General News
Cashless Policy: Disconnects Must be Fixed – Adeyemi
Adeyinka Adeyemi is a managing partner at Intermarc Consulting, an e-payment and e-banking intermediation company. The company organizes trainings, seminars, conferences and exhibitions and publishes industry journals and as well engages in consumer education through the Coalition for e-Payments. Apart from providing services, the company also produces solutions for specific client base in the market that technology companies are not catering to. Adeyemi spoke to funmi ilesanmi on review of the cashless policy by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Cashless Policy The cashless policy recently introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is a long overdue development. Long over due in the sense that given the size of the Nigerian economy which is represented by the size of the market as well as the population of the people; if you take that on one hand and then you look at trends and developments in international and global economies, you will realize that Nigeria is 10 years behind with respect to this policy. However, it is a right policy in the right direction and we know that by the time the policy takes off fully, the economy will be better for it, the country will be better for, the system will be better for it as well. Assessment of Cashless Lagos Well my assessment will be based on work that we have done and that we are doing as a result of our involvement in what we call the Coalition for e-Payments. We have been to the market to talk to people, we have been to the streets to talk to user s and so on. If I am to give an assessment, my assessment will be based on feedbacks that we have gotten from the field which relates to the fact that there is still a lot of work to be done with respect to consumer education. There is still a huge gap between regulators and operators on one hand, and the market on the other hand. If regulators and operators must face facts, if they really want this initiative to succeed then that gap must be bridged. We had a conference recently, it was a Breakfast Forum where a representative of one of the Fast Moving Consumer Goods Companies (FMCGs) indicated that contrary to CBN’s claims that they went to all the markets in Lagos, feedbacks from iyalojas (market women) that they deal with show that no representative of the CBN came to explain the policy to them. That is a significant sector. To say the iyalojas who are decision makers in open markets as at February this year are saying that they still have not seen anybody to explain or to educate them on what the policy is about, that says a lot. There are still a lot of disconnects that has to be fixed. Consumer education is very important. Government needs to do a lot in that area. CBN Awareness Programme on the Policy Last Year The CBN worked with ePPAN on road shows to visit market associations and so on to educate people with respect to the policy which was again a step in the right direction but we must understand two things. One is that even in Lagos State which was the objective and the focus at the time, one agency or one association cannot cope with the enormity of what needs to be done by way of consumer education. The remarks by the representative of the FMCGs referring to iyalojas not been reached is just a classic demonstration of the fact that, yes efforts were made but it was not enough to cover grounds. On the other hand, if you are having this kind of challenge when we are doing the pilot in Lagos, can you imagine a scale of the problems we would be having when we go national, when we roll out the cashless policy on a national level? It means government as represented by the CBN must be able to engage different consultants or different agencies to push this message in the market place. It does not just stop at radio jingles or press adverts or television commercials. It has to be one-on-one engagements of the markets to be able to change the culture. That is my advice to the CBN to say look, if just for the pilot in Lagos we are having these issues, what do you think will happen on a national scale. A lot more people needs to be brought into that work to reduce the pressure. Postponement of Uptake of the Policy Nationwide The truth of the matter is that we can never tell until we get there. I mean there is nothing stopping the CBN from further postponing the start off date for enforcement because typically we lack statistics to say that by such a time we would have covered so much ground so what the CBN is doing as far as I am concerned is just what we call trial and error in terms of putting deadlines but the beauty of that is that if we say the deadline is March and you get close to March and realize that March is not realistic, there is no law that stops you from pushing it forward to June. When it is June also and you realized that it is not realistic, you shift it further until you get it right. What is important is that at the end of the day this initiative is firmly rooted and people must imbibe the culture of electronic payments in the country. Reduction in Processing Fees for Withdrawal and Lodgment of Cash Again like I said my answer is similar to what I said earlier about trial and error. There is no basis for the government to say this is the default charge if you want to lodge or withdraw more than a certain amount of money. If government today sees that the reaction indicates a lack of acceptance by the market and they are willing to bring down the charges, give it another two to three months and again go back to look at the feedbacks. If the feedback then says you probably need to drop the charges because it is not providing incentives for people to comply then you bring it down completely. My position, I need to state this clearly, my position is that it is not right for government to put a fee or a fine on deposits. If somebody wants to withdraw money from the bank, he may have to pay extra because you do not need cash out there. By the same token, you should not charge somebody bringing money into the bank because that is actually where you want the money to be. Until the period of time when you have been able to mop up cash in the system, your objective as government is for you to channel all cash into the banking system so that people can begin to use cards for transactions. What is the incentive if you are now saying somebody that is depositing money has to be charged for depositing money? The man will put the money in his house. Increase in Withdraw Limits If I was the CBN governor which I am not; I would have left it at N150,000 for individuals and N1 million for corporate bodies and then deal with issues of telling people you do not have to pay for deposits, you only need to pay penalties for withdrawing and see how that goes, rather than say I am increasing it from N150,000 to N500,000 and then from N1 million to three million. Having said that I am sure the CBN in its wisdom will have a better picture of reasons why that is in place but let’s see how it goes. Review of the Process Every Six Months I do not think this is right because already there is a fear of what is generally termed policy summersault particularly in the Nigerian setting where government will come today and say this is the policy and everybody is struggling to comply with that policy. Three months down the line, it changes and you are struggling to comply, another three months to six months down the line, it changes again. It does not show that government knows what they are doing and it leaves a lot of doubts in the minds of the citizens. We have to be very careful with the frequency of change of some of those policies. Exemption of MDAs I think it is totally wrong because one of the benefits of the policy particularly from the government point of view would be reduction in corruption if not eradication of corruption. What electronic payments and cashless initiatives like this bring to the table is transparency where transactions are transparent and seen which is audit trail. If government is exempting MDAs then you are saying you can carry on with business as usual meanwhile business as usual as far as statistics tell us is that there is a lot of corruption in the system and because of the paper nature in terms of documentation and all of that, people have a way to hide some of those things. I do not think there is any wisdom at all in exempting any government agency or MDAs from the policy, infact it should start from there. I recall in 2009 when the accountant general of the federation first mentioned the e-Payment Policy even before the CBN doctored it. His emphasis was MDAs with respect to payment of salaries, payment of contractors, pensions and so on. If government is now making a total u-turn by saying MDAs are exempted, the question is where are we going? What is the intent of government by that act of u-turn? Maybe they need to explain. Delay in Uptake of Mobile Money Services in the Country To be honest with you, I wish I knew. It is something that has given us a lot of concern because since licenses were granted, we believe that those licenses were granted based on proof of concept, based on the demonstration that they have the technology and they can demonstrate that it works. Now the question is how come not one of those mobile payment products is in the market? Of course we have seen a lot of adverts, we have seen a lot of promos and teasers going round but where are the products? I have not investigated whether this is technical or whether it is regulatory in nature in terms of what the cost may be but there would be a problem somewhere that I believe the CBN should be very interested in. Encouraging Use of Point of Sale(PoS) Terminals A lot needs to be done to encourage merchants to use PoS terminals and the most important one is education because if you are coming from a background where people shy away from technology and suddenly it has become something of relevance, you need to go all out to educate the people in terms of the culture shift that you are trying to promote. In shops for instance, if you are going to deploy PoS there must be a lot of seminars even to shop attendants, it is not just dumping the PoS with them. A lot of buy-in is required from the shop owners, from the cashiers and so on. There must be a lot of education in terms of benefits even to them because some of these cashiers do not see beyond the immediate benefit of ‘I will not be able to keep the change if I use the PoS’. I agree that they may want to frustrate that effort but for most part if education is done and there is a lot of awareness, a lot of partnership then PoS penetration will be high. Also government needs to be involved in that process either by way of providing some kind of guarantees to Providers of Point of Sale Terminals in Nigeria that have been licensed, by saying we guarantee that you obtain a loan to bring 10 million PoS terminals. I know they are doing something with NIBSS now. NIBSS is bringing in a couple of PoS terminals, I know they are working with a couple of agencies as well to bring in more PoS terminals. Intermarc’s Annual Card Expo Card Expo is one of the ways that we have tried to bring about consumer education because we know that without educating the market place, it is going to be almost impossible to achieve what government needs to achieve in terms of the objectives of government. What we have done is to bring together participants from different parts of the world to exhibit in Nigeria, bring expert speakers from all over the world to talk about some of these things. An important thing with Card Expo is that a lot of our seminars are free. Again just because of this consumer education aspect of it, we want civil servants to come, we want students to come, we want the entire market to be represented so that they can come and get information and they can get to see some of these technologies at work.
Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the Federal Government’s alleged tax evasion case against Binance Holdings Ltd. cryptocurrency exchange, until September 24, 2026, to allow both parties more time to pursue an out-of-court settlement.
Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the new date on Thursday after Moses Ideho, counsel to the Federal Government, informed the court that discussions aimed at resolving the dispute amicably were still ongoing.
Ideho, a deputy director of Legal and Prosecution at the Nigeria Revenue Service (formerly the Federal Inland Revenue Service), told the court that the matter, which had been scheduled for a report on settlement or continuation of trial, could not proceed.
According to him, one reason for the delay was the reported elevation of Justice Nwite to the Court of Appeal, while the second was the continued reconciliation efforts between the parties.
“The parties are still exploring settlement in the charge that led to this case,” Ideho told the court.
Sunday Agaji, counsel to Binance, did not oppose the application for adjournment, following which Justice Nwite postponed proceedings until September 24 for either a report on the settlement discussions or continuation of trial.
The case was previously adjourned on May 12 after both the Federal Government and Binance informed the court that negotiations were underway to settle the matter outside the courtroom.
Binance had first indicated its willingness to pursue an amicable resolution on March 24.
The cryptocurrency company was re-arraigned on July 12, 2024, on a four-count charge bordering on alleged tax evasion.
Ayodele Omotilewa, Nigerian representative, pleaded not guilty on behalf of the company.
The re-arraignment followed the removal of Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan and his colleague, Nadeem Anjarwalla, from the charge after the Federal Government amended the case to make Binance Holdings Ltd the sole defendant.
Justice Nwite had, on June 14, 2024, discharged and struck out the names of Gambaryan and Anjarwalla after the prosecution filed the amended charge.
Binance is also facing a separate criminal prosecution by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which accuses the company of laundering about $35.4m.
In addition, the Nigeria Revenue Service is pursuing a separate civil suit against Binance before another judge of the Federal High Court, seeking approximately $79.5bn in alleged economic losses linked to the company’s operations in Nigeria.
Oodua Youth Coalition (OYC), a Yoruba socio-cultural group, has issued a notice to stage peaceful picketing at MTN Nigeria offices nationwide.
This action stems from the company’s alleged failure to publicly condemn recent xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa.
This is coming despite statement by Karl Toriola, chief executive officer, MTN Nigeria, who recently said that MTN may have originated from South Africa, he explained, but MTN Nigeria is a Nigerian publicly quoted company, managed by Nigerians and with a Nigerian board.
However, in a statement jointly signed Olatunji Adejuwon and Olaoye Abolaji,vice president and national secretary respectively of OYC, described MTN Nigeria’s silence as unacceptable, given the company’s South African roots and the patronage it enjoys from Nigerians
The coalition said it would proceed with a peaceful protest if the telecommunications company continued to ignore its demands, stressing that the action was intended to draw attention to the need for corporate responsibility and moral leadership in condemning xenophobic attacks against fellow Africans.
“Consequently, the Oodua Youth Coalition hereby gives notice that we shall, without hesitation, commence a peaceful picketing of MTN Nigeria’s offices if the company continues to ignore our legitimate demands.
“Our action is intended to draw attention to the need for corporate responsibility and moral leadership in condemning acts of xenophobia against fellow Africans,” the statement said.
The group renewed its call on MTN Nigeria to immediately convene a press conference, with representatives of the coalition in attendance, to unequivocally condemn the xenophobic attacks and reaffirm its commitment to the safety, dignity and unity of all Africans.
It maintained that the proposed protest would be peaceful, orderly and in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
According to the coalition, relevant security agencies have been notified of the planned action, while appropriate communications have also been sent to the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria.
“We once again call on MTN Nigeria to immediately convene a press conference, with representatives of the Oodua Youth Coalition in attendance, to unequivocally condemn the xenophobic attacks and reaffirm its commitment to the safety, dignity and unity of all Africans.
“We emphasise that our proposed action shall remain peaceful, orderly and in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Relevant security agencies have been duly notified, and appropriate communications have also been sent to the South African diplomatic mission in Nigeria.”
Reaffirming its commitment to defending the rights and dignity of Nigerians, the coalition vowed not to relent until its concerns received the desired attention.
“The Oodua Youth Coalition remains committed to defending the dignity of Nigerians and promoting African solidarity. We will not relent until our concerns receive the attention they deserve,” the statement added.
Responding to the controversy, Toriola further condemned all forms of xenophobia and violence against Africans living in South Africa, insisting that MTN Nigeria is a Nigerian company with substantial local ownership.
“We unequivocally condemn any form of xenophobia, violence or attacks against any community in the world. We’re a Nigerian company, through and through. We’re listed on the stock exchange with over 201,000 retail investors, and 11 million people hold shares through their pension funds in MTN Nigeria.
“We provide the digital backbone of the economy, and we have a completely Nigerian entity.
“Yes, MTN was founded in South Africa, and the parent company that is the majority shareholder is South African. But let’s also look at it objectively. The shareholding of MTN Holding South Africa is only 50 per cent African.
“The remaining 50 per cent is from across the world — 27 per cent from the United States, with the rest from the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region,” Toriola said.
By Bidemi Oke
Every civilisation has been built on one invisible infrastructure. The Romans built roads. The Industrial Revolution built electricity. The Internet built information. The next economy may be built on something far less tangible.
Trust
That sounds counterintuitive because we have spent centuries believing that money is the foundation of every economy. It isn’t. Money has never been the foundation; it has simply been the mechanism through which trust is exchanged. Every major financial innovation, from coins and paper notes to credit cards, online banking and blockchain, has been humanity’s attempt to solve the same problem: “how do we help strangers trust one another without ever meeting?”
Seen through that lens, today’s financial revolution looks very different.
Most discussions about digital finance revolve around whether cash will disappear. We debate mobile wallets, central bank digital currencies, cryptocurrency, real-time payments and digital banking. Yet these conversations often mistake the visible change for the actual transformation.
The real shift is not that money is becoming digital. The real shift is that trust is becoming programmable. That single idea explains why the financial landscape is changing faster than many people realize.
For decades, finance has depended on institutions to create confidence. Banks verified identities, governments authenticated currencies, contracts relied on lawyers, payment networks validated transactions and every exchange involved an intermediary whose primary role was to reassure two parties that the system could be trusted.
Technology is quietly rewriting that arrangement
Today, identities can be verified digitally. Transactions can be authenticated within seconds, smart contracts can execute agreements automatically once predefined conditions are met, and artificial intelligence can detect suspicious activity before humans notice it. Increasingly, confidence is being built into the infrastructure itself rather than added afterwards.
This is why I believe we need a new way to think about the evolution of finance, not as a journey from cash to digital payments, but as “three generations of financial trust”.
The first generation was Physical Trust. Trust was tied to tangible assets like gold, paper currency, handwritten signatures and face-to-face interactions. Confidence came from what people could physically see and hold.
The second generation was Institutional Trust. As economies expanded, institutions became the guarantors of financial confidence. Banks, regulators, payment networks and financial intermediaries enabled transactions at a scale impossible through personal relationships alone. Trust shifted from physical objects to established organisations.
We are now entering the third generation: Programmable Trust.
Here, trust is embedded directly into technology. Verification happens automatically. Payments settle in real time, financial services become integrated into everyday experiences instead of existing as separate destinations. Increasingly, people interact with trusted systems rather than trusted institutions alone. That distinction is more profound than it first appears.
Many organisations still measure digital transformation by counting how many services have moved online, but digitising an existing process is not the same as redesigning how trust flows through an economy. Converting paperwork into an application does not automatically create a digital financial ecosystem.
This explains why some economies process millions of digital transactions every day yet continue to face friction, inefficiency and limited financial inclusion. The missing ingredient is rarely another payment platform. More often, it is interoperable infrastructure, trusted digital identity, consistent regulation and systems capable of working together seamlessly.
In other words, the future of finance will not be determined by who builds the fastest application. It will be determined by who builds the most trusted ecosystem.
This has significant implications for Africa. The continent has rightly earned global recognition for accelerating digital financial adoption. Yet the next opportunity extends beyond increasing transaction volumes. The greater challenge is designing financial infrastructure where payments, identity, data, compliance and commerce interact intelligently rather than operating in isolation.
That is where long-term competitive advantage will emerge. Perhaps the greatest irony of all is that the more advanced finance becomes, the less visible it will appear.
People rarely think about the internet protocols that power a video call or the cloud infrastructure supporting an online purchase. Likewise, future generations may hardly think about payment rails, settlement networks or blockchain architecture. Financial experiences will simply happen securely, instantly and almost invisibly.
History suggests that successful technologies eventually disappear from our attention not because they become less important, but because they become so reliable that we stop noticing them altogether.
So, are we entering a fully digital financial economy? Perhaps that is no longer the right question.
A more useful question is whether we are entering an economy where trust itself becomes digital infrastructure because if that is true, then the organisations shaping the future of finance are not merely moving money more efficiently.
They are redesigning how entire economies create confidence at scale and that may prove to be the most valuable innovation of all.
Bidemi Oke is the Chief Executive Officer of FlashChange, a fintech platform focused on secure digital asset exchange. He is an entrepreneur and vibrant leader, recognized for driving innovation and redefining access in the financial technology industry.
Court Adjourns Alleged Binance Tax Evasion Case over Settlement Talks
Fixed Wired Internet Market Lags as Mobile Gains Ground
Xenophobic Attacks: OYC Threatens to Picket MTN Nigeria Offices
New NIMC Act Strengthens Data Protection, Privacy – Director
BON Establishes Six Ad Hoc Committees to Modernize Broadcasting
NASENI Moves to Digitize CCB’s 5m Assets Declaration and Operations
Mobile Internet Gender Gap Widest in Africa – GSMA
Nigeria Launches FreeTV Nationwide
CANAL+ Partners Samsung to Pre-Load DStv Stream on New Samsung TVs In Nigeria, Other African Countries
Lebara Nigeria Launches Lebara Play, Africa’s First Telecom-Owned Micro-Drama Platform
News2 days agoNRC, Ponzi Scheme Collapses Resulting Loss of Billions of Naira
News2 days agoNSITF Partners South African Insurer on Digital Transformation
General News2 days agoKPMG Urges Africa’s Most Innovative Tech Entrepreneurs to Enter the Global Tech Innovator 2026 Competition
E-Financial2 days agoFCT-IRS Unveils New Digital Platform, Taxporta
E-Business2 days agoFG Suspends New Internet Regulations to Prevent Overlapping Rules
E-Business2 days agoNIN Enrollment Hits over 136m as New ID Law Takes Effect
E-Business2 days agoPlateau PCC Collects Nigerians’ Data without Privacy Policy – FIJ
General News2 days agoCourt Declares ARCON’s N60Bn Fine against Facebook Nigeria Illegal