E-Financial
Reps Say Banks Evade Taxes in Billions
House of Representatives Committee on Finance, probing tax remittances, tax assessments and payments by banks, has accused some Nigerian banks of inflating their operating costs to reduce their taxes.
The lawmakers said that the banks are making false declarations and distorting information in attempt to mislead or confuse the Committee as balances reported in the published audited accounts of some of them showed huge variation with the figures submitted to the committee.
Abdulmumin Jibrin, Committee chairman said that his committee found out that data submitted to the CBN in the banks’ monthly returns on the same issues were different from what they presented the Committee for investigation.
According to Jibrin Committee was not making unsubstantiated comments, as the documents submitted by the banks were analysed with capacity support from the United Kingdom’s Department for International and Development (DFID), National Assembly Budget and Research Office (NABRO) and reputable professionals in the industry in conducting the investigations.
“Preliminary findings show a poor quality of returns by the banks, discrepancies in data submitted, outright refusal to present documentary evidence, blanket violations of existing laws, self exemption from existing rules, false declaration, manipulation and distortion of information among others” Jibrin added
The Committee chairman said that “These despicable acts of gross misconduct clearly depict the unscrupulous and roguish character of some banks and their Chief Executive Officers. For the Committee on Finance, this is unacceptable.
“For instance, balances reported in the published audited accounts of some banks show huge variance with the figures submitted to the Committee. The data submitted to the CBN in their monthly returns on the same issues were found to be different from what was tendered before the Committee.
“Even more embarrassing are the inconsistencies and huge variances in some data provided in different pages of documents submitted, thus leaving the committee to conclude that many banks blatantly engage in the creative accounting technique of inflating their operating costs to reduce their exposure to taxes.
“Furthermore, some banks have also created exemption rules for themselves in total disregard for the provisions of extant tax laws, particularly violations of the stamp duty, withholding tax and VAT acts.
“Some chief executives deliberately refused to sign the templates, obviously evading presentation of the documents under oath, in line with legislative procedure. Similarly, key information and data were omitted.
“Such data include details of staff PAYE and utilities with tax implications, etc. There are also many cases of late remittances or outright failure to remit money collected on behalf of government.
“Generally, returns made so far by the banks are incomplete, as the order of presentation was contrary to the guidelines provided in the template. Clearly, this is aimed at misleading the committee.
“Documentary evidence requested was also provided in a haphazard manner.”
According to the committee Chairman, of the 21 banks under scrutiny, only six have supplied information requested, though with certain queries to answer.
On the other hand, he said against banks’ tradition of attention to details, 15 banks suddenly found it convenient to provide poor and incomplete documentation.
“It is obvious that over the years, government has lost billions of naira in fraudulent and underhand dealings corruptly designed by some banks to evade tax.
“This is in addition to being massively and callously shortchanged by banks saddled with the responsibility of collecting and remitting taxes,” he noted.
The committee chairman said it should be of concern to Nigerians that the government continues the yearly ritual of domestic borrowing to balance its budget deficit while the deposit banks continue to manipulate the situation to the detriment of the private and real sectors.
His words: “This domestic borrowing has become a bazaar for many banks, which provide such funds at outrageous interest rates and care less about the implication to the private and real sector, both of which continue to struggle to get the crumbs at a very high cost.
“Domestic borrowing by government has denied the private sector access to affordable funds to grow their businesses and in the process generate employment and create wealth.
“Yet again, some reprobate banks are involved in the criminal act of converting the huge funds in dormant accounts into profits, even with known and accessible next of kin.
“Why should they not pay their taxes in full and remit in full and promptly what they collect on behalf of government?”.
Jibrin said at the end of the investigation, the committee intends to examine various extant tax laws, introduce new clauses or make amendments where necessary to strengthen the country’s tax system and block leakages.
“Chief executives of such Banks must sign the templates and complete their outstanding checklists within 48 hours to set the stage for the last round of engagement between the Committee and the banks,” he said, adding: Between September 23 and 27, the chief executive o fficers of the banks must appear in person to defend their templates in a technical session before the committee.”
Flutterwave has distanced itself from reports claiming the federal government has approved a $75 million investment in the company as a precursor to a public listing.
In a statement, Flutterwave dismissed the reports as “inaccurate,” specifically refuting claims that it is on the verge of a $250 million Initial Public Offering (IPO).
