Connect with us

General News

Why NIA is Opposed to Workmen’s Compensation under NSITF—Ladipo-Ajayi

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Olusola Ladipo-Ajayi, chairman of the Nigerian Insurers association, (NIA) has reiterated the association’s commitment to its stand that the Nigerian Social Insurance Trust Fund, NSITF, is not competent to handle the workmen’s compensation for workers. According to him, their superior argument is hinged on truth and nothing but the truth. He argued that workmen’s compensation fall within the traditional area of insurance which is within the commercial insurance subject area. He said right from time, workmen’s compensation has never been part of social insurance, stressing that injury and death of workmen have always been covered in the commercial market worldwide. He agreed that the Workmen Compensation Act requires amendment and most of the provisions of the Employees Compensation Bill are welcome by the insurance industry, stressing however that in terms of providing the service, it runs contrary to government policy. “You cannot create a huge monopoly out of the administration of employees’ compensation in this country and entrust it with a corporation that has had problems performing its mandate in the past. We all know the story of NPF and we all know the story of NSITF. I am not talking about the institutions now, what I am saying is that with the way that acts is structured, it has always been covered traditionally,” he said.
Ladipo-Ajayi told media men recently that there are a number of issues that the NIA has raised against the bill, and of which it was depending upon the integrity of the National Assembly to look into. He stressed that under this present provision’s there are discriminative provisions, especially for women, and “one of  the things that we don’t really like is that, when two workmen are involved in an injury, in a particular incident, and both of them are on the same scale, they have spent the same number of years, serving their employer, the amount of benefit they will derive from the injury or death will depend on certain variables that have not got anything to do with their employment.” he said. Using the foreman as a basis for explanation, he said if a foreman has spent ten years and the other foreman has spent ten years, if  there was an explosion in the factory where they were both working and both of them died, how are you now talking about the number of wives, as if you looked at the family history of an employee before you pay their salaries, that has nothing to do with employment, one man may have a wife, the other may not have, another one may have four wives, but their remuneration has nothing to do with their family size. He explained that “in ordinary insurance, there is an element of discrimination, somebody who works in a construction company, who is opened to more physical injury, should pay higher than someone who is a clerk, a civil servant or who is a banker.” But if you are now “asking the staff of major construction companies, who are constructing bridges, roads, and power station, to pay one per cent of their wages, and you are asking bankers to pay one per cent of their own wages too, what it means is that one party is paying less than the risk he’s introducing, and other party paying much more than the risk he’s introducing, one party is subsidizing the other.” He explained that when you look at rating regime in the Workmen Compensation Act, you see that it takes these elements of discrimination into consideration; the clerk pays about 0.75 per cent because the risk of injury is less. You cannot compare that with someone who spends the greater part of his day on the road. Explaining the volume of premium which workmen’s compensation has contributed over time, he stated that the “Workmen Compensation Act only stipulates the benefit accruable to every employee in given circumstances of injury and death, and there is a provision that the minister of labour  should make a regulation making the insurance against those employers liability compulsory. But throughout the life of that Act, no regulation was made.” He added that even in Britain, they don’t talk of Workmen Compensation Act, they talk of employers’ liability, because originally, workmen compensation was meant for lowly paid workers, and sometimes in 1970’s, Britain paid employers liability and they took care of all employees, from the chief executive to messengers, not limited it to daily paid workers alone. The NIA boss stated that “one institution cannot manage all the employees in this country. As insurance companies, there are so many of us, if one insurance company does not do well, you can do business with another, but if the NSITF does not do well, where do you go from there? What is the process of seeking redress? Ordinarily, one of the things we pointed out to the National Assembly, is that in debating that Bill in the house, they ought to provide a comparative analysis of the new Bill with the Act it seeks to abolish, because everything about the Workmen Compensation is not totally useless but just specific, it makes it easy for any fool to calculate the Bill, to the extent that if you lose anything, however big or small, there is an amount to be paid. It is a one and for all Bill. You get you compensation in bulk and you go away. He stressed that the numbers of your dependant are immaterial. But the most important thing is that as an employee of a construction firm, and there is a particular incident, four of you are injured, all of you have equal treatment, because the salary your employer pays you is oblivious of your family size or sex.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

General News

Anti Graft Agencies Raise Alarm over Rising Crypto-Linked Financial Crimes

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Ola Olukoyede, chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has raised concerns over the growing threat of cryptocurrency-related crimes in the country.

Anti Graft Agencies Raise Alarm over Rising Crypto-Linked Financial Crimes

Olukoyede made this known at the inauguration of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Country Programme for Nigeria 2026–2030, on Friday in Abuja.

The EFCC boss revealed that the world lost more than 160 billion dollars to illicit transactions involving digital currencies in 2025.

Olukoyede highlighted the risks posed by cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.

He noted that criminal networks were increasingly exploiting technological advancements, global financial systems, and governance gaps to facilitate illicit activities.

“Last year, the world lost over 160 billion dollars to illicit transactions in cryptocurrencies.

”Tackling these challenges requires coordinated national responses, strong institutions and sustained intelligence-driven strategies,” he said.

He said that the UNODC programme came at a time when Nigeria and the global community were grappling with evolving threats from transnational organised crime, financial crimes, illicit financial flows, and cyber-enabled offences.

Olukoyede said the programme represented a strategic foundation for collective efforts to strengthen the rule of law.

This, he said, included enhancing the criminal justice system and protecting institutions and communities from violence, crime, and financial corruption.

He noted that the programme’s focus on combating corruption and illicit financial flows was particularly significant to the EFCC, given the enormous economic and social costs of such crimes on Nigeria.

“The imperative of sustained action to turn the tide cannot be overstated,” he said.

The EFCC chairman expressed pride in the commission’s longstanding partnership with UNODC, stating that the collaboration had strengthened institutional capacity and improved Nigeria’s response to economic and financial crimes.

He said the partnership had supported reforms and operational frameworks that enhanced the agency’s effectiveness in tackling corruption and related offences.

Olukoyede expressed optimism that the programme would further improve national security and safeguard the future of Nigerians through strengthened collaboration and shared operational experiences.

He stressed the need to continuously refine frameworks and ensure that Nigeria’s institutions and citizens remain at the centre of all collaborative efforts.

The EFCC boss commended UNODC for initiating the programme and reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to supporting its implementation to achieve measurable outcomes for Nigeria and the wider region.

Dr Musa Aliyu, SAN, chairman, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC),  in his remarks, called for stronger collaboration among institutions to address Nigeria’s growing security and corruption challenges.

Aliyu said Nigerian society was currently grappling with multiple social ills, stressing that no single agency could effectively tackle the challenges alone.

According to him, the country faces complex and interconnected threats, including violent extremism, organised crime, illicit financial flows, smuggling, and other serious offences.

“There is a common point of truth, Nigerian society is entangled with many ills, and no agency can fight them alone,” he said.

The ICPC boss noted that these challenges also posed significant threats to the nation’s criminal justice system, warning that no society could remain secure under such conditions.

He, however, expressed optimism that through strategic partnerships and collective efforts, Nigeria could overcome the challenges.

Aliyu described the UNODC Country Programme as timely and appropriate, given the scale and urgency of the issues confronting the nation.

He emphasised the importance of international support, noting that Nigeria’s progress in tackling crime and corruption had been strengthened by its collaboration with global partners, particularly the United Nations.

The ICPC chairman said the partnership between the commission and UNODC had been beneficial to Nigerian society, contributing to efforts aimed at strengthening institutions and improving governance.

He congratulated UNODC on what he described as a significant milestone and a “grand stride” in supporting Nigeria’s fight against crime and corruption.

Aliyu reaffirmed ICPC’s commitment to continued collaboration, assuring stakeholders of the commission’s readiness to work with UNODC and other partners toward national development.

“I assure you of our continued support and willingness to work together for the growth and betterment of Nigeria,” he said.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

NCC to Curb SIM Fraud, Strengthen Digital Security with New Platform

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has unveiled plans to introduce a Telecoms Identity Risk Management System (TIRMS) platform to tackle SIM-related fraud, strengthen digital security and boost confidence in Nigeria’s digital economy.

NCC to Curb SIM Fraud, Strengthen Digital Security with New Platform

Aminu Maida, executive vice chairman of the commission, disclosed this on Thursday in Abuja at a stakeholders’ consultative forum on the proposed platform and planned regulatory changes.

Maida, represented by Rimini Makama, executive commissioner, Stakeholder Management, said the Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN), commonly known as SIM or mobile phone number, had become central to financial transactions, digital identity and access to services, but warned that its widespread use had also created vulnerabilities.

He noted that fraudulent activities linked to recycled, swapped, churned and barred SIMs had emerged as a major channel for identity theft and financial crimes, weakening trust in digital platforms.

He said, “The Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number commonly known as the SIM or mobile phone number has evolved into a critical identifier underpinning financial transactions, digital authentication, and access to essential services across all sectors of our economy.

“This evolution, however, has created new and challenging vulnerabilities. The fraudulent use of churned, recycled, swapped, and barred MISISDN’s has become a significant vector for financial fraud and identity theft, eroding public trust in our digital platforms and undermining the identity of systems we have worked hard to build.

“It is in direct response to these challenges that the Commission has initiated the Telecoms Identity Risk Management System Platform.”

According to him, the platform will enable service providers to verify mobile numbers flagged for suspicious or fraudulent activities before granting access, a move expected to reduce exposure to fraud and improve accountability.

He added that the system would enhance coordination among regulators, financial institutions and security agencies to build a more resilient digital ecosystem.

To support the rollout, the commission has proposed amendments to its Quality of Service Business Rules and the Registration of Communications Subscribers framework.

The proposed changes will require telecom operators to notify subscribers at least 14 days before recycling their lines and to upload details of churned numbers to the platform within seven days.

The amendments also introduce stricter provisions for blocking fraudulently registered or misused SIMs, aimed at improving transparency and protecting consumers.

Maida said the initiative reflects the commission’s commitment to collaboration and a whole-of-government approach to addressing digital risks, urging stakeholders to actively contribute to shaping the framework.

Also speaking, Olatokunbo Oyeleye, director of Cybersecurity and Internet Governance at the commission, emphasised the importance of trust in the digital economy.

“As rightly noted, digital trust is the operating licence of modern economy. Without it, nothing scales and with it everything accelerates. For our sector, this trust must be embedded across the entire value chain,” she said.

It was reported earlier that the NCC proposed that telecom operators must give subscribers a minimum of 14 days’ notice before deactivating their SIM cards over inactivity or post-paid churn.

The proposal was contained in a consultation paper titled Stakeholders Consultation Process for the Telecoms Identity Risks Management Platform, dated February 2026 and published on the Commission’s website.

Under the proposed amendments to the Quality-of-Service Business Rules, the NCC stated that “prior to churning of a post-paid line, the Operator shall send a notification to the affected subscriber through an alternative line or an email on the pending churning of his line.”

It added, “This notification shall be sent at least 14 days before the final date for the churn of the number.”

A similar provision was proposed for prepaid subscribers. The commission said, “prior to churning of a pre-paid line, the Operator shall send a notification to the affected subscriber through an alternative line or an email on the pending churning of his line,” stressing again that the notice “shall be sent at least 14 days before the final date for the churn of the number.”


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

Kidnappers Now Use Banks to Collect Ransoms — Expert

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Dr. Kabir Adamu, a security expert, has raised concern that kidnappers in Nigeria are now using banks to collect ransom payments.

Kidnappers Now Use Banks to Collect Ransoms — Expert

Pix… CNBC

Adamu explained that in the past, kidnappers typically demanded cash payments for ransom.

However, there has been a noticeable shift to using mainstream banks for transactions.

Speaking on Arise News, Adamu, who is the CEO of Beacon Security and Intelligence Ltd, said this trend is worrying. In the past, kidnappers usually demanded cash, but now they are asking victims’ families to pay money through bank accounts.

He revealed that his team has tracked cases where ransom money was paid into bank accounts and successfully withdrawn.

Although he did not mention the banks involved, he said some progress is being made to address the issue.

Adamu explained that criminals previously used fintech platforms, but have now moved to traditional banks. This shift raises serious concerns about how well banks are monitoring transactions and following regulations.

He said Nigeria has improved its financial intelligence systems, especially after being removed from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) gray list.

However, he noted that there are still weaknesses in how rules are enforced.

According to him, “A lot has been done in terms of policy, but there are still major gaps in operations and compliance.”

“We’ve monitored kidnapping for ransom cases where the ransom is being collected by formal banks,” Adamu said.

“My team and I were shocked when the ransom demand was made in a formal bank. It was paid and collected. I don’t want to mention the names of the two banks that were extremely guilty, but even for those two, progress is being made,” he said.

The security expert noted that although fintech platforms had previously been linked to ransom payments, criminals have now shifted their operations to traditional banking channels, raising significant concerns about compliance and oversight in the banking industry.

Adamu emphasized that this shift in tactics underscores the urgent need for stronger accountability measures and compliance standards within Nigeria’s financial institutions.

He also pointed out the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in fully addressing the issue, despite recent advancements in financial intelligence efforts.

“From the point of view of policy, a lot has been done, but from the point of view of operations, there is still a lot that remains to be done,” Adamu stated.

According to a report by SBM Intelligence, Nigeria’s kidnap-for-ransom crisis generated at least N2.57 billion for criminal groups between July 2024 and June 2025.

The report, titled “The Year Ahead at an Inflexion Point,” highlighted that despite kidnappers’ demands totaling N48 billion during the year, they only received N2.57 billion in actual payments.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending