Connect with us

Broadcasting

Nollywood: Experts Identify Burning Issues at Roundtable

Published

on

Kindly share this post

The Goethe-Institut Nigeria and Communicating for Change (CFC) recently held a roundtable event on the Nigerian film industry, looking at the issues affecting its future, as well as the progress that has been made.    
The roundtable touched upon piracy, funding and distribution – all factors that have combined to produce a lull in Nigerian film production. Suggestions to strengthen the industry were also considered, with calls for more capacity building and financial investment.

The survival of Nollywood is of paramount importance as the industry not only plays an important economic role in creating employment and generating income, but also plays an important cultural role, helping to re-brand Nigeria’s tainted ‘419’ image abroad, replacing it with creativity and culture.

“Over the last five years, I’ve noticed that people are producing less films due to a fear of piracy and a lack of understanding of the new distribution framework,” said Peace Anyiam-Osigwe, an established filmmaker and founder of the annual African Movie Academy Awards (Amaa). “But more positively there’s been an improvement in the quality of films, with more Nigerian films being accepted at international film festivals.” 

“Nollywood might not be here in a year due to piracy,” said Teco Benson, a film director and CEO of TFP Studios. “People can hawk films freely on the street, the fines are minimal and the NCC doesn’t have enough bite. Nollywood is the hope of this country; we need the support of government to protect intellectual property rights.”

Providing the government’s response to piracy, Emeka Ogbonna, zonal manager, Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) said: ‘Despite our insufficient funding, locally a lot has been done to regulate the production of DVDs; we have introduced regulation, minimum standards for NCC officers and undertake night time inspections of suspected piracy plants.”

“The fundamental problem is that of distribution,” said Madu Chikwendu, producer/director, and the organiser of the Lagos International Film Festival. “Outside of Nigeria, there is a huge demand for our films, and to meet this demand, our films are distributed illegitimately, resulting in a huge loss of revenue for the industry, which leads to a corresponding loss in quality. You can’t talk of quality control when people can’t afford to eat.”

John Okonkwo, Goodlife Production Ltd, based in Alaba market, spoke of the need to include all elements of the industry in distribution reforms. “Many of the main film distributors are not educated and find it difficult to relate to those that use ‘big grammar.’ It’s a big barrier and more needs to be done to carry these people along.”

“Banks and financiers are motivated by profit. They don’t want their money to go in one direction; they need to know that their money will get back to them, with a return,” said  Yewande Sadiku, head of Corporate Finance, Stanbic IBTC Bank Plc, addressing the difficulties of filmmakers in obtaining funding.

Chike Ofili, a poet, screenwriter and researcher of Nollywood, said: “The guilds need to represent the industry and be a place for dialogue, a place for scriptwriters and producers to meet and critique their work. When mental infrastructure has been built, other things can follow.”

Similarly, Jahman Anikulapo, a notable Nigerian art critic and editor of The Guardian on Sunday newspaper highlighted his disappointments regarding the industries priorities. “Instead of celebrating individuals and short term successes, the industry needs to take a long term view, by building lasting structures that will improve Nollywood,” he said. 

“Despite its challenges, Nollywood is developing,” said Sandra Mbanefo Obigao, executive director, CFC, who chaired the roundtable. “CFC is committed to using its unique position, as a producer of development films and a champion of the creative industries, to encourage stronger links between the creative and commercial sectors as well as between film and Nigeria’s rich and well developed art and literary scene.”

 

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Broadcasting

NELFUND Investigates 34 Universities Over Students’ Missing Tuition Refunds

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) says it is investigating about 34 tertiary institutions over allegations that they failed to refund students whose tuition fees were paid twice under the Federal Government’s student loan scheme.

The Managing Director of NELFUND, Mr Akintunde Sawyerr, disclosed this during an interview on Arise Television.

Sawyerr said the agency had deployed a five-member investigative team, including operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and internal auditors, to examine the allegations.

According to him, the investigation was prompted by numerous complaints received from affected students.

“As of right now, there are 34 institutions that we are looking at closely with respect to this issue,” he said.

Sawyerr explained that the double payment issue arose because President Bola Tinubu directed that the student loan scheme commence in the middle of an academic session instead of at the beginning.

He said the decision compelled many students to pay their tuition fees to meet registration deadlines while awaiting approval of their loan applications.

“What happened is that a lot of schools got double payment; some from the students and some from us,” he said.

“The refund process is entirely out of our hands. It is the recipient of the double payments that is obliged to make refunds to the students.”

The NELFUND boss noted that many students had borrowed money from family members, friends and other sources to pay their tuition with the expectation of receiving refunds once the loans were disbursed.

He said while some institutions had promptly refunded affected students, others had failed to do so.

“Some have been very good at this. Others haven’t been so good at it,” Sawyerr said.

“I reserve judgement on the intentionality around it because, for some of them, they just didn’t have the process to make refunds.”

Sawyerr disclosed that NELFUND was exploring a tokenised payment system that would enable students to authorise tuition payments directly to their institutions, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplicate payments.

He said the agency deliberately chose not to disburse tuition loans directly to students to minimise the risk of fund diversion.

“Paying the funds to the students could really lead to the temptation for them to divert and do other things,” he said.

The managing director, however, acknowledged that NELFUND lacked the statutory powers to compel institutions to refund students or prosecute officials found culpable.

He added that many frustrated students had submitted complaints not only to NELFUND but also to anti-corruption agencies, including the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

Sawyerr also expressed concern over increases in tuition fees by some institutions following the introduction of the student loan scheme.

He said NELFUND had declined to pay institutions that increased their tuition fees beyond acceptable levels.

“Some schools, because they get paid easily, started to put up their fees. We refused, point blank, to pay institutions who had hiked their fees beyond a certain level,” he said.

He reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to investigating every reported irregularity and strengthening the implementation of the student loan programme through continuous monitoring and internal reviews.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

Obi, NDC Presidential Candidate Faces N50Bn Defamation Claim over Alleged Podcast Remark

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Abayomi Arabambi, national vice chairman (South-West) of the Labour Party, has demanded a public apology, a retraction, and N50 billion in damages from Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), over an alleged defamatory statement made during a podcast interview.

Obi, NDC Presidential Candidate Faces N50Bn Defamation Claim over Alleged Podcast Remark

The demand was contained in a letter issued by the law firm Neplus Ultra Attorneys and signed by Anderson U. Asemota, Peter O. Asimegbe, and Stanley C. Eziefulle on behalf of Arabambi.

According to the letter, the legal dispute arose from comments allegedly made by Obi during the interview, where he reportedly stated that Arabambi “does not have an address.”

Arabambi’s legal team described the statement as false, malicious, and defamatory, arguing that it portrayed their client as a faceless individual without legitimacy, credibility, or standing in public life.

The lawyers further claimed that the interview was widely circulated on television stations and digital platforms, exposing Arabambi to public ridicule and damaging his reputation.

“Our client has had a known residential and business address, maintains professional and political affiliations within Nigeria, and has never been a person whose whereabouts or identity were unknown,” the letter stated.

The legal team maintained that the alleged publication caused embarrassment and harmed Arabambi’s public image and political standing.

As part of their demands, the lawyers called for an unreserved public apology to be aired on national television, published on Obi’s verified social media platforms, and carried as full-page apologies in national newspapers.

They also demanded the payment of N50 billion as compensation for the alleged injury to Arabambi’s reputation, dignity, political standing, and public image.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Broadcasting

Why We’re Partnering With NIHOTOUR To Bring Nigerians In South Africa Home – Steve Babaeko

Published

on

Kindly share this post

When Nigerians began arriving back home on emergency flights following an ultimatum from anti-migrant groups in South Africa, Steve Babaeko, alongside The Nigerian Institute of Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR), saw an opportunity to step up for his fellow citizens.

Why We’re Partnering With NIHOTOUR To Bring Nigerians In South Africa Home - Steve Babaeko

Steve Babaeko

The CEO of X3M Ideas explains that he saw a deep obligation, one that had nothing to do with advertising and everything to do with hospitality. For Babaeko, it was a reminder that an agency owes a duty of care to the community it exists within.

That conviction shaped the creative agency’s partnership with the Nigerian Institute of Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR) for the newly launched ‘Welcome Home’ pilot programme at Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA) in Lagos. Rather than simply crafting a messaging campaign around the crisis, X3M Ideas helped design a tangible, physical system.

“This wasn’t built as a campaign about a crisis,” Babaeko said. “It was a hospitality agency deciding what it owes its own citizens the moment they land.”

For Babaeko, what X3M has built is infrastructure, something returnees can physically walk through, use, and benefit from the instant they clear the arrival gate.

With the MMIA pilot now officially running, NIHOTOUR directs returnees to immediate support services and issues them a Returnee Card. This card grants individuals a free first night at partner hotels, immediate transport assistance from the airport, and fast-tracked business registration support.

Furthermore, the initiative features a dedicated Restart Desk to assist returnee entrepreneurs and tradespeople with job placement referrals and business registration. This operates alongside a public Homecoming counter that tracks the cumulative number of returnees welcomed, businesses restarted, and jobs facilitated.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending