Connect with us

Cabotage Law: Which Way Forward

Published

on

Kindly share this post

It is lamentable that in the almost seven years of the cabotage law in Nigeria, the nation and indigenous ship owners are still deprived of the needed revenue from haulage of petroleum products which ordinarily should help drive the country’s economy forward.
The cabotage Act was passed into law on April 30, 2003 with the release of guidelines for the implementation of the provisions on June 7, 2004. However, the inability of Federal Government to implement the Act gives foreigners the leeway to invade the country’s waterways to carry out all sorts of illegal shipping activities, which have in turn impoverished Nigerian ship owners.
Vessels owned by indigenous ship operators are considered substandard with poorly trained crew. This provides the ready-made excuse for the oil majors to ignore indigenous operators. In the past when the cargo allocation and reservation principle worked well, a lot of indigenous operators could charter vessels to carry petroleum cargo, but now, most of them simply serve as agents or representatives to foreign shipping companies in Nigeria.
The foreign shipping lines carry petroleum products while the indigenous shippers beg to be given the crumbs. Indigenous operators account for less than 10 percent of the total domestic crude cargo moved through the nation’s coastline of more than 2,000 km, dotted with eight ports.
The discrimination has placed the indigenous shippers at a massive disadvantage to every other flag in the world. Although the indigenous shippers are being over-taken by the better capitalized foreign shipping companies, the contention is that the cabotage laws reserve the haulage of crude oil within the nation’s territorial waterways to indigenous operators.
According to the Act, foreign vessels are not allowed to partake in any domestic coastal trade as obtainable in other developed countries of the world, while it will at the same time, promote the development of indigenous tonnage and establish a Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) and for related matters.
However the Temisan Omatseye led management, which assumed office in July 10,2009, after one year recorded a significant increase of the CVFF from less than seven million dollars in July 2009 to over 55 million dollars in June 2010, representing an increase of 685.7 per cent.
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (Nimasa) management led by  Omatseye as director general and chief executive officer, in one year recorded increase of 685.7 per cent increase in the CVFF.
The law stipulates that Nigerians should carry goods, passengers by vessel, or any other mode of transport, from one place to the other, either directly or via a place outside the country. It further stipulates that only vessels wholly owned, manned, built and registered by Nigerian citizens, shall be engaged in the domestic coastal carriage of cargo and passengers within the coastal territorial inland waters or any point within the waters of the exclusive economic zone of Nigeria; except a foreign vessel is given waiver by the Minister of Transport to carry out such job.
But seven years after the law was enacted, none of the provisions of the Law has been fully implemented by the supervising agency. Rather, waivers have been granted to foreign shipping companies to do jobs which Nigerians could do.
This has resulted in the influx of foreign vessels into the country, which needs to be stopped. In order to stop the influx of foreign vessels into the country, The Indigenous Ship Owners Association of Nigeria (ISAN) embarked on appeals and negotiation.
Since the prospect of achieving result through appeals and negotiations failed, the association resorted to using the power granted it under the Cabotage Laws to fight its cause. Consequently, the association and an indigenous company, Pokat Nigeria, not long ago sued a foreign tanker vessel MT Makhambe, from St Vincent and The Grenades, over illegal coastal trading within the Nigerian territorial waters.
The vessels with International Maritime Organisation (IMO) number 9334612, with 7224 registered gross tonnage was impounded while delivering 10,000 metric tons of petroleum products at Ibafon Jetty 1 in Apapa.
Meanwhile, the case was struck out by the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos in favour of the shipping company.
A lot of maritime experts however insisted that in order to rescue the indigenous shippers, there is the need for the Cabotage Enforcement Unit of Nimasa to wake up to their responsibilities because there is an influx of foreign vessels into the country and this should be stopped.
From available statistics, foreign vessels are scattered everywhere in the country doing illegal businesses because their activities are not effectively monitored and regulated. It is therefore advisable that thorough overhaul of the country’s flag administration should be carried out, and that the Cabotage Act should be revisited and simplified for proper interpretation by the court of law.
The Nimasa management is advised on the need to begin to also take critical look at shipping development to see how they could increase Nigerian fleet because without owning ships, the existence of the organization is meaningless.
Furthermore, the CVFF as provided by the law is the only support from the government that would give intending investors the needed leverage in the sector, otherwise Nigerians would continue to play the second fiddle as far as shipping business is concerned.
As a result of high cost of vessels, some banks find it difficult to sponsor shipping acquisition, a situation which is hampering the development of the expansion of fleets in the country.
According to ship owners, cabotage regime was already failing because interested Nigerians do not have the fund to acquire vessels.
For as long as foreign vessels are doing jobs meant for Nigerians ships, most Nigerians that have ships would certainly no longer be able to maintain them, implying that they would rather have to abandon them so that they would be sold as scraps instead of paying their crew members because they have become redundant, observed a maritime source.
He added that,it is lamentable that the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is paying huge amounts as demurrage to the foreign vessels everyday because most of the indigenous ships are not in good shape due to their inability to obtain loan or any support from the financial institutions and maritime regulatory body, regretting that the Very Large Crude Carriers which bring in petroleum products into the country do not allow Nigerian ships to come near their vessels.
The Very Large Crude Carriers according to information available to Nigeria CommunicationsWeek bring the refined products and also use their smaller vessels to distribute the petroleum products to the tanks and to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation facilities, which is supposed to be done by indigenous vessels operating under the Cabotage regime.
We regret that because Nigerians do not have good vessels, these foreign ships would stay for two to three months, while Nigeria pays as much as $30,000 to $40,000 daily until they finish discharging their contents.
This would have ended long ago if the Cabotage law was working. Most of the time, the regulatory agencies come up with so many excuses, such as; Nigerian vessels do not have Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance, observes another maritime inside source who stressed that it costs about $10 million to get such certificate, which most indigenous shipping companies in Nigeria  could not afford.
However, Omatseye, has promised to do everything humanly possible to ensure vessel expansion in the country is given proper attention, by making the process of CVFF simpler to enable indigenous operators secure loans from the apex maritime body as well as increase local participation in coastal shipping.
According to him, the Agency would make Nigeria’s maritime industry the safest and most secure in Africa, further stressing that the management would equally make Cabotage a reality.
Even as operators and stakeholders continue to applaud the words of Omatseye, they however confess to being skeptical whether it will be another sweet talk as usual, like one of those often rehashed comments of newly appointed chief executives and political office holders as is the tradition in the country. They moreover call on the Federal Government to give the present chief executive officer of NIMASA the freedom to implement his good ideas, which should help move the maritime industry to another level.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Telecom

NCC Temporarily Suspends Issuance of New Licenses

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) says it has temporarily suspended the issuance of new licenses in some categories.

NCC Temporarily Suspends Issuance of New Licenses

The commission said the categories included interconnect exchange license, mobile virtual network operator license and value added service aggregator license.

Reuben Mouka, director of Public Affairs, NCC,  in a statement in Abuja on Friday, said the commission acted in line with its powers under the Nigerian Communications Act (NCA) 2003.

“This temporary suspension is necessary to enable the commission to conduct a thorough review of several key areas within these categories, including the current level of competition, market saturation and current market dynamics.

“The public is invited to note that during the suspension period commencing on May 17, new application for the aforementioned licenses will not be accepted.

“This is without prejudice to pending applications before the commission will be considered on their merits.

“Any enquiry or clarification in respect of this suspension notice should be forwarded to: [email protected],” NCC said.

 

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Crypto Exchanges Begin Delisting Naira from P2P Platforms- SEC

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Crypto exchanges have commenced delisting of the Naira from Peer-to-Peer (P2P) trading platforms, following directives of the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Crypto Exchanges Begin Delisting Naira from P2P Platforms- SEC

P2P trading in the realm of cryptos is a decentralized method that allows individuals to buy and sell digital assets directly with one another.

In this system, P2P trading platforms serve as intermediaries, facilitating secure and trust-based transactions.

SEC explained that its checks have indicated that the Naira has been removed as a fiat currency option for transactions on KuCoin platform and the exchange has already begun the necessary adjustments to its technology to accommodate the delisting of the Naira as soon as practicable.

It explained that the removal of the Naira from the platforms limits the ability to manipulate the exchange rates against the Nigerian currency which is expected to further strengthen the value of the naira.

Dr. Emomotimi Agama, acting director general of SEC, reacting to the delisting by KuCoin, expressed delight that the crypto exchanges were heeding the directives of ONSA and SEC, describing it as a welcome development.

He stated: “We are happy that they have started complying with the directives by the ONSA.  We ask that those involved in sharp practices that undermine national interest should cease and desist. It is in our interest as a people to protect what belongs to us.  Anyone that disobeys directives should be ready to face the full weight of the law”.

Agama added that as the apex regulator of the capital market, “SEC is co-operating  with the Office of the National Security Adviser, the  Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and other relevant agencies to achieve the national objective of making sure that illegality is not allowed to thrive”.

 

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

TI-Nigeria Boss Alleges Nigerian Banks Offer Opportunities for Terrorism Tinancing

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Awual Rafsanjani, executive director, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and head,  Transparency International in Nigeria (TI-Nigeria), has accused banks of offering opportunities for terrorism financing in the country.

TI-Nigeria Boss Alleges Nigerian Banks Offer Opportunities for Terrorism Tinancing

Rafsanjani, stated this at the multi-stakeholder meeting on terrorism financing and violent extremism in the North-East, organised by CISLAC and TI-Nigeria, financed by GIABA-ECOWAS.

According to Rafsanjani, “The financial sector has been exploited for terrorism financing. The use of the financial sector indicates the increasing capabilities of some terrorist groups. These include the Bureau de Change operators, Point of Sale (POS) devices, wire transfers, and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions, among other enabling platforms expanding the scope and depth of terrorism financing.

“It is worrisome that illegal money exchangers including Bureau De Change have been featured in several Terrorism Financing investigations. The 2022 National Inherent Risk Assessment of Terrorism Financing report reveals that between 2019 and 2022, about 19 companies were linked to illegal money exchangers who have used their companies to commingle funds considered to be linked to Terrorism Financing.”

In his goodwill message, Ola Olukoyede, chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)  said that the commission is settling for the use of technology to combat illicit flow of monies into the hands of terrorists.

Olukoyede expressed worry over the dimension terrorism financing has taken, disclosing that the EFCC has discovered platforms other than Binance, which are being used for terrorism financing, saying over a thousand of such accounts were closed.

He said: “The challenge before us is to seek solutions to end this decade-long nightmare and restore order to the troubled region. The quest for a solution is not entirely new. Several conferences and workshops have been convoked, yet the situation remains dire.

“For us in the EFCC, like most Nigerians, the concern is on how this crisis continues to defy solutions and fester? How is it that the terrorist groups in the region are able to sustain their operations, acquire more sophisticated weaponry and engage in daring combat with the Nigerian military?

“It would seem that an economy of criminality has developed around terrorism and violent extremism in the region, where actors who are profiting from the chaos do not cherish the return of civil order. How for instance do we explain the activities of supposed non-profit organisations who profess to want to provide succor to the distressed but end up exploiting their misery for financial gains?

“How do we explain the action of unscrupulous actors who hide under the cover of humanitarian activities to fund terrorist groups? These are issues that we must continue to interrogate.

“The EFCC has had cause to prosecute so-called promoters of non-profit organisation who exploited the desperate conditions in the North-East to profiteer. I am sure many of you are aware of a lady that is called Mama Boko Haram, who at the peak of the insurgency positioned herself as a credible intermediary for the insurgents, but is now in jail for exploiting the distressed citizens of the North-East for personal gain.

“Part of the focus of the EFCC in the quest to tackle terrorism and violent extremism in that region is to follow the funds trail of critical actors in the region and cutting off the supply line of illicit funds to known criminal groups. This responsibility has seen the Commission pay more attention to the movement of funds by NPOs in the region, who are now required to make a declaration to the EFCC.

“Some of our discoveries recently into investigating some of these platforms was mind bugging, and we thought Binance was a major one, yes a major one and we are prosecuting them but much more, other platforms we have discovered, of course you are aware that EFCC has to freeze over a thousand account, and it will shock you what some of those accounts are used for, and some of them are used to fund terrorism activities.

“You can imagine the dimension the whole problem is taking and so, it is important for us to adopt the use of technology, and that is what we are going to do to see how we can adopt technology to be able to track every Naira,” he said.

Also, in a goodwill speech, Dr Musa Aliyu, SAN, chairman, Independent Corrupt Practices and other related Offences Commission, (ICPC), said, “ICPC is fully committed to contributing its expertise and resources to this fight. We are prepared to intensify our efforts in financial oversight, enhance our investigative and prosecutorial capacities, and work closely with all stakeholders to disrupt the financial networks that fuel terrorism.”

 

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending