/home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153
">
Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153
Warning: Attempt to read property "cat_name" on null in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153
The Journey to Establishment of a Postal Service Commission
As the postal industry is expecting the agencies of government that have one thing or the other to do with the postal bill to quicken action for the National Assembly to ratify the bill that will give legal backing to the Postal Service Commission, there has been agitation for the independent postal regulatory body by the courier companies in Nigeria and action taken so far by the government towards realizing this noble objective.
In May 2004, during the 2nd Nigerian Courier summit initiated and organized by the Courier Regulatory Department of Nipost under the leadership of Dr. Simon Emeje, the agitation for an independent regulatory body came to a limelight. The summit was well attended by the Honourable Minister of Communications, representatives of the National Assembly, courier operators, relevant federal government agencies and other stakeholders. This agitation was brought by courier operators based on the present postal situation in the country which entrusts the regulatory responsibility to be handled by a department Courier Regulatory Department via Decree 41 of 1992. It is argued that this legislation is highly limited in powers and has not allowed the department to regulate adequately though it has done tremendously well within the limited powers and resources at its disposal towards sanitizing the industry.
By entrusting Nipost with the regulatory role, an agency that is playing the dual role of a regulator and operator the same time. This has been condemned roundly by private courier operators and even by Nipost management as being a hindrance to effective control of the post. Stakeholders also argue that the practice is no longer fashionable in other parts of the world and that Nigeria should not be an exception. The practice is said to be working against the regulations and conventions of the Universal Postal Union, an agency of the United Nations in charge of postal matters
As a result of the dual role Nipost is saddled with, it has not been able to operate and realize enough revenue for self-sustenance in spite of the efforts of Nipost management to up tick the organization to a profitable venture. In addition the present arrangement has hampered the definition and adequate provision of universal service. The rural sector is not adequately covered in the Universal Service Provision which Nipost owe as its exclusive duty to provide being the national carrier.
In the face of the complaints and advantages the sector stands to benefit by carving out an independent body to regulate the postal and courier sector, it is therefore imperative that action be facilitated for this all important legislation. It has been argued that following the liberalization policy of the federal government which subsequently opened up the postal market to private entrepreneurs, establishing the commission is the only way the government can exercise control over the postal industry as practiced worldwide. Apart from the commission being the agency that will create a level playing business environment for postal operators on behalf of the federal government, it will facilitate, promote and ensure the implementation of the Universal Service Obligation (USO) of the government as recommended by the Universal Postal Union. The Universal service obligation is the effort of the government to make postal service available to all citizens at all locations in Nigeria.
The commission will sanitize the postal industry by licensing and monitoring the postal operators including Nipost. Before now, the postal industry had been noted for pilfering, dumping and loss of mails with a lot of unlicensed operators occupying some space in the industry. The Courier Regulatory Department within its resources and strength has tried to sanitize the sub-sector but there is need for greater empowerment for the Department to be able to take far-reaching measures in regulating the industry.
Stakeholders have advanced the argument that establishing the commission will give a better definition of responsibility to Nipost especially as a designated public postal operator that will provide the universal service and that in then circumstance it enable Nipost to make more revenue and become self-sustaining as more revenue will be realized from the reserved area which is the traditional jurisdiction of Nipost.
Operators have also said that to keep pace with international best practice, establishing the commission is a necessity arguing that Nigeria is one of the few countries in Africa and in fact the rest of the world that has no independent postal regulatory body. Such countries liker Ghana, Tanzania, South Africa, Togo, India Britain,USA among others , they argued are all enjoying established independent postal regulatory commissions
Since the commission will concentrate in regulating the sector, it will ensure more monitoring and enforcement of its laws. This will bring more life and fervor into the sector and its activities will contribute to the economic wellbeing and development of Nigeria considering the fact that the post is a major segment of the communication industry and communication being a vital instrument for economic development.
It would be recalled that consequent upon the agitation to establish an independent postal commission necessitated by the present postal situation, a ministerial committee was inaugurated by Chief Cornelius Adebayo, then Minister for Communications in 2005 to draft the National Postal Policy and the Nigerian Postal Service bill which were to be eventually submitted to the Federal Executive Council and the National Assembly respectively. The process was truncated by the deployment of Cornelius Adebayo from the communications ministry coupled with the tragic end in a plane crash of the enabler of the New Nipost order, Abubarka Argungu in October 2005. The stakeholders’ forum, which was slated to hold the same month, was therefore postponed sine die as a result of the developments.
When the new Minister of Communications, Chief Anibaba took over from Adebayo, time left for him to tidy up the documents for submission to the Federal Executive Council was too short as the Obasanjo-led administration was running out of time.
However in April 2008, the stakeholders’ forum was held. The Nethpost consultants from The Netherlands who signed a contract on postal reform with the federal government through the Bureau of Public Enterprises fine-tuned the documents and finally submitted to BPE for onward transmission to John Ogar Odey, then Minister of Information and Communications.
Around the middle of the year 2008, these documents, National Postal Policy and Postal Bill were presented to the Senate Committee on Communications under the chairmanship of Sylvester Anyanwu in a meeting of the Senate Committee with Nipost, BPE and the executives of the Senior Staff Association (Postal branch).Then it was agreed that BPE should put finishing touches to the documents before the final submission to the honorable minister of Information and Communications who will then submit to the Federal Executive Council and the National Assembly .
Towards the last quarter of 2008 Nigeria CommunicationsWeek gathered that these documents were submitted to the National Council on Privatization (NCP) headed by the vice president. It was gathered also that NCP approved the documents in the NCP meeting that then Minister of Information and Communications, John Odey was in attendance. Based on this approval, the next line of action would have been for the documents to be submitted to the Federal Executive Council through the minister of Information and Communications who until he left office said the documents were not submitted to him by the BPE. Nigeria CommunicationsWeek investigations from Chigbo Anichebe, Head Public Affairs, confirmed BPE was in custody of the documents but revealed that private courier operators were being awaited as at three months ago to make the final input into the documents which BPE said was causing the delay but Toyin Olufade, president, Association of Nigeria Courier Operators (Anco) said some of his members had vetted the documents and sent back to BPE for it to commence further action.

Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 493
Warning: Attempt to read property "cat_ID" on null in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 493
Broadcasting
NBC Files Fresh Appeal against Judgment Barring it from Imposing Fines on Broadcast Stations

National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) has filed an application seeking the permission of the court of appeal to file a fresh appeal against the judgement of the federal high court in Abuja barring it from imposing fines on erring broadcast stations.

In the application filed at the court of appeal in Abuja by Dapo Akinosun, counsel to the NBC, the commission argued sanity in Nigeria’s broadcasting sector is under threat and that the public interest would be better served if the court grants the application.
On January 17, 2024, Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, a judge at the federal high court in Abuja, restrained the NBC from imposing a N5 million fine on broadcast stations sanctioned in 2022 over allegations of “undermining Nigeria’s national security by broadcasting documentaries on banditry in Nigeria”.
The affected broadcast stations were Multichoice Nigeria Limited, owners of DSTV; TelCom Satellite Limited (TSTV); Trust-TV Network Limited; and NTA StarTimes Limited.
The suit was filed by Media Rights Agenda (MRA).
Dissatisfied with the ruling, the NBC appealed the judgement filed an appeal at the court of appeal in Abuja.
In June, the court of appeal dismissed the commission’s appeal, holding that it was “fundamentally defective” and incompetent.
Jane Inyang, lead judge of the panel, held that the parties before the lower court were identified as “Incorporated Trustees of Media Rights Agenda (as applicant) and National Broadcasting Commission (as respondent)” but in the notice of appeal the purported appellant was described as the “Nigerian Broadcasting Commission”,
The judge held that the discrepancy was significant and that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the commission’s appeal.
In the application, the NBC urged the court to grant it leave to raise and argue a fresh issue on appeal relating to the legal capacity of MRA to institute and maintain the original suit before the lower court.
The commission argued that the defect in the earlier notice of appeal, which resulted in the dismissal of its appeal, arose “solely from an inadvertent misdescription” of its name by its lawyer.
The NBC told the court that the subsisting judgement raises questions on the commission’s statutory powers to regulate broadcasting and enforce compliance with broadcasting standards in Nigeria.
The commission argued that the subsisting judgment is capable of creating uncertainty regarding its regulatory powers if it is allowed to stand.
The NBC also argued that without the pronouncement by the appellate court on the issues raised in the appeal, its regulatory framework would be weakened.
“A weakened regulatory framework may embolden non-compliance with established broadcasting standards, thereby increasing the dissemination of false, misleading and unverified information capable of causing unnecessary public anxiety, panic and social unrest,” the NBC said.
“Absence of effective regulatory oversight may further encourage irresponsible broadcasting practices and the misuse of broadcast and digital media platforms by persons who deliberately publish sensational, inaccurate or inflammatory content to intimidate, harass or unduly influence individuals, institutions and public discourse.”
E-Financial
Nigerians Lost N25.85Bn to Digital Payment Fraud in 2025 –CBN

