Connect with us

E-Business

Nigerian Health Tourism & Part Data Ought to Play

Published

on

Blaise Aboh is co-partner at Orodata
Kindly share this post

The tale of the decrepitude of the Nigerian health sector is one now told by many pundits, health writers, professionals, and other activists; it is a fable that you all already know.

But this is not the tale I’m telling today, I want us to ask ourselves these questions, how did the we get here, a place where our hospitals are only ‘world class’ on the pages of newspapers, a most shameful point where the country looses billions to other economies due to ‘medical tourism’ and not ashamed of it.

For as long as I can remember, the UK, US, Canada, has been destination for ailing Nigerians to get health treatment and also for pregnant Nigerian women who could afford the expenses to travel to deliver their babies.

It seemed so normal for a trend which started in the 70s and 80s, until recent times when countries like Malaysia, China, Singapore and India became hot-spots too.

Of over $500million Nigeria loses to these economies, a whopping $260Million goes to India alone. Many times on the newspapers we read stories of white elephant projects; top notch hospitals built by serving governors who seem to prefer to be flown overseas rather than utilize institutions built by themselves, a serious case of a food seller refusing to eat out of the food he/she sells.

In September 2012, former Enugu State governor Sullivan Chime awarded the sum of N13.6 billion to Arab Contractors for the construction of a new Secretariat complex, while demolishing the existing one.

Concerned statesmen spoke up, pointing out that it was needless and that there were more important things the resource could have gone into.

In October of the same year he was reported to have been flown to a London hospital for medical treatment, the story according to Bellanaija was that he had cancer of the nose.

Looking back, what was more important, a medical institution that could handle such rare cases of cancer or a Secretariat complex?

In April 2013, despite opposition by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, a Federal High Court granted former governor of Enugu State, Chimaroke Nnamani leave to travel abroad on medical grounds.

Documents presented to the court showed that the former governor was suffering from “chest pain, shortness of breath, cough and tiredness”, which could otherwise be treated in the 6 billion naira “project for posterity” Teaching Hospital he built in 2005/06, or could it not be?

The governor of Imo State, Rochas Okorocha in April 2013 was flown abroad for medical treatment after sustaining ‘minor injuries on his forehead’ in a car accident. Should we assume that none of the specialist hospitals in his state could treat this injury? This also brings us to the question of the 27 world class general hospital presently under construction in 27 local governments in Imo state.

Would the people be asking too much of the governor if they request that he begins to use one of the hospitals for treatment upon completion; after all they are world class?

In May this year, Godswill Akpabio the immediate past governor of Akwa Ibom state unveiled a 30billion naira ‘world class’ hospital shortly before leaving office.

This hospital Nigerians were told would attract medical tourism to the state due to its world-class specialist standards and ultra-modern medical facilities;  “640 city scanners, digital mammography, endoscopy surgery, highly sophisticated intensive care units and medical gas plants with fully automated laboratories.

Newspapers wrote, blogs blogged, many clapped not knowing that Mr Goodswill perhaps was ‘bo-bo-ing’ Nigerians. In September the ‘bo-bo’ was made manifest.

The same Akpabio now a Senate Minority Leader was reported to have travelled abroad for medical treatment due to injuries sustained in a car crash after violating traffic rules.

According to Premium Times, the former governor ‘preferred’ to seek medical help overseas.

The Federal High Court in Lagos in July 2008, granted the then ex-governor and present governor of Ekiti State, Mr Ayodele Fayose leave to travel overseas for medical treatment while he was standing trial for a 51-count charge of money laundering.

In a similar circumstance, the former governor of Bayelsa state, Timipre Sylva in December 2013 was also granted permission by an Abuja Federal High Court to travel to South Africa for medical treatment while facing a 6.5billion naira fraud charge.

Data seems to show that for one to be fit to stand trial for fraud cases brought against one’s person, one must go overseas and sip from the most addictive juice of wellness served at the canteens of their medical institutions.

We can go on and on, but you see, despite all these similar act of let-down by these individuals who were at some point charged with the cardinal responsibility of ensuring the health and wellness of their people, there was a very rare occasion whence it was proven that the Nigerian health sector still has very good hospitals with credible and well trained professionals.

In December 2012, former governor of Kogi State Idris Wada was said to have rejected the option of being flown abroad for further treatment after undergoing what was described as inter-locking nail surgery on his thigh broken in the crash.

A Thisday article in Jan 2013 wrote that the Federal Government had concluded plans to place a ban on Nigerians seeking medical treatment that could be handled by some public and private health facilities in the country abroad. Two years after it seems like that ‘conclusion’ was not concluded because groups are still calling on the president to put an end to medical tourism.

Last week the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) urged President Muhammadu Buhari to ban all public office holders from seeking medical services overseas. It is said that a ban on medical tourism was one of the methods Chief Obafemi Awolowo leveraged as Premier of Western region, to make sure the children of political officeholders in Action Group (AG) and later, Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) controlled states utilized the public schools and health institutions.

So yes we keep going back and forth on this issue of medical tourism, the need for it to be banned, but that steers us away from the real issue.

Lack of medical information has always been the ‘Judas factor’, it’s the key problem.

Our long loved tradition of going abroad for even the most treatable ailments has caused people to lose faith in the system, most are even unaware that several complex issues can be treated here in Nigeria.

Truth be told our medical advantage has for long been poorly communicated.

What makes these foreign hospitals better than ours? Policy and data. In recent years, a growing number of governments from cities to states to regions have committed to opening up the vast repositories of data they hold across agencies and departments, and in many cases to collecting new kinds of data for public use.

In the UK for example, departments, hospitals, providers, trusts, institutions and other agencies in particular have come under increasing pressure to allow greater access to healthcare data and information.

Over a decade ago, the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgeons began publishing the results of surgeries done by individual physicians across the UK.

Surgical outcomes improved rapidly, and a report by the Society stated that the marked, sustained, incremental improvement in the quality of care the surgical teams have achieved is directly associated with the process of recording, reporting and publishing outcomes at the level of the individual clinician.

Greater data accessibility has radically transformed the health sectors of these economies who have invested substantial resources (financial and intellectual) into developing comprehensive open health data strategies from whence incipient ecology of innovation, analysis and research began to emerge thereby transforming the delivery and experience of their healthcare.

This is why today our rich troop to these economies so as to enjoy the greater efficiencies, innovation, and, perhaps better health outcomes there-in.

Blaise Aboh is co-partner at Orodata, a civic tech organization transforming government and public health sector data into insightful narratives to uphold transparency, accountability, and civic inclusion. He can be contacted via: 08126267941 or [email protected]

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

E-Business

Kaspersky Reports 15% Growth in Malicious email Attacks in 2025

Published

on

Kindly share this post

According to Kaspersky telemetry, almost every second email – 44.99% of global traffic – was spam in 2025. Spam consists not only of unsolicited emails, but can also include various email threats such as scam, phishing and malware.

In 2025, individuals and corporate users encountered over 144 million malicious and potentially unwanted email attachments, representing a 15% increase compared to the previous year figures.

In 2025, APAC had the largest share of email antivirus detections: it reached 30%, followed by Europe with 21%. Next came Latin America (16%) and the Middle East (15%), Russia and CIS (12%) and Africa (6%). As for individual countries, China had the highest rate of malicious and potentially unwanted email attachments, with the share of email antivirus detections of 14%. Russia ranked second (11%), followed by Mexico (8%), Spain (8%) and Turkey (5%).

Email antivirus detections peaked moderately in June, July and November.

Key trends in email spam and phishing

Kaspersky’s annual analysis has also identified several persistent trends in the email spam and phishing threat landscape that are expected to continue into 2026:

  • Combination of various communication channels. Attackers lure email users into switching to messengers or calling fraudulent phone numbers. For instance, scam investment mailings may redirect victims to fake websites, where they are asked to provide their contact information, and then cybercriminals will follow up with a phone call.
  • Usage of diverse evasion techniques in phishing and malicious emails. Threat actors frequently try to disguise phishing URLs, for example, with the help of link protection services and QR codes. These QR codes are often embedded directly in email bodies or within PDF attachments, which not only conceals phishing links but also encourages users to scan them on mobile devices, potentially exploiting weaker security measures than corporate PCs.
  • Mailings exploiting diverse legitimate platforms. For example, Kaspersky experts discovered a fraudulent tactic that abuses OpenAI’s organisation creation and team invitation features to send spam emails from legitimate OpenAI addresses, potentially tricking users into clicking scam links or dialing fraudulent phone numbers. Additionally, a calendar-based phishing scheme, which originated in the late 2010s, resurfaced last year with a focus on corporate users.
  • Refining tactics in business email compromise (BEC) attacks. In 2025 attackers attempted to become even more persuasive by incorporating fake forwarded emails into their correspondence. These emails lacked thread-index headers or other headers, making it difficult to verify their legitimacy within an email conversation. 

“Email phishing shouldn’t be underestimated. Our report reveals that one in ten business attacks starts with phishing, with a significant proportion being Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). In 2025, we saw an increase in the sophistication of targeted email attacks. Even the smallest details are meticulously crafted in these malicious campaigns, including the composition of sender addresses and the tailoring of content to real corporate events and processes.

“The commodification of generative AI has significantly amplified this threat, enabling attackers to craft convincing, personalised phishing messages at scale with minimal effort, automatically adapting tone, language and context to specific targets,” comments Roman Dedenok, anti-spam expert at Kaspersky.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Cybersafe Foundation Partners Google to Strengthen Cybersecurity Among CCIs in Africa

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Cybersafe Foundation has collaborated with Google in strengthening cybersecurity resilience among Critical Community Institutions across Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana and South Africa with the launch of Resilio Africa.

 

Speaking at the event in Lagos, Confidence Staveley, Executive Director of the Cybersafe Foundation, noted that while many organizations recognize the risks posed by cyber threats, conversations often stall when it comes to implementation.

“Across Africa, Critical Community Institutions are facing an increase in cyberattacks often without the capacity to defend themselves. Sub-Saharan Africa is now experiencing some of the most aggressive cyber activity globally. According to a threat report by Kaspersky, the region recorded over 42 million web attacks and 95 million malware-based, on-device attacks in just the first half of 2025.

“What’s especially concerning is the nature of these attacks: spyware, password stealers, and backdoor tools dominate, with password-stealing malware increasing by more than 60%.

“In East Africa, the scale is even more stark. Kenya alone recorded 2.5 billion cyber-threat events in Q1 2025, driven largely by phishing, mobile money fraud, and misconfigured cloud services,” she stated.

According to her, the primary barrier is not a lack of willingness but limited financial capacity to fund adequate cybersecurity measures.

“The conversation drops off at the point of taking action,” she said, explaining that many institutions lack the budgets required to implement robust security systems.

She disclosed that the programme’s provision of 10,000 hours of expert cybersecurity consultation—offered at no cost to participating institutions would ordinarily represent services valued at over one million dollars. The support, funded through a grant from Google.org, will be delivered by specialists across four participating countries.

Staveley reaffirmed that the Cybersafe Foundation remains a non-profit organization focused on supporting vulnerable communities and institutions, and described Resilio Africa as a strategic intervention aimed at strengthening digital trust across the continent, ensuring that commerce and essential public services can operate securely in an increasingly digital society.

Although the programme currently covers Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana and South Africa, Staveley acknowledged that the cybersecurity challenges extend far beyond those countries, and expressed hope that demonstrated impact from the initial phase would attract additional funding to scale the initiative to more than the 200 critical community institutions currently targeted, including underserved Francophone nations.

“This work is free to the organizations we serve, but it is not free to deliver,” she noted, underscoring the need for sustainable funding.

Explaining her personal motivation, Staveley said she views Africa’s cybersecurity challenges as opportunities for impact. Despite her engagements on global platforms, she emphasized her commitment to Nigeria and the broader African continent, describing the region as both home and a priority.

She pointed to a growing mismatch between rising cyber threats and limited investment in cybersecurity infrastructure, arguing that bridging this gap is central to the Foundation’s mission.

Staveley also clarified that Resilio Africa will not collect or own user data from participating institutions. Instead, the programme will focus on strengthening internal controls, building capacity and guiding organizations toward improved data protection practices.

With Resilio Africa now underway, the Cybersafe Foundation aims to demonstrate how targeted support for critical community institutions can enhance digital security and build long-term resilience across Africa’s rapidly expanding digital economy.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Business

Kaspersky Brings more Transparency to Threat Detection with New Hunt Hub

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Kaspersky has announced a major update to its Threat Intelligence Portal (TIP), introducing a new Hunt Hub section alongside an enhanced MITRE ATT&CK coverage map and a significantly expanded vulnerabilities database.

The update strengthens organisations’ ability to investigate threats, understand adversary behaviour, and proactively monitor the most relevant risks across their environments.

According to the Kaspersky Security Bulletin 2025 report, Kaspersky’s detection systems discovered an average of 500,000 malicious files per day in 2025, marking a 7% increase compared to the previous year. As cyberattacks become more sophisticated and frequent, security teams need more than alerts – they need clarity.

The newly launched Hunt Hub is designed to address growing market demand for greater transparency and deeper insight into how modern detection technologies work. Integrated into the Threat Landscape section of the Threat Intelligence Portal, Hunt Hub provides centralised access to Kaspersky’s threat hunting expertise and detection knowledge.

Hunt Hub includes Kaspersky Next EDR Expert hunts, also known as indicators of attack (IoA) or detection rules. All portal users can explore the catalogue of hunts and their descriptions, while Kaspersky Next EDR Expert customers gain extended access to detailed recommendations and detection logic presented in a convenient, SIGMA-like format. Each hunt is mapped to relevant MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques and linked to known threat actors, giving analysts clear context behind every detection.

By making detection logic visible and structured, Hunt Hub effectively removes the “black box” from threat detection. It allows security teams not only to respond to alerts, but also to understand why a detection was triggered and which threat it is designed to uncover – improving trust in security technologies and increasing the efficiency of threat investigation processes.

As part of the update, the MITRE ATT&CK coverage map within the Threat Landscape has been significantly enhanced. The portal now brings together product coverage across SIEM, EDR, NDR and Sandbox solutions, MITRE ATT&CK techniques with scoring, coverage percentages, and related Kaspersky Next EDR Expert hunts in a single, unified view. This enables organisations to assess how well their security stack covers relevant attack techniques and identify potential gaps in protection.

The Vulnerabilities section has also been expanded, with the CVE database now covering nearly 300,000 vulnerabilities. In addition, the portal provides more detailed information on vulnerabilities that have been exploited in real-world attacks, helping organisations prioritise remediation efforts based on actual threat activity.

“With the launch of Hunt Hub in the Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal, we are opening up our detection expertise and giving analysts clear visibility into how and why threats are detected. This transparency helps organisations move from reactive alert handling to informed threat hunting and proactive risk management,” comments Nikita Nazarov, Head of Threat Exploration at Kaspersky.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending