Telecom
Adapt or Die: Nigeria’s Telecoms Sector’s Chance at Survival Amid Economic Turmoil

By Dr. Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun
When the Global Systems for Mobile Communications (GSM) was first introduced into the Nigerian market in 2001, the acquisition of a cellular device swiftly became a badge of distinction, signifying one’s immersion in the technological revolution of the 21st century.

Dr. Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun
The devices became the exclusive purview and financial burden of the elite, relegating many middle-class households to sharing a solitary device among its members. It was expected.
The cost of procuring a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) hovered between N40,000 to N50,000 (about $384 to $480 at the time), while iconic models such as the NOKIA 3310 and Samsung series commanded prices exceeding N80,000 (about $769) to over N100,000 (about $961). At inception, networks operated within the 900 and 1800 MHz spectrum with a billing structure set at about N50 per minute, until the introduction of the per-second billing system. As such, barely 10% of the country’s 125-million population could afford to own a device with regular credit recharge.
But before the arrival of such devices with an unattainable luxury status for the economically disadvantaged, Nigerians had long grappled with problematic services from the oft-maligned Nigerian Telecommunications Limited (NITEL). Until 2001, NITEL’s 16-year operation was plagued with citizen discontent over poor management as it maintained monopoly over Nigeria’s telecommunications and data services. The arrival of GSM — spearheaded by MTN, Econet (now Airtel) and MTEL months apart in 2001, and Globacom two years later in 2003 — to relieve the troubled service provider, therefore, changed everything.
In mobile phone accessibility and internet service affordability progress since that time, the numbers have been staggering. By 2022, two decades after GSM introduction, more than 222 million mobile phone subscribers existed in Nigeria according to the Nigerian Bureau of Statistics and the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), out of which over 215 million were active. The projections for the future are just as phenomenal. A steady surge in smartphone adoption is expected across the country from 2024 to 2029, with the user base estimated to reach a new peak in the next five years.
Network subscriptions are also at the lowest they have ever been. Mobile data subscriptions in Nigeria, today, are available for as low as N25 while call rates go as low as 9 kobo per second. However, considering Nigeria’s frail economic climate in recent years, providing affordable services to citizens while maintaining high-standard infrastructure presents the greatest challenge for the telecommunications industry and operators in the country.
Nigeria’s economy has experienced two major recessions over the last 10 years and currently faces one of its most difficult periods of uncertainty. Recent market conditions and currency devaluation have plunged the value of the Naira in the foreign exchange market, resulting in skyrocketed prices of commodities. Unfortunately, the telecommunications sector, which contributes approximately 16% to Nigeria’s GDP, is, like other sectors, not immune to the profound repercussions of the prevailing economic upheavals.
The telecoms industry, like many others in the country, is heavily reliant on foreign exchange (FX) for the procurement of essential equipment, infrastructure, and technology. With a significant portion of telecom equipment and services being imported from foreign markets, fluctuations in currency exchange rates directly impact the cost of operations for industry players. As the value of the Naira fluctuates against major currencies such as the US Dollar and Euro, the cost of procuring equipment and services denominated in foreign currencies escalates, placing immense strain on the financial resources of telecom companies.
Mobile network operators in the telecommunications sector, whose tariffs are rigorously regulated by the NCC, therefore, face a dilemma in balancing investments towards sustaining quality and affordable services for their vast subscriber base with their goal of achieving profitability. For a sector battling various environmental and infrastructural impediments including frequent fibre cuts due to road construction and vandalism, right-of-way challenges, and exploitative rent-seeking practices, maintaining operational efficiency amidst prevalent economic adversities become increasingly daunting.
None of these existing challenges are alien to industry regulators and stakeholders. Operators’ advocacy for critical infrastructure protection in the ICT/telecommunications sector in recent years has especially served as a striking illustration of a cry for proactive actions to curtail the profound financial impact of such obstacles on its operations. Yet, while these challenges persist, mobile network operators have remained unflinching in their commitments to ensuring seamless connectivity, service reliability, and pricing affordability for their subscribers.
Despite Nigeria’s headline inflation rate surging to a 27-year peak of 29.9% in December 2023 and reaching 33.2% in March 2024, the telecoms industry, compared to other sectors adeptly adapting to Nigeria’s changing market conditions, continues to find itself traversing the intricate terrain of regulatory compliance and financial viability. In the mobile market which maintains a strong connection to the telecoms sector, for instance, prices of mobile phones, today, have nearly doubled to reflect the rising cost of production and import, while call and data tariffs largely remain the same they have been for over a decade.
A similar rise in cost has been evident in food prices which increased to over 30% in February, impacting the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. The sector has since adjusted, with FMCG corporations including brewing companies increasing product prices in tandem with the high cost of raw materials and production. Companies in other sectors providing domestic consumer needs, such as Pay TV companies and Discos, have also duly followed suit by conducting price reviews in recent times.
While these price adjustments may be inconvenient for consumers due to limited purchasing power, they are more than necessary for businesses to continue to meet demands, deliver value to shareholders, and contribute significantly to the Nigerian economy.
It is especially pivotal to recognise the broader socio-economic implications for Nigeria if the telecoms sector sticks with its pricing plans as other sectors adapt. The industry is reputable for its crucial role in driving economic growth, creating employment opportunities, and improving digital inclusion efforts across the country.
Notably, over 15,000 people have been directly employed by licensees in Nigeria’s $75.6 billion telecoms sector, according to a December 2022 report by the NCC. Also, as of second quarter 2023, the Information and Telecommunications industry ranked highly among activity sectors contributing the most to the country’s GDP. Not least of mobile service providers’ critical contributions to socio-economic issues is their position at the forefront of Nigeria’s digital inclusion ambitions, which sees them providing more than 83 million citizens with the opportunity to benefit from prompt information access and exchange necessary for increased social and business productivity.
A lack of adjustments within the sector amidst FX-dependent pressures and rising inflation will indubitably pose a threat to these transformative indicators in the next few years. When telecom companies struggle to maintain and expand their infrastructure, there are higher chances of network congestion, dropped calls, and slow internet speeds that can undermine productivity, hinder business operations, and diminish the overall quality of communication services. Operators’ ability to invest in infrastructure upgrades, network expansion, and technological advancements could be significantly hampered, significantly impacting coverage and service quality.
They can’t afford to test consumers’ patience in this regard.
Quality of Service (QoS) in the sector is, indeed, deemed non-negotiable among consumers. Regardless of any situation within or beyond their control, operators are expected to uphold high standards of service delivery to remain competitive and retain customer loyalty, and any compromise can have far-reaching consequences. But maintaining and improving on progress made thus far in the sector would be impossible without access to adequate financial resources for further investments. It is, as such, a critical time to employ new adaptive strategies for the sector to achieve profitability and survive in an increasingly competitive landscape.
Operators such as MTN Nigeria, Airtel, Globacom, and 9Mobile have commendably demonstrated an understanding of the grim economic situation’s impact on citizens’ spending power by adhering to regulators’ rules and showing restraint in pushing for higher charges. However, their display of empathy may prove to be their Achilles’ heel in a brutal business and economic climate. Therefore, the review of tariffs to reflect new economic realities, despite regulators’ reluctance, may be long overdue.
At this critical juncture, the onus is on regulators to ensure that consumers are adequately informed about the imperative need for an upward revision of tariffs to secure the industry’s survival. This revision would provide crucial funding for network infrastructure upgrades, necessary for the continued delivery of services.
A measured review of current tariffs, with pricing plans that are adaptive and responsive to the evolving business and economic climate, would enable the industry to mitigate potential socio-economic and business risks. However, regulators must strike a delicate balance between consumer protection and the sustainability of the telecom industry.
The telcos have expressed their readiness to collaborate with regulators on reasonable adjustments in call and data tariffs to mitigate the cost of running their networks. As the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) recently stated, “For a fully liberalized and deregulated sector, the current price control mechanism, which is not aligned with economic realities, threatens the industry’s sustainability and can erode investors’ confidence.”
As economic pressures on the sector intensify, telcos hope that their concerns will be understood, and urgent action taken to ensure their continued capacity to offer improved services, before the damaging impact of inaction becomes more pronounced than imagined.
Dr. Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun serves as a lecturer and SDG 4 Cluster Team Lead at Landmark University’s Department of Computer Science. Additionally, she holds the position of Multimedia Engineering and AI Researcher at Kaunas University of Technology in Kaunas, Lithuania.
Telecom
ALTON Urges Urgent Resolution of Regulatory Dispute over Airtime Loans

Association of Licensed Telecoms Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), has called for urgent resolution of the regulatory dispute affecting the airtime credit market, warning that continued disruption could harm millions of Nigerians and undermine investor confidence.

Gbenga Adebayo, chairman, ALTON, in a statement on Tuesday, said the situation goes beyond a disagreement between regulators, describing it as a critical test of the country’s regulatory credibility.
“What is happening in the airtime credit market is not simply a dispute between regulators. It is a test of whether the structures that underpin business confidence in this country are functioning as they should.
“Court orders have been issued, businesses hold valid licences, and consumers are still being affected. We believe all parties have a responsibility to bring this to an orderly resolution,” he said.
The dispute stems from overlapping regulatory claims between the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) over the control of airtime credit and Value Added Services.
According to Adebayo, interims injunctions by Federal High Courts in Lagos and Abuja had restrained interference in the operations of licensed providers, including Nairtime Nigeria Limited and members of the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria.
However, the continued disruption of services despite subsisting court orders has raised concerns across the telecom industry.
ALTON maintained that the regulatory framework for licensed Value Added Service providers falls under the NCC, warning that unresolved jurisdictional overlap is driving uncertainty in the market.
Adebayo said the association had earlier flagged the issue to the NCC, noting that conflicting regulations risk undermining both legal clarity and commercial stability.
He stressed that the impact of the disruption is being felt most by ordinary Nigerians who rely on airtime credit as a financial lifeline.
“These are not abstract figures. Behind every naira in that market is a Nigerian who cannot go to a bank and get a loan. Airtime credit is how they bridge the gap.“When the service goes dark, they feel it immediately,” Adebayo said.
He added that the market, estimated to be worth between ₦300 billion and ₦400 billion annually, plays a critical role for traders, artisans and small-scale entrepreneurs who depend on short-term credit for daily transactions.
On investor sentiment, Adebayo warned that uncertainty in regulatory coordination could discourage long-term investment in Nigeria’s digital economy.
“Investors take their cues from how disputes are managed, not just how they begin. A market where regulatory jurisdiction is unclear and where resolving that uncertainty causes disruption will struggle to attract the kind of long-term investment Nigeria needs,” he said.
ALTON called on both the FCCPC and NCC to urgently coordinate and clarify their roles, urging that any resolution must align with existing court orders.
The association also expressed readiness to engage with regulators and the Federal Government to restore stability in the market.
The development comes amid confusion over the status of airtime and data credit services after the FCCPC dismissed claims that it had banned the services, describing such reports as false and misleading.
Despite the clarification, major telecom operators, including MTN Nigeria and Airtel Nigeria, temporarily suspended airtime and data borrowing services.
The disruption has affected millions of subscribers who rely on the services for emergency communication, particularly through the widely used *303# short code.
The FCCPC had reportedly directed operators to comply with its Digital, Electronic, Online, or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations 2025, requiring engagement only with approved service providers.
Subscribers have since expressed frustration, describing the suspension as disruptive to daily communication needs and economic activities.
Telecom
Court Strikes Out Suit against NCC over 50 Percent Tariff Hike

Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has struck out a high-profile lawsuit that sought to nullify the 50 percent telecommunications tariff hike approved by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) on January 1, 2025 .

The ruling, delivered by Justice M.G. Umar, effectively shuts down a case that had threatened to force telecom operators including MTN Nigeria to reimburse subscribers with interest and pay N100 million in general damages.
The Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit due to a fundamental flaw on the part of the applicant.
The suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/643/2025 – Barr. Obioma Ezenwobodo v. Nigerian Communications Commission & MTN Nigeria Communications Plc was originally filed on October 21, 2025, by the applicant.
In his Application for Judicial Review, Ezenwobodo, through Joseph Onu Silas, his counsel, sought three major reliefs against both the NCC (the industry regulator) and MTN Nigeria (the 2nd Respondent) – an order prohibiting and setting aside the NCC’s rule and regulation approving the 50 percent telecommunication tariff adjustment (popularly referred to as the tariff hike) issued on Monday, January 20, 2025; an order mandating the NCC and MTN Nigeria, their servants, agents, licensees, and staff to reimburse, return, and pay back with interest all deductions, tariffs, and charges made as a result of the said 50 percent tariff hike.
He also sought an order of N100 million as general damages against the respondents, citing untold hardship, economic deprivation, psychological distress, and pain suffered by the applicant due to the alleged illegal and arbitrary charges.
Counsel to MTN Nigeria Communications Plc, Ituah Imhanze and Divine Oguru of Kenna LP on November 24, 2025, opposed the applicant’s originating motion, and challenged the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear the suit. In that motion, MTN urged the Court to dismiss or strike out the suit entirely in limine (at the outset).
The jurisdictional challenge was argued on January 26, 2026, with Divine Oguru Esq., Senior Counsel from Kenna LP, appearing for MTN Nigeria.
The applicant and the NCC were also represented by their respective counsel.
Delivering a well considered judgment, Justice M.G. Umar upheld the core arguments advanced by MTN Nigeria’s legal team.
The Court ruled decisively on the issue of locus standi – the legal right of the applicant to bring the case before the Court. Justice Umar found that Barrister Obioma Ezenwobodo had failed to demonstrate any special interest in the subject matter of the suit beyond that of the general public.
The Court noted that the 50 percent tariff hike applied to all telecom consumers, not uniquely or disproportionately to the applicant.
As such, the applicant’s grievance was a general grievance, not one showing a specific, personal, or greater injury than that suffered by any other Nigerian telecom subscriber.
Because the applicant lacked the requisite locus standi, the Court held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Consequently, the matter was struck out.
On the issue of legal costs, the Court directed that parties bear their respective costs, meaning no award of damages or reimbursement was granted against MTN Nigeria or the NCC.
The ruling is a significant legal endorsement of NCC’s regulatory authority to approve tariff adjustments and confirms that MTN Nigeria and other operators in the telecommunications sector may continue to implement the 50 percent tariff hike without legal hindrance from challengers lacking direct personal standing.
Industry observers note that the judgment sets an important precedent: future challenges to industry-wide pricing policies must be brought by parties who can show a concrete, particularised injury distinct from that of the general consuming public.
Telecom
Despite Security Concerns, Reps Push for 18-Month Delay before Inactive Phone Numbers are Reassigned

House of Representatives has asked the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to extend the validity period for inactive phone numbers before they are reassigned to new users to 18 months.

Recall that SIM card security concerns, prompted the NCC launched the Telecoms Identity Risk Management System (TIRMS) late March 2026 to curb fraud linked to SIM recycling.
This portal will allow regulators and banks to track reassigned numbers.
NCC regulations require 360 days of inactivity before a SIM can be recycled.
But the House of Representatives, said the proposed extension from the current timeline would enhance compliance with the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023.
The House resolution followed the adoption of a motion sponsored by the member representing Orhionmwon/Uhunmwode Federal Constituency of Edo State, Billy Osawaru.
Leading the debate on the motion, Mr Osawaru warned that the current practice of recycling dormant SIM cards without sufficient public notification exposes unsuspecting Nigerians to embarrassment, extortion and even wrongful criminal suspicion.
He said some reassigned numbers often remain tied to sensitive personal records, including bank verification numbers and national identity data, creating opportunities for misuse by new subscribers or criminal actors.
Adopting the motion, the House called on the NCC to ensure inactive SIM cards earmarked for reallocation are published in national newspapers during a six-month notice period and that details of such numbers be shared with security agencies to improve transparency and aid crime prevention.
The house noted that the move would help reduce risks associated with recycled phone numbers while improving accountability in the telecommunications sector.
Following adoption of the motion, the House mandated its Committees on Communications and Commerce to engage the NCC, the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) and other stakeholders and report back within four weeks for further legislative action.
Telecom2 days agoElon Musk Launches XChat with Video Calling to Take on WhatsApp, Messenger
Telecom2 days agoMTN-Backed Pitchathon Awards ₦45m to Startups @‘Gathering on 100’ in Lagos
Broadcasting2 days agoSERAP, NGE Sue NBC over Threat to Sanction Broadcasters
E-Financial2 days agoCRMI Backs CBN’s New Measures to Curb Fraud
Telecom2 days agoHow NITDA Is Transforming Corps Members into Digital Millionaires
Telecom2 days agoGlobacom Unveils Two New TVCs Showcasing the Future of Connectivity
E-Financial2 days agoSystemically Weak Banks Put Nigeria’s $1Trillion Ambition at Risk
News2 days agoBOI MD, Olasupo Olusi, Charts Tech-Driven Path to Growth for Nigeria



















