,996 deals.

Third place was the ICT Industry, with a turnover of 237.680 million shares worth N3.628 billion in 5,280 deals.

Trading in top three equities namely, Wema Bank Plc, FBN Holdings Plc and Universal Insurance Plc, measured by volume accounted for 1.679 billion shares worth N20.838 billion in 4,922 deals.

These contributed 35.74 per cent and 24.50 per cent to the total equity turnover in volume and value respectively.

Also, 51 equities appreciated in price during the week, lower than 82 equities in the previous week.

Thirty-nine equities depreciated in price higher than 18 in the previous week, while 62 equities remained unchanged, higher than 52 recorded in the previous week.

Multiverse Mining and Exploration Plc led 50 other advanced equities on the gainers’ table by 53.42 per cent to close at N12.35 per share.

Sunu Assurances also led the 38 other declined equities on losers’ table by 36.52 per cent to close at N7.30 per share.

Looking ahead, analysts at Cowry Asset Management Ltd., predicted bullish momentum at the equity market to persist in the coming week.

The analysts said this would be supported by anticipation of fourth quarter 2024 unaudited financial results and preparations for the dividend earning season.

They noted that positive sentiment is likely to prevail as stocks continue to reach new historical highs, bolstered by favourable market valuations and outlooks.

“Nonetheless, we advise investors to focus on fundamentally sound stocks to maximise returns amidst the ongoing rally,” the analysts said. (NAN)

Culled from NAN


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Falana/Citadel vs Zinox: FIRS Document Shows Benjamin Joseph Lied under Oath

Published

on

Kindly share this post

As the case between Citadel Oracle Concept Limited and Zinox Technologies returns to court, a document from the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has put a lie to the claim under oath by Benjamin Joseph, CEO of Citadel, that he was not aware of the contract executed by his company at FIRS.

It will be recalled that Joseph, in his statement on oath in suit No: LD/4335/2014 in the High Court of Justice, Lagos State, dated 28th June, 2019, averred that his company, Citadel, did not execute any contract with FIRS and that he was not aware that a contract had been awarded to Citadel.

In his deposition under oath, Joseph claimed that Citadel “did not at any time execute any contract for the FIRS and neither did the 2nd defendant (Princess O. Kama) who is its agent in respect of the contract it bid for with the FIRS deliver/release any documents to the Claimant (Citadel) indicating that the contract it bid for, or any other contract was awarded to it by the FIRS or any other body.”

However, a letter from the FIRS addressed to the chamber of Afe Babalola & Co dated 11th February 2014 (FIRS/PD/GDS/2559) and signed by one Idrissa Kogo, Head Legal Department, stated: “Contrary to your client’s claim that they knew nothing about the execution of the contract awarded to them and that they did not receive any payment for the execution of the contract, our record reveals otherwise.

“Your client instructed FIRS through a letter dated 13th December 2012 to deal with Princess O. Kama (Your client’s agent) in relation to the contract. Through three separate letters dated 20th December 2012, your client instructed FIRS to pay to the client’s account with Access Bank plc.

“Please note that FIRS acted in compliance with your client’s instruction and with due diligence,” the FIRS letter stated.
The FIRS letter was a response to inquiry by Afe Babalola Chamber, lawyers to Citadel Oracle Concept Ltd and its MD, Mr. Benjamin Joseph, at that time.

Spokesman for Zinox, Mr. Chimezie Orisakwe, when contacted, confirmed the letter, stressing that the document from FIRS was actually in response to inquiries by the chamber of Afe Babalola SAN, who was Joseph’s first lawyer.

“Mr. Joseph had been presenting the story in a manner that portrays him as the victim in a business relationship, but it was apparent that he did not give full disclosure to the chamber of Afe Babalola, who had to write the FIRS to get a proper brief on the matter.

“I want to believe that the disclosure from FIRS which rubbished all the depositions of Joseph and exposed him as a perjurer must have informed the withdrawal of the highly respected Afe Babalola from the case. Interestingly, this letter has already been filed in Suit No. LD/4335/2014, the civil case at the Lagos State High Court.

“More curious is that Mr. Benjamin Joseph, in his Witness Statement on Oath in the said civil case, admitted that he gave the corporate documents of Citadel Oracle Concept Ltd and a letter of authorisation to Princess Kama, his staff, dated 13th December 2012, in respect of the FIRS contract.

“This, therefore, contradicts his present claim that his corporate documents were forged to open the bank account”, Mr. Orisakwe added.

The Zinox spokesman expressed shock that Femi Falana would include Zinox in his purported fiat/charges, even when the company has nothing to do with the transaction or allegations.

He said: “Zinox has never been invited by any investigative agency, including the police and the EFCC, on the so-called allegations.

“There is no report either by the police or the EFCC or any investigative agency where the name of Zinox was mentioned as a suspect.

“There is no judgment or ruling of any court where Zinox was mentioned as having anything to do, whatsoever, with the transaction or the allegations, the basis of the fiat/charges.

“Mr. Leo Stan Ekeh, the Chairman of Zinox, has never made any statement to the police in the course of any investigations and has never been mentioned in any court proceedings or judgment as part of any investigations relating to these allegations.”

Orisakwe cited instances in which Mr. Joseph lost the case and its allied suits. In a petition/case Mr. Joseph reported since 2013 and for which the Inspector General of Police charged him for false information in charge no.CR/216/16, the Zinox spokesman said Mr. Joseph was unable to prove his case.

He recalled that in another case filed by the EFCC at his instance against his partner, Princess O. Kama, in charge no. FCT/HC/CR/244/2018, Honorable Justice Danlami Z. Senchi of the FCT High Court (as he then was), dismissed as false all the allegations made by Benjamin Joseph, and imposed the sum of N20 million as damages against him for false petitioning in relation to these same allegations.

The Zinox spokesman alleged that the current charges said to have been filed by Falana on the basis of a fiat from the Attorney General is the third in a row as he had earlier filed charge no.CR/469/2022, which was struck out by Honourable Justice C. O. Oba of the FCT High Court, by an order dated 8th November 2022.

“He filed the same charges before Honorable Justice A. S. Adepoju of the FCT High Court, and the charges were, once more, struck out by the Honourable Court on 19th March 2024, with Honorable Justice Adepoju holding that: ‘This matter was brought in dead, extinct and should be confined into the dustbin of history…I hold that the instant suit is an abuse of the process of court and it is hereby struck out accordingly,’ Orisakwe said.

He expressed shock that a “learned Senior Advocate in the person of Femi Falana, would, yet, proceed to file the same charges before Honourable Justice A. O. Ebong of the FCT High Court in charge no. FCT/HC/CR/985/24 in November 2024.”

According to the Zinox spokesman, “It is very clear that the deliberate intention for instituting this new charge by Femi Falana SAN, to include the name of Zinox and its Chairman and other persons who were never part of the investigations, is to embarrass them, harm their reputation, and thereby damage their businesses.”

Meanwhile, when the case came up on 9th January 2025, the lawyers to Zinox and Technology Distributions filed Preliminary Objections boldly challenging the jurisdiction of the court over the case and the appearance of Falana, on the ground that the purported Fiat was legally wrongful and defective, and ought not to have been granted to Mr. Femi Falana SAN, in the first place.

This, thus, robs the court of jurisdiction because the case is brought on the basis of the Fiat, and if it is shown that the Fiat is defective and invalid, the court cannot exercise its jurisdiction over the case.

In the light of this development, Mr. Falana asked the court for an adjournment to enable him respond to the Preliminary Objections. The court consequently adjourned the case to 3rd March 2025, to hear the Preliminary Objections and any other pending application.

From a legal perspective, the issue of jurisdiction must first be determined by the court before any other step can be taken in the case, including the plea of the defendants.

This was the reason for the absence of the defendants in court on the said 3rd March 2025, especially as the individual defendants were yet to be served the court papers.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending