Connect with us

Telecom

NITDA Pushes Stronger Cyber Resilience Across Government Agencies

Published

on

Rep. DG NITDA,Dr Ayo Bakare, poses for a group photograph with participants at the Two Day Cybersecurity Workshop for MDAs, held at the e Government Training Centre, Abuja.
Kindly share this post

National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) has urged Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) to adopt a coordinated and proactive approach to securing Nigeria’s government digital infrastructure against the rising wave of cyber threats.

NITDA Pushes Stronger Cyber Resilience Across Government Agencies

Rep. DG NITDA,Dr Ayo Bakare, poses for a group photograph with participants at the Two Day Cybersecurity Workshop for MDAs, held at the e Government Training Centre, Abuja.

The call was made at the opening of a two-day Cybersecurity Workshop for MDAs, themed “Securing Government Digital Infrastructure through Capacity Building,” where the Director General of NITDA, Kashifu Inuwa, CCIE, was represented by the Assistant Director, Cybersecurity Department at NITDA, Dr. Ayodele Bakare.

Speaking at the event, Inuwa said the workshop comes at a crucial period when cyberattacks against government digital platforms have become more frequent, sophisticated and disruptive.

He noted that incidents such as website defacement, ransomware attacks, data breaches and the misuse of personal information now pose serious risks to governance, public trust and national development.

He observed that government digital platforms, relied upon daily by millions of Nigerians, have increasingly become attractive targets for cybercriminals.

“We have watched websites of government organisations defaced, hijacked and quietly redirected to gambling sites. We have seen coordinated ransomware attacks force government web portals to shut down and witnessed repeated attacks on government databases leading to data exfiltration and abuse of personal data,” he said.

Advertisement

Highlighting the growing magnitude of the challenge, the DG referenced findings from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Cybercrime Assessment for Nigeria, which identified Nigeria as one of Africa’s three most targeted countries due to its expanding digital economy and increasing cyberattack surface.

He also cited the Lloyd Cybersecurity Outlook, which estimated that cybercrime cost Nigeria more than $3 billion between 2019 and 2025.

According to him, every digital service delivered by government represents a promise of efficiency, transparency and accessibility to citizens and businesses, adding that such promises can only be fulfilled when the underlying systems are adequately secured.

He stressed that today’s cyber threats are orchestrated by highly organised and well-funded actors who exploit vulnerabilities across institutions, making inter-agency collaboration indispensable.

“A weakness in one MDA becomes a doorway into another. Our defences cannot be fragmented. Cybersecurity in government is a shared national obligation, and we are only as strong as our least protected system,” he stated.

Advertisement

Reaffirming NITDA’s commitment to strengthening national cyber resilience, the DG highlighted the Agency’s Computer Emergency Response Team (CERRT) as the government’s first point of contact during cyber incidents. He, however, emphasised that the true value of any emergency response capability lies in preventing attacks before they occur.

He explained that effective cybersecurity requires continuous risk assessments, robust governance frameworks, policy implementation, regular awareness campaigns, technical safeguards, incident response planning and sustained capacity development.

Inuwa also underscored the importance of the human factor in cybersecurity, describing personnel as the first and most critical line of defence.

“No firewall or technical control can replace an informed, alert and security-conscious workforce. That is what we refer to as the human firewall,” he remarked.

Encouraging participants to maximise the workshop, he described it as more than a conventional training programme, but a platform for practical learning, intelligence sharing and collaborative problem-solving through discussions and real-life case studies drawn from recent cyber incidents affecting public institutions.

Advertisement

He further disclosed that participants would serve as the first external stakeholder group to review and provide input on NITDA’s draft Regulatory Guidelines for Government Information Security Management ahead of broader stakeholder consultations.

Urging participants to engage openly throughout the sessions, Inuwa said candid discussions on institutional cybersecurity challenges would help other agencies strengthen their own resilience against emerging threats.

“Ask difficult questions and honestly share the security concerns within your environment because your candour may help a sister agency avoid the same issue,” he advised.

Concluding his address, the DG maintained that Nigeria’s ongoing digital transformation should be viewed as an opportunity rather than a source of concern, provided the nation’s digital assets remain adequately protected.

“Nigeria’s digital future is not a threat to be feared. It is an opportunity to be secured. Securing it is precisely the duty we have gathered here to take up together,” he said.

Advertisement

The workshop is expected to deepen cybersecurity knowledge across MDAs, enhance institutional collaboration and strengthen Nigeria’s collective cyber resilience, in line with NITDA’s commitment to fostering a secure, trusted and resilient digital ecosystem for the country.

Kindly share this post

Ugo Onwuaso is an ICT enthusiast. He believes technology should be used for general good. He holds a Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree from the Lagos state University. Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

Telecom

Telcos Seek Clear Regulatory Framework on Airtime Credit Services

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Telecommunications operators have called on the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to establish a clear regulatory framework for airtime and data credit services, warning that millions of Nigerians could face fresh disruptions if the agencies fail to coordinate their responsibilities.

Telcos Seek Clear Regulatory Framework on Airtime Credit Services

Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, ALTON

This is coming on the heels of the Federal High Court judgment affirming the FCCPC’s authority to regulate consumer protection in the airtime and data credit market while preserving the NCC’s exclusive mandate over telecommunications licensing and technical regulation.

The ruling effectively clarified that both regulators have complementary roles rather than overlapping powers.

Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), said the judgment should serve as the basis for stronger collaboration between the two regulators to avoid the regulatory uncertainty that earlier forced operators to suspend airtime and data credit services.

Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, ALTON, said the industry was not disputing the authority of either regulator but was seeking a clearly defined operational framework before any further regulatory actions are taken.

“The court has done something important. It has confirmed the FCCPC’s authority and, in the same breath, affirmed that the NCC’s role is preserved. Concurrency means coexistence. The industry now expects both regulators to establish the coordination framework that the court’s reasoning requires,” Adebayo said.

Advertisement

He stressed that regulatory certainty had become critical because millions of Nigerians depend on airtime and data credit services for daily communication.

“Forty million Nigerians depend on these services. The court has made clear that both regulators have a role. The industry is asking them to define how that works before any action that could disrupt access again,” he stated.

Adebayo also urged both agencies to engage industry stakeholders before introducing measures capable of affecting consumer access to the services.

According to him, the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC) directive requiring Regulatory Impact Assessments before major policy changes should be observed to minimise unintended consequences on businesses and consumers.

The renewed call comes months after major mobile network operators temporarily suspended airtime and data borrowing services following the implementation of the FCCPC’s Digital, Electronic, Online and Non-Traditional Consumer Lending (DEON) Regulations, a development that affected millions of subscribers nationwide.

Advertisement

In its judgment, the Federal High Court held that while the FCCPC has powers over competition and consumer protection issues in the digital lending ecosystem, it cannot assume the NCC’s statutory responsibility for licensing telecommunications operators.

Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa ruled that the two agencies must operate within their respective mandates, describing their relationship as one of “coexistence, not displacement.”

 

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

MTN Warns Customers against Fake Promo

Published

on

Kindly share this post

MTN Nigeria has warned customers to disregard fraudulent online posts claiming the telecom operator is offering “1 Month Free Data for Old Subscribers,” describing the promotion as fake and unauthorised.

MTN Warns Customers against Fake Promo

In a statement shared on its X handle, the telco said the circulating promotion is not from MTN and is not affiliated with the company.

MTN urged customers not to click on the accompanying link in the online post or provide their phone numbers or personal information on any third-party website.

Customers are advised not to click on the link or provide their phone numbers or personal information on any third-party website.

“We will never require customers to submit their details on external platforms to claim data or any other reward,” MTN said.

Advertisement

The company  added that all genuine promotions, products and services are announced only through its official communication channels.

“All authentic MTN promotions, products and services are communicated exclusively through our official channels, including www.mtn.ng, our verified social media pages and *180#,” the company said.

MTN also urged customers to remain vigilant against online scams designed to steal personal information, warning that fraudulent offers often impersonate trusted brands to deceive unsuspecting users.

“Don’t be the next victim!” the company said, reiterating that the purported “1 Month Free Data for Old Subscribers” offer is fake and not associated with MTN Nigeria.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Telecom

Court Dismisses Pan African Towers’ Bid to Halt Ex-CEO’s Suit, Awards ₦500,000 Costs

Published

on

Kindly share this post

National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN), sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has dismissed a Notice of Preliminary Objection filed by Pan African Towers Ltd. (PAT) in an employment dispute instituted by its former Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Azeez Amida.

Court Dismisses Pan African Towers' Bid to Halt Ex-CEO's Suit, Awards ₦500,000 Costs

The court also awarded ₦500,000 in costs against the company after holding that the application lacked merit.

Justice Essien, who delivered the ruling on July 21 in Suit No. NICN/LA/143/2025: Mr. Azeez Amida v. Pan African Towers Limited, held that the substantive case concerning Amida’s alleged outstanding contractual entitlements under a Mutual Separation Agreement should proceed to hearing.

The ruling effectively rejected the company’s attempt to terminate the proceedings on jurisdictional grounds.

Jurisdictional Challenge Rejected

Pan African Towers had argued that the National Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter because the Mutual Separation Agreement executed between the parties required disputes to first pass through negotiation, mediation and arbitration before litigation could be initiated.

Advertisement

The company maintained that Mr. Amida failed to exhaust those contractual dispute resolution mechanisms before approaching the court.

However, Justice Essien rejected the argument after examining evidence presented by the claimant showing that several attempts had been made to activate the agreed dispute resolution process before legal proceedings commenced.

According to the court, documentary evidence showed that Mr. Amida, through his solicitors, issued correspondence and formal demand letters aimed at resolving the dispute amicably in line with the terms of the agreement.

The court found that rather than engaging with those efforts, Pan African Towers failed to meaningfully participate in the process and later sought to rely on the same contractual provisions to challenge the court’s jurisdiction.

Evidence Considered by the Court

According to evidence presented by Mr. Amida’s legal team, the court considered correspondence involving senior officials of Pan African Towers and its investors.

Advertisement

Among the documents relied upon was a letter allegedly written by the Chairman of the Board of Pan African Towers and Partner at Development Partners International (DPI), Mr. Adefolarin Ogunsanya, rejecting the demand made by Mr. Amida’s legal representatives for an amicable resolution before litigation.

The claimant’s legal team also tendered multiple email communications allegedly sent from January 2025 to Verod Capital Management’s in-house legal counsel, Mr. Dipo Okuribido.

According to the claimant, those emails did not receive any response before the commencement of the suit.

Based on the evidence before it, the court held that the conduct of Pan African Towers was inconsistent with reliance on the contractual dispute resolution provisions.

Justice Essien ruled that the company had effectively waived its right to insist on arbitration after frustrating the preliminary dispute resolution process contemplated by the parties’ agreement.

Advertisement

The court consequently held that Pan African Towers could not rely on the arbitration clause to prevent the court from hearing the substantive claims.

Court Awards Costs

Having dismissed the Preliminary Objection, the National Industrial Court awarded costs of ₦500,000 against Pan African Towers.

The court described the objection as lacking merit.

Substantive Defence Yet to Be Filed

The ruling represents the first judicial determination in the employment dispute.

The claimant’s legal team noted that since the suit commenced, the principal response filed by Pan African Towers had been the Preliminary Objection challenging the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court.

Advertisement

According to the claimant, the company has yet to file a substantive defence addressing the merits of the claims relating to the alleged outstanding contractual entitlements.

With the dismissal of the jurisdictional challenge, the matter will now proceed to hearing on its merits.

The court adjourned the substantive suit until Jan. 12, 2027.

Background to the Dispute

The dispute arose following Mr. Amida’s departure from Pan African Towers after both parties executed a Mutual Separation Agreement.

According to the claimant, while the agreement governed the terms of his exit from the company, certain contractual entitlements remained unpaid.

Advertisement

His legal representatives said they initially sought to resolve the dispute through the mechanisms provided under the agreement by engaging the company through correspondence and formal demand letters.

When those efforts failed to produce a resolution, they commenced proceedings before the National Industrial Court seeking payment of the outstanding contractual entitlements.

Rather than filing a substantive defence to the claims, Pan African Towers challenged the jurisdiction of the court, arguing that arbitration and other dispute resolution mechanisms had not been exhausted.

The National Industrial Court has now rejected that position.

Related Commercial Litigation

The employment proceedings are separate from ongoing commercial cases before the Federal High Court involving Mr. Amida, Development Partners International (DPI), Verod Capital Management and other parties.

Advertisement

Those proceedings relate to issues concerning the ownership of Pan African Towers and remain pending before the courts.

The National Industrial Court noted that those matters would be determined independently based on their respective facts, evidence and applicable legal principles.

Legal Team Reacts

Reacting to the ruling, representatives of Mr. Amida’s legal team welcomed the decision.

“The Court has affirmed an important principle of contractual dispute resolution.

“A party cannot frustrate the agreed process and later seek to rely on that same process to prevent a claim from being heard.

Advertisement

“We now look forward to presenting the substantive case before the Court,” the legal team said.

The lawyers acknowledged that Pan African Towers retained the right under Nigerian law to pursue any available appellate remedies but stated that they were fully prepared for the substantive hearing scheduled for January 2027.

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending