Connect with us

E-Financial

Zumax Files N4.1Bn Suit against CBN over ‘Fraudulent’ Receivership

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Zumax Nigeria Limited, an oil services company, has filed a N4.1 billion lawsuit against the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), alleging gross negligence and complicity in what it calls a fraudulent receivership imposed by the apex bank.

Zumax Files N4.1Bn Suit against CBN over ‘Fraudulent’ Receivership

In the case, which is before the Federal High Court, Lagos, Zumax claimed that the CBN failed in its statutory duty to supervise banks and protect customers’ interests.

At the hearing of the matter on Tuesday before Justice Akintoye Aluko, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) told the court that the Plaintiff (Zumax) had an application dated February 20, 2025, asking the court to hear the application.

He urged the court to allow him to move the application as the defendant had responded.

Olanipekun also told the court that the Plaintiff and defendant’s preliminary objections can be consolidated and heard together.

He stated that the priority of which application to be heard first shouldn’t arise as the Plaintiff has not opposed the hearing of CBN’s preliminary objection.

But Adeleke Agboola (SAN), counsel, counsel, told the court that the defendant has a preliminary objection in the suit, which commenced as a writ of summons challenging the jurisdiction of the court.

He argued that CBN filed its notice of preliminary objection within time and that the Plaintiff has responded to it.

Agboola said: “This preliminary objection has priority over any other applications. The Plaintiff’s application is not meritorious.

“There is no suggestion by the claimant that we did not file within time. We are saying that this court does not have the jurisdiction to hear this matter. I urge your lordship to allow us to argue this matter.

“There is no doubt that preliminary objection takes precedence; it says it must be heard first, and determining our objection is very serious; we have complied strictly by the rules.

“We urge this court to hear the preliminary objection and dismiss the Plaintiff’s application.”

In his response, Olanipekun said: “My learned friend said the application we filed is not meritorious. It is the court that can make any pronouncement on that.

“My lord, even when we talk of being tidy, we are not saying the court should not hear his preliminary objection. He is now the one saying that our application should not be heard.

“The court has to determine whether the objection has to be heard first or the Plaintiff’s application dated February 20, 2025, has to be heard first.

“It’s no longer the law; in fact, it has never been the law that when there is a preliminary objection, the court will say let’s take it first. We urge your lordship to take our application that has not been contested by the defendant.”

After listening to the submissions and arguments of both parties, Justice Aluko adjourned the case till April 22, 2025, for ruling on which application to hear first.

According to court documents, Zumax had and maintained its account with the defunct IMB International Bank Plc., which, under several mergers and consolidations of banks, ultimately fused into the much larger banking institution known as First City Monument Bank (FCMB).

The Plaintiff said it obtained a facility from IMB International Bank, an overdraft facility of N50m, which was later increased to N200m in/or at the first half of 1998.

However, the bank allegedly inflated the company’s debt and, by December 6, 2002, claimed it had risen to N465.6 million, the claim which was vehemently disputed by Zumax.

Zumax contends that FCMB, under its former Managing Director Edwin Chinye, took control of its foreign currency earnings held in a JP Morgan Bank account through its sister company, Redsear Limited.

According to the plaintiff, the Bank’s Managing Director not only insisted upon and got shares in Redsears Limited and a directorship of that company as a condition precedent for the loan, he also allegedly inserted himself as the lone signatory for the company’s bank account with JP Morgan Bank.

The plaintiff further alleged that “the bank misappropriated $ 4 million from this account, a shortfall discovered during an audit.

“Rather than addressing the dispute, FCMB appointed receivers to take over Zumax’s operations, a move the company described as fraudulent.

“The receivership, which lasted from December 2002 until 2022, led to severe financial losses, including the collapse of Zumax’s business and the loss of contracts with multinational oil companies such as Chevron.

“The company claimed it was unable to operate for two decades due to the receivership, which was based on what it describes as an entirely fabricated debt.

“Zumax further alleged that despite repeated petitions, the CBN failed to investigate FCMB’s actions or intervene to prevent the alleged financial mismanagement.

“The company maintained that a 2007 CBN report confirmed that it had paid over N547 million to FCMB, proving it was never in debt to the bank.

“Additionally, the Court of Appeal ruled in December 2021 that the consent judgment upon which the receivership was based was fraudulent and should be set aside.”

The plaintiff is seeking a court declaration that the CBN was negligent in its duty to regulate Nigerian banks.

It’s also asking for special damages amounting to $ 41 million, including lost income and asset depreciation; general damages of N2 billion, exemplary damages of N2 billion, and legal costs amounting to N100 million.

But the CBN’s preliminary objection is challenging the jurisdiction of the Court to hear the matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

E-Financial

NDIC Drags Wema Bank to Court  over N125.38Bn Banana Island Assets

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), acting as liquidator of the defunct Gulf Bank Plc., has instituted two separate actions at the Federal High Court in Lagos against Wema Bank Plc.

NDIC Drags Wema Bank to Court  over N125.38Bn Banana Island Assets

The combined claims amount to approximately N125,384,535,500, arising from two distinct sets of disputed high-value properties in Banana Island, Lagos, alongside an alleged improper cash transaction of N401 million.

Both suits were filed under the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts and Financial Malpractices in Banks) Act and form part of NDIC’s long-running efforts to recover and liquidate outstanding assets of the defunct Gulf Bank nearly two decades after its collapse.

The two actions, though related, concern distinct sets of six properties each, acquired through different shell companies allegedly used by the defunct bank.

The first suit concerns six properties in Banana Island purchased in the name of Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited, described in the pleadings as a shell company used by Gulf Bank.

These plots situate in Zones J, K, L and P, have a combined area of approximately 13,794.145 square metres.

At the prevailing market rate of N4,500,000 per square metre, NDIC values these properties at N62,073,652,500.

The second suit concerns a separate set of six properties in Banana Island acquired through Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (later renamed Supra Commercials Limited), another entity in which the defunct bank held over 80 per cent shareholding.

These plots have a combined area of approximately 13,979.974 square metres, valued at N62,909,883,000 at the same per-square-metre rate.

In addition, the second suit claims recovery of N401,000,000 allegedly collected by Wema Bank from the NDIC’s agent bank, United Bank for Africa (UBA), in September 2009.

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria revoked Gulf Bank Plc’s banking licence by notice published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Volume 93, Number 3, Government Notice No. 7) dated January 16, 2006, and the Federal High Court, Lagos Division, subsequently made a winding-up order on November 27, 2006, appointing NDIC as liquidator.

On the basis of those instruments, the Corporation maintains it is legally mandated to trace, recover, and liquidate all outstanding assets of the defunct bank for the benefit of depositors and creditors.

In the first suit, NDIC alleged that Gulf Bank acquired six Banana Island plots between 1998 and 2003 using Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited as a vehicle.

The internal records of the defunct bank reportedly treated the acquisition as a loan account, an arrangement NDIC contended shows the assets remain beneficially owned by Gulf Bank.

NDIC further alleged that Wema Bank took custody of these properties purportedly to secure an interbank deposit of N771.79 million, but that a joint CBN/NDIC special examination conducted in September 2005 found no record in Gulf Bank’s books confirming that any such deposit existed.

The examination report, dated September 30, 2005, found the defunct bank’s explanations unsatisfactory and no supporting documentation was subsequently produced.

According to NDIC, Wema Bank later presented two managers’ cheques from Access Bank and Intercontinental Bank, both dated September 2005 totaling N250 million in favour of Euston Wenberg Engineering Limited, which NDIC framed as instruments for a purchase rather than a recovery of a deposit.

NDIC contended that the purported sale at N250 million was commercially implausible, given that a single property in Banana Island at that time was worth in excess of N500 million.

In the second suit, NDIC also alleged that Gulf Bank injected N20 million into Bacad Finance and Investment Limited in 2001 to increase its share capital, and later invested a further N60 million in the company in 2003.

The defunct bank ultimately held over 80 per cent of Bacad Finance’s shares and used the entity to acquire a second set of six Banana Island plots.

The pleadings record that the defunct bank intended to develop the properties as a luxury residential estate of 72 flats, to be called Bacad Estate, in partnership with Shelter Afrique.

NDIC alleged that Wema Bank, without any valid mortgage, court order, or proprietary interest, took custody of these properties and later claimed to have sold them for N524 million by way of managers’ cheques dated 2006 and 2007.

NDIC described this claimed sale price as grossly implausible given that each property was worth over N4 billion by that period.

Separately, NDIC stated that in June 2009 it wrote to Wema Bank approving payment of N1,635,616.44 as the full outstanding deposit due to the bank as at January 16, 2006, the date Gulf Bank went into liquidation.

Notwithstanding that communication, NDIC alleged that in September 2009 Wema Bank collected N401 million from UBA, NDIC’s agent bank, without lawful justification, and that the Corporation has no record showing Wema Bank was owed any sum beyond the approved N1.635 million.

Wema Bank, through its counsel, Dr Oladapo Olanipekun (SAN), Mr Kehinde Ogunwunmiju (SAN) and Mr Tunde Afe-Babalola (SAN) have filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

The bank relies on the Failed Banks Act, the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020, the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and Sections 6(6) and 251(1) of the 1999 Constitution.

Wema Bank argued that NDIC’s claims do not arise from any loan, credit facility, guarantee or banking transaction between the parties, as required under the Failed Banks Act, and that the bank was never a customer of Gulf Bank in respect of any credit facility.

The bank further contended that the suits disclose no debtor-creditor relationship and that NDIC lacks locus standi because the disputed properties were allegedly owned by Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (now Supra Commercials Limited), a separate legal entity.

According to Wema Bank, the matter is fundamentally one of property ownership rather than banking debt recovery, placing it outside the Federal High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 251(1) of the Constitution.

The bank also argued that any cause of action, if it existed at all, arose between 2006 and 2007 and is now statute-barred under the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and accuses NDIC of abusing court process by attempting to circumvent limitation laws with a stale claim.

Wema Bank is asking the court to strike out or dismiss both suits.

The matters have been adjourned to June 25, 2026 for further proceedings.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

OneWallet Partners MTN, Zenith Bank to Provide Digital Financial Services to Abia SMEs

Published

on

Kindly share this post

OneWallet microfinance Bank is partnering Zenith bank and MTN to build a platform that will provide digital financial services to support the growth of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) businesses in Abia State.

Dr. C Darl Uzu, Chairman of OneWallet, who disclosed this while launching the platform for traders at the Ariaria International Market, Aba, Abia State said it was meant majorly for traders and the SMEs because they are the bedrock of the Nigerian economy.

According to Dr. Uzu, “We want to expand the inclusion of small businesses in digital financial services by making it easy for them to make and receive payments on affordable digital devices, hence the UnionBell Smart phones and POS.

“We want to help SMEs to access financial support and loan easily to grow their business, and also help businesses to build the history and credibility they require for future growth and expansion.”

He said OneWallet was not created just as a payment application, but as a business support platform designed around the real needs of SMEs.

Dr. Uzu said the choice of Ariaria International Market as the pilot for the platform was intentional since the market is one of the strongest symbol of enterprise in Nigeria.

“We are not here however to teach Ariaria people how to trade because Ariaria already understands business, but we are hear to support Ariaria business energy with tools that can help businesses do more, reach more customers, organize better and prepare for bigger opportunities; we are here to help Ariaria innovate and grow.”

He thanked MTN, Zenith bank and the leadership of the traders for partnering OneWallet to provide the platform that help businesses to expand.

A representative of MTN at the launch, Dr. Ernest Chieke described OneWallet as a platform for individuals and SMEs which intend to move their businesses forward.

He expressed joy that his firm was partnering OneWallet to bring solution to SMEs’ financial problems.

Carl Akwarandu who represented Zenith bank at the event said the bank decided to partner OneWallet because it has a unique product that will make small businesses grow faster.

He promised that Zenith bank would give OneWallet all the support it needs to make it number one microfinance bank in the country.

The Director of OneWallet, Dr. David Nwosu described the microfinance bank a one stop-touch for SMEs growth.

He said at OneWallet, collateral are not needed to obtain loan, but the individual’s business history.

A member of the board of the microfinance bank, Wiedong Wang, commended Dr. Uzu for establishing OneWallet.

He expressed optimism that with the help of its partners, OneWallet will excel.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

CBN Warns Non-Interest Banks  against Governance, Compliance Risks

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has warned non-interest financial institutions against governance and compliance risks capable of undermining public confidence and financial stability in the country’s growing Islamic finance sector.

CBN Warns Non-Interest Banks  against Governance, Compliance Risks

Interest-free banks, often known as non-interest or Islamic banks, operate without charging or paying traditional interest (Riba).

The warning was contained in a press statement issued by the apex bank following the 2nd Annual Interactive Session between the CBN Financial Regulation Advisory Council of Experts and the Advisory Committees of Experts of Non-Interest Financial Institutions held at the CBN Auditorium in Abuja.

Speaking through Dr Rita Sike, director of the Financial Policy and Regulation Department,  Philip Ikeazor, deputy governor, Financial System Stability, said the rapid expansion of the industry had increased exposure to operational and regulatory vulnerabilities.

The statement read, “The Deputy Governor, however, observed that as the industry grows in size, sophistication, and interconnectedness, it faces unique risks, particularly non-compliance risk, governance challenges, operational vulnerabilities, and emerging technological risks.

“He warned that such risks, if not properly managed, could undermine public confidence, financial stability, and the overall credibility of the non-interest finance ecosystem.”

According to the CBN, the engagement was part of ongoing efforts to strengthen Shariah governance, improve regulatory clarity, and reinforce risk management standards within the non-interest financial services industry.

The apex bank noted that non-interest financial institutions continued to play an increasingly important role in Nigeria’s financial system by providing ethical and Shariah-compliant alternatives to conventional banking.

It stated that the institutions were also contributing to financial inclusion, real sector financing, micro, small, and medium enterprises development, and shared prosperity.

The CBN further explained that the establishment of FRACE and the mandatory constitution of ACEs across all non-interest financial institutions were designed to institutionalise a harmonised governance framework for the sector.

According to the statement, sustained interaction between FRACE and ACEs remained critical to ensuring that regulatory expectations were properly understood and consistently implemented across the industry.

“The objectives of today’s session include fostering the institutionalisation and effective operation of a robust Shariah governance system within Non-Interest Financial Institutions, and providing a structured platform for dialogue, knowledge-sharing, and collaboration,” Ikeazor was quoted in the statement.

In his remarks, Prof Bashir Umar, deputy chairman of FRACE,  said the interactive session was aimed at strengthening governance within the non-interest finance sub-sector and promoting constructive engagement between regulators and industry advisory committees.

He also commended the management of the CBN for reviving the session, which was first introduced in 2014.

Earlier in her welcome remarks, Sike reaffirmed the apex bank’s commitment to building a strong and well-governed non-interest financial services industry.

She noted that the growing diversity of products and delivery channels, particularly the emergence of Islamic fintech, had increased the need for stronger regulatory oversight and continuous engagement among industry stakeholders.

“The growing diversity of products, institutions, and delivery channels, particularly with the emergence of Islamic fintech, underscores the need for continuous dialogue, sound regulatory oversight, and robust advisory input from scholars and practitioners,” she said.

The session featured technical presentations on Shariah non-compliance risks in non-interest banks and the role of Islamic fintech in driving financial inclusion.

Participants at the event included members of FRACE, chairmen and members of various ACEs, managing directors of non-interest banks, senior CBN officials, and representatives of the Bank of Industry and the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending