Connect with us

E-Financial

E-PPAN, Others Say Judiciary Strategic In Combating Financial Frauds

Published

on

(L-r): Iliyasu Kwarbai,‎ head of Lagos zone, EFCC, Osioke Ojior, chief risk officer at NIBSS and Justice Atinuke Ipaye of the High Court of Lagos, at the 5th annual Payment Systems & Fraud Conference 2014 held in Lagos recently.
Kindly share this post

Stakeholders in the Nigerian financial sector have urged the judiciary not to relent on the fight against financial and other related frauds in a bid to safeguard the economy.

Rising from the 5th e-fraud conference organized by the Electronic Payment Association of Nigeria (E-PPAN) in Lagos, the stakeholders issued a communiqué identifying the judiciary as strategic partners to stem fraud.

The communiqué signed by Mrs Onajite Regha, chief executive officer of E-PPAN read: The criminal justice process in Nigeria in relation to electronic frauds is evolving with relevant laws still being enacted and law enforcement agencies and judicial system still in the process of understanding the technicalities of the issues.

“The entire process is made up of Laws, Institutions and Processes. Participants welcomed the formation of a collaborative strategy between the judiciary, the law enforcement agencies and the financial industry. They offered the industry their full support to strengthen justice and to implement policies and procedures that ensure that all components of the process are effective. All of these measures are necessary in order to successfully combat electronic payment crimes which threaten the entire payment framework”.

The conference participants averred that electronic payment fraud is a threat not only to individuals and corporate organisations but to the entire nation. Its cost implication can be measured through its economic and social impacts.

“It affects job opportunities and reduces standard of living. It diminishes national image, affects consumers’ confidence, ruin big brands and erodes international confidence in the authenticity of our payments systems. They condemned the acts of fraudsters who gladly exploit the anonymity, global reach, speed and cost effectiveness of the electronic payment system to pursue criminal endeavours,” the Communique read.

According to the statistics provided by NIBBS, in the first 9 months of 2014, the industry had lost over Four Billion, Eight Hundred and Ten Million, Two Hundred and Sixty Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Sixty Six Naira, (N4, 810,262,266). Participants agreed to cooperate and do everything to ensure that offenders are brought to justice.

All participants accentuated the urgent need to enhance awareness creation at different levels of the criminal justice chain, which includes staff of financial institutions, the law enforcement agencies and the judiciary.

They decried the situation where the prosecutors and the judiciary are not invited to be part of knowledge event.

To that effect, the industry committed to supporting the judiciary and law enforcement agents with awareness and trainings on trends and techniques of electronic crime.

“The participants recognized the role of the judiciary as strategic partners to stem fraud. The Chief Judge of Lagos State reaffirmed the commitment of the judiciary to the fight against electronic payment crime.  She advised investigators and prosecutors to pay great attention to details and be meticulous to ensure investigations stand the scrutiny of the courts  since the courts decisions are based on evidence.

“The participants agreed that the role of the judiciary remains unchanged as the resolver of disputes, interpreter of the law and defender of the Constitution. What must change however, are the tools and resources to tackle crimes.

“Participants proposed a practice direction from the judiciary to accept opening statements in cases of electronic fraud to assist the court in understanding the gravity of offences before the court. The advantage of an opening statement is that both attorneys at the earliest opportunity are able to give a brief summary of their case and highlights the evidence they intend to lead in support or defence of the allegation.

“A well planned opening statement serves as a road map of the trial. Participants welcomed the prospect of working on an action plan to improve the knowledge of the judiciary as it relates to types, modus operandi and consequence of electronic fraud.

“The status of the current laws in Nigeria shows that the delay in the cyber crime law has its negative effect in the criminal justice process. There is need for accelerated passage of comprehensive laws on payment system e.g. the Payment System Management Bill and other relevant laws that can support the structure of the payment systems”.

The passage of the Evidence Act of 2011 has improved the opportunities for prosecution of criminals.

However, the deficiency of expertise in digital forensics within the banking sector impairs adequate evidence to prosecute fraudsters that are apprehended and charged to court.

Participants therefore called for an industry wide forensics laboratory and capacity building of experts in digital forensics.

Reiterating their support for E-PPAN, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) requested further cooperation of the financial institutions, ISPs, and telecommunication companies for crime investigators and prosecutors.

They lamented the current information sharing process within the industry.

The participants agreed that all parties involved in the e-Payment ecosystem should carryout due diligence and detailed background checks on employees before employment.

The Electronic Payment Providers Association of Nigeria (E-PPAN) hosted the 5th Annual Payment Systems and Fraud Conference on the 4th of November, 2014 with the theme: “Unbundling the Criminal Justice Process in a Digital Economy”.

Delegations came from thirty four companies to strategize on collaborative opportunities on achieving a smooth and speedy prosecution of financial crimes.

The communiqué acknowledges the push on the critical need for education and awareness within the criminal justice process and the crucial role of collaboration amongst stakeholders in ensuring the success of crime reduction within the cyber space.

The conference participants (Abbey Mortgage Bank, Altech West Africa, Central Bank of Nigeria, Computer Warehouse Group, Economic and Financial Crime Commission, Digital Encode, Eartholeum Networks, E-Payment Providers Association of Nigeria, Enterprise Bank Plc, First City Monument Bank, ITEX Integrated Services, Lagos State Judiciary and Mainstreet Bank Plc.

Others are Money4 Nigeria Services Ltd, Nigeria Inter Bank Settlement Systems, P O. Jimoh- Lasisi and Associates, Socketworks Ltd, Standard Chartered Bank, United Bank for Africa, Unified Payments Services, and VoguePay ) expressed their commitment to the development of a formidable electronic crime justice process.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

E-Financial

EFCC Seeks Suspension, Prosecution of Banks for Aiding N162Bn Crypto Scams

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has called for the suspension and prosecution of deposit banks, Fintechs and microfinance banks aiding and abetting fraudsters in defrauding Nigerians through fraudulent schemes.

EFCC Seeks Suspension, Prosecution of Banks for Aiding N162Bn Crypto Scams

Wilson Uwujaren, director of Public Affairs of the Commission, made the call in Abuja, on the sidelines of a recent news briefing about negligence and compromise of the financial institutions that cost victims billions of naira.

Uwujaren said that the commission uncovered widespread compromise within Nigeria’s financial system, involving an N18.7 billion investment scam and fraudulent transactions of N162 billion in cryptocurrencies.

He accused one new-generation bank, six Fintechs and some microfinance banks of aiding and abetting fraudsters in laundering their proceeds.

“It is worrisome that investigations by the commission showed that cryptocurrency transactions to the tune of N162 billion passed through a new generation bank without any due diligence.

“Investigations also showed that a single customer maintained 960 accounts in the new generation bank, and all the accounts were used for fraudulent purposes.”

He said that the financial institutions clearly compromised banking procedures and allowed the fraudsters to safely change their ill-gotten gains into digital assets and move them to safe destinations.

“The Commission is calling on regulatory bodies to bring financial institutions to compulsory compliance with regulations in the areas of Know Your Customers (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) and others.

“Deposit money banks, Fintechs and microfinance banks found to be aiding and abetting fraudsters should be suspended and referred to the EFCC for thorough investigation and possible prosecution,” he said.

He said that the scams of N18.7 billion were in two categories, adding that the first was a syndicate of fraudsters that employed an airline discount scheme to lure their victims.

The second one, according to him, involved a company named Fred and Farid Investment Limited, simply called FF Investment, which lured Nigerians into a bogus investment arrangement.

“The modality of the fraudsters in the airline scam involved a string of carefully devised airline discount information that any unsuspecting foreign traveller will fall for.

“What they do is to advertise a discount system in the purchase of flight tickets of a particular foreign carrier.

“The payment module is designed in such a way that their victims would be convinced that the payment is actually made into the account of the airline.

“No sooner is the payment made than the passenger’s entire funds in his bank account are emptied.”

He said that over 700 victims had fallen into the trap of fraudsters through the scheme with a total loss of N651.1 million.

Uwujaren said that the commission succeeded in recovering and returning N33.63 million to victims of the scam and cautioned Nigerians to be more vigilant.

The second scheme, according to him, involved a company named Fred and Farid Investment Limited, simply called FF Investment, which lured Nigerians into bogus investment arrangements.

“More than 200,000 victims have been defrauded in this regard.  A total sum of N18.1 billion was raked in through nine companies offering diverse investment packages.”

Uwujaren said that foreign nationals are behind the schemes, with three Nigerian accomplices who have been arrested and charged in court.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

Fitch Downgrades Afreximbank to ‘BB+’/Stable Amid Concerns Over Ghana’s Debt

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Fitch Ratings has downgraded African Export-Import Bank’s (Afreximbank) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to ‘BB+’ from ‘BBB-’.

Fitch also downgraded Afreximbank’s Short-Term IDR to ‘B’, from ‘F3’, and the long-term ratings on the bank’s global medium-term note programme and debt issuance to ‘BB+’, from ‘BBB-’.

The global rating institution subsequently withdrew the bank’s ratings.

In a statement posted on its website, Fitch explained that the downgrade “reflects our revision of Afreximbank’s policy importance risk to ‘medium’ from ‘low’ following the announcement of an agreement on Ghana’s debt to Afreximbank in the context of Ghana’s broader restructuring”.

It said, “This has led us to revise our assessment of Afreximbank’s business profile to ‘high risk’ from ‘medium risk’, which resulted in an overall business environment notching of -3 (-2 previously).”

Essentially, a BB+ /Stable rating from Fitch is considered non-investment grade, also known as high-yield or “junk”.

The statement added, “Fitch has chosen to withdraw the ratings for commercial reasons. Fitch will no longer provide ratings or analytical coverage for the bank.”

In arriving at its decision, Fitch stated, “Afreximbank and Ghana announced in December 2025 that they had reached an agreement in principle with respect to Afreximbank’s $750 million sovereign loan to Ghana.

“The IMF stated that the deal is in line with the comparability of treatment under Ghana’s official creditor committee. We view this as evidence that Afreximbank did not benefit from its preferred creditor status (PCS).”

It said, “While we had not previously given any uplift in our solvency assessment for PCS, the de-facto preferential treatment in a broader sense that Afreximbank, along with most other multilateral development banks, benefit from was previously factored into our assessment of the bank’s policy importance.

“The bank’s inclusion in Ghana’s restructuring underlines its weakening policy importance, in our view.”

The rating institution also said, “Our latest assessment of Afreximbank’s ‘high’ business profile risk underpins the ‘high risk’ quality of governance assessment, and ‘high’ strategy risk.

“The ‘high risk’ business environment assessment reflects the bank’s exposure to a ‘high risk’ operating environment with weak credit quality, low income per capita and high political risk in the countries of operation.”

It explained that the ratings were driven by the bank’s Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) of ‘bb+’, reflecting the lower of the solvency (bbb+) and liquidity (a) assessments and its ‘high risk’ business environment.

The statement added that the solvency assessment balanced the bank’s ‘strong’ capitalisation and ‘moderate’ risk profile.

Fitch stated, “Afreximbank’s ‘bbb+’ solvency assessment reflects both ‘strong’ capitalisation and ‘moderate’ solvency risks. Our assessment of capitalisation is underpinned by a ‘moderate’ usable capital to risk-weighted assets (21 per cent at end-2024) ratio, a ‘strong’ equity to assets and guarantees ratio (19 per cent) and ‘excellent’ internal capital generation.

“The ‘moderate’ solvency risks assessment reflects ‘high’ credit risk, ‘weak’ risk management policies, ‘low’ concentration risk and ‘very low’ equity risk.

“Afreximbank’s ‘a’ liquidity assessment reflects the ‘strong’ quality of treasury assets, measured by the share of treasury assets rated ‘AA-’ to ‘AAA’ (50 per cent at end-2024 and we expect it to remain above the ‘strong’ threshold of 40 per cent), and a ‘moderate’ liquidity buffer (defined as liquid assets-to-short-term debt, at 95 per cent at end-2024).

“The bank’s liquidity profile is enhanced by its access to capital markets and diversified funding sources, including credit lines ($2.1 billion, of which $0.6 billion was committed at end-2024) and collateral deposits. The short duration of the loan portfolio also contains liquidity needs.”

Fitch also stated that it “assesses shareholders’ capacity to support Afreximbank at ‘bb-’, based on the average rating of key shareholders (ARKS) accounting for more than 50 per cent of the bank’s capital.

“The sovereign upgrades of Egypt and Nigeria, Afreximbank’s two largest shareholders, in April 2025 improved the ARKS to ‘B+’ from ‘B’.

“Credit risk mitigants on callable capital (covering 40 per cent of $4.3 billion) enhance the support capacity by one notch to ‘bb-’.

“The support assessment also reflects the ‘strong’ propensity of shareholders to support the bank, which has been consistently demonstrated by ongoing capital injections and dividend reinvestments.”

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

FBNQuest Merchant Bank Rebrands as Quest Merchant Bank

Published

on

Kindly share this post

FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited has completed a change of name and will now operate as Quest Merchant Bank Limited, following the receipt of all required corporate and regulatory approvals.

The name change does not affect the Bank’s legal or going-concern status, management, or the nature of its business. Quest Merchant Bank Limited remains a duly licensed merchant bank, regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and continues to deliver its full suite of merchant banking, advisory, and capital markets services to clients.

Commenting on the development, the Ag. Managing Director/CEO, Afolabi Olorode, stated: “This name change represents a pivotal milestone in the rich history of the Bank and a deliberate strategic repositioning that reflects our resilience, strong track record, and long-term growth ambitions. While our name has evolved, our commitment to our clients, stakeholders, and regulators remains unwavering.”

As part of the transition, the Bank is updating its branding, communications, and digital platforms to reflect the new name. During this period, some legacy references may remain visible across select touchpoints as updates are progressively completed.

All existing contracts, client relationships, and obligations of the Bank remain valid, binding, and fully enforceable following the name change.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending