News
Nigeria not Good for Business – World Bank

The World Bank Group’s Doing Business Report 2016, has delivered a damning report which would further scare away investors from Nigeria. It said that Nigeria is no longer a good business environment.
Comparatively, the 2015 report saw Nigeria ranking 170 point of 189 in the world, with a Distance To Frontier (DTF) or Ease of Doing Business Score of 47.33, against Singapore’s 88.27 and Eritrea’s 33.16.
However, in the 2016 version of the report, Nigeria climbed one rung of the ladder to the 169 position, but sheds almost 3 percentage points to clock at 44.69.
Highlighted in the report as Nigeria’s Achilles heel in doing business are the unusually long number of steps it takes to register a business, the difficulty of building a warehouse, poor access to electricity and the administrative burden of complying with tax payments, among other lacunas.
According to data collected by Doing Business, starting a business in Nigeria requires 8.70 procedures, takes 30.80 days, costs 31.70 percent of income per capita and requires paid-in minimum capital of 0.00 percent of income per capita.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 139 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of starting a business.
Underlying the indicators for Nigeria, according to the report, is a set of specific procedures—the bureaucratic and legal steps that an entrepreneur must complete to incorporate and register a new firm.
According to data collected by Doing Business, dealing with construction permits requires 16.10 procedures, takes 106.30 days and costs 24.40 percent of the warehouse value.
Obtaining a new electricity connection in Nigeria requires 9.00 procedures, takes 181.20 days and costs 437.70 percent of income per capita.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 182 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of getting electricity.
The length of time it takes to transfer property is another setback for the country. According to data collected by Doing Business, registering property requires 12.10 procedures, takes 69.60 days and costs 10.50% of the property value.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 181 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of registering property.
The economy has a score of 6.00 on the depth of credit information index and a score of 6.00 on the strength of legal rights index. Higher scores indicate more credit information and stronger legal rights for borrowers and lenders.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 59 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of getting credit.
The economy has a score of 6.80 on the strength of minority investor protection index, with a higher score indicating stronger protections.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 20 in the ranking of 189 economies on the strength of minority investor.
The report observes that the administrative burden in paying taxes by companies leaves much to be desired.
On average, firms make 59.00 tax payments a year, spend 907.90 hours a year filing, preparing and paying taxes and pay total taxes amounting to 33.30 percent.
Globally, Nigeria stands at 181 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of paying taxes. The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful information for assessing the tax compliance burden for businesses in Nigeria.
Globally, Singapore keeps her place in the easiest country to do business in, with a DTF of 87.34, while Eritrea remained at the bottom of the ladder, plunging further to 27.61 from 33.16 in 2015.
The report, which chronicled enviable progress made since 1999 and the last few years of booming economy, categorically stated that doing business in Nigeria is far difficult than in 2015.
Nigeria has seen her stock plummet with a consistent fall in oil prices at the international market. Added to this grim environment has been lack of budget for almost a month fueling anxiety on the direction of the country.
Rwanda remained the best destination for business in Africa, invigorating new drives in the country long beset by political and ethnic violence. The two countries are 32 and 62 in Africa, respectively.
Nigeria’s West African neighbour Ghana came top in ECOWAS category clocking 114 of 189 countries. Ghana has innovative economic policies augmented by strong building of civil service, judiciary and curbing corruption, factors inhibiting Nigeria’s growth.
According to the World Bank, “Where informal construction is rampant, the public can suffer. Take the case of Nigeria, which lacks an approved building code setting the standards for construction,” slaying into authority’s lack of policy direction.
“Without clear rules, enforcing even basic standards is a daunting task, and many buildings fail to comply with proper safety standards. Structural incidents have multiplied.
“According to the Nigerian Institute of Building, 84 buildings collapsed in the past 20 years, killing more than 400 people,” the report pointed out.
Core to any nation’s stability and growth, the report decried the worsening power generation in the country pointing out that the “industry is a core sector for the generation of national wealth and employment in Nigeria, but faced with an electricity sector hampered by poorly utilized generation capacity, high transmission losses and frequent outages, companies turn to self-provision of electricity.”
Thus, “This raises their production costs, reducing their competitiveness and thus their demand for labour. The erratic and inadequate power supply in Nigeria has often been cited as the main reason forcing multinationals to relocate production lines to other countries. Power outages also affect output levels.”
On reforms, it said, “Nigeria made transferring property in Lagos less costly by reducing fees for property transactions.
“Nigeria strengthened minority investor protections by requiring that related-party transactions be subject to external review and to approval by disinterested shareholders. This reform applies to both Kano and Lagos.”
News
DataPro Upgrades Dangote Cement’s Credit Rating to AA+

DataPro Rating Agency has upgraded the long-term credit rating of Dangote Cement Plc to AA+ from AA, citing the company’s strong financial performance, market leadership and ability to meet its financial obligations despite Nigeria’s challenging economic environment.