Nigerians lost N25.85 billion to digital payment fraud in 2025, according to Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

Though the figure represents a significant decline from the N52.26 billion recorded in 2024, CBN, said the losses remained substantial for payment service providers (PSPs).
According to the report, although the value of digital payment fraud declined significantly year-on-year, when compared to the N52.26 billion recorded in the previous year, the losses remained substantial for Payment Service Providers (PSPs), underscoring the need for stronger fraud prevention measures across the industry.
In the report, the CBN, also identified systemic risks, cyber threats, the dominance of a few systemically important payment service providers, and the activities of unlicensed payment companies as major concerns confronting the financial sector.
According to the report, although the value of digital payment fraud declined significantly year-on-year, the losses remained substantial for Payment Service Providers (PSPs), underscoring the need for stronger fraud prevention measures across the industry.
“Digital payment fraud in Nigeria stood at N25.85 billion in 2025,” the apex bank said.
It noted that while this represented a considerable improvement from the N52.26 billion lost in 2024, the amount remained significant.
“Though this was lower than N52.26 billion in the preceding year, it represented a substantial loss for PSPs,” the report stated.
The CBN attributed the reduction in fraud losses to enhanced security measures implemented across the financial sector.
It said, “The lower losses in 2025 reflected improvements in monitoring, BVN-NIN integration, and tighter controls.”
Beyond fraud, the report warned that Nigeria’s rapidly expanding digital payments landscape faces increasing systemic vulnerabilities as banks and fintech companies become more interconnected through shared payment infrastructure.
According to the report, a major operational failure involving a single payment service provider could quickly spread across the financial system because of the growing dependence on integrated payment platforms.
The CBN observed that despite ongoing efforts to strengthen payment system integration, interoperability remains a significant challenge.
It disclosed that about half of fintech stakeholders continued to express dissatisfaction with the current level of system-wide interoperability.
The report stated that “about 50.00 per cent of fintech stakeholders continued to rate system-wide interoperability as poor, primarily due to the lack of universal APIs and data-sharing standards.”
The apex bank also expressed concern over the concentration of payment activities among a few Systemically Important Payment Service (SIPS) providers, warning that operational failures involving any of them could have widespread consequences.
It explained that the failure of such providers could trigger a “domino effect”, where insolvency or operational glitches in one payment service provider spread rapidly to others, disrupting the smooth functioning of the financial system.
Cybersecurity also featured prominently among the risks identified in the report.
The CBN warned that payment service providers remain vulnerable to ransomware attacks, data breaches and credential theft, noting that cybercriminals are becoming increasingly sophisticated in targeting financial institutions.
According to the report, “Banking and fintech institutions remained prime targets for ransomware, data leaks, and credential theft.”
It added that, “Cyber threats in Nigeria are no longer random cybercrimes, but increasingly targeted, organised, and identity-driven campaigns.”
The report further cautioned Nigerians against transacting with unlicensed payment companies, stressing that such entities operate outside regulatory oversight and expose users to significant financial risks.
It warned that customers using unlicensed PSPs are not protected by existing regulatory safeguards and that such operators could facilitate illicit financial activities.
“Users of unlicensed PSPs are not covered by regulatory protection that comes with effective oversight and supervision,” the CBN said.
It further warned that, “Unlicenced payment companies are gateways for money laundering which could undermine regulatory efforts and corrode public trust.”
The report underscores the growing importance of strengthening fraud detection systems, improving payment infrastructure interoperability, enhancing cybersecurity resilience, and intensifying regulatory oversight as Nigeria continues to expand its digital payments ecosystem.
E-Financial
NRS Announces 30 Percent Tax on Corporate Crypto Income

Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) yesterday announced that medium and large companies in Nigeria that earn income from cryptocurrency and other virtual asset transactions will now be subject to a 30 per cent corporate income tax.

NRS stated this in its new guidelines setting out a tax framework for cryptocurrency and other digital asset transactions.
The guidelines cover registration, record-keeping, valuation, and tax treatment for VASPs, P2P operators, and individuals in the virtual asset space.
NRS said the move is aimed at encouraging voluntary compliance and improving transparency as Nigeria’s digital asset sector grows.
The Guidelines on the Taxation of Virtual Assets, provide a comprehensive framework for the taxation of virtual asset transactions and businesses operating within Nigeria’s digital economy.
The guidelines apply to companies, individual taxpayers, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), peer-to-peer (P2P) marketplace operators and other participants in the virtual asset ecosystem
The latest framework follows the signing of the Presidential Executive Order on Virtual Assets Coordination, 2026 by President Bola Tinubu, which established a coordinated regulatory structure for cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, tokenised assets and other digital assets across government agencies.
According to the NRS, companies that derive profits from virtual asset activities will be taxed under the provisions of the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA), 2025. While small companies will continue to enjoy applicable tax exemptions under the law, medium and large companies will be liable to the standard 30 per cent corporate income tax rate.
The agency stated that taxable income under the guidelines covers a broad range of virtual asset-related activities, including cryptocurrency trading, the operation of virtual asset exchanges, transaction fees, brokerage commissions, custody and wallet services, token issuance, mining, staking, decentralised finance (DeFi) activities, investment gains and other virtual asset business operations.
According to the guidelines, “Applicable rates under the NTA include progressive rates for individuals, and 30 per cent for companies other than small companies.”
The NRS said the guidelines were introduced to provide clarity, certainty and consistency in the administration of Nigeria’s tax laws as they apply to virtual assets, adding that the framework is intended to improve transparency, encourage voluntary tax compliance and support the development of an efficient tax regime for the digital asset sector.
The agency also clarified that merely holding cryptocurrencies or other virtual assets does not constitute a taxable event.
Any appreciation in the value of a digital asset while it remains in a taxpayer’s possession will not attract income tax until the asset is sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of through a taxable transaction.
Similarly, transfers of cryptocurrencies or other virtual assets between wallets owned and controlled by the same individual are exempt from income tax, provided there is no change in beneficial ownership.
This means that moving digital assets such as Bitcoin or Ether between personal wallets will not trigger a tax liability.
However, the exemption does not extend to transfers involving companies, partnerships, trusts, unincorporated associations or other legal entities, where different tax rules may apply.
The NRS further explained that although these non-taxable transactions do not attract immediate tax, they establish the acquisition cost for future disposals.
Consequently, taxpayers are required to maintain adequate records of acquisitions, transfers and disposals to facilitate accurate tax computations when taxable events occur.
The guidelines also reaffirm that unrealised gains on cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets are not subject to income tax. Instead, tax liability arises only when a taxable disposal takes place, aligning Nigeria’s approach with internationally recognised principles for the taxation of digital assets.
The issuance of the guidelines is expected to provide greater regulatory certainty for investors, businesses and digital asset service providers, while strengthening the government’s efforts to expand the tax base and improve compliance in Nigeria’s growing virtual asset ecosystem.
News2 days agoAtte, Nigerian Develops AI Algorithm for Hair Transplants
E-Financial2 days agoFCT Court Awards Ex-Customers N15m against Stanbic IBTC over Data Privacy Breach
E-Financial2 days agoCBN Exposes over 13,000 BVNs Tied to Fraud as Banks Tighten Security
News2 days agoFG to Abolish Subsidies in Power Sector in 2027 – Minister
General News2 days agoDare Tackles Onaiyekan over Criticism of Tinubu, Says Economic is Working
General News2 days agoSERAP Asks Tinubu to Probe Alleged N6.79Bn Missing Police Funds, Firearms
Telecom2 days agoStarbase Technologies Introduces Yolly, a Reward-Based Social Entertainment Platform
General News2 days agoLenacapavir, HIV Injectable Drug Offers Pregnant, Lactating Mothers 100 Percent Protection – Study













