General News
Cashless Policy: Disconnects Must be Fixed – Adeyemi

Adeyinka Adeyemi is a managing partner at Intermarc Consulting, an e-payment and e-banking intermediation company. The company organizes trainings, seminars, conferences and exhibitions and publishes industry journals and as well engages in consumer education through the Coalition for e-Payments. Apart from providing services, the company also produces solutions for specific client base in the market that technology companies are not catering to. Adeyemi spoke to funmi ilesanmi on review of the cashless policy by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Cashless Policy The cashless policy recently introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is a long overdue development. Long over due in the sense that given the size of the Nigerian economy which is represented by the size of the market as well as the population of the people; if you take that on one hand and then you look at trends and developments in international and global economies, you will realize that Nigeria is 10 years behind with respect to this policy. However, it is a right policy in the right direction and we know that by the time the policy takes off fully, the economy will be better for it, the country will be better for, the system will be better for it as well. Assessment of Cashless Lagos Well my assessment will be based on work that we have done and that we are doing as a result of our involvement in what we call the Coalition for e-Payments. We have been to the market to talk to people, we have been to the streets to talk to user s and so on. If I am to give an assessment, my assessment will be based on feedbacks that we have gotten from the field which relates to the fact that there is still a lot of work to be done with respect to consumer education. There is still a huge gap between regulators and operators on one hand, and the market on the other hand. If regulators and operators must face facts, if they really want this initiative to succeed then that gap must be bridged. We had a conference recently, it was a Breakfast Forum where a representative of one of the Fast Moving Consumer Goods Companies (FMCGs) indicated that contrary to CBN’s claims that they went to all the markets in Lagos, feedbacks from iyalojas (market women) that they deal with show that no representative of the CBN came to explain the policy to them. That is a significant sector. To say the iyalojas who are decision makers in open markets as at February this year are saying that they still have not seen anybody to explain or to educate them on what the policy is about, that says a lot. There are still a lot of disconnects that has to be fixed. Consumer education is very important. Government needs to do a lot in that area. CBN Awareness Programme on the Policy Last Year The CBN worked with ePPAN on road shows to visit market associations and so on to educate people with respect to the policy which was again a step in the right direction but we must understand two things. One is that even in Lagos State which was the objective and the focus at the time, one agency or one association cannot cope with the enormity of what needs to be done by way of consumer education. The remarks by the representative of the FMCGs referring to iyalojas not been reached is just a classic demonstration of the fact that, yes efforts were made but it was not enough to cover grounds. On the other hand, if you are having this kind of challenge when we are doing the pilot in Lagos, can you imagine a scale of the problems we would be having when we go national, when we roll out the cashless policy on a national level? It means government as represented by the CBN must be able to engage different consultants or different agencies to push this message in the market place. It does not just stop at radio jingles or press adverts or television commercials. It has to be one-on-one engagements of the markets to be able to change the culture. That is my advice to the CBN to say look, if just for the pilot in Lagos we are having these issues, what do you think will happen on a national scale. A lot more people needs to be brought into that work to reduce the pressure. Postponement of Uptake of the Policy Nationwide The truth of the matter is that we can never tell until we get there. I mean there is nothing stopping the CBN from further postponing the start off date for enforcement because typically we lack statistics to say that by such a time we would have covered so much ground so what the CBN is doing as far as I am concerned is just what we call trial and error in terms of putting deadlines but the beauty of that is that if we say the deadline is March and you get close to March and realize that March is not realistic, there is no law that stops you from pushing it forward to June. When it is June also and you realized that it is not realistic, you shift it further until you get it right. What is important is that at the end of the day this initiative is firmly rooted and people must imbibe the culture of electronic payments in the country. Reduction in Processing Fees for Withdrawal and Lodgment of Cash Again like I said my answer is similar to what I said earlier about trial and error. There is no basis for the government to say this is the default charge if you want to lodge or withdraw more than a certain amount of money. If government today sees that the reaction indicates a lack of acceptance by the market and they are willing to bring down the charges, give it another two to three months and again go back to look at the feedbacks. If the feedback then says you probably need to drop the charges because it is not providing incentives for people to comply then you bring it down completely. My position, I need to state this clearly, my position is that it is not right for government to put a fee or a fine on deposits. If somebody wants to withdraw money from the bank, he may have to pay extra because you do not need cash out there. By the same token, you should not charge somebody bringing money into the bank because that is actually where you want the money to be. Until the period of time when you have been able to mop up cash in the system, your objective as government is for you to channel all cash into the banking system so that people can begin to use cards for transactions. What is the incentive if you are now saying somebody that is depositing money has to be charged for depositing money? The man will put the money in his house. Increase in Withdraw Limits If I was the CBN governor which I am not; I would have left it at N150,000 for individuals and N1 million for corporate bodies and then deal with issues of telling people you do not have to pay for deposits, you only need to pay penalties for withdrawing and see how that goes, rather than say I am increasing it from N150,000 to N500,000 and then from N1 million to three million. Having said that I am sure the CBN in its wisdom will have a better picture of reasons why that is in place but let’s see how it goes. Review of the Process Every Six Months I do not think this is right because already there is a fear of what is generally termed policy summersault particularly in the Nigerian setting where government will come today and say this is the policy and everybody is struggling to comply with that policy. Three months down the line, it changes and you are struggling to comply, another three months to six months down the line, it changes again. It does not show that government knows what they are doing and it leaves a lot of doubts in the minds of the citizens. We have to be very careful with the frequency of change of some of those policies. Exemption of MDAs I think it is totally wrong because one of the benefits of the policy particularly from the government point of view would be reduction in corruption if not eradication of corruption. What electronic payments and cashless initiatives like this bring to the table is transparency where transactions are transparent and seen which is audit trail. If government is exempting MDAs then you are saying you can carry on with business as usual meanwhile business as usual as far as statistics tell us is that there is a lot of corruption in the system and because of the paper nature in terms of documentation and all of that, people have a way to hide some of those things. I do not think there is any wisdom at all in exempting any government agency or MDAs from the policy, infact it should start from there. I recall in 2009 when the accountant general of the federation first mentioned the e-Payment Policy even before the CBN doctored it. His emphasis was MDAs with respect to payment of salaries, payment of contractors, pensions and so on. If government is now making a total u-turn by saying MDAs are exempted, the question is where are we going? What is the intent of government by that act of u-turn? Maybe they need to explain. Delay in Uptake of Mobile Money Services in the Country To be honest with you, I wish I knew. It is something that has given us a lot of concern because since licenses were granted, we believe that those licenses were granted based on proof of concept, based on the demonstration that they have the technology and they can demonstrate that it works. Now the question is how come not one of those mobile payment products is in the market? Of course we have seen a lot of adverts, we have seen a lot of promos and teasers going round but where are the products? I have not investigated whether this is technical or whether it is regulatory in nature in terms of what the cost may be but there would be a problem somewhere that I believe the CBN should be very interested in. Encouraging Use of Point of Sale(PoS) Terminals A lot needs to be done to encourage merchants to use PoS terminals and the most important one is education because if you are coming from a background where people shy away from technology and suddenly it has become something of relevance, you need to go all out to educate the people in terms of the culture shift that you are trying to promote. In shops for instance, if you are going to deploy PoS there must be a lot of seminars even to shop attendants, it is not just dumping the PoS with them. A lot of buy-in is required from the shop owners, from the cashiers and so on. There must be a lot of education in terms of benefits even to them because some of these cashiers do not see beyond the immediate benefit of ‘I will not be able to keep the change if I use the PoS’. I agree that they may want to frustrate that effort but for most part if education is done and there is a lot of awareness, a lot of partnership then PoS penetration will be high. Also government needs to be involved in that process either by way of providing some kind of guarantees to Providers of Point of Sale Terminals in Nigeria that have been licensed, by saying we guarantee that you obtain a loan to bring 10 million PoS terminals. I know they are doing something with NIBSS now. NIBSS is bringing in a couple of PoS terminals, I know they are working with a couple of agencies as well to bring in more PoS terminals. Intermarc’s Annual Card Expo Card Expo is one of the ways that we have tried to bring about consumer education because we know that without educating the market place, it is going to be almost impossible to achieve what government needs to achieve in terms of the objectives of government. What we have done is to bring together participants from different parts of the world to exhibit in Nigeria, bring expert speakers from all over the world to talk about some of these things. An important thing with Card Expo is that a lot of our seminars are free. Again just because of this consumer education aspect of it, we want civil servants to come, we want students to come, we want the entire market to be represented so that they can come and get information and they can get to see some of these technologies at work.
General News
Lagos Unveils Plan for 24-hour Electricity Supply in the State

Lagos State Government has unveiled an ambitious roadmap to end the “culture of blackouts” and establish a 24-hour electricity market driven by private sector investment, smart metering and independent power generation across the state.

Biodun Ogunleye, commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, middle at the press briefing
Biodun Ogunleye, commissioner for Energy and Mineral Resources, disclosed this during the 2026 Ministerial Press Briefing held in Alausa, Ikeja, on Monday, where he presented the achievements and strategic direction of the ministry under the Babajide Sanwo-Olu administration.
Ogunleye said the state had commenced aggressive reforms following the implementation of the Lagos State Electricity Law 2024, describing the initiative as a major step towards making Lagos the leading subnational electricity market in Africa.
According to him, the administration’s long-term objective is to deliver between 95 and 100 per cent grid availability, achieve full metering penetration and reduce energy losses to single digits by 2030.
“The administration’s plan for a farewell to the culture of blackouts rests on strong regulatory institutions, investor-friendly policies, independent power generation and full metering,” Ogunleye said.
He disclosed that the Lagos State Electricity Regulatory Commission (LASERC), had already begun licensing operators, enforcing regulatory standards and strengthening consumer protection mechanisms within the emerging electricity market.
Ogunleye revealed that 14 licences and permits had already been issued to compliant operators, while the state planned to commence a 100 per cent metering initiative from July 2026.
The commissioner said Lagos was also developing an Artificial Intelligence-powered monitoring system known as the “Electric Eye of Lagos” to provide real-time visibility across electricity trading and power delivery activities statewide.
According to him, the state was finalising market rules, grid interface guidelines and consumer supply codes to support a competitive and investor-friendly electricity ecosystem.
Ogunleye disclosed that Lagos currently has 12 Independent Power Producers under regulation, with seven already fully operational commercially.
He added that the state government was facilitating strategic energy infrastructure projects to improve reliability and industrial growth.
Among the major projects highlighted was the 37.7-kilometre Badagry electricity infrastructure corridor, which includes three high-voltage distribution towers crossing the Gbaji Lagoon and the rehabilitation of 33kV lines linking Gbaji, Seme, Owode and Apa.
The commissioner also announced plans for a major Lekki-Epe Integrated Energy Corridor featuring a 132kV bulk transmission line stretching from Ajah to Alaro City alongside a parallel gas pipeline network.
Ogunleye stated that the government had significantly expanded public lighting infrastructure through the deployment of 42,000 smart solar streetlights across major roads and highways in Lagos.
He said 22,000 conventional streetlights had already been replaced with solar-powered systems on corridors including Gbagada-Oshodi Expressway, Lekki-Epe Expressway, Lagos Island Expressway and Ikorodu Road.
The commissioner further disclosed that nearly 40,000 solar-powered streetlights were now operational across the state.
On power interventions in public institutions, Ogunleye said Gbagada General Hospital now enjoys between 21 and 22 hours of uninterrupted electricity daily following the installation of 2MVA and 1MVA transformers.
He added that renewable energy upgrades had also been completed in 52 secondary schools and 11 primary healthcare centres through lithium-ion battery replacement projects.
General News
Group Backs Constitutional Challenge against X Restriction in Tanzania

Paradigm Initiative (PIN) has thrown its support behind an ongoing constitutional case before the High Court of Tanzania challenging restrictions on access to X, formerly known as Twitter, in the East African country.

A determination on the matter is expected on May 22, 2026.
The case was filed in 2025 by Tanzanian lawyers, Tito Elia Magoti and Kumbusho Dawson Kagine, as a public interest constitutional challenge against the Minister for Communications and Information Technology, the Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority (TCRA), and the Attorney General.
The applicants are seeking judicial intervention on the constitutionality of actions restricting access to digital platforms under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania and the Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act.
The dispute stems from restrictions imposed on May 20, 2025, which have rendered X inaccessible to users in Tanzania except through the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).
The applicants argued that the restriction violates constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 18, 20 and 29, including freedom of expression, access to information and freedom of assembly.
They further contended that the measures were blanket in nature, disproportionate in impact and introduced without public consultation or clear legal justification.
According to court filings, the restriction has disrupted access to public health information, affected digital and media-related livelihoods, constrained journalistic activities and undermined civic participation.
The applicants also noted that forcing citizens to rely on VPNs imposes additional financial and potential legal burdens while fragmenting communication within the country.
Supporting the suit, PIN said restrictions of such nature undermine constitutional guarantees and risk establishing disproportionate state control over digital spaces.
Executive Director of PIN, Gbenga Sesan, said the case raises critical questions about the limits of state power in regulating digital platforms.
“Where restrictions are imposed, they must meet constitutional thresholds of legality, necessity and proportionality.
“Blanket disruptions of access to widely used platforms threaten not only freedom of expression but also the broader ecosystem of civic participation and access to information,” Sesan said.
In response, the respondents denied claims that the restriction on X in Tanzania constitutes a global concern.
They maintained that the action was lawful and necessary to ensure public safety, public health and public morals.
The respondents further argued that the owner of X had been given prior notice to comply with Tanzanian laws and procedures before the restriction was imposed.
They said access to the platform was restricted due to the owner’s alleged failure to comply with local regulatory requirements.
The case remains pending before the High Court of Tanzania, with observers saying its outcome could define constitutional boundaries for digital platform restrictions and shape digital rights jurisprudence across the region.
General News
Xenophobic Attacks: Anonymous Nigeria Threatens to Leak South African Stolen Data

Anonymous Nigeria, hacktivism, known for launching coordinated cyberattacks and protests in support of socio-political movements, has threatened to leak stolen South African government data unless its demands were met.

The group, called for the department to stop xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, or it will expose the data.
“They call themselves correctional services, but they can’t correct the citizens. What a shame,” the group said in its Telegram channel, MyBroadband reported.
“They killed a lot of Nigerians while the so-called correctional services watched and the ministry of justice.”
It is immediately know if Anonymous Nigeria is affiliated to Nullsec Nigeria.
But in a post on a hacker forum, Nullsec Nigeria included a link showcasing an example of data stolen from the department.
It included two bid invitation notices, bid results, a copy of the bids received, and a notice of a bid awarded in various formats.
“We’ll expose all your evil deeds for the world to see, unless this attack stops. But if not, we’ll leak everything they got,” Nullsec Nigeria said.
“Unless the government of South Africa ends these xenophobic attacks on Nigeria, we’ll expose everything about you, your evil deeds will be exposed, and the world shall know.”
MyBroadband asked the Department of Correctional Services about the claimed breach and Nullsec Nigeria’s demands, but it did not immediately respond to our questions.
Nullsec Nigeria also claimed responsibility for breaching several other entities in South Africa, while responding to an X post about its OpSouthAfrica campaign in its Telegram channel.
“I wanna express something here. I saw a report on the #OpSouthAfrica hack by Nullsec Nigeria, but it was stolen by another person,” it said. “Tag the real breachers next time.”
In a separate thread on the hacker forum, Nullsec Nigeria also claimed responsibility for breaching the Ephraim Mogale Local Municipality’s systems.
It claimed to have hacked the local government’s website and threatened to expose “everything you got for others to see how heartless you are. You killed mothers, brothers, students.”
Nullsec Nigeria said the breach and the threats were in response to the xenophobic attacks on and killing of Nigerians and the South African government’s supposed silence on the issue.
“These attacks are still going on in the dark, and we’ll expose them all. If the South African government doesn’t act first, the whole of South Africa will suffer,” it said.
“This is just a wave. These documents are about 11GB, but we decided to pull just this one.”
Its post included two images: one for a public hearing and another, a handwritten tender document for the appointment of an insurance service provider.
It also included a link to several other documents, including an old annual report, council resolutions, financial statements, and various other notices.
The Nigerian Government recently announced plans to bring citizens back to the country from South Africa after violent protests over foreign nationals in the country erupted earlier in May.
President Cyril Ramaphosa condemned the protests and criminal acts directed at foreign nationals in his From the Desk of The President weekly newsletter on 11 May 2026.
He emphasised the recent demonstrations and attacks did not represent the views of the South African people, nor the government’s policy.
“These are the acts of opportunists who are exploiting the legitimate grievances, particularly those of the poor, under the false guise of ‘community activism’,” The President said.
“Some of these people are assuming functions that only state officials are permitted to perform, including stopping people to check identification and conducting searches of private property.”
He added that such lawlessness would not be tolerated, regardless of who the perpetrators or victims were.
General News2 days agoXenophobic Attacks: Anonymous Nigeria Threatens to Leak South African Stolen Data
Telecom2 days agoMTN Targets 8m Homes in Fibre Expansion Drive
E-Financial2 days agoChapel Hill Denham Says Banks Lose N2.5 Trillion Annually to High CRR in New Report
Telecom2 days agoGBB Says Cross-border Partnerships Key to Africa’s Digital Transformation
E-Financial2 days agoLagos Sanctions 15 Money Lending Firms for Operational Violations
E-Financial2 days agoAfDB Approves $200m for BoI to Support MSMEs
News2 days agoWHO Says Ebola Outbreak Worse than Reported
News2 days agoDigital PayExpo 2026 to Convene Africa’s Most Influential Payments Leaders in Lagos














