General News
FG Not Serious in IP Law Enforcement – Aponmade

Akeem Aponmade, a legal practitioner and intellectual property consultant and expert in IP law enforcement. He is very passionate about intellectual property rights and an avid anti-piracy campaigner as well. An intellectual property consultant of note, he is the lead consultant at A.O Aponmade & Co. Aponmade has worked in IP firms. He is a member of the National Anti-piracy Committee and an adviser to the Nigerian Copyright Commission. He spoke to funmi ilesanmi on ways individuals can best protect their intellectual property rights, software piracy and level of awareness on intellectual property rights in Nigeria.
IP in Nigeria
The knowledge that Nigerians have about the concept of intellectual property is minimal. The ramifications of IP rights and the impact of IP infringement are quite low.
From my experience over the years some people are now aware but the awareness level is still quite low. Several years ago, I witnessed where a pool of right owners went to the police station to request for police support in raiding a shop where several thousands of pirated works were found.
On getting there, the DPO picked up a fake copy and requested for the original and said are you sure this is a fake copy, why are you bothering this people we should praise them for a job well done; this is the way Taiwan started.
I think the police have improved over the years; you need to explain to them what has been done.
We have improved in terms of knowledge but there is still a long way to go. A long way to go among the law enforcement officers themselves, we need to take the issue of IP infringement more seriously.
We are not talking about just the right owners but everybody.
There are people who have died as a result of being driven in vehicles where fake brake pads were used.
There are people who have died because fake drugs were administered on them. Somebody who has hypertension and fake drugs to cure the ailment was administered on him, he cannot be better.
The celebration of IP Day needs to be driven by both the private and public sector. Unfortunately, we have not seen the federal government showing seriousness in IP rights by putting IP on the front burner.
How to Protect your Intellectual Property Right
The starting point is the rule of law.
You have the Copyright Act and all the subsidiary litigations in place and that law vests rights in the creators and owners of certain works.
This means that they would enjoy copyright of their work for a number of years, and that if such work is infringed upon, the owner can take up the matter by suing the infringer and demand for damages for an account and then ask for conversion.
If a pirated copy is made of a work; that (pirated) copy is deemed to be your property when the court at the end of the day finds that an infringement of your work has been made.
You also have the right to write to the law enforcement agencies asking them to apprehend the infringer and prosecute him.
The Copyright Act provides for both civil remedies and criminal sanctions; so if you want to protect your work, first of all you must know that the law allows you to protect your work because if the law does not make copyright infringement a civil wrong and does not make the act an offence then there is nothing you can do about it.
That the law provides for it is a big boost to right owners interested in enforcing their rights.
The other thing to talk about now is what steps to take to physically protect your work from being infringed and it depends on the type of work you are talking about.
I know that in the literary industry which is the book industry, some people have come up with copy protects – materials used in printing that make it impossible for anyone to copy the contents.
There is also the DFID, a material placed in a book to prevent it from being pirated.
There are different kinds of antipiracy devices people have come up with in different areas.
You have the literary industry comprising publishers, software developers, photographers. You also have those in the music and film industries.
You have those in the broadcast and those in the physical arts – sculptors and the rest of them so there are different types of works and different types of owners.
In the United States of America for instance, those in the motion-picture industry have come up with a device that makes it impossible for you to replicate from an original DVD. That is a way of protecting your work.
What you must realize is that as science and technology are improving so are also the means of infringing on the copyright of people.
What copyright owners must also do is that if the thief does not stop thinking of devising new ways of stealing my property, I also must not stop thinking of how to protect my work.
Preventing people from infringing on your intellectual property right is the first step towards protecting your work.
The second step is what happens when the work has been infringed? If you sit down in your office or home and you are doing nothing, it means that the infringement would go serial.
What right owners also need to do is to put in place a kind of system that would help them detect when their works have been infringed and to identify where the infringement took place and who is responsible for the infringement.
I am also aware that in US and Europe, there are those we call ‘investigative consultants’ and law firms; and associations also have their employees – (Association of right owners) that have the responsibility of going out to monitor the pirates.
To find out if there are infringed copies and where they are coming from.
When they get the information, they pass it to their association and if they want to use law enforcement agencies they do that.
If what they want to do is to file an action in court, they pass the information to their solicitors who then file the necessary processes in court.
Software Piracy
There are different ways in which software piracy can take place.
When you take genuine software and make several copies from it that is one way to pirate software.
Another way is when a company that has 100 systems buys one software product – you must know first of all that what was sold is the licence – that is the authorization to use the software.
The authorization is given in units so if you buy software, the manufacturer of the software would indicate how many systems you could use it on.
It can be indicated that the software can be used on three systems.
The moment you load it on the third system, you do not have any right to load it on the fourth system.
If you load it on the fourth system, you have stolen that software.
Because it has been copied on more than the specified number of systems, there has been an infringement.
The Server dictates the number of systems a company has and the question to ask anyone who does it is: where is your Certificate of Authorization (COA) in all the systems? Failure to produce the COA shows that whatever thing you have there is illegal.
These are ways in which you can know if the software has been pirated.
What you must realize is that IP law enforcement in Nigeria is just developing.
When it comes to physical CD containing software, it can be just a straight way piracy.
When you pick one of those, you will know if it has been pirated or not.
You do not need to go to Dublin before you know because the packaging and every other thing would be different but there are some that are of such high quality that it would be very difficult to tell if it has been pirated or not.
The packaging and every other thing could be the same. It is only the manufacturer that would know all the distinguishing factors.
What Government Needs to Do
The agencies responsible for enforcing the IP laws need to be more serious about enforcement. I do not see any reason the police should not have an IPR section at the first CID level, at the state CID level, at the area command level and at the division level.
The issue of IP is a growing problem. Presently, there is a product which has no genuine one in the country. Effort must be made to remove the one we have in the country completely.
Today Nigeria is a destination for all the major brands of the world because they see it as one that holds great potential for growth.
The markets in Europe and America are saturated; this is why a country with more than 150 million people is the one that should not be ignored by any serious minded brand owner.
If we are interested in jump starting our economy, one of the areas that we have to take seriously is IP and attention can only be paid to the country when we take enforcement of IP rights seriously.
Government can show seriousness if it funds such agencies sufficiently.
When it insists on such agencies functioning effectively because it is not just a matter of funding alone, how are you dispensing it? So if you are given more, what will you do?
One of the ways of doing this is to ensure that the right people run these agencies.
When you put a round peg in a round hole, you get the desired results.
Is there anybody in the presidency that is overseeing IP right enforcement in the country or do we expect the president to know what is going on everywhere?
BSA Report on Software Piracy in Nigeria
This is a software alliance made up of software vendors like Microsoft, Symantec, and Autodesk along with their hardware partners like Dell and the rest.
What they do is to join hands to create an environment where IP rights can thrive in order to assist in achieving the overall goal of the software companies.
I had the priviledge of being their spokesperson sometime back.
Every year, the hardware manufacturers have a figure of how many products they sell in each country.
If you buy a new HP system or Dell for instance, you are most likely to find operating system in them, the software already loaded. It is different from going to Otigba to couple the system.
You do not have the right to couple the software.
Dell has an arrangement with Microsoft that for every hardware sold, there is Microsoft software in it and Dell pays Microsoft for this.
The application software whether you want to use Microsoft office or Adobe or Autodesk, it is then that you will buy and install on your hardware.
When they sell general software like Microsoft office, the intention might be that you have 1,000 systems and that 800 of them will use Microsoft office which is the application, not the operating system.
But the number of hardware sold into the country when compared with the application software sold by software companies does not match.
That is one area the BSA gets it statistics from. This is used to determine the level of software piracy we have in the country.
They are also aware that there is a growing menace of purchase of software online.
When people buy software online not from the vendor but from people who advertise that they have cheap software to sell, they end up buying pirated ones.
I know that some people who sell counterfeit software buy on auction and then get those things shipped to them.
Anybody in a particular business knows the price at which their product is being sold coming directly from the vendor so if anybody is offering you a pirated product at lesser price, then the red flag should be raised that something is fishy
Cost should not be a reason for patronizing pirated software. If we place value on IP rights, people will not think that way.
General News
Ant Graft Agencies Raise Alarm over Rising Crypto-Linked Financial Crimes

Ola Olukoyede, chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has raised concerns over the growing threat of cryptocurrency-related crimes in the country.

Olukoyede made this known at the inauguration of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Country Programme for Nigeria 2026–2030, on Friday in Abuja.
The EFCC boss revealed that the world lost more than 160 billion dollars to illicit transactions involving digital currencies in 2025.
Olukoyede highlighted the risks posed by cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.
He noted that criminal networks were increasingly exploiting technological advancements, global financial systems, and governance gaps to facilitate illicit activities.
“Last year, the world lost over 160 billion dollars to illicit transactions in cryptocurrencies.
”Tackling these challenges requires coordinated national responses, strong institutions and sustained intelligence-driven strategies,” he said.
He said that the UNODC programme came at a time when Nigeria and the global community were grappling with evolving threats from transnational organised crime, financial crimes, illicit financial flows, and cyber-enabled offences.
Olukoyede said the programme represented a strategic foundation for collective efforts to strengthen the rule of law.
This, he said, included enhancing the criminal justice system and protecting institutions and communities from violence, crime, and financial corruption.
He noted that the programme’s focus on combating corruption and illicit financial flows was particularly significant to the EFCC, given the enormous economic and social costs of such crimes on Nigeria.
“The imperative of sustained action to turn the tide cannot be overstated,” he said.
The EFCC chairman expressed pride in the commission’s longstanding partnership with UNODC, stating that the collaboration had strengthened institutional capacity and improved Nigeria’s response to economic and financial crimes.
He said the partnership had supported reforms and operational frameworks that enhanced the agency’s effectiveness in tackling corruption and related offences.
Olukoyede expressed optimism that the programme would further improve national security and safeguard the future of Nigerians through strengthened collaboration and shared operational experiences.
He stressed the need to continuously refine frameworks and ensure that Nigeria’s institutions and citizens remain at the centre of all collaborative efforts.
The EFCC boss commended UNODC for initiating the programme and reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to supporting its implementation to achieve measurable outcomes for Nigeria and the wider region.
Dr Musa Aliyu, SAN, chairman, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), in his remarks, called for stronger collaboration among institutions to address Nigeria’s growing security and corruption challenges.
Aliyu said Nigerian society was currently grappling with multiple social ills, stressing that no single agency could effectively tackle the challenges alone.
According to him, the country faces complex and interconnected threats, including violent extremism, organised crime, illicit financial flows, smuggling, and other serious offences.
“There is a common point of truth, Nigerian society is entangled with many ills, and no agency can fight them alone,” he said.
The ICPC boss noted that these challenges also posed significant threats to the nation’s criminal justice system, warning that no society could remain secure under such conditions.
He, however, expressed optimism that through strategic partnerships and collective efforts, Nigeria could overcome the challenges.
Aliyu described the UNODC Country Programme as timely and appropriate, given the scale and urgency of the issues confronting the nation.
He emphasised the importance of international support, noting that Nigeria’s progress in tackling crime and corruption had been strengthened by its collaboration with global partners, particularly the United Nations.
The ICPC chairman said the partnership between the commission and UNODC had been beneficial to Nigerian society, contributing to efforts aimed at strengthening institutions and improving governance.
He congratulated UNODC on what he described as a significant milestone and a “grand stride” in supporting Nigeria’s fight against crime and corruption.
Aliyu reaffirmed ICPC’s commitment to continued collaboration, assuring stakeholders of the commission’s readiness to work with UNODC and other partners toward national development.
“I assure you of our continued support and willingness to work together for the growth and betterment of Nigeria,” he said.
General News
NCC to Curb SIM Fraud, Strengthen Digital Security with New Platform

Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has unveiled plans to introduce a Telecoms Identity Risk Management System (TIRMS) platform to tackle SIM-related fraud, strengthen digital security and boost confidence in Nigeria’s digital economy.

Aminu Maida, executive vice chairman of the commission, disclosed this on Thursday in Abuja at a stakeholders’ consultative forum on the proposed platform and planned regulatory changes.
Maida, represented by Rimini Makama, executive commissioner, Stakeholder Management, said the Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number (MSISDN), commonly known as SIM or mobile phone number, had become central to financial transactions, digital identity and access to services, but warned that its widespread use had also created vulnerabilities.
He noted that fraudulent activities linked to recycled, swapped, churned and barred SIMs had emerged as a major channel for identity theft and financial crimes, weakening trust in digital platforms.
He said, “The Mobile Station International Subscriber Directory Number commonly known as the SIM or mobile phone number has evolved into a critical identifier underpinning financial transactions, digital authentication, and access to essential services across all sectors of our economy.
“This evolution, however, has created new and challenging vulnerabilities. The fraudulent use of churned, recycled, swapped, and barred MISISDN’s has become a significant vector for financial fraud and identity theft, eroding public trust in our digital platforms and undermining the identity of systems we have worked hard to build.
“It is in direct response to these challenges that the Commission has initiated the Telecoms Identity Risk Management System Platform.”
According to him, the platform will enable service providers to verify mobile numbers flagged for suspicious or fraudulent activities before granting access, a move expected to reduce exposure to fraud and improve accountability.
He added that the system would enhance coordination among regulators, financial institutions and security agencies to build a more resilient digital ecosystem.
To support the rollout, the commission has proposed amendments to its Quality of Service Business Rules and the Registration of Communications Subscribers framework.
The proposed changes will require telecom operators to notify subscribers at least 14 days before recycling their lines and to upload details of churned numbers to the platform within seven days.
The amendments also introduce stricter provisions for blocking fraudulently registered or misused SIMs, aimed at improving transparency and protecting consumers.
Maida said the initiative reflects the commission’s commitment to collaboration and a whole-of-government approach to addressing digital risks, urging stakeholders to actively contribute to shaping the framework.
Also speaking, Olatokunbo Oyeleye, director of Cybersecurity and Internet Governance at the commission, emphasised the importance of trust in the digital economy.
“As rightly noted, digital trust is the operating licence of modern economy. Without it, nothing scales and with it everything accelerates. For our sector, this trust must be embedded across the entire value chain,” she said.
It was reported earlier that the NCC proposed that telecom operators must give subscribers a minimum of 14 days’ notice before deactivating their SIM cards over inactivity or post-paid churn.
The proposal was contained in a consultation paper titled Stakeholders Consultation Process for the Telecoms Identity Risks Management Platform, dated February 2026 and published on the Commission’s website.
Under the proposed amendments to the Quality-of-Service Business Rules, the NCC stated that “prior to churning of a post-paid line, the Operator shall send a notification to the affected subscriber through an alternative line or an email on the pending churning of his line.”
It added, “This notification shall be sent at least 14 days before the final date for the churn of the number.”
A similar provision was proposed for prepaid subscribers. The commission said, “prior to churning of a pre-paid line, the Operator shall send a notification to the affected subscriber through an alternative line or an email on the pending churning of his line,” stressing again that the notice “shall be sent at least 14 days before the final date for the churn of the number.”
General News
Kidnappers Now Use Banks to Collect Ransoms — Expert

Dr. Kabir Adamu, a security expert, has raised concern that kidnappers in Nigeria are now using banks to collect ransom payments.

Pix… CNBC
Adamu explained that in the past, kidnappers typically demanded cash payments for ransom.
However, there has been a noticeable shift to using mainstream banks for transactions.
Speaking on Arise News, Adamu, who is the CEO of Beacon Security and Intelligence Ltd, said this trend is worrying. In the past, kidnappers usually demanded cash, but now they are asking victims’ families to pay money through bank accounts.
He revealed that his team has tracked cases where ransom money was paid into bank accounts and successfully withdrawn.
Although he did not mention the banks involved, he said some progress is being made to address the issue.
Adamu explained that criminals previously used fintech platforms, but have now moved to traditional banks. This shift raises serious concerns about how well banks are monitoring transactions and following regulations.
He said Nigeria has improved its financial intelligence systems, especially after being removed from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) gray list.
However, he noted that there are still weaknesses in how rules are enforced.
According to him, “A lot has been done in terms of policy, but there are still major gaps in operations and compliance.”
“We’ve monitored kidnapping for ransom cases where the ransom is being collected by formal banks,” Adamu said.
“My team and I were shocked when the ransom demand was made in a formal bank. It was paid and collected. I don’t want to mention the names of the two banks that were extremely guilty, but even for those two, progress is being made,” he said.
The security expert noted that although fintech platforms had previously been linked to ransom payments, criminals have now shifted their operations to traditional banking channels, raising significant concerns about compliance and oversight in the banking industry.
Adamu emphasized that this shift in tactics underscores the urgent need for stronger accountability measures and compliance standards within Nigeria’s financial institutions.
He also pointed out the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in fully addressing the issue, despite recent advancements in financial intelligence efforts.
“From the point of view of policy, a lot has been done, but from the point of view of operations, there is still a lot that remains to be done,” Adamu stated.
According to a report by SBM Intelligence, Nigeria’s kidnap-for-ransom crisis generated at least N2.57 billion for criminal groups between July 2024 and June 2025.
The report, titled “The Year Ahead at an Inflexion Point,” highlighted that despite kidnappers’ demands totaling N48 billion during the year, they only received N2.57 billion in actual payments.
Telecom2 days agoUS Jury Finds Meta, Google Liable in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case
News2 days agoEU Pumps €290m into Nigeria’s Digital, Health, Agri Sectors
News2 days agoFirm Shares Tips for Updating Your Digital Habits for an AI-driven World
E-Business2 days ago5 Wealth-Building Strategies for Nigerian Women-led Businesses
Telecom2 days agoMobile Money Transactions Accounted for $2 trillion in 2025
E-Business2 days agoNigeria, Finland Sign Cybersecurity Pact
E-Financial2 days agoMoneyMaster Enhances App, Rewards Users with Data and Airtime Bonuses
E-Financial1 day agoCBN Says Bank Customers Won’t Lose Deposits because of Recapitalisation













