Connect with us

/home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153
">
Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153

Warning: Attempt to read property "cat_name" on null in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 153

Cabotage Law: Which Way Forward

Published

on

Kindly share this post

It is lamentable that in the almost seven years of the cabotage law in Nigeria, the nation and indigenous ship owners are still deprived of the needed revenue from haulage of petroleum products which ordinarily should help drive the country’s economy forward.
The cabotage Act was passed into law on April 30, 2003 with the release of guidelines for the implementation of the provisions on June 7, 2004. However, the inability of Federal Government to implement the Act gives foreigners the leeway to invade the country’s waterways to carry out all sorts of illegal shipping activities, which have in turn impoverished Nigerian ship owners.
Vessels owned by indigenous ship operators are considered substandard with poorly trained crew. This provides the ready-made excuse for the oil majors to ignore indigenous operators. In the past when the cargo allocation and reservation principle worked well, a lot of indigenous operators could charter vessels to carry petroleum cargo, but now, most of them simply serve as agents or representatives to foreign shipping companies in Nigeria.
The foreign shipping lines carry petroleum products while the indigenous shippers beg to be given the crumbs. Indigenous operators account for less than 10 percent of the total domestic crude cargo moved through the nation’s coastline of more than 2,000 km, dotted with eight ports.
The discrimination has placed the indigenous shippers at a massive disadvantage to every other flag in the world. Although the indigenous shippers are being over-taken by the better capitalized foreign shipping companies, the contention is that the cabotage laws reserve the haulage of crude oil within the nation’s territorial waterways to indigenous operators.
According to the Act, foreign vessels are not allowed to partake in any domestic coastal trade as obtainable in other developed countries of the world, while it will at the same time, promote the development of indigenous tonnage and establish a Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) and for related matters.
However the Temisan Omatseye led management, which assumed office in July 10,2009, after one year recorded a significant increase of the CVFF from less than seven million dollars in July 2009 to over 55 million dollars in June 2010, representing an increase of 685.7 per cent.
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (Nimasa) management led by  Omatseye as director general and chief executive officer, in one year recorded increase of 685.7 per cent increase in the CVFF.
The law stipulates that Nigerians should carry goods, passengers by vessel, or any other mode of transport, from one place to the other, either directly or via a place outside the country. It further stipulates that only vessels wholly owned, manned, built and registered by Nigerian citizens, shall be engaged in the domestic coastal carriage of cargo and passengers within the coastal territorial inland waters or any point within the waters of the exclusive economic zone of Nigeria; except a foreign vessel is given waiver by the Minister of Transport to carry out such job.
But seven years after the law was enacted, none of the provisions of the Law has been fully implemented by the supervising agency. Rather, waivers have been granted to foreign shipping companies to do jobs which Nigerians could do.
This has resulted in the influx of foreign vessels into the country, which needs to be stopped. In order to stop the influx of foreign vessels into the country, The Indigenous Ship Owners Association of Nigeria (ISAN) embarked on appeals and negotiation.
Since the prospect of achieving result through appeals and negotiations failed, the association resorted to using the power granted it under the Cabotage Laws to fight its cause. Consequently, the association and an indigenous company, Pokat Nigeria, not long ago sued a foreign tanker vessel MT Makhambe, from St Vincent and The Grenades, over illegal coastal trading within the Nigerian territorial waters.
The vessels with International Maritime Organisation (IMO) number 9334612, with 7224 registered gross tonnage was impounded while delivering 10,000 metric tons of petroleum products at Ibafon Jetty 1 in Apapa.
Meanwhile, the case was struck out by the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos in favour of the shipping company.
A lot of maritime experts however insisted that in order to rescue the indigenous shippers, there is the need for the Cabotage Enforcement Unit of Nimasa to wake up to their responsibilities because there is an influx of foreign vessels into the country and this should be stopped.
From available statistics, foreign vessels are scattered everywhere in the country doing illegal businesses because their activities are not effectively monitored and regulated. It is therefore advisable that thorough overhaul of the country’s flag administration should be carried out, and that the Cabotage Act should be revisited and simplified for proper interpretation by the court of law.
The Nimasa management is advised on the need to begin to also take critical look at shipping development to see how they could increase Nigerian fleet because without owning ships, the existence of the organization is meaningless.
Furthermore, the CVFF as provided by the law is the only support from the government that would give intending investors the needed leverage in the sector, otherwise Nigerians would continue to play the second fiddle as far as shipping business is concerned.
As a result of high cost of vessels, some banks find it difficult to sponsor shipping acquisition, a situation which is hampering the development of the expansion of fleets in the country.
According to ship owners, cabotage regime was already failing because interested Nigerians do not have the fund to acquire vessels.
For as long as foreign vessels are doing jobs meant for Nigerians ships, most Nigerians that have ships would certainly no longer be able to maintain them, implying that they would rather have to abandon them so that they would be sold as scraps instead of paying their crew members because they have become redundant, observed a maritime source.
He added that,it is lamentable that the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is paying huge amounts as demurrage to the foreign vessels everyday because most of the indigenous ships are not in good shape due to their inability to obtain loan or any support from the financial institutions and maritime regulatory body, regretting that the Very Large Crude Carriers which bring in petroleum products into the country do not allow Nigerian ships to come near their vessels.
The Very Large Crude Carriers according to information available to Nigeria CommunicationsWeek bring the refined products and also use their smaller vessels to distribute the petroleum products to the tanks and to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation facilities, which is supposed to be done by indigenous vessels operating under the Cabotage regime.
We regret that because Nigerians do not have good vessels, these foreign ships would stay for two to three months, while Nigeria pays as much as $30,000 to $40,000 daily until they finish discharging their contents.
This would have ended long ago if the Cabotage law was working. Most of the time, the regulatory agencies come up with so many excuses, such as; Nigerian vessels do not have Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance, observes another maritime inside source who stressed that it costs about $10 million to get such certificate, which most indigenous shipping companies in Nigeria  could not afford.
However, Omatseye, has promised to do everything humanly possible to ensure vessel expansion in the country is given proper attention, by making the process of CVFF simpler to enable indigenous operators secure loans from the apex maritime body as well as increase local participation in coastal shipping.
According to him, the Agency would make Nigeria’s maritime industry the safest and most secure in Africa, further stressing that the management would equally make Cabotage a reality.
Even as operators and stakeholders continue to applaud the words of Omatseye, they however confess to being skeptical whether it will be another sweet talk as usual, like one of those often rehashed comments of newly appointed chief executives and political office holders as is the tradition in the country. They moreover call on the Federal Government to give the present chief executive officer of NIMASA the freedom to implement his good ideas, which should help move the maritime industry to another level.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 493

Warning: Attempt to read property "cat_ID" on null in /home/kenneth/web/nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/parts/post-single.php on line 493

Broadcasting

SERAP, NGE Sue NBC over Threat to Sanction Broadcasters

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) have jointly sued the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) over what they described as an “arbitrary, unconstitutional, and unlawful” threat to sanction broadcast stations and presenters.

SERAP, NGE Sue NBC over Threat to Sanction Broadcasters

The development was disclosed in a Sunday statement signed by Kolawole Oluwadare, deputy director, and Onuoha Ukeh, general secretary of the Nigerian Guild of Editors.

According to the statement, SERAP and NGE challenged a recent directive by NBC, warning presenters and journalists against “expressing personal opinions as facts,” “bullying or intimidating guests,” and failing to maintain neutrality.

The statement reads, “SERAP and the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) have filed a lawsuit against the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) over the arbitrary, unconstitutional, and unlawful ‘Formal Notice’, which threatens to sanction broadcast stations and presenters for allegedly ‘expressing personal opinions as facts, bullying or intimidating guests, or failing to maintain neutrality.’

“The NBC had recently threatened to sanction broadcast stations and presenters who ‘express personal opinions as facts’ or ‘bully and intimidate guests,’ claiming it had ‘identified a sustained increase in breaches of the 6th Edition of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code across news, current affairs, and political programmes.’”

In the suit marked FHC/L/CS/854/2026 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court in Lagos State, SERAP and NGE asked the court to determine whether the various provisions of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code relied upon by the NBC in the directive are inconsistent with the Nigerian Constitution 1999 (as amended) and the country’s international human rights obligations.

According to the statement, the groups disclosed that Femi Falana (SAN), human rights lawyer, would lead a team of senior lawyers to represent SERAP and NGE in the lawsuit.

SERAP and NGE asked the court to declare that the provisions of the 6th Edition of the Broadcasting Code used by the NBC are vague and constitute a fundamental breach of press freedom guaranteed by the Nigerian Constitution and international human rights standards.

The statement added, “SERAP and NGE are asking the court for a declaration that the provisions of the 6th Edition of the Broadcasting Code used by the NBC are vague and overly broad and constitute a fundamental breach of freedom of expression and media freedom guaranteed by the Nigerian Constitution and international human rights standards.”

The groups also sought an interim injunction to restrain the NBC, its agents and other authorities from imposing sanctions on broadcast stations and presenters based on what they described as “unlawful provisions of the 6th Edition of the Broadcasting Code”, pending the hearing and determination of the motion.

“SERAP and NGE are also seeking an order of interim injunction restraining the NBC, its agents or privies, whether jointly or severally or any other authority, from imposing sanctions on broadcast stations and presenters based on the patently unlawful provisions of the 6th Edition of the Broadcasting Code, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice filed simultaneously in this suit,” the statement concluded.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

CRMI Backs CBN’s New Measures to Curb Fraud

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Chartered Risk Management Institute of Nigeria (CRMI) has backed recent regulatory measures by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) aimed at strengthening the security of the country’s digital financial ecosystem, while urging stricter compliance across the banking industry.

CRMI Backs CBN’s New Measures to Curb Fraud

Kevin Ugwuoke, president and chairman of Council,  in a statement, described the new framework as a timely and proactive response to rising risks such as fraud, identity theft, and unauthorised access within the instant payment system.

He noted that key safeguards introduced by the apex bank including a N20,000 transaction limit on newly activated mobile banking applications within the first 24 hours, mandatory device binding, and real-time enterprise fraud monitoring are designed to reduce vulnerabilities associated with account takeovers, especially during the early stages of account activation.

“By limiting transaction exposure during the high-risk activation window, the framework significantly reduces the opportunity for fraudsters to exploit newly onboarded or compromised accounts,” Ugwuoke said.

The institute, however, stressed that the success of the measures would depend largely on effective implementation.

It called on banks, fintech firms and payment service providers to strengthen cybersecurity infrastructure, invest in fraud analytics and prioritise staff training as well as customer awareness.

CRMI also welcomed the introduction of the Nigerian Overnight Financing Rate (NOFR), describing it as a major step toward standardising overnight funding rates, deepening financial markets and improving monetary policy transmission in line with global best practices.

The endorsement comes as the CBN unveiled a draft revised Guide to Charges for Banks and Other Financial Institutions, 2026, signalling a broader shift toward transparency, consumer protection and efficiency in the financial system.

The revised guide introduces caps on key banking charges and mandates stricter disclosure requirements.

Under the framework, interbank transfers between N5,000 and N50,000 are capped at N10, while transactions above N50,000 attract a maximum of N50, with transfers below N5,000 remaining free.

The apex bank also standardised ATM withdrawal charges, pegging fees at N100 per N20,000 for on-site withdrawals from other banks’ machines, while off-site transactions may attract an additional surcharge of up to N500, subject to disclosure at the point of use.

In a bid to protect borrowers, the regulator directed that all lending rates be presented as Annual Percentage Rates (APR), ensuring full disclosure of interest and associated fees.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

General News

NRS Debunks Viral Claim of New Tax on Vehicle

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) has denied reports that the federal government has introduced a new tax on vehicles.

NRS Debunks Viral Claim of New Tax on Vehicle

The clarification follows the circulation of a viral message online claiming that all vehicle owners would be required to start paying a new tax from July 1, 2026.

In a statement released on Sunday, the NRS said the information in the message is false and did not come from the agency or any official government institution.Nigeria Travel Guides

According to Dare Adekanmbi, spokesperson for the NRS, the viral message was designed to mislead the public. He explained that it was made to look genuine by using official government logos and formatting.

The message reportedly instructed owners of private, commercial, and corporate vehicles to pay an unspecified fee either online or through approved banks and agencies. It also included a website that was wrongly presented as an official government platform.

Adekanmbi stressed that the website mentioned is not connected to the government and warned Nigerians not to make any payments based on such information.

He said the NRS has not introduced any new vehicle tax and that any official policy or tax change would be properly announced through verified government channels.

The agency urged citizens to ignore the fake message and avoid falling victim to possible fraud. It also advised Nigerians to always confirm such information through trusted and official sources before taking any action.

The NRS further encouraged the public to follow its official communication platforms to stay informed about genuine tax policies, updates, and government directives.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending