Abuja Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has arraigned Blessing Gozi-Anyaokei, managing director, Viscount Microfinance Bank, over allegations of unlawful conversion of investment funds amounting to N19 million and $30,000.

Blessing Gozi-Anyaokei, managing director, Viscount Microfinance Bank

Gozi-Anyaokei was brought before Justice Y. Halilu of the Federal High Court, Maitama, Abuja, on a two-count charge bordering on alleged illegal conversion and obtaining money under false pretence.

According to a statement issued on Thursday by  Dele Oyewale, EFCC spokesperson, the defendant allegedly received N19 million from one Ernest Terkula Jor in 2022 for investment purposes while serving as the Managing Director of the bank.

The anti-graft agency accused her of diverting the funds for personal use, contrary to the provisions of the Penal Code Act.

In the second charge, the EFCC alleged that she also received $30,000 from the same individual for investment purposes but dishonestly converted the money for her personal benefit.

The commission stated that the alleged offences contravene Section 311 of the Penal Code Act Cap 532, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (Abuja) 1990, and are punishable under Section 312 of the same Act.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges when they were read before the court.

Following her plea, prosecution counsel, S.N. Robert, requested a date for the commencement of trial.

Justice Halilu subsequently granted the defendant bail with two sureties who must possess landed property within Abuja.

The court also ordered her to surrender her travel documents and barred her from travelling outside the country without court approval.

The matter was adjourned until July 19, 2026, for commencement of trial.

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), acting as liquidator of the defunct Gulf Bank Plc., has instituted two separate actions at the Federal High Court in Lagos against Wema Bank Plc.

The combined claims amount to approximately N125,384,535,500, arising from two distinct sets of disputed high-value properties in Banana Island, Lagos, alongside an alleged improper cash transaction of N401 million.

Both suits were filed under the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts and Financial Malpractices in Banks) Act and form part of NDIC’s long-running efforts to recover and liquidate outstanding assets of the defunct Gulf Bank nearly two decades after its collapse.

The two actions, though related, concern distinct sets of six properties each, acquired through different shell companies allegedly used by the defunct bank.

The first suit concerns six properties in Banana Island purchased in the name of Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited, described in the pleadings as a shell company used by Gulf Bank.

These plots situate in Zones J, K, L and P, have a combined area of approximately 13,794.145 square metres.

At the prevailing market rate of N4,500,000 per square metre, NDIC values these properties at N62,073,652,500.

The second suit concerns a separate set of six properties in Banana Island acquired through Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (later renamed Supra Commercials Limited), another entity in which the defunct bank held over 80 per cent shareholding.

These plots have a combined area of approximately 13,979.974 square metres, valued at N62,909,883,000 at the same per-square-metre rate.

In addition, the second suit claims recovery of N401,000,000 allegedly collected by Wema Bank from the NDIC’s agent bank, United Bank for Africa (UBA), in September 2009.

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria revoked Gulf Bank Plc’s banking licence by notice published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Volume 93, Number 3, Government Notice No. 7) dated January 16, 2006, and the Federal High Court, Lagos Division, subsequently made a winding-up order on November 27, 2006, appointing NDIC as liquidator.

On the basis of those instruments, the Corporation maintains it is legally mandated to trace, recover, and liquidate all outstanding assets of the defunct bank for the benefit of depositors and creditors.

In the first suit, NDIC alleged that Gulf Bank acquired six Banana Island plots between 1998 and 2003 using Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited as a vehicle.

The internal records of the defunct bank reportedly treated the acquisition as a loan account, an arrangement NDIC contended shows the assets remain beneficially owned by Gulf Bank.

NDIC further alleged that Wema Bank took custody of these properties purportedly to secure an interbank deposit of N771.79 million, but that a joint CBN/NDIC special examination conducted in September 2005 found no record in Gulf Bank’s books confirming that any such deposit existed.

The examination report, dated September 30, 2005, found the defunct bank’s explanations unsatisfactory and no supporting documentation was subsequently produced.

According to NDIC, Wema Bank later presented two managers’ cheques from Access Bank and Intercontinental Bank, both dated September 2005 totaling N250 million in favour of Euston Wenberg Engineering Limited, which NDIC framed as instruments for a purchase rather than a recovery of a deposit.

NDIC contended that the purported sale at N250 million was commercially implausible, given that a single property in Banana Island at that time was worth in excess of N500 million.

In the second suit, NDIC also alleged that Gulf Bank injected N20 million into Bacad Finance and Investment Limited in 2001 to increase its share capital, and later invested a further N60 million in the company in 2003.

The defunct bank ultimately held over 80 per cent of Bacad Finance’s shares and used the entity to acquire a second set of six Banana Island plots.

The pleadings record that the defunct bank intended to develop the properties as a luxury residential estate of 72 flats, to be called Bacad Estate, in partnership with Shelter Afrique.

NDIC alleged that Wema Bank, without any valid mortgage, court order, or proprietary interest, took custody of these properties and later claimed to have sold them for N524 million by way of managers’ cheques dated 2006 and 2007.

NDIC described this claimed sale price as grossly implausible given that each property was worth over N4 billion by that period.

Separately, NDIC stated that in June 2009 it wrote to Wema Bank approving payment of N1,635,616.44 as the full outstanding deposit due to the bank as at January 16, 2006, the date Gulf Bank went into liquidation.

Notwithstanding that communication, NDIC alleged that in September 2009 Wema Bank collected N401 million from UBA, NDIC’s agent bank, without lawful justification, and that the Corporation has no record showing Wema Bank was owed any sum beyond the approved N1.635 million.

Wema Bank, through its counsel, Dr Oladapo Olanipekun (SAN), Mr Kehinde Ogunwunmiju (SAN) and Mr Tunde Afe-Babalola (SAN) have filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

The bank relies on the Failed Banks Act, the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020, the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and Sections 6(6) and 251(1) of the 1999 Constitution.

Wema Bank argued that NDIC’s claims do not arise from any loan, credit facility, guarantee or banking transaction between the parties, as required under the Failed Banks Act, and that the bank was never a customer of Gulf Bank in respect of any credit facility.

The bank further contended that the suits disclose no debtor-creditor relationship and that NDIC lacks locus standi because the disputed properties were allegedly owned by Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (now Supra Commercials Limited), a separate legal entity.

According to Wema Bank, the matter is fundamentally one of property ownership rather than banking debt recovery, placing it outside the Federal High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 251(1) of the Constitution.

The bank also argued that any cause of action, if it existed at all, arose between 2006 and 2007 and is now statute-barred under the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and accuses NDIC of abusing court process by attempting to circumvent limitation laws with a stale claim.

Wema Bank is asking the court to strike out or dismiss both suits.

The matters have been adjourned to June 25, 2026 for further proceedings.

Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) has raised an alarm that members of the business community have drawn it’s attention to the rising incidents of vandalism of telecommunications infrastructure across Nigeria.

Dr. Chinyere Almona, director general of LCCI,

Dr. Chinyere Almona, director general of LCCI, who stated this in Lagos recently, said that the increasing infrastructure vandalism was posing a serious threat to economic productivity, national security, digital inclusion, and investor confidence.

According to her, “our members have drawn our attention to the rising incidents of vandalism of telecommunications infrastructure across Nigeria. This trend is a serious threat to economic productivity, national security, digital inclusion, and investor confidence.

“Telecommunications infrastructure remains critical to modern economic activity, supporting banking services, e-commerce, education, healthcare, logistics, public administration, and millions of small businesses.

Persistent attacks on fiber-optic cables, base stations, power systems, and related assets disrupt essential services, increase service providers’ operating costs, and reduce service quality for consumers and businesses.”

Speaking further, Dr. Almona explained that “to address this challenge, the chamber urges governments at all levels to treat telecommunications infrastructure as critical national assets that require stronger protection.

“This should include enhanced security surveillance, stricter enforcement of laws against vandalism, faster prosecution of offenders, and closer collaboration between security agencies, regulators, communities, and network operators.”

She added: “The Chamber also calls for improved rightof-way management, better coordination during road construction and urban works, and stronger public awareness campaigns on the economic damage caused by vandalism.”