In its latest rating report, the technology-driven credit rating agency also affirmed Dangote Cement’s short-term rating at A1, with a Stable Outlook. The ratings are valid until June 16, 2027.
DataPro said the upgrade reflects the cement maker’s sustained financial strength, resilient operating performance and dominant position in Nigeria and across Africa.
According to the agency, the assessment followed a comprehensive review of the company’s capital base, earnings, liquidity, corporate governance, regulatory compliance and the sustainability of its financial performance over the medium to long term.
It noted that Dangote Cement’s strong brand, leading market share, solid earnings, robust asset base and experienced management continue to strengthen its ability to meet financial commitments on time.
The agency also highlighted the company’s outstanding financial performance in 2025.
According to the report, Dangote Cement posted N4.31 trillion in revenue during the year, representing a 20 per cent increase from the previous year. Profit before tax more than doubled, rising 109 per cent to N1.53 trillion, driven by higher sales, improved operating efficiency, lower finance costs and a stronger capital structure.
DataPro said the AA+ long-term rating indicates low credit risk and reflects excellent financial strength, business profile and operating performance relative to its rating benchmarks.
It added that the A1 short-term rating signifies good credit quality and shows that the company has a strong capacity to meet its short-term financial obligations as they fall due.
The rating agency, however, noted that the credit rating has a maximum shelf life of 12 calendar months in line with international best practice and should be used only as a reference, not as an offer to trade in securities or as a substitute for investors’ independent judgement.
News
Xora Finance, Fintech Firm Refuses to Hire Nigerians over Alleged Dishonesty

Xora Finance has announced it will no longer consider job applicants from Nigeria.

Xora Finance is a digital bank founded by Joren Lundgren, in February 2026 and allows users to deposit and earn interest on their XRP cryptocurrency.
Lundgren, founder, in an announcement on X (formerly Twitter), cited an ongoing pattern of misconduct, such as dishonesty and theft, from previous Nigerian hires as the reason for the decision.
This sudden blanket ban came just days after the company’s official career page was aggressively recruiting remote workers for marketing and content roles.
The announcement generated heavy backlash online, with many people upset that a blanket rule punishes honest job seekers.
News
How Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers

Some lawyers have said that victims of Ponzi schemes have legal remedies, although recovering lost funds and prosecuting perpetrators remain major challenges.

A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new participants rather than from actual profits.
Operators lure victims by promising high returns with little to no risk.
The scheme inevitably collapses when the flow of new investors slows down.
Some lawyers who spoke to News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) separate interviews with on Sunday, said that victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money.
Mr Chibuikem Opara, a lawyer at Justification Chambers, Ikeja,said many Nigerians continued to fall victim to Ponzi schemes in spite of repeated warnings.
Opara said it was wrong to attribute participation in Ponzi schemes to a lack of investment opportunities, noting that promoters often exploit investors’ greed through promises of unrealistic returns.
“What you cannot take away is the fact that many Nigerians have fallen and continue to fall victim to these schemes every time,” he said.
According to him, victims may individually or collectively institute civil actions against the beneficiary company for breach of contract or refund arising from failure of consideration.
Opara said victims could also unite to seek an order from the Federal High Court to wind up the beneficiary company.
He, however, noted that such efforts might yield little benefit if perpetrators had already siphoned the funds and left behind an empty shell.
The lawyer said available remedies largely depended on the actions of relevant authorities, adding that recipient accounts could be frozen to facilitate fund recovery and support winding-up proceedings.
Opara said regulators and law enforcement agencies often became aware of Ponzi schemes only after substantial losses had occurred.
According to him, victims frequently failed to report suspicious schemes early enough to enable timely intervention.
He added that funds are sometimes moved outside the country before authorities become aware of the fraud.
Opara also cited inadequate information and the deceptive nature of the schemes as major obstacles to investigation and prosecution.
“Most times, everything about the schemes is made to appear elusive, just like the profits promised to victims,” he said.
Also speaking, Mr Vincent Aminu of A.F. Aminu and Co. advised that victims of investment scams should report such cases to appropriate law enforcement agencies on time.
Aminu said victims could petition the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) or file reports with the police.
He said that after investigation, prosecutors could bring charges against suspects under relevant fraud-related laws, including provisions of the Criminal Code and the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act.
Beyond criminal prosecution, Aminu said .victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money
According to him, such actions may be based on breach of contract, unjust enrichment, or fraudulent misrepresentation, depending on the circumstances.
He added that victims could petition the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which could investigate illegal operators, shut down unauthorised platforms, and freeze assets.
He identified the anonymity of online fraudsters as one of the biggest challenges confronting investigators.
According to him, many operators concealed their identities through fake digital profiles and technologies that made tracking them difficult.
Aminu also noted that victims who delayed taking legal action risked losing opportunities for redress.
He added that prolonged court proceedings often delayed justice for victims.
“Many fraud-related cases take years before the court reaches a verdict, thereby delaying justice for victims,” he said.
Also, Mr Chris Ayiyi of Ayiyi Chambers, Apapa, described Ponzi schemes as a gamble that benefited early participants at the expense of later investors.
Ayiyi said some early entrants received returns on their investments, thereby encouraging others to join the schemes.
He said the schemes eventually collapsed, leaving late investors to bear the losses
The lawyer called for a complete ban on Ponzi schemes or sustained public enlightenment campaigns against them.
He urged the National Assembly to enact laws that would strengthen regulation and provide greater protection for investors.
According to him, stronger legal safeguards are necessary in a country operating a capital-based economy.
News2 days agoXora Finance, Fintech Firm Refuses to Hire Nigerians over Alleged Dishonesty
Telecom2 days agoNCC Advances Dig Once Policy, Engages Stakeholders on Cost-Based Framework for Duct Sharing
Telecom2 days agoNCC to Keynote Telecom Sector Sustainability Forum 7.0
General News2 days agoFG Secures Fresh $208.3m World Bank Loan for Cash Transfer
News2 days agoHow Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers
News2 days agoPalmPay Nigeria Appoints Samuel Oluyemi as Chief Operating Officer
General News2 days agoSERAP Sues INEC over Alleged N800Bn 2027 Tinubu Campaign Fund
E-Business2 days agoKaigama,Catholic Archbishop of Abuja Warns against Misuse of AI













