General News
Number Portability will Benefit Operators & Subscribers – Onwudiwe

Uche Onwudiwe is the chief operating officer of Interconnect Clearing House, one of the companies licensed by Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to implement Number Portability in the telecom space. His experience in the industry dates back to 1994 when he ran a company called Technologies Incorporated in the US before his return to Nigeria. He spoke to chike onwuegbuchi on issues around the company’s effort in preparation for the commencement of Number Portability in the country later this year, as well how the company is reconciling operators’ bills that arise from interconnectivity.
Interconnect Clearing House in the Telecom Space
The role of Interconnect Clearing House is to act as an intermediary for traffic and fees passed from one operator to another. In essence, if operator A wants to send traffic to operator B, instead of creating links to each operator in the industry, he can create a central link to Interconnect Clearing House from there we would pass the traffic to everybody. This reduces infrastructure cost, reduces over head and makes transit of traffic and the fees associated with that traffic a lot easier. Our job is to carry traffic from one operator to the other operator in a seamless and efficient manner as well as paying fees from one operator to the other for the traffic that has been carried.
Reconciling Bills
There are two issues to that. One is payment of bills; the second issue is reconciliation to make sure that the bills are accurate. Our role is to work on both. One of them we can do easily, the second we cannot easily carry out. For the reconciliation and accuracy of the bills, we can through our switch validate the accuracy of traffic that passes through us to the other operators. We can do that by the actual volume of traffic that we see coming through and we can also do it by comparing the traffic that all other operators send to other persons. This can be verified either through the operator who receives the traffic or through the operator who sends the traffic. That is part of the reconciliation of making sure the numbers are accurate.
The second issue is about collecting payments. We do our best to make sure that we collect payments from all the debtors and pay them to the creditors. In cases where there is an operator who is having issues in the industry or their businesses and does not have the money to pay, there will be a settlement of debts. We try to work out ways which will help them manage their debts either by exchange of traffic or by giving them payment plans to help offset it. So we are working towards reducing debts in the industry. We also offer options of security deposits and bank guarantees for those who can get them.
The debts that are still out there are with those companies that are not doing so well. Their business is actually struggling which is why they have the high levels of debts but for those who are trying to be in business and working towards making their payments, the invoices they receive are more accurate so they are not over billed or under billed for anything.
Subduing Smaller Operators
Our role as a neutral party is to ensure that small and large operators are connected and they have the capacity they need. Our position is to make sure traffic flows freely; we make our money based on the traffic that flows, so there is no incentive for us if we restrict traffic. Anybody can come to us for connectivity whether you need one E1 or you need a fibre link with multiple exchange points, we connect with you then our role is to ensure that we inform all other operators that the new Operator/Service provider is connected to us and traffic between both parties should be routed through us. We would guarantee their payments. We will make sure as the Clearinghouse that traffic from any operator that comes to us, we assure the other operators that they will get their money and vice versa. It is our role to ensure that everybody can connect and that everybody has capacity. If we notice that one operator is subduing or not accepting traffic from another operator, we first of all enquire with them to make sure it is not a technical issue or an issue that can be resolved easily such as a transmission link or switch being down or capacity being reached thus not allowing further connections or traffic. We also make sure that it is not a financial or a business related issue where the new service provider owed money before and did not pay and are now trying to come to us to send that same traffic. As long as it is not any of those two reasons, we then work to make sure that the link is up and is working. If we still continue to notice issues, we then take it to the NCC to intercede on the issue.
Connecting to Other Clearing Houses
We will like to think of ourselves as the biggest and the best clearing house though we are not the only clearing house so operators have the option of connecting to them if they want redundant links. A number of operators have direct links to each other but some of them also have redundant links between multiple clearing houses, which is good but at the same time even with the redundant links you will still use the most reliable one and the bigger one as your primary link. If for some reasons you have problems, you can fall back on the secondary link. We try to assure them that their links will be up, the traffic will be passed, and service quality would be at the best they can get. By this, they use us as their primary link but at the same time they have the option of connecting to other clearing houses or connecting directly to other operators and passing traffic that way as well.
How Prepared Are You for Number Portability?
We are fully prepared and our role as the integrator or those who are to implement number portability has started, whether working with our partners or other operators in the industry. We have started communicating with the network operators and with Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), we have ordered equipment, our facilities are upgraded, so we are very much ready and able to deliver within the timeline. If there are issues with some of the other players in fulfilling their roles that may also delay the rollout, these issues will be sorted out but as far as our responsibilities and those of our partners are concerned, we are definitely ready.
Postpaid Subscribers Porting before Month End
There is going to be an additional workshop regarding the business rules for number portability. NCC put out the business rules document about half a month ago for everybody to review and make comments on it. The business rules determine who is allowed to port, when they are allowed to port and what their restrictions are on porting. I cannot remember exactly what it says about post paid customers, but I know that they are allowed to port but then in some cases they may loose their balances if they have credits left on their accounts but they are still required to pay up the full amount even if they port over. There are some things that still need to be worked out between operators and the NCC on how it is going to work out. There would be allowances for postpaid or even prepaid customers to port back and forth, even if it is just to give them a timeline saying you can port before end of the month or before your billing cycle, but the operator cannot use that as a way to hold back customers from porting over. That is to say there is an allowance for postpaid customers to move over in the course of time.
Why Do You Think Interconnect Can Deliver?
We are partnering with the number one company in the world for number portability and we consider ourselves the number one company in Nigeria in interconnectivity which is a major requirement for number portability. With our history of work with all operators in Nigeria, we feel that we have the Nigerian knowledge and the qualifications for the local presence to provide number portability and with our partner, Telcordia that is a primary company as it relates to number portability around the world, we feel that together as a team we can definitely implement number portability. In all other countries Telcordia has provided number portability, they do so with a local partner that in most cases have never done it before and most of those partners do not even have the connections that we have at this time. We already have lots of infrastructure with the services that we interconnect, so adding on their knowledge and skills in number portability, we feel it is a more straight forward way and we can implement the service.
How Long Does the Porting Process Take?
The NCC requirement is that it should not take more than two days to port from one operator to the other and since most of the processes are automated, there should not be a problem with its being accomplished between those two days. The hardest part that you have to do is receive a SIM card from the operator after the process has been completed.
Envisaged Challenges
Our partners have done it in India; they have done it in other places that are not as straight forward as the UK or the United States, so they have some knowledge as far as the processes are concerned. Our duty is to gather information at the right time and from the right people to make sure we have the information we need to implement. On our part on the local side a lot of those challenges are being taken care of from our history in business.
However, we are doing a lot of communication with NCC and the operators informing them on regular basis on the steps and stages that we are. We have a project plan that says this day we are supposed to be here or there, this is the status of the plan, how far we have come, what have we accomplished? What problems are we facing?
Keeping the communication lines open between the stakeholders is an important thing that we are looking at and then our relationship with those other operators and other stakeholders is also very important. They have trust in us as they have done business with us for a while so it allows for things to go smoothly. Any time we have problems we can all meet together as stakeholders being the operators, ourselves as the implementation group and the NCC as the regulator to make sure that things are moving at the right pace.
Co-operation from Operators
We are getting cooperation from the operators but I will say education is key. Some operators do not want it to come while some operators want it to come just like any other thing out there, but the good thing is that NCC has said it is going to come. The key thing for us to do is to assist with the education of all Service providers who will be involved. Some may think that they will lose subscribers in this situation of number portability but there are ways to also gain subscribers from it. We are a neutral third party and we are not allowed to support any operator. . What we do is that we have general workshops and conferences with everybody, explain to them what the benefits of number portability are and how they can benefit from it. By such kind of education and support, it helps them know that Number Portability is to their advantage. Number Portability has been implemented within a short period of time in Ghana, South Africa and other places. It will not push anybody out of business but by education of the process and knowing the proper requirements, it will be implemented in a better way and the subscribers and operators will gain.
General News
Jumia Kicks Off December Holiday Sale, Bringing Festive Deals to Shoppers Nationwide

Jumia Nigeria has launched its highly anticipated December Holiday Sale, unlocking a wide range of festive deals and savings for shoppers across the country from December 2 to December 28.

This year’s campaign goes beyond seasonal discounts, introducing a special sub-series titled “Celebrate Naija / Naija is Game,” running from December 15 to January 18. The initiative spotlights uniquely Nigerian themes and experiences, infusing the holiday season with cultural relevance and local inspiration.
The December Holiday Sale delivers a compelling mix of value, quality, and discovery, featuring the popular 12 Days of Christmas promotions, exclusive Brand Days, and deep-discount Anchor Deals across multiple product categories.
Speaking on the campaign, Temidayo Ojo, Chief Executive Officer, Jumia Nigeria, said the sale reflects the platform’s commitment to meeting the evolving needs of Nigerian consumers.
“The December Holiday Sale is our way of helping Nigerians celebrate the season without compromise. Today’s shoppers are value-driven, they want quality, convenience, and affordability. This campaign brings all three together with festive deals that address real household needs and aspirations,” Ojo said.
He added that strong Black Friday momentum continues on the platform, offering customers extended savings opportunities throughout the festive period.
On the creative direction behind the campaign, Lere Awokoya, Chief Marketing Officer, Jumia Nigeria, noted that the 2025 holiday sale is rooted in everyday moments that matter to customers.
“This year’s campaign is built around the joy of giving and daily value. ‘Celebrate Naija’ brings that spirit to life through culturally relevant themes and surprises that resonate across regions and lifestyles. We’re excited for Nigerians to discover everything we’ve curated—from gifts and essentials to dream purchases,” Awokoya said.
Shoppers can access deals across key categories including electronics, home and kitchen, fashion, beauty and personal care, and everyday essentials, with seamless online price discovery supported by Jumia’s nationwide logistics network.
Extending beyond major urban centres, Jumia’s fulfilment and pick-up infrastructure ensures customers in secondary cities and peri-urban communities enjoy the same festive prices without additional travel costs, turning convenience into tangible value.
With thousands of deals going live throughout the season, customers can expect faster deliveries, extensive pick-up options, and transparent pricing, making holiday shopping simpler and more affordable nationwide.
General News
Dangote, Monopoly Power, and Political Economy of Failure

By Blaise Udunze
Nigeria’s refining crisis is one of the country’s most enduring economic contradictions. Africa’s largest crude oil producer, strategically located on the Atlantic coast and home to over 200 million people, has for decades depended on imported refined petroleum products. This illogicality has drained foreign exchange, weakened the naira, distorted investment incentives, and hollowed out state institutions. Instead of catalysing industrialisation, Nigeria’s oil wealth became a mechanism for capital flight, rent-seeking, and institutional decay.

Dangote
With the challenges surrounding the refining of crude oil, the establishment of Dangote Refinery signifies an important historic moment. The refinery promises to reduce fuel imports to a bare minimum, sustain foreign exchange growth, ensure there is constant fuel domestically, and strategically position Nigeria as a regional exporter of refined oil products if functioned at full capacity. Dangote Refinery symbolises what private capital, technology, and ambition can achieve in Africa following years of fuel queues, subsidy scandals, and global embarrassment.
Nigerians must have a rethink in the cause of celebration. Nigeria’s refining problem is not simply about capacity; it is about systems. Without addressing the policy failures and institutional weaknesses that made Dangote an exception rather than the rule, the country risks replacing one failure with another, this time cloaked in private-sector success.
For a fact, Nigeria desperately needs the emergence of Dangote refinery, and its success is in the national interest. Hence, this is not an argument against the Dangote Refinery. But history warns that structural failures are not solved by scale alone. Over the year, situations have shown that without competition and strong institutions, concentrated market power, whether public or private, can undermine price stability, energy security, and consumer welfare.
The Long Silence of Refinery Investments
Perhaps the most troubling question in Nigeria’s oil history is why none of the global oil majors like Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Total, or Agip has built a major refinery in Nigeria for over four decades. These companies operated profitably in Nigeria, extracted their crude, and sold refined products back to the country, yet never committed capital to domestic refining.
Over the period, it has been shown that policy incoherence has been the cause, not a matter of technical incapacity, such as price controls, resistant licensing processes, subsidy arrears, frequent regulatory changes, and political interference, which made refining an unattractive investment. Importation, by contrast, offered quick returns, lower political risk, and guaranteed margins, often backed by government subsidies.
Nigeria carelessly designed a system that rather rewarded importers and punished refiners. Dangote did not succeed because the system improved; he succeeded despite it. His refinery exists largely because of the concessions from the government, exceptional financial capacity, political access, and a willingness to absorb risks that institutions should ordinarily mitigate. This raises a deeper concern; when institutions fail, progress becomes dependent on extraordinary individuals rather than predictable systems.
The Tragedy of NNPC Refineries
If private investors stayed away, Nigeria’s state-owned refineries should have filled the gap. Instead, the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries became monuments to mismanagement. Records have shown that between 2010 and 2025, Nigeria reportedly wasted between $18 billion and $25 billion, over N11 trillion, just for Turn Around Maintenance and rehabilitation. Kaduna Refinery alone is estimated to have consumed over N2.2 trillion in a decade.
Despite these expenditures, output remained negligible. This was not merely a technical failure but a governance one. Contracts were poorly monitored, accountability was absent, and consequences were nonexistent. In functional systems, such outcomes trigger investigations, sanctions, and reforms. In Nigeria, the cycle simply repeated itself, eroding public trust and deepening dependence on imports.
Where Is BUA?
Dangote is not the only Nigerian conglomerate to announce refinery ambitions. In 2020, BUA Group unveiled plans for a 200,000-barrels-per-day refinery. Years later, progress remains unclear, timelines have shifted, and execution appears stalled.
This pattern is revealing. When multiple large investors struggle to translate plans into reality, the issue is not ambition but environment. Refinery projects in Nigeria appear viable only at a massive scale and with extraordinary political leverage. Smaller or mid-sized players are effectively crowded out, not by market forces, but by systemic dysfunction.
Policy Failure and the Singapore Comparison
Nigeria often aspires to emulate Singapore’s refining and petrochemical success. The comparison is instructive. Singapore has no crude oil, yet built one of the world’s most sophisticated refining hubs through consistent policy, investor protection, infrastructure planning, and regulatory certainty.
Nigeria chose a different path: price controls, subsidies, weak contract enforcement, and politically motivated policy reversals. Refineries became tools of patronage rather than productivity. Capital exited, infrastructure decayed, and import dependence deepened. The outcome was predictable.
The Cost of Import Dependence
For years, Nigeria spent billions of dollars annually importing petrol, diesel, and aviation fuel. This placed constant pressure on foreign reserves and the naira. Petrol subsidies alone were estimated at N4-N6 trillion per year, often exceeding national spending on health, education, or infrastructure.
Even after subsidy removal, legacy costs remain: distorted consumption patterns, weakened public finances, and entrenched interests built around importation. These interests did not disappear quietly.
Who Really Benefited from the Subsidy?
Although framed as pro-poor, fuel subsidies disproportionately benefited importers, traders, shipping firms, depot owners, financiers, and politically connected intermediaries. Smuggling across borders meant Nigerians subsidised fuel consumption in neighbouring countries.
Ordinary citizens received marginal relief at the pump but paid far more through inflation, deteriorating infrastructure, and underfunded public services. The subsidy system functioned less as social protection and more as elite redistribution.
The Traders’ Dilemma
Why did major fuel marketers like Oando invest in refineries abroad but not in Nigeria? Again, incentives explain behaviour. Importation offered faster returns, lower capital requirements, and political insulation. Domestic refining demanded long-term investment under unstable rules.
In an irrational system, rational actors optimise accordingly. Importation thrived not because it was efficient, but because policy made it so.
FDI and the Confidence Problem
Sustainable Foreign Direct Investment follows domestic confidence. When local investors, who best understand political and regulatory risks, avoid long-term industrial projects, foreign investors take note. Capital flows to environments with predictable pricing, rule of law, and policy consistency.
Nigeria’s challenge is not attracting speculative capital, but building conditions for patient, productive investment.
Dangote and the Monopoly Question
Dangote Refinery deserves credit. But scale brings power, and power demands oversight. If importers exit and no competing refineries emerge, Dangote could dominate refining, pricing, and supply. Nigeria’s experience with cement, where domestic production rose but prices soared due to limited competition, offers a cautionary tale.
Markets function best with competition. Without it, price manipulation, supply risks, and weakened energy security become real dangers, especially in countries with fragile regulatory institutions.
The Way Forward: Competition, Not Replacement
Nigeria does not need to weaken Dangote; it needs to multiply Dangotes. The goal should be a competitive refining ecosystem, not a replacement of a public monopoly with a private monopoly.
This requires transparent crude allocation, open access to pipelines and storage, fair pricing mechanisms, and strong antitrust enforcement. State refineries must either be professionally concessional or decisively restructured. Stalled projects like BUA’s should be unblocked, and modular refineries should be supported.
The Litmus Test
Nigeria’s refining crisis was decades in the making and cannot be solved by one refinery, however large. Dangote Refinery is a turning point, but only if embedded within systemic reform. Otherwise, Nigeria risks trading one form of dependency for another.
The true test is not whether Nigeria can refine fuel, but whether it can build fair, open, and resilient institutions that serve the public interest. In refining, as in democracy, excessive concentration of power is dangerous. Competition remains the strongest safeguard.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
General News
OAU, Baptist Day School Oluponna honour Akano with Distinguished Alumnus Awards

Mr. Tim Akano, renowned entrepreneur, technologist, and philanthropist, has been honoured with two Distinguished Alumnus Awards by Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) and Baptist Day School, Oluponna, in recognition of his outstanding contributions to education, mentorship, technology, innovation, and community development at large.

Both awards were conferred in November 2025, and this mark a significant milestone in Mr. Akano’s lifelong commitment to human capital development and social impact.
Mr. Akano, a 1983 graduate of Obafemi Awolowo University, was recognized by the university for his global impact in entrepreneurship, technology and innovation, as well as his sustained mentorship of students.
In 2023, he awarded 1,000 scholarships that was worth ₦60 million to OAU students for them to study Artificial Intelligence. Since then, he has consistently adopted five students from the Department of International Relations annually under his structured mentorship initiative.
In the same vein, at Baptist Day School, Oluponna, Mr. Akano received a historic honour as the first alumnus ever to be decorated with a Distinguished Alumnus Award since the school was established in the 1930s. During a recent visit to the school, Mr. Akano inspected several infrastructural projects financed by him through the Tim Akano Foundation three years ago.
These include the construction of a borehole, modern toilet facilities for teachers and pupils, and the erection of a perimeter fence and gate around the school which has prevented incessant disturbance of pupils by Fulani Herdsmen who previously engaged in reckless grazing within the school premises, polluted the environment with cow waste, and exposed the children to security risk. All these challenges have since become a thing of the past following the erection of the perimeter fence.
In addition, the School Principal recounted a tragic incident that occurred before the fence was built, when a nine-year-old pupil was kidnapped within the school premises and was never found. According to the Principal, the pupil had gone into a nearby bush to answer the call of nature, unaware that kidnappers were hiding there. Since the completion of the fence three years ago, no case of pupil kidnapping has been recorded in the school.
The principal further disclosed that the school has experienced a geometric increase in enrolment since Mr. Akano’s intervention. In 2025 alone, over 30 new pupils were enrolled. This is a trend that has been consistent over the past three years.
To further enhance safety and learning conditions, the Tim Akano Foundation pledged to provide a grass-cutting machine to maintain the expansive school compound, noting that the pupils are fragile and overgrown vegetation could expose them to snake bites. The Foundation also announced the adoption of 10 best graduating pupils, committing to sponsor their secondary school education.
Furthermore, in a move to motivate and support teachers, the Foundation introduced a monthly cash incentive for all teachers, aimed at complementing the modest government salaries. The November incentive was paid immediately, with assurances that the initiative would continue in perpetuity.
In a symbolic and emotional moment, Mr. Akano presented the pupils with the glazed copy of his Primary School Leaving Certificate, issued by Baptist Day School in 1975. All pupils were invited to hold the certificate as a powerful reminder that “if I can do it, you can do even more.” In appreciation, the school management presented Mr. Akano with the Distinguished Alumnus Award, celebrating his transformative impact on the institution and its pupils.
Similarly, at Obafemi Awolowo University, Mr. Akano was honoured with the Distinguished Alumnus Award for his sustained mentorship of students and his contributions to entrepreneurship development, technology, and innovation within Nigeria and the global community.
The double recognition underscores Mr. Tim Akano’s enduring legacy as a bridge between education, opportunity, and societal transformation.
General News3 days agoFirstCap Acts as Joint Issuing House on Veritasi Homes & Properties Plc’s ₦30 Billion Bond Programme
News3 days agoPalmPay Launches N400 Million World Travel Carnival, Rewarding Users with Free Global Trips
Telecom3 days agoQualcomm Completes Third Edition of Make in Africa Startup Mentorship Program
E-Business3 days agoNigeria Takes the Lead in the Global WSIS+20 Digital Agenda
Telecom3 days agoMastercard Expands Africa Acceptance Network by 45% in 2025, Driving Digital Economy Growth
Telecom3 days agoFynd Expands Global Footprint, Adds Africa With Surtee Group Partnership
Telecom3 days agoAI Meets Governance: Anambra Rolls Out SmartGov for Seamless Citizen Interaction
E-Business2 days agoNigeria Police Arrest Okitipi, Nigerian Allegedly Linked to Microsoft 365 Hack













