E-Business
Nigeria Needs Cyber security Office for Effective Coordination – Makatiani

William Makatiani, managing director, Serianu, recently visited Nigeria and spoke to chike Onwuegbuchi on cyber security issues
Africa is playing catch-up in cyber security
We are not prepared in Africa. The problem we have in Africa is that, we like to do easy things fast. Easy thing means deploy technology, some vendors will come and tell you this thing works in the US, put it in place and we put it in-place. The problem with that is you never get to look at security.
Security is complicated because there is local aspect around securing systems, most of our fraudsters live here, most of the banks that lose money are in Nigeria, in Ghana, in Kenya among others and those that perpetrate these frauds are within those environments. There is no way somebody will come from the US and secure it, that is the hard work. We need somebody to understand how these people are doing it.
Only locals can do it, those are the difficult things, implementation of the system is easier and those are the things we are focusing on.
When it comes to preparation we are not ready because we don’t have enough skills. Secondly, we are not ready because we are not collaborating. If you are Bank A and I’m Bank B, if you get compromised you keep quiet if it is insured you go get compensated and you will not tell Bank B and Bank B will get hit, it really empowering the hackers now they know they can get away with all these attacks.
Third issue is Malware- malicious software. We are not training our people well enough. You get an employee, an assistant to the chief executive officer, the CEO tells his assist if you get an email click on it, print it for me let me see what it is. Now, they are clicking on malicious links. Immediately they click they get Ransonware and get compromised and Ransonware takes over the network as you are looking at that our curriculum in the universities are old.
There is no single individual that can come from our traditional university that will be able to get into cyber security field without additional preparation.
We have those gaps. When you think of where we are headed and we need to ask ourselves how do we address it?
Our board members does not understand technology, if you tell them about the safe, that somebody is getting into the safe they will understand, but the safe is no longer save. The database is the new safe, if a board member cannot understand that Oracle database is the new safe there is pretty much they can be able to secure, so if I tell them I want to secure Oracle database, they will say last year we bought a router this year we have bought a firewall why are we buying something new? They will say no, but the padlock we bought for the safe last year was good but has gone out of the market we need a new padlock, that padlock will cover our database which is Oracle. This is the language we need to get to our board members.
The language technical people are taking to board members and senior managers is out dated, you cannot talk technology to somebody who spend his time playing golf or somebody who spends his time looking at financial statements you need to come up with something that is comparative.
From a typical corporate perspective the question is how do we change? If you come to global cyber security problem you have three steps.
First is, understanding what is happening; second is attributing it to an individual and third is how do we stop that individual?
In understanding in Africa, we are trying our best but we are 20 per cent, this has to do with deploying of technology to understand what is going on in the network. When it comes to attribution we are poor just 2 per cent , there is no single attack that has be successful being attributed very few, because these individuals came out and say it happened like this or this is what led to this or that.
If it comes to attribution of attacks happening in different countries in Africa it is not easy to attribute it to somebody, attribution is a challenge.
Deterrent requires law enforcement and it is where we are really struggling. Law enforcement agents are not working together you find judiciary, national intelligence or Army, they don’t know how to coordinate this issue of cyber security so that they can be able to attribute most of the bigger attacks to somebody. That is the biggest cyber security problem and that is where we are facing challenge.

Issues of lack of collaboration
The reason why there isn’t much collaboration is because of fear. For instance, with the private sector such as banks there is this fear that customers will run away, we don’t want people to know they have stolen from me, it is an African problem. Africans we don’t want sharing our things in public.
We have to move beyond where we are and only regulation will force people to talk to each other. If you get compromised, it is okay. It is normal let us know so that we allow other people to learn from that experience. That is the key.
Most of these law enforcement officials don’t coordinate because some of them don’t know. We also need to be very clear in terms of who is responsible for what, if you are an investigation agency, we need to know where you start and where you stop. If you are in national intelligence services, you need to help us develop intelligence on why banks are getting attacked, who is attacking and who is benefit from these money that is where you start and ones you get it you empower the police who are going out to investigate some of these crimes so that they can be able to be addressed.
If you are in the army you need to have intelligence to know if it is a state problem, if the hackers are coming from Ghana, Ukrane, Ruwanda or Kenya, you need to look at that and say how do we coordinate this? And then empower the prosecution and the judges so that they can make a clear case of what is going on when and how. That is the type of collaboration we need.
Impact of different regulatory agencies in the fight against cyber crime
If you have a cyber-security office which in Nigeria is lacking, this will have an incumbent who is responsible for cyber security policy in the country like we are seeing in the UK, South Africa among others, where you have office of the cyber security incumbent who could coordinate all these issues.
It can become a problem if it is political, he can’t do much. That is why it is allowed to run just like Attorney general.
The biggest problem with cyber security office depends on where it sits. For countries where it is located in the judiciary it works very well, because the whole idea is to be able to oppressionalize the security laws and if it is located under the attorney general it works very well. If you move it into ICT ministry it fails, if you move it into NIS or national security Agency it fails.
Cyber security law
Cyber security changes very fast, four years ago we didn’t know about Ransomeware, we didn’t know about cryptomining, cryptomining is a biggest thing now. What we see across the world is instead of us to focus on technology, we focus on particulars of crimes which means at the end of the day it is fraud, unauthorised access, there is sabotage and those were the results of somebody coming in and compromising in an environment.
Most of our laws are copy and paste especially from Malaysia, Singerpole. We copy our laws from those countries across Africa and if you look at the laws we have in place, they focus a lot on tools and techniques and that is what is out-dated.
The tools, techniques and processes of attacking have changed. We have to change from focusing so much on tools, techniques and processes and focus on fraud say somebody did A,B,C,D whichever way they did it, it is still a fraud.
Criminals 100 years ago were interested in stealing money, information about you, interested in making sure you don’t move, it is the same thing today. Criminal are interested in stealing money from banks, making sure you don’t provide service, interested in stealing Intellectual Property (IP) or private data. In terms of motive they have not changed, intentions have not changed and therefore we have to build flexible laws that address motives, intensions and the principles of what the laws are trying to achieve to deter.
Building Cyber security Skills in Organisations to Fight Cyber-attacks
If I were an ambitious leader, I will cancel quite a number of technology programmes in our curriculum, they are wasting time. Get in touch with the industry, get some professional from other countries, look at the areas of artificial intelligent, analytics, look at the areas of cyber security build practical programmes.
Start with forcing graduates to do one to two year programme where they learn practical, set up research foundations behind these new technologies, because if you don’t do it now, even smaller countries like Rwanda, Botswana Mauritius will be more powerful than bigger countries like even South Africa, Nigeria. In some of these areas, the problem is to start early.
Number one thing is to change the curriculum, the curriculum we have now is useless. Yes, it builds the people to the level where you can convert them, but it doesn’t build the curiosity to continue building your capability into analytics crypto. If you look at the curriculums of those in the United States, UK and Europe even Rwanda and Mauritius you now see the embedding of these new technologies and new media. First of all you have to start with that.
Number two, it is unfortunate the tools most of the professional we have in the market place are bringing are out-dated. The days of sitting somewhere looking at risk on huge template are gone, if you are going to lose money you lose money through the payment system, through a card or fund and risks starts there. And you fall back who is likely to do it? That has changed, now employees need to change, they don’t need to sit down in class, but they need to look at what they are doing, what is changing in the industry and then retrain in terms of approach.
E-Business
Kaspersky Reports 15% Growth in Malicious email Attacks in 2025

According to Kaspersky telemetry, almost every second email – 44.99% of global traffic – was spam in 2025. Spam consists not only of unsolicited emails, but can also include various email threats such as scam, phishing and malware.

In 2025, individuals and corporate users encountered over 144 million malicious and potentially unwanted email attachments, representing a 15% increase compared to the previous year figures.
In 2025, APAC had the largest share of email antivirus detections: it reached 30%, followed by Europe with 21%. Next came Latin America (16%) and the Middle East (15%), Russia and CIS (12%) and Africa (6%). As for individual countries, China had the highest rate of malicious and potentially unwanted email attachments, with the share of email antivirus detections of 14%. Russia ranked second (11%), followed by Mexico (8%), Spain (8%) and Turkey (5%).
Email antivirus detections peaked moderately in June, July and November.
Key trends in email spam and phishing
Kaspersky’s annual analysis has also identified several persistent trends in the email spam and phishing threat landscape that are expected to continue into 2026:
- Combination of various communication channels. Attackers lure email users into switching to messengers or calling fraudulent phone numbers. For instance, scam investment mailings may redirect victims to fake websites, where they are asked to provide their contact information, and then cybercriminals will follow up with a phone call.
- Usage of diverse evasion techniques in phishing and malicious emails. Threat actors frequently try to disguise phishing URLs, for example, with the help of link protection services and QR codes. These QR codes are often embedded directly in email bodies or within PDF attachments, which not only conceals phishing links but also encourages users to scan them on mobile devices, potentially exploiting weaker security measures than corporate PCs.
- Mailings exploiting diverse legitimate platforms. For example, Kaspersky experts discovered a fraudulent tactic that abuses OpenAI’s organisation creation and team invitation features to send spam emails from legitimate OpenAI addresses, potentially tricking users into clicking scam links or dialing fraudulent phone numbers. Additionally, a calendar-based phishing scheme, which originated in the late 2010s, resurfaced last year with a focus on corporate users.
- Refining tactics in business email compromise (BEC) attacks. In 2025 attackers attempted to become even more persuasive by incorporating fake forwarded emails into their correspondence. These emails lacked thread-index headers or other headers, making it difficult to verify their legitimacy within an email conversation.
“Email phishing shouldn’t be underestimated. Our report reveals that one in ten business attacks starts with phishing, with a significant proportion being Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). In 2025, we saw an increase in the sophistication of targeted email attacks. Even the smallest details are meticulously crafted in these malicious campaigns, including the composition of sender addresses and the tailoring of content to real corporate events and processes.
“The commodification of generative AI has significantly amplified this threat, enabling attackers to craft convincing, personalised phishing messages at scale with minimal effort, automatically adapting tone, language and context to specific targets,” comments Roman Dedenok, anti-spam expert at Kaspersky.
E-Business
Cybersafe Foundation Partners Google to Strengthen Cybersecurity Among CCIs in Africa

The Cybersafe Foundation has collaborated with Google in strengthening cybersecurity resilience among Critical Community Institutions across Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana and South Africa with the launch of Resilio Africa.

Speaking at the event in Lagos, Confidence Staveley, Executive Director of the Cybersafe Foundation, noted that while many organizations recognize the risks posed by cyber threats, conversations often stall when it comes to implementation.
“Across Africa, Critical Community Institutions are facing an increase in cyberattacks often without the capacity to defend themselves. Sub-Saharan Africa is now experiencing some of the most aggressive cyber activity globally. According to a threat report by Kaspersky, the region recorded over 42 million web attacks and 95 million malware-based, on-device attacks in just the first half of 2025.
“What’s especially concerning is the nature of these attacks: spyware, password stealers, and backdoor tools dominate, with password-stealing malware increasing by more than 60%.
“In East Africa, the scale is even more stark. Kenya alone recorded 2.5 billion cyber-threat events in Q1 2025, driven largely by phishing, mobile money fraud, and misconfigured cloud services,” she stated.
According to her, the primary barrier is not a lack of willingness but limited financial capacity to fund adequate cybersecurity measures.
“The conversation drops off at the point of taking action,” she said, explaining that many institutions lack the budgets required to implement robust security systems.

She disclosed that the programme’s provision of 10,000 hours of expert cybersecurity consultation—offered at no cost to participating institutions would ordinarily represent services valued at over one million dollars. The support, funded through a grant from Google.org, will be delivered by specialists across four participating countries.
Staveley reaffirmed that the Cybersafe Foundation remains a non-profit organization focused on supporting vulnerable communities and institutions, and described Resilio Africa as a strategic intervention aimed at strengthening digital trust across the continent, ensuring that commerce and essential public services can operate securely in an increasingly digital society.
Although the programme currently covers Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana and South Africa, Staveley acknowledged that the cybersecurity challenges extend far beyond those countries, and expressed hope that demonstrated impact from the initial phase would attract additional funding to scale the initiative to more than the 200 critical community institutions currently targeted, including underserved Francophone nations.
“This work is free to the organizations we serve, but it is not free to deliver,” she noted, underscoring the need for sustainable funding.
Explaining her personal motivation, Staveley said she views Africa’s cybersecurity challenges as opportunities for impact. Despite her engagements on global platforms, she emphasized her commitment to Nigeria and the broader African continent, describing the region as both home and a priority.
She pointed to a growing mismatch between rising cyber threats and limited investment in cybersecurity infrastructure, arguing that bridging this gap is central to the Foundation’s mission.
Staveley also clarified that Resilio Africa will not collect or own user data from participating institutions. Instead, the programme will focus on strengthening internal controls, building capacity and guiding organizations toward improved data protection practices.
With Resilio Africa now underway, the Cybersafe Foundation aims to demonstrate how targeted support for critical community institutions can enhance digital security and build long-term resilience across Africa’s rapidly expanding digital economy.
E-Business
Kaspersky Brings more Transparency to Threat Detection with New Hunt Hub

Kaspersky has announced a major update to its Threat Intelligence Portal (TIP), introducing a new Hunt Hub section alongside an enhanced MITRE ATT&CK coverage map and a significantly expanded vulnerabilities database.

The update strengthens organisations’ ability to investigate threats, understand adversary behaviour, and proactively monitor the most relevant risks across their environments.
According to the Kaspersky Security Bulletin 2025 report, Kaspersky’s detection systems discovered an average of 500,000 malicious files per day in 2025, marking a 7% increase compared to the previous year. As cyberattacks become more sophisticated and frequent, security teams need more than alerts – they need clarity.
The newly launched Hunt Hub is designed to address growing market demand for greater transparency and deeper insight into how modern detection technologies work. Integrated into the Threat Landscape section of the Threat Intelligence Portal, Hunt Hub provides centralised access to Kaspersky’s threat hunting expertise and detection knowledge.
Hunt Hub includes Kaspersky Next EDR Expert hunts, also known as indicators of attack (IoA) or detection rules. All portal users can explore the catalogue of hunts and their descriptions, while Kaspersky Next EDR Expert customers gain extended access to detailed recommendations and detection logic presented in a convenient, SIGMA-like format. Each hunt is mapped to relevant MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques and linked to known threat actors, giving analysts clear context behind every detection.
By making detection logic visible and structured, Hunt Hub effectively removes the “black box” from threat detection. It allows security teams not only to respond to alerts, but also to understand why a detection was triggered and which threat it is designed to uncover – improving trust in security technologies and increasing the efficiency of threat investigation processes.
As part of the update, the MITRE ATT&CK coverage map within the Threat Landscape has been significantly enhanced. The portal now brings together product coverage across SIEM, EDR, NDR and Sandbox solutions, MITRE ATT&CK techniques with scoring, coverage percentages, and related Kaspersky Next EDR Expert hunts in a single, unified view. This enables organisations to assess how well their security stack covers relevant attack techniques and identify potential gaps in protection.
The Vulnerabilities section has also been expanded, with the CVE database now covering nearly 300,000 vulnerabilities. In addition, the portal provides more detailed information on vulnerabilities that have been exploited in real-world attacks, helping organisations prioritise remediation efforts based on actual threat activity.
“With the launch of Hunt Hub in the Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal, we are opening up our detection expertise and giving analysts clear visibility into how and why threats are detected. This transparency helps organisations move from reactive alert handling to informed threat hunting and proactive risk management,” comments Nikita Nazarov, Head of Threat Exploration at Kaspersky.
Telecom2 days agoInside Nigeria’s Telecom Exploitation Crisis Draining Household Budgets
News2 days agoNITDA Supports CAC AI Driven Transformation
Telecom2 days agoSophos Expands AI Capabilities with Arco Cyber Acquisition
News2 days agoCAC Pushes Single National Register to Curb Corruption Loopholes
News2 days agoU.S. Slams Nigerians: Overstays Jeopardize All Visas
News2 days agoNAFDAC Seizes N3Bn Fake Malaria Drugs, Cosmetics in Lagos Raid
E-Business2 days agoKaspersky Gives Advice on How to Make AI for Children Safer @ Safer Internet Day
General News3 days agoPalmPay Celebrates Valentine with #LoveWithPalmPay Campaign















