Connect with us

News

Outcry over Bill Seeking Death Penalty for Hate Speech

Published

on

Kindly share this post

A bill that seeks death penalty and the establishment of an agency to check hate speech, has sparked varied assortments of condemnations from Nigerians with some describing it as draconian

 

The National Commission for the Prohibition of Hate Speeches (Estb., etc) Bill 2019, is a bill seeking death by hanging for anyone found guilty of any form of hate speech that results in the death of another person.

 

Under the proposed law, offenders are also either liable to 10 years jail term or payment of N10m fine.

 

An offender, according to the bill is, “a person who uses, publishes, presents, produces, plays, provides, distributes and/or directs the performance of any material, written and or visual.

 

The bill sponsored by , Sabi Abdullahi, a former Senate spokesperson, who is now the deputy Senate Whip, had suffered a setback for some unknown reasons.

 

But in a new development, the bill was on Tuesday, November 12, read for the first time at the senate.

 

It stated that such individuals had committed an offence if they intended  to stir up ethnic hatred, or having regard to all the circumstances, ethnic hatred is likely to be stirred up against any person or persons from such an ethnic group in Nigeria.

 

“Any person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable to life imprisonment and where the act causes any loss of life,  the person shall be punished with death by hanging,” it added.

 

Offenders liable to a 10-year jail term or that risk N10m fine are those who stir ethnic hatred by their speeches.

 

The bill states, “In this section (3), ethnic hatred means hatred against a group of persons from any ethical group indigenous to Nigeria.

 

“A person subjects another to harassment on the basis of ethnicity for the purposes of this section where on ethnic grounds, he justifiably engages in a conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating that other person’s dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for the person subjected to the harassment.

 

“Conduct shall be regarded as having the effect specified in subsection (1) (a) or (b) of this section if, having regard to all circumstances, including in particular the perception of that  person.

 

“A person who subjects another to harassment on the basis of ethnicity commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to an imprisonment for a term not less than 10 years, or to a fine of not less than N10m, or to both.

 

“Any person who knowingly utters words to incite feelings of contempt, hatred, hostility, violence or discrimination against any person, group or community on the basis of ethnicity or race, commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not less than five years, or to a fine of not less than N10m or to both.

 

“A person victimises another if in any circumstance relevant for the purpose of this Act, the person does any act that is injurious to the wellbeing and esteem of another person by  treating the person to less favourably than, in those circumstances.”

 

The bill added that,  where the  offenders are a corporate organisation, every director, trustee and officer of that body corporate shall also be deemed to be guilty of the offence.

 

In a swift reaction, Mr Raphael Adebayo, convener, Free Nigeria Movement, said his organisation would mobilise Nigerians to resist the proposed anti-hate speech bill.

 

The activist described the planned anti-hate speech commission as an attempt to muzzle Nigerians and deprive the citizens of their rights.

 

Adedayo admonished Nigerians to rise up and oppose the bill, which he said was designed to take way the people’s liberty and constitutional rights, adding that the nation could not allow the National Assembly to pass “this tyrannical legislation.”

 

Also,  former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar, on Tuesday said  the bill was an abuse of the legislative process, adding  that it would violate Nigerians’ constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech.

 

He said in a statement by his Media Adviser, Mr. Paul Ibe, that it was prudent to build upon the tolerance inherited from those years and not shrink the democratic space to satisfy personal and group interests.

 

He said, “Atiku  wishes to sound a note of caution to those now toying with the idea of an anti-hate Speech Bill, with punishment for supposed hate speech to be death by hanging. The contemplation of such laws is in itself not just hate speech, but an abuse of the legislative process that will violate Nigerians’ constitutionally guaranteed right to Freedom of Speech.

 

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) said  that the newly introduced bill could not be justified in a democracy.

 

The association, in a statement sent to The PUNCH by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Kunle Edun, on Tuesday, cautioned the Senate to “tread carefully” with the bill.

 

It also reminded the Senate that section 39(3) of the Constitution had made it mandatory that no law could abrogate the rights of Nigerians to exercise their right to freedom of speech.

 

It stated, “We therefore, strongly advise that the Senate should tread carefully on this bill.

 

“Section 39(3) of the Constitution makes it mandatory that no law can abrogate the rights of Nigerians to exercise their right to freedom of speech except if such law can be reasonably justified in a democratic society. “Can a Hate Bill be reasonably justified in a democratic society?”

 

The NBA said with the nation already grappling with wanton arrest and prosecution of citizens from treasonable felony after expressing their opinions, there might not be any guarantee that the bill when signed into law would not be used to harass those  exercising their right to free speech.

 

It noted that while the right to freedom of expression was not absolute, there were enough laws in Nigeria to tackle the excesses, implying that there was no need for the proposed law.

 

Also, Chief Ifedayo Adedipe, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, condemned the bill and called on Nigerians to resist it. The SAN described the bill as an extension of rights abuses under the All Progressives Congress  government.

 


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

News

Cybervergent Expands to Three New Markets

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Cybervergent has launched version 3.0 of its artificial intelligence (AI)-native posture management platform and expanded operations into Kenya, Ghana, and SA.

The move, according to the company, introduces automated risk verification for enterprises and aims to position Africa as a force in digital governance technology.

It goes on to say the latest platform upgrade introduces continuous posture management, replacing traditional point-in-time governance, risk, and compliance reporting with real-time verification systems.

An AI engine independently verifies 99.9% of audit and monitoring findings before they appear on enterprise dashboards, according to Cybervergent.

It says risk management, compliance, audit, and data security operations are integrated into a unified system built for cloud and on-premise environments.

According to  Cybervergent, the platform maps more than 4 500 controls across frameworks, including the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA), International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 27001, and System and Organisation Controls (SOC) 2.

Cybervergent says the rollout of its first South African customer validates the platform’s readiness for highly regulated enterprise markets and strengthens its expansion strategy across Africa’s leading technology and financial hubs.

The company is also adopting a channel-first deployment model, working with local partners and system integrators in Lagos, Accra and Johannesburg to scale verified security infrastructure for enterprises navigating increasingly complex regulatory demands.

“We built verification into the architecture,” said Ayomide Daniels, co-founder and chief scientist at Cybervergent. “If a finding is not traceable back to source documentation, it does not reach the dashboard.”

Cybervergent rebranded from Infoprivacy in late 2023 to reflect its shift towards AI-automated cybersecurity.

The start-up previously focused on data privacy compliance in the West African market before pivoting to its current integrated posture management model.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

FG Bans Honorary Degree Holders from Using ‘Dr’ Title, Warns of Academic Fraud

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Federal Government has directed recipients of honorary doctorate degrees to stop using the title “Dr.” before their names, as part of efforts to protect the integrity of academic qualifications and curb the misuse of honorary awards.

FG Bans Honorary Degree Holders from Using ‘Dr’ Title, Warns of Academic Fraud

Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa

Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, announced the directive after the approval of the new policy by the Federal Executive Council (FEC).

Alausa said the measure was necessary to address the growing abuse, commercialisation and politicisation of honorary degrees in some tertiary institutions across the country.

He explained that honorary doctorates are symbolic recognitions of outstanding contributions to society and do not equate to earned academic qualifications obtained through rigorous study, research and examination.

“Recipients of honorary doctorate degrees are not entitled to use the title ‘Dr.’ as a prefix to their names in official, professional or academic engagements,” he said.

According to the minister, awardees may instead indicate the honorary distinction after their names using formats such as D.Litt (Honoris Causa), LL.D (Honoris Causa) or other approved honorary designations.

Under the revised policy, only universities with active doctoral programmes will be permitted to confer honorary doctorate awards.

The government also restricted recognised honorary awards to four categories: Doctor of Laws (LL.D), Doctor of Letters (D.Litt), Doctor of Science (D.Sc), and Doctor of Humanities (D.Arts).

In addition, all honorary degree certificates must clearly carry inscriptions such as “Honorary” or “Honoris Causa” to distinguish them from earned academic degrees.

The minister warned universities against indiscriminate conferment of honorary degrees, noting that institutions found violating the directive would face sanctions from the National Universities Commission and the Federal Ministry of Education.

He said the policy was part of broader reforms aimed at restoring credibility to Nigeria’s higher education system and ensuring academic titles are not misrepresented for personal, political or financial gains.

Observers say the development could reshape the long-standing culture where public office holders, business executives and celebrities often adopt the “Dr.” title after receiving honorary awards.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Africa Fintech Revenues to Hit $65 billion by 2030 – Report

Published

on

Kindly share this post

African fintech revenues are projected to expand 13-fold to approximately $65 billion by 2030, marking the continent as the world’s fastest-growing digital finance market.

The “Beyond Payments: Unlocking Africa’s Second FinTech Wave ” report, released by Boston Consulting Group at the Inclusive FinTech Forum in Kigali, indicates the sector is shifting from transactional inclusion to scalable, infrastructure-driven systems.

While Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 74% of global mobile money volume, more than 50% of lending still occurs through informal channels, representing a massive gap for B2B payments and data-driven underwriting.

The opportunity now is to convert scale into sustained, institutional-grade growth, says the report. Markets offering regulatory clarity and interoperable infrastructure are becoming increasingly attractive to long-term capital.

Rwanda is highlighted as an example of deliberate institutional coordination that lowers the cost to scale for financial institutions.

Forward-looking regulation and the License Passporting Memorandum of Understanding between Rwanda and Kenya are cited as practical steps toward easing regional expansion.

Financial centres like the Kigali International Financial Centre play a critical role in this next phase by reducing uncertainty for banks and investors.

By combining regulatory clarity and Pan-African integration, they reduce uncertainty for banks, fintechs, and investors, and help position markets as credible, long-term investment destinations.

Africa’s next fintech phase will be led by financial institutions, the report notes. It goes on to say banks and regulated entities are becoming the primary customers of digital financial infrastructure, demanding platforms that align with their risk frameworks.

The report identifies five institutional priorities to sustain momentum: interoperable infrastructure, data-driven credit, regulatory coherence, trust, and resilience.

Building seamless wallet-to-bank integration will enable more efficient value movement, while transforming transaction data into AI-enabled underwriting models will help bridge the gap in SME lending.

Proportional licensing frameworks and predictable supervisory practices will lower the cost to scale for innovators. Furthermore, expanding cybersecurity capabilities will ensure the ecosystem remains reliable as digital usage grows.

Africa has demonstrated that fintech scale is achievable, and the next decade will be shaped by those markets that strengthen their institutional foundations, the report concludes.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending