Connect with us

News

FG Recants, Mulls ‘Amnesty’ for Boko Haram

Published

on

Kindly share this post

President Goodluck Jonathan on Thursday set up an amnesty committee to fine- tune details of clemency to Boko Haram sect members.

This is a major departure from Jonathan’s earlier stand that his government will not extend such cloak of grace to members of the group, he claimed are “faceless”

The consideration of amnesty for the deadly sect is said to have upset military chiefs in the country who tried in vain convince the President  not to fall into the trap that has been set for him by prominent northern leaders on the issue.

Rising from an emergency National Security Council (NSC) meeting where the possibility of granting amnesty to Boko Haram insurgents was discussed, the President however, soft-pedaled and set up a committee on the feasibility and modalities to be adopted to grant pardon to members of the dreaded Boko Haram sect.

A source at a security meeting held at the Presidential Villa, said members of the committee will work closely with the office of the National Security Adviser and is expected to submit its report to the president in two weeks.

Advertisement

The NSC meeting followed an earlier parley on Wednesday between the President and leadership of the Northern Elders Forum (NEF) at the State House, Abuja.

Ango Abdullahi,  chieftain of NEF, disclosed after Wednesday’s meeting with the President that government was contemplating options open to it on the issue.

“I’m sure something substantial will come out of this meeting,” Abdullahi told newsmen.

Sources said Wednesday’s meeting between the President and the NEF was a follow-up to a similar one in May 2012 during which the Northern group submitted a memorandum which the President promised to study and invite them back for further discussion on the issues raised.

Thursday’s NSC meeting had in attendance Muhammed Abubakar, inspector general (IG) of Police, Sambo Dasuki, National Security Adviser (NSA), and the Service Chiefs, among others.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, military chiefs were to have warned the President that the security implications of the action may be grave and that could also be interpreted to mean that the President is not a man of his word.  

Jonathan has flip-flopped on federal policy against Boko Haram since he took office in 2010.

Sahara Reporters,  an online community of international reporters and social advocates, reported that the military bosses reminded him of his words when he visited Borno State a few weeks ago when he said that there was no way he would grant amnesty to ghosts, stressing that nothing has changed.

Jonathan once said there were members of Boko Haram in his government, but it is not clear if they are still ghosts or he has identified them.

He was also said to have been reminded that many of their men and other security officers have been indiscriminately killed, warning him that telling the rank and file the decision on amnesty could ignite anger in the barracks.

Advertisement

At the end of the lengthy discussion, which lasted for five hours, the President had his way against the genuine advice of the military chiefs, except one.  He set up a committee to handle the issue of amnesty.

Kindly share this post

Dear Reader, Your support matters. But we believe that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. That is why, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and finance and how they affect lives. Our incisive and analytical view of how technology news affects the daily life help individuals and organizations make up their minds. Quality journalism costs money. Today, we're asking that you support us to do more. Kindly support our effort to deliver technology and finance journalism to everyone in the world. Donate as little as N1,000. Bank transfers can be made to: UBA Plc 1017156876 Communication Week Media Ltd

News

DataPro Upgrades Dangote Cement’s Credit Rating to AA+

Published

on

Kindly share this post

DataPro Rating Agency has upgraded the long-term credit rating of Dangote Cement Plc to AA+ from AA, citing the company’s strong financial performance, market leadership and ability to meet its financial obligations despite Nigeria’s challenging economic environment.

In its latest rating report, the technology-driven credit rating agency also affirmed Dangote Cement’s short-term rating at A1, with a Stable Outlook. The ratings are valid until June 16, 2027.

DataPro said the upgrade reflects the cement maker’s sustained financial strength, resilient operating performance and dominant position in Nigeria and across Africa.

According to the agency, the assessment followed a comprehensive review of the company’s capital base, earnings, liquidity, corporate governance, regulatory compliance and the sustainability of its financial performance over the medium to long term.

It noted that Dangote Cement’s strong brand, leading market share, solid earnings, robust asset base and experienced management continue to strengthen its ability to meet financial commitments on time.

Advertisement

The agency also highlighted the company’s outstanding financial performance in 2025.

According to the report, Dangote Cement posted N4.31 trillion in revenue during the year, representing a 20 per cent increase from the previous year. Profit before tax more than doubled, rising 109 per cent to N1.53 trillion, driven by higher sales, improved operating efficiency, lower finance costs and a stronger capital structure.

DataPro said the AA+ long-term rating indicates low credit risk and reflects excellent financial strength, business profile and operating performance relative to its rating benchmarks.

It added that the A1 short-term rating signifies good credit quality and shows that the company has a strong capacity to meet its short-term financial obligations as they fall due.

The rating agency, however, noted that the credit rating has a maximum shelf life of 12 calendar months in line with international best practice and should be used only as a reference, not as an offer to trade in securities or as a substitute for investors’ independent judgement.

Advertisement

 

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

Xora Finance, Fintech Firm Refuses to Hire Nigerians over Alleged Dishonesty

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Xora Finance has announced it will no longer consider job applicants from Nigeria.

 

Xora Finance is a digital bank founded by Joren Lundgren, in February 2026 and allows users to deposit and earn interest on their XRP cryptocurrency.

Lundgren, founder, in an announcement on X (formerly Twitter), cited an ongoing pattern of misconduct, such as dishonesty and theft, from previous Nigerian hires as the reason for the decision.

This sudden blanket ban came just days after the company’s official career page was aggressively recruiting remote workers for marketing and content roles.

Advertisement

The announcement generated heavy backlash online, with many people upset that a blanket rule punishes honest job seekers.

 

 

 

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

News

How Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Some lawyers have said that victims of Ponzi schemes have legal remedies, although recovering lost funds and prosecuting perpetrators remain major challenges.

How Ponzi Scheme Victims can Seek Legal Remedies — Lawyers

A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new participants rather than from actual profits.

Operators lure victims by promising high returns with little to no risk.

The scheme inevitably collapses when the flow of new investors slows down.

Some lawyers who spoke to News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) separate interviews with on Sunday, said that victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money.

Advertisement

Mr Chibuikem Opara, a lawyer at Justification Chambers, Ikeja,said many Nigerians continued to fall victim to Ponzi schemes in spite of repeated warnings.

Opara said it was wrong to attribute participation in Ponzi schemes to a lack of investment opportunities, noting that promoters often exploit investors’ greed through promises of unrealistic returns.

“What you cannot take away is the fact that many Nigerians have fallen and continue to fall victim to these schemes every time,” he said.

According to him, victims may individually or collectively institute civil actions against the beneficiary company for breach of contract or refund arising from failure of consideration.

Opara said victims could also unite to seek an order from the Federal High Court to wind up the beneficiary company.

Advertisement

He, however, noted that such efforts might yield little benefit if perpetrators had already siphoned the funds and left behind an empty shell.

The lawyer said available remedies largely depended on the actions of relevant authorities, adding that recipient accounts could be frozen to facilitate fund recovery and support winding-up proceedings.

Opara said regulators and law enforcement agencies often became aware of Ponzi schemes only after substantial losses had occurred.

According to him, victims frequently failed to report suspicious schemes early enough to enable timely intervention.

He added that funds are sometimes moved outside the country before authorities become aware of the fraud.

Advertisement

Opara also cited inadequate information and the deceptive nature of the schemes as major obstacles to investigation and prosecution.

“Most times, everything about the schemes is made to appear elusive, just like the profits promised to victims,” he said.

Also speaking, Mr Vincent Aminu of A.F. Aminu and Co. advised that victims of investment scams should report such cases to appropriate law enforcement agencies on time.

Aminu said victims could petition the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) or file reports with the police.

He said that after investigation, prosecutors could bring charges against suspects under relevant fraud-related laws, including provisions of the Criminal Code and the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act.

Advertisement

Beyond criminal prosecution, Aminu said .victims could pursue civil actions to recover their money

According to him, such actions may be based on breach of contract, unjust enrichment, or fraudulent misrepresentation, depending on the circumstances.

He added that victims could petition the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which could investigate illegal operators, shut down unauthorised platforms, and freeze assets.

He identified the anonymity of online fraudsters as one of the biggest challenges confronting investigators.

According to him, many operators concealed their identities through fake digital profiles and technologies that made tracking them difficult.

Advertisement

Aminu also noted that victims who delayed taking legal action risked losing opportunities for redress.

He added that prolonged court proceedings often delayed justice for victims.

“Many fraud-related cases take years before the court reaches a verdict, thereby delaying justice for victims,” he said.

Also, Mr Chris Ayiyi of Ayiyi Chambers, Apapa, described Ponzi schemes as a gamble that benefited early participants at the expense of later investors.

Ayiyi said some early entrants received returns on their investments, thereby encouraging others to join the schemes.

Advertisement

He said the schemes eventually collapsed, leaving late investors to bear the losses

The lawyer called for a complete ban on Ponzi schemes or sustained public enlightenment campaigns against them.

He urged the National Assembly to enact laws that would strengthen regulation and provide greater protection for investors.

According to him, stronger legal safeguards are necessary in a country operating a capital-based economy.

Advertisement

Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending