Connect with us

News

Outcry over Bill Seeking Death Penalty for Hate Speech

Published

on

Kindly share this post

A bill that seeks death penalty and the establishment of an agency to check hate speech, has sparked varied assortments of condemnations from Nigerians with some describing it as draconian

 

The National Commission for the Prohibition of Hate Speeches (Estb., etc) Bill 2019, is a bill seeking death by hanging for anyone found guilty of any form of hate speech that results in the death of another person.

 

Under the proposed law, offenders are also either liable to 10 years jail term or payment of N10m fine.

 

An offender, according to the bill is, “a person who uses, publishes, presents, produces, plays, provides, distributes and/or directs the performance of any material, written and or visual.

 

The bill sponsored by , Sabi Abdullahi, a former Senate spokesperson, who is now the deputy Senate Whip, had suffered a setback for some unknown reasons.

 

But in a new development, the bill was on Tuesday, November 12, read for the first time at the senate.

 

It stated that such individuals had committed an offence if they intended  to stir up ethnic hatred, or having regard to all the circumstances, ethnic hatred is likely to be stirred up against any person or persons from such an ethnic group in Nigeria.

 

“Any person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable to life imprisonment and where the act causes any loss of life,  the person shall be punished with death by hanging,” it added.

 

Offenders liable to a 10-year jail term or that risk N10m fine are those who stir ethnic hatred by their speeches.

 

The bill states, “In this section (3), ethnic hatred means hatred against a group of persons from any ethical group indigenous to Nigeria.

 

“A person subjects another to harassment on the basis of ethnicity for the purposes of this section where on ethnic grounds, he justifiably engages in a conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating that other person’s dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for the person subjected to the harassment.

 

“Conduct shall be regarded as having the effect specified in subsection (1) (a) or (b) of this section if, having regard to all circumstances, including in particular the perception of that  person.

 

“A person who subjects another to harassment on the basis of ethnicity commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to an imprisonment for a term not less than 10 years, or to a fine of not less than N10m, or to both.

 

“Any person who knowingly utters words to incite feelings of contempt, hatred, hostility, violence or discrimination against any person, group or community on the basis of ethnicity or race, commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not less than five years, or to a fine of not less than N10m or to both.

 

“A person victimises another if in any circumstance relevant for the purpose of this Act, the person does any act that is injurious to the wellbeing and esteem of another person by  treating the person to less favourably than, in those circumstances.”

 

The bill added that,  where the  offenders are a corporate organisation, every director, trustee and officer of that body corporate shall also be deemed to be guilty of the offence.

 

In a swift reaction, Mr Raphael Adebayo, convener, Free Nigeria Movement, said his organisation would mobilise Nigerians to resist the proposed anti-hate speech bill.

 

The activist described the planned anti-hate speech commission as an attempt to muzzle Nigerians and deprive the citizens of their rights.

 

Adedayo admonished Nigerians to rise up and oppose the bill, which he said was designed to take way the people’s liberty and constitutional rights, adding that the nation could not allow the National Assembly to pass “this tyrannical legislation.”

 

Also,  former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar, on Tuesday said  the bill was an abuse of the legislative process, adding  that it would violate Nigerians’ constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech.

 

He said in a statement by his Media Adviser, Mr. Paul Ibe, that it was prudent to build upon the tolerance inherited from those years and not shrink the democratic space to satisfy personal and group interests.

 

He said, “Atiku  wishes to sound a note of caution to those now toying with the idea of an anti-hate Speech Bill, with punishment for supposed hate speech to be death by hanging. The contemplation of such laws is in itself not just hate speech, but an abuse of the legislative process that will violate Nigerians’ constitutionally guaranteed right to Freedom of Speech.

 

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) said  that the newly introduced bill could not be justified in a democracy.

 

The association, in a statement sent to The PUNCH by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Kunle Edun, on Tuesday, cautioned the Senate to “tread carefully” with the bill.

 

It also reminded the Senate that section 39(3) of the Constitution had made it mandatory that no law could abrogate the rights of Nigerians to exercise their right to freedom of speech.

 

It stated, “We therefore, strongly advise that the Senate should tread carefully on this bill.

 

“Section 39(3) of the Constitution makes it mandatory that no law can abrogate the rights of Nigerians to exercise their right to freedom of speech except if such law can be reasonably justified in a democratic society. “Can a Hate Bill be reasonably justified in a democratic society?”

 

The NBA said with the nation already grappling with wanton arrest and prosecution of citizens from treasonable felony after expressing their opinions, there might not be any guarantee that the bill when signed into law would not be used to harass those  exercising their right to free speech.

 

It noted that while the right to freedom of expression was not absolute, there were enough laws in Nigeria to tackle the excesses, implying that there was no need for the proposed law.

 

Also, Chief Ifedayo Adedipe, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, condemned the bill and called on Nigerians to resist it. The SAN described the bill as an extension of rights abuses under the All Progressives Congress  government.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

News

Africa Fintech Revenues to Hit $65 billion by 2030 – Report

Published

on

Kindly share this post

African fintech revenues are projected to expand 13-fold to approximately $65 billion by 2030, marking the continent as the world’s fastest-growing digital finance market.

The “Beyond Payments: Unlocking Africa’s Second FinTech Wave ” report, released by Boston Consulting Group at the Inclusive FinTech Forum in Kigali, indicates the sector is shifting from transactional inclusion to scalable, infrastructure-driven systems.

While Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 74% of global mobile money volume, more than 50% of lending still occurs through informal channels, representing a massive gap for B2B payments and data-driven underwriting.

The opportunity now is to convert scale into sustained, institutional-grade growth, says the report. Markets offering regulatory clarity and interoperable infrastructure are becoming increasingly attractive to long-term capital.

Rwanda is highlighted as an example of deliberate institutional coordination that lowers the cost to scale for financial institutions.

Forward-looking regulation and the License Passporting Memorandum of Understanding between Rwanda and Kenya are cited as practical steps toward easing regional expansion.

Financial centres like the Kigali International Financial Centre play a critical role in this next phase by reducing uncertainty for banks and investors.

By combining regulatory clarity and Pan-African integration, they reduce uncertainty for banks, fintechs, and investors, and help position markets as credible, long-term investment destinations.

Africa’s next fintech phase will be led by financial institutions, the report notes. It goes on to say banks and regulated entities are becoming the primary customers of digital financial infrastructure, demanding platforms that align with their risk frameworks.

The report identifies five institutional priorities to sustain momentum: interoperable infrastructure, data-driven credit, regulatory coherence, trust, and resilience.

Building seamless wallet-to-bank integration will enable more efficient value movement, while transforming transaction data into AI-enabled underwriting models will help bridge the gap in SME lending.

Proportional licensing frameworks and predictable supervisory practices will lower the cost to scale for innovators. Furthermore, expanding cybersecurity capabilities will ensure the ecosystem remains reliable as digital usage grows.

Africa has demonstrated that fintech scale is achievable, and the next decade will be shaped by those markets that strengthen their institutional foundations, the report concludes.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

This Is Nigeria Launches ‘The 36: Nigeria Unscripted’ to Showcase Nation’s Culture, Innovation

Published

on

Kindly share this post

For too long, the story of Nigeria has been told by foreigners or shaped by people who don’t truly understand our spirit; This Is Nigeria is a movement changing that. We are putting the power back into the hands of Nigerians to tell our stories from our perspectives.

This Is Nigeria Launches ‘The 36: Nigeria Unscripted’ to Showcase Nation’s Culture, Innovation

Our mission is simple: to change how the world sees us by sharing the positive, impactful stories of our land and its people.

Today, we are officially launching “The 36: Nigeria Unscripted”. This series will travel through every single state in the country, starting with our pilot season in Lagos. We want to show the world the true drive, food, diversity, culture, and innovation that define Nigerians at home.

“The 36: Nigeria Unscripted” takes a deep dive into the history, people, landmarks, and investment potential that make each state unique. Instead of focusing on the usual headlines, we are highlighting the real people building businesses, creating new technologies, making scientific breakthroughs, and leading cultural shifts here and across the globe.

The Kick-Off

The journey begins in Lagos. Over the next two weeks, our crew will be on the streets filming the vibrant energy of the city. This is a “boots-on-the-ground” look at what Nigerian innovation actually looks like today.

Alongside the series, we are also launching a Global Desk. This is a dedicated space to find and share stories of Nigerians living abroad who are making us proud with that signature Nigerian excellence.

How We Are Different

Most Nigerian travel content usually falls into two categories: it’s either a refined ad that ignores reality, or it focuses only on struggle while ignoring achievements.

This Is Nigeria rejects both. Our campaign gives you a behind-the-scenes look at the real passion and effort that fuel our success.

For more information or to share your story, visit www.thisis-nigeria.com.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Court Orders SERAP to Pay DSS Operatives N100m Damages Over Defamation

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Abuja has ordered the Incorporated Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) to pay N100 million in damages to two operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) over defamation.

Court Orders SERAP to Pay DSS Operatives N100m Damages Over Defamation

SERAP

Justice Yusuf Halilu delivered the judgment in a suit filed by two DSS operatives, Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, who accused SERAP of making false and defamatory claims against them.

The claimants had approached the court following a series of posts published by SERAP on its X handle on Sept. 9, 2024, alleging that DSS officers unlawfully invaded and occupied its Abuja office.

In the posts, SERAP claimed that officers of the State Security Service had stormed its office and were demanding to see its directors.

“Officers from Nigeria’s State Security Service are presently unlawfully occupying SERAP’s office in Abuja, asking to see our directors. President Tinubu must immediately direct the SSS to end the harassment, intimidation, and attack on the rights of Nigerians,” the organisation had posted.

However, in his judgment, Justice Halilu held that the allegations made by SERAP were false and defamatory, adding that the two DSS operatives were justified in instituting legal action to protect their reputations.

The court consequently awarded N100 million in damages against SERAP in favour of the claimants.

Justice Halilu also ordered SERAP to issue a public apology to the two DSS operatives.

According to the judgment, the apology must be published in two national newspapers and aired on two television stations.

In addition, the court awarded N1 million against SERAP as the cost of litigation.

The court further ruled that the judgment sum would attract 10 per cent interest annually until the full amount is paid.

The case stems from growing tensions between civil society organisations and security agencies over allegations of harassment, intimidation, and civic space restrictions in Nigeria.

Neither SERAP nor the DSS had publicly reacted to the judgment as of the time of filing this report.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending