Connect with us

General News

What Can Delay Life Insurance Claims

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Claims making and payment are the most challenging aspects of life insurance and indeed any area of insurance. Often times, prospective insurance buyers do not take time to do all that are expected of them at the point of buying the life insurance. Life insurance claims occur when an insured person passes away. And if one understands what is involved during the claims process, then he can help prevent any delays in payment. There are a number of factors that can cause delays in a claim being paid and knowing what these factors are can help you make the claims process happen much faster and avoid any delays. Life insurance is purchased to provide financial protection for those left behind and when you purchase this coverage you want the benefits to be available as soon as possible to avoid any financial hardships. Life insurance claims involve a number of steps and during each step any mistakes or omissions can cause a delay, which could be short or take months to redeem, depending on the specific reasons for the delay. The first step is to locate the actual policy, which has information that will be needed. Look at the policy to determine the life insurance company that is on the policy and then contact the insurer. Usually the policy will contain all the relevant information on who to contact regarding a claim. If you can not locate the policy but know the company who offered it then you can call the company and explain the situation.
The next step for life insurance claims is to fill out the claim form. This is usually sent by the life insurance company. This step is very important and the form should be filled out completely and as comprehensive as possible. If you do not know the answer or it does not apply make sure it is clearly written in the answer space. Do not leave any questions blank, because this will delay the claim payment while the company investigates the answer. It is also very helpful to have the policy number, because this will make the life insurance claims process go much faster. If you are not sure of an answer or do not know, you can call your insurance agent, your broker or the life insurance company. They may be able to look up any missing information if it is in the database and providing this on the claim form may prevent any unnecessary delays.  Another important part of the life insurance claims process is the death certificate. After you have filled out the claim form completely, you will need to get a certified copy of the death certificate for each claim being sent in. It may be a good idea to call first and determine where to go to get this certificate. You may be able to get the needed copies from the hospital if one was used, or you may have to go to either the local government that the deceased resided in or the state where the death occurred. A claim without a certified copy of the death certificate may be delayed or even denied. Once you have the required death certificate, send it together with the completed life insurance claims forms to the life insurance company. These tips can help you avoid any delay in the claim payment. However one topical question to ask is when does an insurance claim delay becomes an insurance claim dispute. It is only disreputable insurance companies that apply delay tactics to frustrate claimants. And this is based largely on the premise that by forcing you to wait for settlement of your claim, you will eventually give up. Giving up translates to less or no money for the claim payment and thus more money for the insurance company.  This unholy practice used to be in place in Nigeria when we had over hundred insurance companies with some of them unregistered and unregulated. In furtherance of this endeavor, carriers will utilize a variety of tactics to delay your claim through a process dubbed "claim management". Insurance consumers must arm themselves with sufficient knowledge to identify the difference between legitimate insurance claim investigations and illegitimate claim delays. An insurance company has a right, a duty in fact, to conduct insurance claim investigations.  The key here is that the investigation must be reasonable and timely. Insurance policies require that the insured must cooperate with the carrier in matters concerning a claim.  These conditions are generally included in the petition. Accordingly, it is reasonable for your insurer to ask you for specific documents or items related to your claim. By all means, it is advisable to comply with requests for relevant information and data. Likewise, it is important to cooperate with the insurer’s request, including your recorded statement, proof of lost documents which must be supported with affidavits. If one fails to comply with these reasonable requests, such a person may be putting himself in jeopardy of a lengthy investigation and a probable claim denial. Some of the delay tactics that insurance companies utilize include confirmation of coverage.  Your adjuster may cling to some little issues as "confirm coverage" which is based on the terms of the insurance policy.  Flawed, faulty, or unfair policy interpretation is also one of the more common examples of unfair tactics insurance companies often use to delay claims.  This process is frequently no more than a search for reasons not to pay claims. Requirement for a follow-up recorded statement is another plot.  In a legitimate claim, follow-up statements should not be necessary. While the adjuster has the duty to properly investigate the claim, he also has the obligation to keep you abreast of the status of your insurance claim.  If a claimant is experiencing to the level that he is continuously told that "the claim remains under investigation", then one should assume that a problem of denial was looming. In making claims, investigations are crucial to the final outcome, one of which is referral to the special investigations unit.  Such referrals are legitimately a means to investigate potential insurance fraud.  However illegitimate referrals represent a process designed to avoid payment of insurance claims. One other trick of insurance companies is examination under oath.  This is a formal proceeding taken under oath and is usually convened when the carrier legitimately requires additional detailed information from the policyholder in order to make a coverage decision.  When such is used illegitimately, it is aimed at unfairly targeting claims for denial.  In either event, if you are called for an examination under oath, it means there is a problem with your claim. Having known these, it is instructive to be on the alert while also considering stand by solution to any such delay tactics. One of the ways to frustrate such evil plots is to continue to cooperate, no matter the approach of the insurer to frustrate you. It is better to assume the position that you have cooperated to the fullest extent possible.  This places additional burdens on the insurance company.  This is more so as they cannot argue that their processes were delayed solely because you "failed" to cooperate. It is also important that you call the adjuster frequently, behaving courteously as you do.  In doing so, always be prepared to ask specific questions about the progress of your claim rather than engaging in boring conversation.  Always offer to provide any additional information needed. An insurance company’s failure to properly conclude your legitimate insurance claim suggests the essence of unfair claims handling.  Document all activities in anticipation of unfair settlement offers or an outright denial in case your claim delay has qualified as a claim dispute.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

Tech Firms Sack over 45,000 so Far in 2026

Published

on

Kindly share this post

More than 45,000 jobs have been cut across the global technology sector in the first few months of 2026, according to data from RationalFX, signalling that the industry is still adjusting after a period of aggressive hiring rather than returning to a full growth phase.

Tech Firms Sack over 45,000 so Far in 2026

“In 2025, automation, artificial intelligence, and sustained cost-discipline measures drove much of the downsizing, with entire departments restructured or eliminated in favour of leaner, AI-assisted workflows. This trend has continued full steam into 2026,” said Alan Cohen, analyst at RationalFX.

According to the report, if the current rate of redundancies is sustained, total layoffs in 2026 could surpass the 245,000 recorded in 2025.

The majority of these layoffs have been concentrated in the United States, with major companies continuing to trim their workforce despite stable core operations.

Amazon has announced approximately 16,000 job cuts this year, while Block has also reduced thousands of roles as it tightens operations and shifts focus towards artificial intelligence.

There are indications that further reductions may follow.

Meta is reportedly considering additional layoffs as it increases investment in AI infrastructure, while PayPal and Klarna are reassessing spending and hiring strategies amid ongoing uncertainty.

Established technology firms are also undergoing restructuring. Dell has reduced its workforce by around 11,000 over the past year as part of a broader reorganisation, while Salesforce has cut approximately 1,000 roles in 2026 while aligning its teams more closely with AI-driven products.

Outside the United States, layoffs have been smaller in scale but more geographically dispersed.

Australia has reported around 2,650 job cuts so far this year, followed by Sweden with roughly 1,923 and Netherlands with about 1,700.

Other markets have also been affected. Israel and India have recorded approximately 1,539 and 1,520 layoffs respectively, with Israel’s startup ecosystem particularly sensitive to tighter funding conditions, while in India, both startups and larger IT firms have reduced headcount as global client spending slows.

In Singapore, around 1,016 layoffs have been reported, reflecting a softer hiring environment across Asia’s major technology hubs, where companies are adopting a more cautious approach amid uneven demand.

Across Europe, job cuts have been comparatively limited but still noticeable.

The United Kingdom has recorded around 1,000 layoffs, while Czech Republic and Germany have seen smaller reductions.

The broader trend suggests that technology companies are shifting towards leaner operations and more defined priorities following years of expansion. Increasing investment in automation and artificial intelligence is also reshaping the types of roles in demand.

For employees, the impact is becoming increasingly visible, with hiring slowing and becoming more selective. While opportunities remain, companies are taking a more measured approach to recruitment compared to the rapid expansion seen in previous years.

 

Further credit… .storyboard18.com

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Jury Finds Elon Musk Liable for Misleading Twitter Investors

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Elon Musk, a billionaire internet entrepreneur, was held responsible by a federal jury in San Francisco for deceiving Twitter shareholders during his contentious $44 billion takeover of the social media site.

Jury Finds Elon Musk Liable for Misleading Twitter Investors

Elon Musk

Following a three-week trial in a federal court in California, the verdict was handed out on Friday.

It found that Musk had made false and misleading representations in tweets that were posted in May 2022.

The jury concluded that at a crucial point in the purchase process, these remarks caused Twitter’s share price to decline.

Investor Giuseppe Pampena filed the action on behalf of stockholders who sold their Twitter stock between mid-May and early October 2022, a time when Musk’s commitment to closing the purchase was questionable.

Jurors determined that Musk violated US securities laws prohibiting deceptive statements capable of influencing market prices.

Legal representatives for the plaintiffs estimate potential damages at approximately $2.6 billion, exposing Musk to a significant financial penalty if the ruling is upheld.

In order to give Musk leverage to renegotiate the purchase price or back out of the transaction, plaintiffs contended that the statements were meant to lower Twitter’s valuation.

Musk finished the transaction in October 2022 after Twitter filed a lawsuit to enforce the arrangement, despite early attempts to end it. Later, he changed the platform’s name to X.

The ruling has been disputed by Musk’s legal team, which has confirmed plans to appeal and described it as a temporary setback.

For Musk, who has won a number of well-known court cases, the decision represents a rare setback.

Meanwhile, he was cleared in a separate defamation case in Texas and had also won a similar shareholder lawsuit in 2023 related to his 2018 tweets about taking Tesla private.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

SEC, NYSC Partner to Combat Ponzi Schemes

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) have formalised a strategic partnership aimed at embedding financial literacy and anti-Ponzi education into the national service programme.

SEC, NYSC Partner to Combat Ponzi Schemes

This is in a move to shield young Nigerians from the growing menace of fraudulent investment schemes.

The collaboration, sealed through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in Abuja, marks a significant step toward strengthening investor education at the grassroots level by targeting thousands of corps members annually.

The agreement was executed by Emomotimi Agama, director-general, SEC, and Olakunle Oluseye Nafiu, his NYSC counterpart, at the NYSC headquarters.

At the heart of the initiative is the integration of anti-Ponzi scheme campaigns into the NYSC’s Community Development Service (CDS), specifically under its Education and Enlightenment arm.

The move is designed not only to educate corps members on identifying fraudulent investment schemes but also to cultivate a culture of responsible and informed investing among Nigeria’s youth population.

Under the terms of the agreement, the SEC will spearhead the development of comprehensive educational materials and training modules covering capital market operations, safe investment practices, and strategies for identifying and avoiding Ponzi schemes.

The Commission will also fund and facilitate specialised training sessions for selected corps members and NYSC officials, who will, in turn, serve as facilitators within their host communities.

The NYSC, on its part, will ensure the seamless integration of these training modules into its existing CDS framework. This will include structured workshops, sensitisation campaigns during orientation camps, and continuous engagement throughout the service year.

By leveraging its nationwide presence across all local government areas, the scheme is expected to amplify awareness and significantly reduce the vulnerability of young Nigerians to financial fraud.

Both institutions also pledged to collaborate on extensive public awareness campaigns using a blend of traditional media, digital platforms, and grassroots outreach initiatives.

In addition, mechanisms will be established for data sharing and performance tracking to assess the impact and effectiveness of the programme over time.

Speaking at the signing ceremony, Agama underscored the SEC’s longstanding commitment to youth development through the NYSC scheme.

He revealed that the Commission currently hosts between 160 and 180 corps members, one of the highest among public institutions in the country.

“We have consistently demonstrated our belief in the capacity of young Nigerians by providing them with opportunities to learn and grow within the capital market ecosystem.

“These corps members are not just participants; we regard them as integral members of our workforce. By equipping them with the right knowledge and values, we are preparing them to become ambassadors of sound investment practices in society,” he said.

Agama further emphasised that the initiative aligns with the Commission’s broader mandate of investor protection and market development, noting that early education remains a critical tool in combating financial scams.

In his remarks, Nafiu described the partnership as a milestone achievement and a key performance indicator for both organisations.

He commended the SEC for its proactive role in promoting trust and participation in Nigeria’s capital market, noting that the collaboration would have far-reaching benefits for the nation.

“It is important to catch them young,” he said, referring to corps members. “By instilling the right financial habits at this stage, we can prevent them from falling prey to Ponzi schemes and other fraudulent ventures.”

He assured that the NYSC would remain fully committed to implementing the agreement, adding that the execution phase would be carried out diligently to ensure maximum impact on Nigerian society.

The initiative comes at a time when Nigeria continues to grapple with the proliferation of Ponzi schemes and unregulated investment platforms, many of which have resulted in significant financial losses for unsuspecting citizens.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending