Connect with us

E-Financial

FXTM Analysis: FXTM June Major Assets Roundup

Published

on

forex new.jpg
Kindly share this post

Pushed to the cliff’s edge over the last six months of speculation and negative sentiment, the GBPUSD finally toppled off the verge on June 24th, the day after the Brexit vote was confirmed.

Plunging to levels last seen in 1985 during the ensuing panic sell-off, the GBPUSD fell to the level of 1.3234 from a high of 1.4974 earlier in the month.
 
Although the UK is not in the Eurozone, the implications of the wider European Union economic bloc without the UK partnership has also impacted heavily on the Euro.

The EURUSD fell from a high of1.135 mid-month to a low of 1.099 after the vote, while the GBPEUR dived steeply from a high of 1.3132 to a low of 1.1991. UK travellers are expected to find their Sterling cash worth much less across most major exchange rates, at the very least for the short-term.

The Gold price soared amid the uncertainty, taking off from $1260/ounce on June 23rd to over $1330 by June 24th. Investors stayed true to form during the market crisis, and rushed to buy up the safe-haven asset, while selling off the ones with higher risks.

Black gold – WTI Crude Oil – was also caught up in the sell-off, dropping to a low of $47/barrel from a high of $52 in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit shock.

The storm’s epicentre may have been the UK, but it spread fast and furiously across the world markets. Emerging market currencies suffered short-term wave crests in the storm before stabilising.

The USDIDR bucked from 13,333 to 13,550, throwing off the calming reins placed by Bank Indonesia’s new measures, namely an interest rate benchmark of 5.5 percent.

Due to the risk aversion in the markets and sudden loss of risk appetite following the unexpected shock from the EU referendum result, all of the emerging market currencies declined with this including the Indonesian Rupiah.

The reason was not too due to Brexit outcome having a direct impact on the local economy, but because reduced risk appetite encourages investors to be less attracted towards the emerging markets.

The local currency has since then regained losses, however it is possible that global economic uncertainty will linger for some time following this vote and this would mean there could be risk aversion in the markets at a later date.

The news of a possible tax cut is going to dominate the news locally within Indonesia, with the advantage to such an initiative being that the government is clearly trying to ease disposably income in the hope of higher domestic spending.

Of course and like the regular easing from the Bank Indonesia, these initiatives are targeted to improve domestic spending and GDP growth at a time where the economy is slowing down due to external risks.

The Ringgit blinked in shock as well. The USDMYR jumped from 3.9500 to 4.0900 in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit.

The volatility smoothed out somewhat thanks to Malaysian Prime Minister NajibRazak’s timely statement. The PM said that he did not expect that the Brexit would have a significant impact on the Malaysian economy, and that fiscal reforms would continue to be furthered.

The Malaysian Ringgit has been on a wild rollercoaster as of late, suffering steep losses as a result of the EU referendum shock to then regain all momentum around one week after the outcome. The EU referendum outcome is going to lead to a period of uncertainty in the markets that is likely to fuel risk aversion at a later stage, which in turn could negatively impact the Malaysian Ringgit.

It is still very difficult to pinpoint which direction the local currency is heading in next, and it should be remembered that the Federal Reserve have still not publically commented on how this could impact US interest rate policy.

The bright side to this is that if the Fed do postpone any possibility of future rate rises, then it might pull investors back towards the emerging markets where there is the benefit of higher interest rates.

The USDCNY was jolted from 6.5800 to 6.6900. It was to be expected that China’s currency could face challenges in the wake of the Brexit, but on the other hand, there is also speculation that China’s stock markets and larger business centres could gain some business if it starts flowing out of London.

The UK’s capital is expected to lose some power as a worldwide business and financial centre, mainly because of the gigantic tangle of legal and trading uncertainties presented by the Brexit.

The CNY is continuing to play down the expectations,as we believed it would do as the second half of the year approached.

The period of uncertainty now in the markets, following the EU referendum shock is going to plague risk appetite, which will be negative for the emerging markets and no EM is alone in withstanding this threat.

There are concerns in the short term that the China economy could be negatively impacted by the UK leaving the European Union, mainly because it is clear that the two governments have formed very close ties over the past two years and any loss of UK stability could impact the UK economy and its ability to maximize China relations.

The bright spot is however that the UK is now going to be forced to diversify trade relations outside of the EU, which is obviously going to present opportunities for the emerging markets because this is one area of the UK economy you would think would be reached out towards.

Obviously, if China has now developed strong relations with the UK then this could work out to their advantage at a later stage.

For the UAE’s Dirham, the main story was the GBPAED exchange rate, which fell from 5.5110 to 4.841 overnight just after the Brexit vote.

The ramifications could include cheaper exports from the UK to the UAE, but more barriers to travellers from the UK to GCC countries, given the stronger AED versus the Pound.

One possible benefit however is that the Brexit has triggered new impetus towards the idea of a free trade area between the UAE and the UK.

I think the plunge in the GBP exchange rate must be very pleasing news to any UK expatriate living in the Emirates right now. Of course, there is the positive aspect that any UAE company could now exploit and import products from the UK at a cheaper price, which might be encouraging to GDP prospects via higher imports at a time when GDP growth will be slipping lower due to depression in the price of oil.

I remain unsure how much further the GBP could fall against the AED in the medium term, not necessarily because there is any reason to be positive on the British currency, but because I don’t think the Federal Reserve are going to be in any position to begin raising US interest rates anytime soon. Any Dollar pressure is likely to lead to AED weakness, due to its peg against the USD.

Looking ahead to July, the market fallout from the Brexit vote is set to dominate, and risk appetite appears to be due for a diet of Gold and short-term profit-taking.


Kindly share this post

Nigeria CommunicationsWeek believes that technology makes life more exciting and helps improve the lives of people around Nigeria and indeed the world. So since 2007, we have devoted our energy to independent reportage of technology and how they affect lives.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

E-Financial

NDIC Drags Wema Bank to Court  over N125.38Bn Banana Island Assets

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), acting as liquidator of the defunct Gulf Bank Plc., has instituted two separate actions at the Federal High Court in Lagos against Wema Bank Plc.

NDIC Drags Wema Bank to Court  over N125.38Bn Banana Island Assets

The combined claims amount to approximately N125,384,535,500, arising from two distinct sets of disputed high-value properties in Banana Island, Lagos, alongside an alleged improper cash transaction of N401 million.

Both suits were filed under the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts and Financial Malpractices in Banks) Act and form part of NDIC’s long-running efforts to recover and liquidate outstanding assets of the defunct Gulf Bank nearly two decades after its collapse.

The two actions, though related, concern distinct sets of six properties each, acquired through different shell companies allegedly used by the defunct bank.

The first suit concerns six properties in Banana Island purchased in the name of Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited, described in the pleadings as a shell company used by Gulf Bank.

These plots situate in Zones J, K, L and P, have a combined area of approximately 13,794.145 square metres.

At the prevailing market rate of N4,500,000 per square metre, NDIC values these properties at N62,073,652,500.

The second suit concerns a separate set of six properties in Banana Island acquired through Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (later renamed Supra Commercials Limited), another entity in which the defunct bank held over 80 per cent shareholding.

These plots have a combined area of approximately 13,979.974 square metres, valued at N62,909,883,000 at the same per-square-metre rate.

In addition, the second suit claims recovery of N401,000,000 allegedly collected by Wema Bank from the NDIC’s agent bank, United Bank for Africa (UBA), in September 2009.

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria revoked Gulf Bank Plc’s banking licence by notice published in the Official Gazette of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Volume 93, Number 3, Government Notice No. 7) dated January 16, 2006, and the Federal High Court, Lagos Division, subsequently made a winding-up order on November 27, 2006, appointing NDIC as liquidator.

On the basis of those instruments, the Corporation maintains it is legally mandated to trace, recover, and liquidate all outstanding assets of the defunct bank for the benefit of depositors and creditors.

In the first suit, NDIC alleged that Gulf Bank acquired six Banana Island plots between 1998 and 2003 using Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited as a vehicle.

The internal records of the defunct bank reportedly treated the acquisition as a loan account, an arrangement NDIC contended shows the assets remain beneficially owned by Gulf Bank.

NDIC further alleged that Wema Bank took custody of these properties purportedly to secure an interbank deposit of N771.79 million, but that a joint CBN/NDIC special examination conducted in September 2005 found no record in Gulf Bank’s books confirming that any such deposit existed.

The examination report, dated September 30, 2005, found the defunct bank’s explanations unsatisfactory and no supporting documentation was subsequently produced.

According to NDIC, Wema Bank later presented two managers’ cheques from Access Bank and Intercontinental Bank, both dated September 2005 totaling N250 million in favour of Euston Wenberg Engineering Limited, which NDIC framed as instruments for a purchase rather than a recovery of a deposit.

NDIC contended that the purported sale at N250 million was commercially implausible, given that a single property in Banana Island at that time was worth in excess of N500 million.

In the second suit, NDIC also alleged that Gulf Bank injected N20 million into Bacad Finance and Investment Limited in 2001 to increase its share capital, and later invested a further N60 million in the company in 2003.

The defunct bank ultimately held over 80 per cent of Bacad Finance’s shares and used the entity to acquire a second set of six Banana Island plots.

The pleadings record that the defunct bank intended to develop the properties as a luxury residential estate of 72 flats, to be called Bacad Estate, in partnership with Shelter Afrique.

NDIC alleged that Wema Bank, without any valid mortgage, court order, or proprietary interest, took custody of these properties and later claimed to have sold them for N524 million by way of managers’ cheques dated 2006 and 2007.

NDIC described this claimed sale price as grossly implausible given that each property was worth over N4 billion by that period.

Separately, NDIC stated that in June 2009 it wrote to Wema Bank approving payment of N1,635,616.44 as the full outstanding deposit due to the bank as at January 16, 2006, the date Gulf Bank went into liquidation.

Notwithstanding that communication, NDIC alleged that in September 2009 Wema Bank collected N401 million from UBA, NDIC’s agent bank, without lawful justification, and that the Corporation has no record showing Wema Bank was owed any sum beyond the approved N1.635 million.

Wema Bank, through its counsel, Dr Oladapo Olanipekun (SAN), Mr Kehinde Ogunwunmiju (SAN) and Mr Tunde Afe-Babalola (SAN) have filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

The bank relies on the Failed Banks Act, the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020, the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and Sections 6(6) and 251(1) of the 1999 Constitution.

Wema Bank argued that NDIC’s claims do not arise from any loan, credit facility, guarantee or banking transaction between the parties, as required under the Failed Banks Act, and that the bank was never a customer of Gulf Bank in respect of any credit facility.

The bank further contended that the suits disclose no debtor-creditor relationship and that NDIC lacks locus standi because the disputed properties were allegedly owned by Bacad Finance and Investment Limited (now Supra Commercials Limited), a separate legal entity.

According to Wema Bank, the matter is fundamentally one of property ownership rather than banking debt recovery, placing it outside the Federal High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 251(1) of the Constitution.

The bank also argued that any cause of action, if it existed at all, arose between 2006 and 2007 and is now statute-barred under the Limitation Law of Lagos State, and accuses NDIC of abusing court process by attempting to circumvent limitation laws with a stale claim.

Wema Bank is asking the court to strike out or dismiss both suits.

The matters have been adjourned to June 25, 2026 for further proceedings.

 


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

OneWallet Partners MTN, Zenith Bank to Provide Digital Financial Services to Abia SMEs

Published

on

Kindly share this post

OneWallet microfinance Bank is partnering Zenith bank and MTN to build a platform that will provide digital financial services to support the growth of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) businesses in Abia State.

Dr. C Darl Uzu, Chairman of OneWallet, who disclosed this while launching the platform for traders at the Ariaria International Market, Aba, Abia State said it was meant majorly for traders and the SMEs because they are the bedrock of the Nigerian economy.

According to Dr. Uzu, “We want to expand the inclusion of small businesses in digital financial services by making it easy for them to make and receive payments on affordable digital devices, hence the UnionBell Smart phones and POS.

“We want to help SMEs to access financial support and loan easily to grow their business, and also help businesses to build the history and credibility they require for future growth and expansion.”

He said OneWallet was not created just as a payment application, but as a business support platform designed around the real needs of SMEs.

Dr. Uzu said the choice of Ariaria International Market as the pilot for the platform was intentional since the market is one of the strongest symbol of enterprise in Nigeria.

“We are not here however to teach Ariaria people how to trade because Ariaria already understands business, but we are hear to support Ariaria business energy with tools that can help businesses do more, reach more customers, organize better and prepare for bigger opportunities; we are here to help Ariaria innovate and grow.”

He thanked MTN, Zenith bank and the leadership of the traders for partnering OneWallet to provide the platform that help businesses to expand.

A representative of MTN at the launch, Dr. Ernest Chieke described OneWallet as a platform for individuals and SMEs which intend to move their businesses forward.

He expressed joy that his firm was partnering OneWallet to bring solution to SMEs’ financial problems.

Carl Akwarandu who represented Zenith bank at the event said the bank decided to partner OneWallet because it has a unique product that will make small businesses grow faster.

He promised that Zenith bank would give OneWallet all the support it needs to make it number one microfinance bank in the country.

The Director of OneWallet, Dr. David Nwosu described the microfinance bank a one stop-touch for SMEs growth.

He said at OneWallet, collateral are not needed to obtain loan, but the individual’s business history.

A member of the board of the microfinance bank, Wiedong Wang, commended Dr. Uzu for establishing OneWallet.

He expressed optimism that with the help of its partners, OneWallet will excel.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

E-Financial

CBN Warns Non-Interest Banks  against Governance, Compliance Risks

Published

on

Kindly share this post

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has warned non-interest financial institutions against governance and compliance risks capable of undermining public confidence and financial stability in the country’s growing Islamic finance sector.

CBN Warns Non-Interest Banks  against Governance, Compliance Risks

Interest-free banks, often known as non-interest or Islamic banks, operate without charging or paying traditional interest (Riba).

The warning was contained in a press statement issued by the apex bank following the 2nd Annual Interactive Session between the CBN Financial Regulation Advisory Council of Experts and the Advisory Committees of Experts of Non-Interest Financial Institutions held at the CBN Auditorium in Abuja.

Speaking through Dr Rita Sike, director of the Financial Policy and Regulation Department,  Philip Ikeazor, deputy governor, Financial System Stability, said the rapid expansion of the industry had increased exposure to operational and regulatory vulnerabilities.

The statement read, “The Deputy Governor, however, observed that as the industry grows in size, sophistication, and interconnectedness, it faces unique risks, particularly non-compliance risk, governance challenges, operational vulnerabilities, and emerging technological risks.

“He warned that such risks, if not properly managed, could undermine public confidence, financial stability, and the overall credibility of the non-interest finance ecosystem.”

According to the CBN, the engagement was part of ongoing efforts to strengthen Shariah governance, improve regulatory clarity, and reinforce risk management standards within the non-interest financial services industry.

The apex bank noted that non-interest financial institutions continued to play an increasingly important role in Nigeria’s financial system by providing ethical and Shariah-compliant alternatives to conventional banking.

It stated that the institutions were also contributing to financial inclusion, real sector financing, micro, small, and medium enterprises development, and shared prosperity.

The CBN further explained that the establishment of FRACE and the mandatory constitution of ACEs across all non-interest financial institutions were designed to institutionalise a harmonised governance framework for the sector.

According to the statement, sustained interaction between FRACE and ACEs remained critical to ensuring that regulatory expectations were properly understood and consistently implemented across the industry.

“The objectives of today’s session include fostering the institutionalisation and effective operation of a robust Shariah governance system within Non-Interest Financial Institutions, and providing a structured platform for dialogue, knowledge-sharing, and collaboration,” Ikeazor was quoted in the statement.

In his remarks, Prof Bashir Umar, deputy chairman of FRACE,  said the interactive session was aimed at strengthening governance within the non-interest finance sub-sector and promoting constructive engagement between regulators and industry advisory committees.

He also commended the management of the CBN for reviving the session, which was first introduced in 2014.

Earlier in her welcome remarks, Sike reaffirmed the apex bank’s commitment to building a strong and well-governed non-interest financial services industry.

She noted that the growing diversity of products and delivery channels, particularly the emergence of Islamic fintech, had increased the need for stronger regulatory oversight and continuous engagement among industry stakeholders.

“The growing diversity of products, institutions, and delivery channels, particularly with the emergence of Islamic fintech, underscores the need for continuous dialogue, sound regulatory oversight, and robust advisory input from scholars and practitioners,” she said.

The session featured technical presentations on Shariah non-compliance risks in non-interest banks and the role of Islamic fintech in driving financial inclusion.

Participants at the event included members of FRACE, chairmen and members of various ACEs, managing directors of non-interest banks, senior CBN officials, and representatives of the Bank of Industry and the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Kindly share this post
Continue Reading

Trending