The denial follows a flurry of local media reports on Monday, sparked in part by a now-deleted social media post from a special assistant to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
Flutterwave has said it has no knowledge of a reported $75 million investment by Nigeria’s federal government, pushing back against local media reports that suggested the deal had been approved as part of the company’s path toward a public listing.
Earlier reports on Monday, including a now-deleted tweet from a special assistant to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, stated that the president had authorised an investment of $75 million in the payments company through the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MoFI).
Flutterwave’s spokesperson clarified the company’s position stating that, “Flutterwave is not in any way close to an IPO, and they have made no announcements regarding a listing or fundraising tied to an IPO as described.”
The confusion highlights the intense scrutiny surrounding the unicorn, which was valued at over $3 billion during its 2022 funding round.
While Flutterwave has long been touted as the torchbearer for African tech on the global public stage, the company appears to have pivoted toward a more conservative timeline.
The reports also indicated that the startup was preparing to raise up to $250 million in an initial public offering.
CitiTrust Financial Services Limited, the parent company of Osun-partly owned LivingTrust Mortgage Bank, has approached the Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos, following the company’s conviction at the Federal High Court, Lagos, over alleged fraud and illegal financial operations.
CitiTrust, is challenging the conviction and asset forfeiture order handed down by the Court in the case brought the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
EFCC accused it of money laundering, illegal financial operations, and operating a Ponzi scheme.
Federal High Court, had ordered the forfeiture of the firm’s assets to the federal government of Nigeria, citing evidence of unlawful financial activities.
CitiTrust is fighting back according to the hearing notice No. CA/L/571/2025, issued on April 15, 2026, the appeal against the federal government, will be heard at the Court of Appeal complex in Tafawa Balewa Square, Lagos.
The matter, listed before Court 1, will first address a motion by the appellants seeking leave to file their appeal out of time.
Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi (SAN), counsel to the appellants, in a motion dated September 23, 2025, argued that procedural delays necessitated the application.
He explained that although the Record of Appeal was transmitted on May 26, 2025, the defence could not file its Brief of Argument within the stipulated 45 days due to time constraints and competing professional obligations.
Atoyebi further noted that the appellants’ brief exceeds the 35-page limit prescribed under the Court of Appeal Rules, 2021, by three pages, requiring the court’s permission for its adoption.
The appellants are therefore seeking the leave of the court to file and serve their Brief of Argument out of time, an order extending the time for filing, and an order deeming the already filed brief as properly filed.
The EFCC had earlier secured a conviction against CitiTrust and its subsidiaries, CitiTrust Asset Management Limited and CitiTrust Holding Plc, over alleged fraudulent financial operations.
It would be recalled that in a ruling delivered by Justice Friday Nemakonam Ogazi of the Federal High Court, Lagos, the judge held that there was overwhelming evidence linking the firms to unlawful activities.
The court found that one of the entities was not duly registered with regulatory authorities, including the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), describing the operations as illegal despite corporate registration.
Relying on Section 12 of the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act, 2022, the court ruled that the EFCC had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the assets were proceeds of unlawful activity.
Justice Ogazi also invoked provisions of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act and the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), holding that the corporate veil could be lifted where fraud is alleged.
“The law is that when issues of fraud arise, the corporate veil must be lifted. Statutory provisions cannot be used as a refuge to justify illegality,” the court held.
The court subsequently ordered the final forfeiture of CitiTrust-linked assets, forfeiture of shares held in LivingTrust Mortgage Bank Plc, compensation of investors from recovered funds, and transfer of any balance to the Federal Government.
The anti-graft agency had also declared some executive directors of the firm wanted, alleging that they are currently on the run.
Federal court in Lagos has suspended the enforcement of Nigeria’s most comprehensive framework for regulating digital lending apps.
On April 15, Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa of the Federal High Court in Lagos granted an interim injunction blocking the enforcement of the Digital, Electronic, Online, or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations 2025, better known as the DEON Regulations.
The order followed an urgent ex parte application filed the previous day by the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPA Nigeria), the industry body representing wireless application service providers operating mainly within the telecoms ecosystem.
The suit targets twelve specific provisions of the text, covering licensing, sanctions, compliance obligations and data-handling rules, according to court documentation published by Lawyard.
Until the next hearing on April 27, 2026, the regulator cannot impose sanctions, enforce compliance directives, or issue new instructions to WASPA members.
The judge also barred the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) from interfering with the ongoing commercial operations of association members.
The case pits two actors whose respective mandates the Nigerian legal framework has never clearly separated.
On one side stands the FCCPC — the federal agency established in 2018 to enforce consumer protection and competition — which gazetted the DEON Regulations on July 21, 2025, under sections 17, 18 and 163 of its founding Act.
In a press statement dated September 3, 2025, Tunji Bello, executive vice chairman, FCCPC, justified the rules by citing “a long history of complaints” involving exploitative practices, data breaches, abusive debt recovery, and harassment.
On the other side, WASPA Nigeria contests the very legitimacy of the FCCPC’s intervention, arguing that services tied to telecoms — airtime credit, data loans, mobile-financing products — fall exclusively under the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), the telecoms regulator created by the Nigerian Communications Act of 2003.
In the affidavit deposed by Ayo Stuffman, the association contends that the FCCPC is acting ultra vires and creating a regulatory regime parallel to the NCC’s.
A jurisdictional war that stretches far beyond a procedural dispute
The conflict is not limited to a question of legal boundaries. It strikes at the commercial core of the market: who collects the licensing fees, who sets the operational conditions, who governs the financial products embedded in telecom networks.
Nigeria’s consumer credit stock reached 3.82 trillion naira at the end of December 2024, up 21.27% on September, according to Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) data relayed by The Cable and AFP.
In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, personal loans disbursed amounted to approximately 470 billion naira.
A growing share flows through mobile applications and telecom-embedded lending products — including MTN’s MoMo Airtime Lending, operated by the country’s largest telecom operator.
If the court validates WASPA’s position, these products fall outside the FCCPC’s scope and come under the sole authority of the NCC, a regulator historically less active on consumer protection issues.
Available data on demand illustrate the social stakes. Between 2021 and 2023, the FCCPC recorded more than 11,000 consumer complaints for harassment, data abuse and unethical debt recovery practices, according to the agency.
The number of lending applications approved by the FCCPC rose from 269 in September 2024 to 408 in March 2025, while 47 apps were delisted and 88 were placed on the watchlist, according to data compiled by AFP and OneSafe.
The DEON Regulations were meant to introduce interest-rate caps, precontractual disclosure obligations, continuous supervision of recovery practices and fines of up to 100 million naira per violation, according to Legit.ng. The compliance deadline was set for January 5, 2026, and the FCCPC had issued written compliance notices to operators with an April 16 deadline, according to WASPA’s affidavit.
It is precisely this enforcement pressure that triggered the legal challenge.
Nnaji, Former Minister Seeks Out-of-court Settlement over Certificate Forgery Allegations
Nigeria @ Risks Losing Digital Control- NiRA
CIBN Allegedly Hit by 250GB Data Breach
NUJ Accuses NBC of Attempting to Gag Media, Demands Dialogue
BOI, RMRDC Seal MoU to Address Agric Value Chain Challenges, Boost Nigeria’s GDP
NBC Boss Urges Content Ceators to Participate in DSO
NITDA Takes Over National Digital Architecture System
DLM SPV PLC Lists ₦9.00bn AAA-Rated Medium-Term Notes on FMDQ Exchange, Sets Benchmark in Corporate Bond Market
FG Shifting Focus to “Meaningful Connectivity” to Drive Inclusion – Minister
Jury Finds Meta, Google Liable for Woman’s Social Media Addiction
E-Business1 day agoLagos Unveils Cybersecurity Guidelines to Tackle Rising Digital Threats
Telecom1 day agoNBC Warns Broadcasters Against Bullying Guests, Passing Opinions as Facts
Telecom1 day agoWATRA Secretary sees Resilience as a Critical Link in West Africa’s Digital Economy
E-Financial1 day agoCitiTrust Heads to Appeal Court over Alleged Ponzi Scheme
Telecom1 day agoTech Shake-Up: Snap Cuts Hundreds as AI Drives Efficiency Push
Telecom1 day agoWhy Nigeria Must Embrace .ng Now – NiRA Reveals Five Critical Steps
News1 day agoFG Borrows N100Bn from Unclaimed Dividends, Dormant Bank Accounts
News1 day agoFG Carpets W/Bank, Denies Alleged Diversion of Federation Revenue